An interventional study of Biliary drainage in Biliary Stones, Bile Duct Diseases and Bile Duct Obstruction, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-29.
Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Migration of stones from the gallbladder to the common bile duct (CBD) facilitated by gallbladder contractions can be listed as a complication of gallstones disease. In the case of common bile duct stone (CBDs) migration, an endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be offered for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients fit for the procedure. An ERCP with an adequate endoscopic sphincterotomy obtains a complete biliary clearance in about 80-90% of the patients[5]. Whilst most cases are successfully treated with such first-line approaches, about 10-15% need alternative and/or adjunctive techniques to achieve bile duct clearance. These conditions are generally defined as "difficult" bile duct stones, a broad category of cases that encompasses very different scenarios. In the case of irretrievable CBDs, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends the endoscopic placement of a temporary biliary plastic stent to warrant biliary drainage. Since their introduction, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) have rapidly been adopted for the treatment of benign biliary conditions such as strictures, leaks, or bleeding. In a recent retrospective study it has been shown that FCSEMS are useful in the approach of difficult lithiasis of CBD with no significant adverse events associated. Moreover, a promising FC-SEMS with a particular prosthesis design (flare type - Niti-S "S-Type" Taewoong) could be even more useful since it reduces the frequent complication of fully covered stents which is the migration of the prosthesis. However, prospective data on the effectiveness and on the adverse events rate on the use of SEMS for incomplete stone CBDs clearance are still lacking. Therefore, the investigators aim to estimate the incidence of adverse events, complete biliary clearance, and migration rate after 3-6 month from ERCP index (stent positioning), comparing plastic stents vs FC-SEMS (Niti-S "flare type" - Taewoong).
BACKGROUND
The presence of gallstones is a very common condition worldwide, especially in developed countries where it is estimated to affect 10-15% of the adult population and accounts for a great part of total gastrointestinal-related healthcare expenditures[1]. Fortunately, only 10-25% of gallstones became symptomatic in their lifetime with an annual incidence of 2-3% per year [2, 3]. Moreover, the worldwide increase in obesity and in the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) , which represents a risk factor for gallstones, could contribute to the rising gallstone disease prevalence[4]. Migration of stones from the gallbladder to the common bile duct (CBD) facilitated by gallbladder contractions can be listed as a complication of gallstones disease. In the case of common bile duct stone (CBDs) migration, an endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be offered for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients fit for the procedure[1, 3]. An ERCP with an adequate endoscopic sphincterotomy obtains a complete biliary clearance in about 80-90% of the patients[5]. Whilst most cases are successfully treated with such first-line approaches, about 10-15% need alternative and/or adjunctive techniques to achieve bile duct clearance[1, 5]. These conditions are generally defined as "difficult" bile duct stones, a broad category of cases that encompasses very different scenarios, including large or multiple stones, peculiar stone shapes (e.g., barrel-shaped), stones located above a stricture or impacted, intrahepatic stones, altered distal bile duct (oblique, narrowed, sigmoid-shaped). In the case of irretrievable CBDs, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends the endoscopic placement of a temporary biliary plastic stent to warrant biliary drainage[1, 5, 6].
Numerous non-randomized studies, both prospective and retrospective, showed that an indwelling plastic stent may reduce the number and the size of CBDs[7-9], although the mechanism by which the endoprosthesis contributes to the clearance of CBD is unclear. Probably, the continuous friction between the CBDs and the stent contributes to producing mechanical stress that facilitates the disruption of the stones[10]. Available data showed that the biliary plastic stent had a success rate ranging from 44 to 96% for stone removal after the previous ERCP[11-14]. Since their introduction, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) have rapidly been adopted for the treatment of benign biliary conditions such as strictures, leaks, or bleeding. In a recent retrospective study it has been shown that FCSEMS are useful in the approach of difficult lithiasis of CBD with no significant adverse events associated[9]. However, comparative prospective data between plastic and metal stents are still lacking. Theoretically, FC-SEMS could be more effective compared to the plastic stent in producing stress forces that facilitate the stone disintegration, but the quality of this evidence is still very low due to lack of data.
Moreover, a promising FC-SEMS with a particular prosthesis design (flare type - Niti-S "S-Type" Taewoong) could be even more useful since it reduces the frequent complication of fully covered stents which is the migration of the prosthesis[15-17]. However, the majority of the data concerning SEMS migration rate are available for the treatment of benign biliary stricture, understandably, with a low rate of both distal and proximal migration[17]. However, prospective data on the effectiveness and on the adverse events rate on the use of SEMS for incomplete stone CBDs clearance are still lacking. A definitive biliary stenting is not recommended by ESGE guidelines, but it is warranted to completely remove the CBD stones during the second ERCP, if possible.
AIM The investigators aim to estimate the incidence of adverse events, complete biliary clearance, and migration rate after 3-6 month from ERCP index (stent positioning) comparing plastic stents vs FC-SEMS (Niti-S "flare type" - Taewoong).
88 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholecystolithiasis; 17 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 186 is above the median of 100 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Cholecystolithiasis.
Browse Cholecystolithiasis studies →Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention group (IG): Patients with flare type SEMS placement
Device: Biliary drainage
Control group (CG): Patients with plastic stent placement
Device: Biliary drainage
Biliary drainage with FC-SEMS Niti-S FLARE TYPE
Incidence of adverse events
To estimate the incidence of adverse events, complete biliary clearance, and migration rate after 3-6 month from ERCP index (stent positioning), comparing plastic stents vs FC-SEMS (Niti-S "flare type" - Taewoong).
Time frame: 3 months
Plan to share: No
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena