ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06169475Updated Dec 13, 2023

Effect of Dexmedetomidine vs Esmolol or Placebo on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Septic Shock

An interventional study of Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride and Esmolol Hydrochloride in Septic Shock, Stress Response and Cerebral Hemodynamics, sponsored by Xinchen Wang. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-13.

Sponsored by Xinchen Wang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Nov 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Some researchers proposed that the dysregulated response or organ dysfunction can be lessened by reducing the stress response, which further reduce complication and mortality rates of sepsis. Dexmedetomidine is alpha adrenergic receptor agonist, presenting sympatholytic action in certain parts of the brain with anxiolytic, sedative, and pain killing effects. In the experiments of sepsis animal model, dexmedetomidine have been proved to improve serum lactate clearance and the microcirculation. Dexmedetomidine may inhibit inflammation, as it enhances the activity of the immune system while reducing its systemic reaction and lowering cytokine concentrations. There are also evidences in clinical trials with definite safety that dexmedetomidine reduced inflammation, reduced vasopressor requirements and improved organ function. The beta antagonist esmolol has been proposed as a therapy to lower heart rate, thereby improving diastolic filling time, and improving cardiac output, resulting in a reduction in vasopressor support. A recent meta-analysis of 8 randomized studies using esmolol suggested that the 32% risk ratio decreased 28-day mortality, and a meta-analysis of 7 studies using esmolol in patients with sepsis and septic shock was associated with 32% lower 28-day mortality. However, the effect of anti-stress drugs on cerebral hemodynamics is unknown. In this study, investigators are going to apply the technique of transcranial Doppler to assess the reaction of cerebral blood flow in anti-stress group and control group.

Read the detailed description

It is a single-blinded, single-center, randomized trial. Patients with septic shock established within 24 hours in the ICU of Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital will be screened for recruitment. After adequate fluid resuscitation, continuous infusion of norepinephrine is given to the patients to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65-75 millimeter of mercury (mmHg). Midazolam and fentanyl are given to achieve the goal sedation of bispectral index (BIS) 40-60, patients who are still with tachycardia (heart rate over 100 b.p.m.) will be recruited. After recruitment, patients in accordance with the random number table are divided into dexmedetomidine group, esmolol group and control group (T0). Patients in the two experimental groups are required to achieve the heart rate goal of 75-95 b.p.m. in one hour by adjusting the dose of dexmedetomidine or esmolol every twenty minutes. All patients acquired the hemodynamic evaluation at T1, T2, T3, T4 (6, 12, 18, 24hours after enrollment). The hemodynamic evaluation including transcranial Doppler of middle cerebral artery(MCA), deep middle cerebral vein (DMCV), basal vein Rosenthal (BVR) and transverse sinus (TS), hemodynamic parameters acquired by the pressure-recording analytical method through peripheral arterial with Mostcare. Demographic characteristics, diagnosis, laboratory reports and drug dose are collected during the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock
  • Stress Response
  • Cerebral Hemodynamics

Keywords

  • Septic shock
  • Stress response
  • Trans-cranial Doppler
03

In context

Shock, Septic

890 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 210 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 78 across 547 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Xinchen Wang is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 \~ 80 years old.
  2. Patients established septic shock according to sepsis 3.0 criteria.
  3. Under deep sedation of BIS 40-60 with midazolam and fentanyl.
  4. After achieving the goal sedation, patients are still with tachycardia (heart rate over 100 b.p.m..

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy.
  2. Patients with severe arrhythmia.
  3. Patients with aortic or aortic valve disease.
  4. Patients with mechanical circulatory assist device (e.g. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), etc).
  5. Patients with cerebral trauma.
  6. Any contraindication to the use of transcranial doppler.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    dexmedetomidine group

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride

  • Experimental
    esmolol group

    Drug: Esmolol Hydrochloride

  • No intervention
    control group

Interventions

  • The continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.1mg/ml) will start at 0.1ug/kg/h, increasing every 20 minutes by a step change of 0.05-0.2ug/kg/h to reach the target heart rate with the expectation that this should be within 12 hours. The infusion will be reduced by step change, and if necessary, ultimately stopped if the heart rate fall below 80b.p.m..

  • The continuous intravenous infusion of esmolol (10mg/ml) will start at 20mg/h, increasing every 20 minutes by a step change of 20mg/h to reach the target heart rate with the expectation that this should be within 12 hours. The infusion will be reduced by step change, and if necessary, ultimately stop if the heart rate fall below 80b.p.m..

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The cerebral hemodynamic change caused by the anti-stress therapy

    The cerebral hemodynamics will be evaluated according to the features of the blood flow of MCA, DMCV, BVR and TS measured by transcranial doppler, as well as regional cerebral oxygen saturation measured by the near infrared spectroscopy at Hour 0, Hour 6, Hour 12, Hour 18 and Hour 24. The difference will be acquired by contrasting between two intervention group and one control group.

    Time frame: Hour 0, Hour 6, Hour 12, Hour 18 and Hour 24.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The systemic hemodynamic change caused by anti-stress therapy

    The systemic hemodynamic changes will be acquired through the pressure-recording analytical method with Mostcare, blood pressure and electro cardiac monitor, central venous pressure (CVP) monitor, trans thoracic echocardiography, and blood gas at Hour 0, Hour 6, Hour 12, Hour 18 and Hour 24. The difference will be acquired by contrasting between two intervention group and one control group

    Time frame: Hour 0, Hour 6, Hour 12, Hour 18 and Hour 24

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science
    Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PubMed 26903338 ↗
  • Du W, Liu D, Long Y, Wang X. The beta-Blocker Esmolol Restores the Vascular Waterfall Phenomenon After Acute Endotoxemia. Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):e1247-e1253. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002721. PubMed 28991824 ↗
  • Dardalas I, Stamoula E, Rigopoulos P, Malliou F, Tsaousi G, Aidoni Z, Grosomanidis V, Milonas A, Papazisis G, Kouvelas D, Pourzitaki C. Dexmedetomidine effects in different experimental sepsis in vivo models. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 5;856:172401. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 May 17. PubMed 31108055 ↗
  • Ohta Y, Miyamoto K, Kawazoe Y, Yamamura H, Morimoto T. Effect of dexmedetomidine on inflammation in patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation: a sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Crit Care. 2020 Aug 10;24(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03207-8. PubMed 32778146 ↗
  • Scibelli G, Maio L, Sasso M, Lanza A, Savoia G. Dexmedetomidine: Current Role in Burn ICU. Transl Med UniSa. 2017 Jul 1;16:1-10. eCollection 2017 Jan. PubMed 28775963 ↗
  • Nakashima T, Miyamoto K, Shima N, Kato S, Kawazoe Y, Ohta Y, Morimoto T, Yamamura H; DESIRE Trial Investigators. Dexmedetomidine improved renal function in patients with severe sepsis: an exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 2;8:1. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0415-z. eCollection 2020. PubMed 31908779 ↗
  • Zhang J, Chen C, Liu Y, Yang Y, Yang X, Yang J. Benefits of esmolol in adults with sepsis and septic shock: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29820. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029820. PubMed 35801730 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2020 to primary completion in Nov 2021, 12 months.

Of 144 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 150 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 27, 2023
First posted
Dec 13, 2023
StartActual
Nov 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Nov 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Nov 1, 2023
Last update
Dec 13, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06169475
Lead sponsor
Xinchen Wang
Collaborators
Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital
Responsible party
Xinchen Wang (Attending Doctor, Peking Union Medical College Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 13, 2023
Start date
Nov 1, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2021
Completion
Nov 1, 2023
Last update
Dec 13, 2023

Study contacts

Wei Du, M.D.
principal investigator · Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Dexmedetomidine · Esmolol

Start the discussion