ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06152666Updated Dec 1, 2023

Day-case Endourology; Enablers, Barriers, Unexpected Outcomes

An observational study in Bladder Cancer, Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Urolithiasis, sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-01.

Sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2024, 2 years 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
15
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A qualitative research study conducted in hospitals across England, in which staff members will be interviewed. We will interview staff who are directly or indirectly involved in delivering care for patients undergoing the operations of interest; namely bladder tumour resection, prostate resection or enucleation, and ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. We hope to find out the reasons why some hospitals can perform day-case surgery with very high rates, and why others do not. We also hope to find out about any unexpected outcomes observed when performing day-case surgery for the operations of interest.

Staff working in a range of different hospitals from across England with varying day-case rates will be interviewed. Hospitals in large city and more rural areas will be assessed. Interviews are anticipated to take place over a six month period. The study will end when "saturation" is achieved, whereby no new themes are identified through interviews. Saturation will be sought for each individual operation of interest.

Read the detailed description

Safe day-case surgery pathways offer to reduce pressure on hospitals by avoiding overnight inpatient admission. This is particularly relevant given the intense pressures on hospital resources in the United Kingdom. Urological surgery includes a number of frequently performed operations for which safe day-case surgery pathways have been demonstrated. These include bladder tumour resection (TURBT), prostate resection or enucleation using diathermy or laser (TURP and TUEP), and ureteroscopy and laser for upper urinary tract stones (URS). All of these operation types involve endoscopic access to the bladder via the urethra, and do not involve skin incisions. They can be performed under general or spinal anaesthesia, although spinal anaesthesia is rarely used for ureteroscopy.

For the 12 months from December 2021, the national median day-case rate for transurethral resection of bladder tumour In England was 21.1%, and ranged from 0% to 87.3% at different hospitals, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 10.5% to 37.7%, and 23,071 cases performed in total. For bladder outflow obstruction surgery the median day-case rate was 7.7% (range 0% to 82.4%, IQR 4.4% to 19.1%, 18,912 cases), and this includes TURP and TUEP. For URS the median day case rate was 60.1% (range 0% to 87.9%, IQR 44.4% to 69.7%, 23,130 cases). This demonstrates that for these common operations there is significant variation in practice across England.

The Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) Urology programme advocates for a "day-case by default" approach to TURBT and URS, and that day-case surgery should ideally be offered for prostate resection and enucleation. As well as reducing pressure on inpatient services, greater day-case adoption offers to reduce financial costs, shorten waiting lists by allowing greater access to day-case theatres away from the acute hospital, and reduce environmental impact by adopting a less resource-intensive approach. It also offers a more standardised patient experience.

National day-case rates for all of TURBT, TURP/TUEP and URS have increased over the past five years, however the wide variation in practice identifies a need to understand reasons underlying a significant observed divergence in practice. We want to understand why some hospitals have rapidly adopted day-case surgery whereas others have not. Furthermore, it is necessary to understand any positive and negative outcomes associated with the increased utilisation of day-case surgery. In order to explore this area we intend to perform qualitative research involving members of staff involved in the delivery of one or more of the operations of interest. We will interview staff from a range of different hospitals with differing day-case performances to further understand enablers and barriers associated with day-case adoption. We would also like to understand staff members' experiences of any wider unexpected outcomes associated with day-case surgery adoption.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bladder Outlet Obstruction
  • Urolithiasis
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,798 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 445 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 200 across 410 observational studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Any of the following staff members from across a range of urology units:

  • Consultant and trainee urologists
  • Anaesthetists
  • Theatre nursing staff and healthcare assistants
  • Day-case unit nursing staff
  • Inpatient ward nursing staff
  • Cancer nurse specialists
  • Urology managers
  • Urology department clinical leads

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Staff members who are routinely involved, either directly or indirectly, in the delivery of any of TURBT, TURP, TUEP, URS within NHS hospitals.
  • Willing and able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Staff who are not regularly involved in any of TURBT, TURP, TUEP or URS, defined as being involved in the operation less than 10 cases per year.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Staff

    Members of healthcare teams involved in the delivery of day-case endourology operations.

    Other: None - qualitative interviews

Interventions

  • OtherNone - qualitative interviews

    These are qualitative interviews and involve no intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Staff perspectives on delivering day-case endourology surgery

    Obtained through qualitative interview

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — None. Anonymised quotes will be used in the published study report.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2023; primary completion for Apr 2024, 4 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 21, 2023
First posted
Dec 1, 2023
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2024
Last update
Dec 1, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06152666
Lead sponsor
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust, North Bristol NHS Trust, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2023
Start date
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 1, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion