ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06821360ARC-T1DUpdated Feb 12, 2025

Assessing Remote Confirmation of Type 1 Diabetes

An observational study in Diabetes and Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-12.

Primary conditionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Registry: Diabetes MellitusReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Diabetes Mellitus — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, a narrower term within Diabetes Mellitus.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this research is to assess the practicalities and potential benefits of collecting home finger prick samples from all patients within a hospital type 1 diabetes service to test how much insulin each patient is producing. To do this we will send detailed study information, sample collection kits and reply-paid return packs to 1500 randomly selected patients, treated as type 1 diabetes, in a hospital clinic (3000 patients in the whole clinic). We will ask participants to consent to take part (either online or by completing a paper consent form returned with their pack) before collecting a finger prick blood sample. We will ask participants to collect the sample between 1 and 5 hours after a meal and to check and record their blood glucose level at the same time. Participants will then return the sample and glucose result, using the pre-paid pack provided, to the hospital clinic laboratory for a test called C-peptide (a measure of how much of their own insulin they are producing). The sample collection process should take no longer than 10 minutes.

We will record the percentage of patients returning samples within 4 weeks of initial contact and determine the number of cases with high C-peptide suggestive of non-type 1 diabetes. If this study shows remote C-peptide testing is a practical and acceptable to patients, it could allow this remote service to be offered to all type 1 diabetes clinics in every hospital in the United Kingdom. An estimated 350,000 people in the United Kingdom have type 1 diabetes. Reclassifying an estimated 1 in 15 people would mean approximately 23,000 people nationally could benefit from being identified as potentially able to stop insulin treatment.

Read the detailed description

Background It can be hard to diagnose type 1 diabetes in adults because the symptoms can overlap with type 2 diabetes and misclassification of type 2 and type 1 diabetes can occur. This matters as type 2 diabetes cases misclassified as having type 1 diabetes potentially receive a lifetime of unnecessary insulin treatment without access to the effective treatment strategies for type 2 diabetes. Whether someone needs treating as type 1 diabetes can be confirmed by measuring their insulin levels using a test called C-peptide. This should be measured when diabetes is longstanding (over 3 years diabetes duration) as, at diagnosis levels of insulin secretion can overlap in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A study in Scotland measured C-peptide in a clinic of patients with long standing treatment as type 1 diabetes showing around 1 in 15 of cases did not have type 1 diabetes.

As a result, in Scotland all those with longstanding type 1 diabetes now have C-peptide measured and this is likely to be recommended across the UK. For newly diagnosed cases this will occur prospectively as part of patients' ongoing type 1 diabetes care. However, for existing cases, each hospital will need to test C-peptide, on a blood sample collected from a vein, in all patients in their type 1 diabetes clinic. In addition to the burden on clinical staff to collect the samples, this C-peptide test is not measured in many UK laboratories so co-ordinating this testing on all patients within a clinic will be extremely challenging.

We have recently validated a method of testing C-peptide on capillary blood (finger prick) samples. Importantly these can be collected by a patient at their home and can be posted back to any UK laboratory where C-peptide measurement is available. Using this approach means that clinic visits for blood collection are not required and testing can be co-ordinated from a central location, making organising testing in a whole clinic much more straightforward.

Study Aims \& Participation The aim of this research is to assess the practicalities \& potential benefits of collecting home finger prick samples from all patients within a hospital type 1 diabetes service to test how much insulin each patient is producing. To do this we will send detailed study information, sample collection kits and reply-paid return packs to 1500 randomly selected patients from a type 1 diabetes clinic (3000 patients in the whole clinic). We will ask participants to consent to take part (either online or by completing a paper consent form returned with their pack) before collecting a finger prick blood sample. We will ask participants to collect the sample between 1 and 5 hours after a meal and to check and record their blood glucose level at the same time. Participants would then return the sample and glucose result, using the pre-paid pack provided to the hospital clinic laboratory for a test called C-peptide (a measure of how much of their own insulin a person is producing). The sample collection process should take no longer than 10 minutes.

We will record the percentage of patients returning samples within 4 weeks of initial contact and determine the number of cases with high C-peptide suggestive of non-type 1 diabetes. If this study shows remote C-peptide testing is practical, and acceptable to patients, it could lead to remote testing being offered at all type 1 diabetes clinics in every hospital in the United Kingdom. Diabetes UK estimates around 350,000 people in the United Kingdom have type 1 diabetes. Reclassifying 1 in 15 people would mean approximately 23,000 people nationally could benefit from being identified as potentially able to stop insulin treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes
  • Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Diabetes diagnosis. Insulin levels. Remote testing. C-peptide. Home finger-prick samples.
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Reclassified

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 125 across 792 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Compared within Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Diabetes Mellitus. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with a Type 1 diabetes follow up code OR rapid progression to insulin (within 3 years of diagnosis) to capture miscoded cases. Under the clinical care of the diabetes team(s) at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a Type 1 diabetes follow up code OR rapid progression to insulin (within 3 years of diagnosis) to capture miscoded cases.
  • Under the clinical care of the diabetes team(s) at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
  • Duration of diabetes >3 years
  • Aged 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients considered by their clinical care team to be unsuitable/inappropriate to be invited to take part in this research (e.g. severe sight impairment, reduced capacity to consent)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Main Cohort

    Adults treated as Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and under the clinical care of the specialist diabetes team(s) at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Diabetes duration \>3 years at the time of study participation. Aged \> 18 at the time of study participation.

    Diagnostic Test: C-peptide test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testC-peptide test

    Participants collect a single home finger-prick sample and post to the clinical laboratory for C-peptide analysis (a measure of endogenous insulin production).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of samples returned

    The number of completed samples returned within four weeks of sample pack mailout.

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks of initial contact

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2025, 9 months after the start.

Of 249 non-industry observational studies under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 78. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 299 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 69.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 10, 2025
First posted
Feb 12, 2025
StartActual
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Feb 12, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06821360
Lead sponsor
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, NIHR BRC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2025
Start date
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2025

Study contacts

Nicholas Thomas, PhD MRCP
principal investigator · University of Exeter and Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion