ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06903780SHARP EoBUpdated Jun 27, 2025

Experience of Biologic Treatments for Severe Asthma: a Survey

An observational study in Severe Asthma, sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-27.

Sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Severe asthma is a disease characterised by respiratory and non-respiratory symptoms. The respiratory symptoms can include breathlessness, wheeze and asthma attacks. The disease can come to dominate patients' lives, impacting their social, working and personal lives, leading to depression, anxiety and feelings of social isolation.

There are now 7 different biologic treatments available on the NHS in the UK for severe asthma. These treatments have dramatically changed how severe asthma can be treated. Research has typically focused on the benefits of these drugs from a clinical perspective, e.g., improvements in lung function, blood tests and reduction in frequency of asthma attacks and use of steroid tablets.

While these are important outcomes, they do not reflect the experiences of patients receiving these treatments, which can vary greatly. First, not all patients benefit to the same degree. Second for patients who do respond, some respond slower than others. Third while these treatments target respiratory symptoms, some patients report wider benefits, such as reductions in fatigue, depression, ability to engage in family life and other daily activities. Fourth, patients report different side effects when starting these treatments and sometimes for months afterwards, including headaches, fatigue, mental fog and joint pain. These experiences are reported by clinicians and patients, but the extent of these four variations is poorly understood, and potential reasons for them have not been explored.

To describe these differences between patients' experiences and begin understanding why they are present, we have co-designed a survey with people who have lived experience of severe asthma who are members of the European Lung Foundation's (ELF) Patient Advisory Group (PAG). This process has resulted in a survey that contains content important to patients and is worded in a way that avoids confusion regarding the meaning of the questions.

Read the detailed description

A multi-centre cross-sectional survey to retrospectively assess patients' perceptions of their responses to biologic treatments for their severe asthma.

Methods A total of 400 patients will be recruited from the severe asthma centres responsible for their clinical care.

Leads from each participating site will identify patient's eligible to take part in the study. Each lead for a site will be provided with unique 'Collector IDs' (that are linked with a unique survey web URL). After receiving verbal consent from each patient, the researcher at the site will allocate the patient a 'Collector ID' and unique web URL to a survey hosted on SurveyMonkey.

On visiting the survey URL, patients will be provided with study information, provide informed consent and complete the survey information.

Participants will complete the survey without any assistance from physicians or the study staff. All survey questions and responses will be provided in the participants' native languages. All processes will be monitored by a study coordinator to assess recruitment and the completion of the survey.

Variables

Variables from the patient survey will include:

  • Experience of starting a biologic treatment

    o What changed, when did the change take place and to what degree was the change experienced.

  • Side effects experienced after taking a biologic treatment. Demographics
  • Gender
  • Age Medication use
  • Use of OCS
  • Use of biologic treatment Data analysis

    1. To describe the time course and nature of response in people with severe asthma who continue to be prescribed biologics for between 6 - 18 months.

  • Demographics data and other survey responses will be reported as descriptive statistics including mean (SD).
  • We will report a frequency distribution of responses for each survey item to describe the samples experience of biologic drugs for their severe asthma.
  • To assess for the presence of recall differences between those who have been on a biologic for \<12 months vs those on a biologic for ≥12 months data from these participants will be stratified and compared.

    2. To identify subgroups of response pattern to biologic treatments for severe asthma.

Analysis will be exploratory and descriptive, with relationships between survey responses identified through correlations. These correlations will provide insight into which experiences of biologic treatment (response) are related. For example, the literature anticipates that a fast response will be associated with a "better" response to biologic treatments. We will define "better" from a patient perspective, by investigating the relationship between Question 8 (Satisfaction with treatment), and time to first noticed treatment response (Question 6).

3. To describe the characteristics of the different subgroups of response pattern.

  • Participants demographic data will be reported as a function of the different response patterns we identify in analysis 2.

    4. To identify a set of hypotheses driven characteristics which may predict response to biologics in future longitudinal studies for people with severe asthma, including the extra-pulmonary symptoms and side effects of treatment.

  • Fatigue and other side effects from biologics may be predictors of fast response or high satisfaction with treatment.
  • Correlations between the different response patterns identified in analysis 2, and questions concerning side effects and extra-pulmonary questions will be calculated. These include questions: 17, 18 and 19.
  • We will also calculate correlations between the response patterns we identify in analysis 2, and the biologic the patient was prescribed.
02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • asthma
  • survey
  • patient perspectives
  • patient centred
  • co-development
  • multi-centre
03

In context

Asthma

4,841 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 158 across 1,250 observational studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient has severe asthma as defined by :

GINA step 4 \& 5 Moderate to high dose ICS and a LABA or LTRI or LAMA (theophylline)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Receiving a biologic treatment for at least 6 months.

  • But has not been on the treatment for longer than 18 months. Note: In clinical practice, a 12-month trial of biologic treatments is needed before a decision to stop/switch treatment is made. Therefore, our inclusion criteria will capture people who are non-responders to biologic treatments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they are unwilling/unable to provide consent to use their data.
  • Patients who have switched biologics will also be excluded.
  • In the opinion of the physician responsible for the care of the patient, the patient has a condition, other than asthma which is significantly contributing to their respiratory symptoms, e.g. lung cancer, heart failure or severe .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherSurvey using a questionnaire.

    A short 23-item survey concerning patients' experiences of their biologic treatments for their severe asthma.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severe asthma biologic experience survey

    A 23-item survey concerning the experiences of severe asthma patients who have received a biologic treatment. This survey covers many aspects of experience from: Degree of response Time to respond Benefits first noticed - pulmonary and extra-pulmonary Changes to other medications Side effects HRQoL improvement

    Time frame: 6-18 month recall

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06903780
Lead sponsor
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of Plymouth, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, University Hospital Birmingham, Barts Helth NHS Trust, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 1, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 27, 2025

Study contacts

Joseph Lanario, PhD
Contact
joseph.lanario@plymouth.ac.uk
+44 01752 764403
Alison Kerridge, PhD
Contact
alison.kerridge@nhs.net
+44 01392 403055
Matthew Masoli, MD
principal investigator · Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion