ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06181357REPEATUpdated Jun 23, 2026

Trial Evaluating the Rate of Pneumothorax in Severe Emphysema Secondary to Endoscopic Volume Reduction With Two-stage ZEPHYR® Valves Versus Endoscopic Volume Reduction With One-stage ZEPHYR® Valves

An interventional study of Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 2 stages and Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 1 stage in COPD, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Recruiting at 17 sites in France. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
244
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects 3.5 million people and is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Emphysema involves air retention in the lungs and is ultimately responsible for a major deterioration in the quality of life. Available drug treatments have moderate efficacy whereas surgical lung volume reduction can improve exercise capacity when offered to a very selected population but at the cost of significant morbidity and mortality.

Endoscopic Lung Volume reduction with ZEPHYR® valves improves respiratory function at rest, exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with little or no interlobar collateral ventilation.

If this technique has therefore proven its effectiveness, it is not devoid of complications and is notably responsible for pneumothorax in 27% of cases. The management of this complication is clearly codified, ranging from patient monitoring to the removal of one or more valves. It is therefore a subject of major concern for multiple reasons: high incidence, lengthening of hospital stay, increase in the overall cost of care, potential loss of benefit for the patient in the event of permanent withdrawal. valves and above all a potentially fatal event.

A new strategy for implanting ZEPHYR® valves in two stages has been developed in Limoges University Hospital. This innovative algorithm has been evaluated in several non-comparative single or multicenter studies. In those studies, pneumothorax' rate secondary to lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves is rated between 4.5 and 12%. The efficacy of the treatment appears to be comparable with the data found in the trials evaluating in which the entire lobe was treated in one procedure. Moreover, despite two procedures, there does not seem to be any increased risk of occurrence of other complications. Finally, the systematic scheduling of a thoracic computed tomography between the two procedures showed that 26.6% of patients presented a reduction in volume greater than 350mL despite incomplete treatment.

These data seem promising but no direct comparison with standard one-step treatment has ever been conducted so far.

Read the detailed description

The Zephyr® valve was first implanted in 2001. Since then, 5 important studies have proven a clinical superiority compared to the existing standard of care. Bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction with the use of one-way endobronchial valves is a potential treatment for patients with severe emphysema. Loss of lung elastic recoil leads to airflow obstruction, gas trapping, and increased operating lung volumes. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), resection of the most affected of the lung, has been clearly shown to improve outcomes in selected patient groups. The surgical intervention is, however, associated with significant morbidity and an early mortality rate of about 5%. Therefore, there is considerable interest in developing novel treatment approaches that can reduce lung volume and gas trapping, either more safely than LVRS or in patients for whom LVRS is not an option.

In the present study, 244 patients will be randomized. After the selection process, they will all be hospitalized in order to undergo an endoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valve under general anesthesia. Half of them, the experimental group, will be treated according to Limoges' treatment algorithm (2 stages). For the other half, the control group, the entire lobe will be treated during one procedure will. Both groups will receive the standard of care treatments, according to the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease recommendations (GOLD).

Both groups will be followed for one year:

  • All the patients will undergo a thorax CT scan 45 days after implanting the last valve. Three follow-up consultations are planned at 45 days, 6, and 12 months. During these consultations, each patient will complete a Saint-George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Test, a plethysmography and a 6-minutes walking test.
  • Patients randomized in the experimental group will undergo a plethysmography and a thorax CT scan one day before the second procedure.
02

Conditions studied

  • COPD

Keywords

  • Endobronchial Zephyr® valves
  • Endoscopic lung volume reduction
  • Pneumothorax
  • Emphysema
  • COPD
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 244 is above the median of 62 across 3,839 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Limoges is the lead sponsor of 264 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patient able to give and participate in the study

  • Age ≥ 35 years old and ≤ 80 years old at the time of signing the consent
  • Emphysema (homogeneous or heterogeneous) on a recent CT scan (\< 6 months). Heterogeneous emphysema defined by a difference of at least 15% destruction (threshold 910HU) between two adjacent lobes.
  • Destruction ≥ 50% (threshold 910 HU) of the target lobe on the chest scanner
  • Smoking quit for 3 months
  • Dyspnea ≥ 2 according to the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire)
  • Post-bronchodilator FEV between 15 and 50% theoretical
  • Post-bronchodilator total lung capacity ≥ 100% theoretical and post-bronchodilator residual volume ≥ 175% theoretical
  • Distance traveled during the TM6M ≥ 100m
  • Member of or beneficiary of a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Asthma considered as main diagnosis
  • Recurrent exacerbations: (>3 over the last year or 2 requiring hospitalization)
  • Myocardial infarction or stroke in the 6 months prior to inclusion
  • Symptoms of heart failure in the 6 months prior to inclusion
  • Chest CT abnormalities: giant bulla (occupying more than a third of the pulmonary field), paraseptal emphysema, pulmonary nodule greater than 0.8cm (not applicable pulmonary nodules known for more than a year and stable), fibrosing interstitial pneumonitis, dilated bronchi
  • Pulmonary tomoscintigraphy:

    • Patients for whom the least perfused lobe is not the one with the highest emphysema destruction score
    • Patients with homogeneous emphysema for whom the perfusion delta (difference in perfusion between the ipsilateral lung and the treated lobe) is less than 10%
  • Arterial blood gas analysis in ambient air: Hypoxemia in ambient air (PaO2 \< 45 mmHg). Hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 55 mmHg)
  • Echocardiography:

    • Left Ventricular Ejection Function \< 45%
    • Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure > 45 mmHg
  • History of pneumonectomy, lung surgery homolateral to the lobe targeted for endoscopic lung volume reduction
  • History of pneumothorax homolateral to the lobe targeted for endoscopic lung volume reduction
  • History of endoscopic volume reduction
  • Oral therapy > 20 mg/day within the 4 weeks preceding inclusion
  • Symptomatic bronchial dilatations, bronchial colonization with pseudomonas aeruginosa, multi-resistant bacteria or aspergillus origin
  • cancer undergoing treatment or whose treatments ended less than 5 years ago
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Nickel allergy
  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship or under judicial protection
  • Participation in another interventional clinical research
  • Any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the objective of the study or would cause the subject's participation in the study to be suboptimal, in particular (non-exhaustive list) unweaned alcoholism, substance abuse, non-compliance with usual follow-up visits)

secondary exclusion criteria:

- Evidence of collateral ventilation measured by the Chartis system

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
244 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    two-stage ZEPHYR® valves

    Procedure: Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 2 stages

  • Sham comparator
    one-stage ZEPHYR® valves

    Procedure: Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 1 stage

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic lung volume reduction in 2 stages

    After the selection process, they will all be hospitalized in order to undergo an endoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valve under general anesthesia. In the experimental group, patients will be treated according to Limoges' treatment algorithm (2 stages)

  • ProcedureEndoscopic lung volume reduction in 1 stage

    After the selection process, they will all be hospitalized in order to undergo an endoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valve under general anesthesia. In the control group, the entire lobe will be treated during one procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pneumothorax rate

    Proportion of patients suffering from at least one pneumothorax rate between the beginning and the first 45 days following the end of lung volume reduction with ZEPHYR® valves

    Time frame: 45 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measurement

    Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of FEV1 in liter

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  2. Force Vital Expiratory (FVE) measurement

    Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of FVE in Liter

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  3. Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) measurement

    Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of FRC in Liter

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  4. Inspiratory Capacity (IC) measurement

    Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of IC in Liter

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  5. Residual Volume (RV) measurement

    Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of RV in Liter

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  6. Residual Volume (RV) / Total Lung Capacity (TLC) ratio

    Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of ration RV/TLC in Liter

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  7. Exercise tolerance

    6 minutes walking test

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  8. Quality of life questionnaire

    EuroQol 5-Digit 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  9. Quality of life questionnaire

    COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Minimum score is 0 and maximum is 40

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  10. Quality of life questionnaire

    Saint-George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)

    Time frame: 0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

  11. lobe volume reduction

    Target lobe volume reduction by Thorax scanner

    Time frame: 45 Day

  12. Respiratory events

    Study of morbidity and mortality. number of Respiratory events

    Time frame: 12 month

  13. Events related to the valves

    Study of morbidity and mortality. number of events related to the valves

    Time frame: 12 month

  14. Revision bronchoscopies

    Study of morbidity and mortality. Numbers of revision bronchoscopies

    Time frame: 12 month

  15. Death

    Study of morbidity and mortality. numbers of death

    Time frame: 12 month

  16. responder's rate

    In the experimental arm, responder's rate after the first procedure (despite infralobar treatment) defined by: * Plethysmography * FEV1: Improvement of equal or more than 12% * RV: Decrease of equal or more than 430mL * Thorax CT scan: target lobe volume reduction rated at more than 350mL.

    Time frame: 12 month

  17. Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR)

    Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) of the 2 intervention strategies expressed in euros per QALY gained in 12 months. The ICUR will be calculated on the basis of the following data: Quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Direct medical costs.

    Time frame: 12 month

07

Study locations

13 of 17 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06181357
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 26, 2023
Start date
May 6, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 6, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 6, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Study contacts

Thomas EGENOD, MD
Contact
thomas.egenod@chu-limoges.fr
05 55 05 68 92
Eloise DOBBELS, MD
Contact
eloise.dobbels@chu-limoges.fr

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion