ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07449897BilnorUpdated Mar 6, 2026

Cholecystectomy With Intraoperative Management of Bile Duct Stones in Norway - the BILNOR Study

An observational study in Bile Duct Stones, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-06.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
340
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The BILNOR study is a prospective multicenter observational study evaluating how common bile duct stones are best managed in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. The study focuses particularly on transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and assesses stone clearance, technical success, complications, and health-economic outcomes in routine clinical practice. A secondary aim is to compare LCBDE with intraoperative ERCP regarding efficacy, complication rates, and costs. Approximately 340 patients from several Norwegian centers are planned to be included starting in March 2026.

Read the detailed description

The BILNOR study (Cholecystectomy with intraoperative management of bile duct stones in Norway) is a prospective, multicenter observational study evaluating how common bile duct stones (CBDS) are best managed when patients also need a cholecystectomy. Although ERCP followed by later cholecystectomy is still the most frequently used strategy, it often requires two separate procedures, with additional discomfort, risk, admissions, and costs. Single-stage alternatives-either intraoperative ERCP (including rendezvous techniques) or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE)-may reduce resource use and improve the patient pathway, but are unevenly available across Norwegian hospitals and have differing complication profiles.

The primary focus of BILNOR is transcystic LCBDE, a technique implemented at Oslo University Hospital in 2019 using a structured "step-up" approach (e.g., saline flushing, pharmacologic relaxation, guidewire passage, papillary balloon dilatation up to 8 mm, and transcystic choledochoscopy with stone extraction; intraoperative ERCP if needed/available). The study will estimate real-world stone clearance (defined as no repeat biliary intervention within 90 days), technical success (intraoperative clearance on cholangiography), and 30-day complications including a study-specific definition of post-procedure pancreatitis, as well as bile leak and other Clavien-Dindo graded events. Health economic outcomes (length of stay and costs per patient) and which procedural steps are most often required to achieve clearance are also assessed.

A secondary aim is to compare LCBDE with intraoperative ERCP regarding efficacy, complication rates, and costs, including a non-inferiority assessment for stone clearance. The planned total sample size is approximately 340 patients (155 per group plus allowae for dropouts). Learning-curve effects will be addressed with center-level sensitivity analyses excluding early cases. Inclusion is planned to start March 1, 2026, with expansion to additional centers as the technique spreads in Norway.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bile Duct Stones

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cholecystolithiasis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholecystolithiasis; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 340 is close to the median of 341 across 28 observational studies indexed under Cholecystolithiasis.

Browse Cholecystolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 834 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Eligible patients will be identified during routine clinical evaluation by the treating surgical team. Either in the outpatient clinic or in the ward for emergency admitted patients.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18 years
  • Preoperatively image proven choledocholithiasis or bile duct sludge (US / CT / MRI)

    • ≤ 8 mm size
    • ≤ 5 stones
    • Not proximal bile duct stones
  • Planned cholecystectomy with intraoperative bile duct clearance (LCBDE or intraoperative ERCP)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Previous cholecystectomy
  • Medically unfit for surgery (frailty, comorbidity)
  • Technically inoperable (hostile abdomen, inflammatory processes, bleeding conditions, cirrhosis)
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
340 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • LC+LCBDE

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and inhtraoperative bile duct clearance.

  • LC+IOERCP

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ERCP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reintervention rate

    Bile duct reintervention rate

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2031, 60 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 27, 2026
First posted
Mar 4, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2031
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2036
Last update
Mar 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07449897
Responsible party
Magnus Fasting (Consultant Surgeon, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2036 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 6, 2026

Study contacts

Magnus H Fasting, MD, PhD, FEBS (UGI)
Contact
magfas@ous-hf.no
0047 22800000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion