An observational study in Diabetes and Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-12.
Sponsored by Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · Observational
The aim of this research is to assess the practicalities and potential benefits of collecting home finger prick samples from all patients within a hospital type 1 diabetes service to test how much insulin each patient is producing. To do this we will send detailed study information, sample collection kits and reply-paid return packs to 1500 randomly selected patients, treated as type 1 diabetes, in a hospital clinic (3000 patients in the whole clinic). We will ask participants to consent to take part (either online or by completing a paper consent form returned with their pack) before collecting a finger prick blood sample. We will ask participants to collect the sample between 1 and 5 hours after a meal and to check and record their blood glucose level at the same time. Participants will then return the sample and glucose result, using the pre-paid pack provided, to the hospital clinic laboratory for a test called C-peptide (a measure of how much of their own insulin they are producing). The sample collection process should take no longer than 10 minutes.
We will record the percentage of patients returning samples within 4 weeks of initial contact and determine the number of cases with high C-peptide suggestive of non-type 1 diabetes. If this study shows remote C-peptide testing is a practical and acceptable to patients, it could allow this remote service to be offered to all type 1 diabetes clinics in every hospital in the United Kingdom. An estimated 350,000 people in the United Kingdom have type 1 diabetes. Reclassifying an estimated 1 in 15 people would mean approximately 23,000 people nationally could benefit from being identified as potentially able to stop insulin treatment.
Background It can be hard to diagnose type 1 diabetes in adults because the symptoms can overlap with type 2 diabetes and misclassification of type 2 and type 1 diabetes can occur. This matters as type 2 diabetes cases misclassified as having type 1 diabetes potentially receive a lifetime of unnecessary insulin treatment without access to the effective treatment strategies for type 2 diabetes. Whether someone needs treating as type 1 diabetes can be confirmed by measuring their insulin levels using a test called C-peptide. This should be measured when diabetes is longstanding (over 3 years diabetes duration) as, at diagnosis levels of insulin secretion can overlap in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A study in Scotland measured C-peptide in a clinic of patients with long standing treatment as type 1 diabetes showing around 1 in 15 of cases did not have type 1 diabetes.
As a result, in Scotland all those with longstanding type 1 diabetes now have C-peptide measured and this is likely to be recommended across the UK. For newly diagnosed cases this will occur prospectively as part of patients' ongoing type 1 diabetes care. However, for existing cases, each hospital will need to test C-peptide, on a blood sample collected from a vein, in all patients in their type 1 diabetes clinic. In addition to the burden on clinical staff to collect the samples, this C-peptide test is not measured in many UK laboratories so co-ordinating this testing on all patients within a clinic will be extremely challenging.
We have recently validated a method of testing C-peptide on capillary blood (finger prick) samples. Importantly these can be collected by a patient at their home and can be posted back to any UK laboratory where C-peptide measurement is available. Using this approach means that clinic visits for blood collection are not required and testing can be co-ordinated from a central location, making organising testing in a whole clinic much more straightforward.
Study Aims \& Participation The aim of this research is to assess the practicalities \& potential benefits of collecting home finger prick samples from all patients within a hospital type 1 diabetes service to test how much insulin each patient is producing. To do this we will send detailed study information, sample collection kits and reply-paid return packs to 1500 randomly selected patients from a type 1 diabetes clinic (3000 patients in the whole clinic). We will ask participants to consent to take part (either online or by completing a paper consent form returned with their pack) before collecting a finger prick blood sample. We will ask participants to collect the sample between 1 and 5 hours after a meal and to check and record their blood glucose level at the same time. Participants would then return the sample and glucose result, using the pre-paid pack provided to the hospital clinic laboratory for a test called C-peptide (a measure of how much of their own insulin a person is producing). The sample collection process should take no longer than 10 minutes.
We will record the percentage of patients returning samples within 4 weeks of initial contact and determine the number of cases with high C-peptide suggestive of non-type 1 diabetes. If this study shows remote C-peptide testing is practical, and acceptable to patients, it could lead to remote testing being offered at all type 1 diabetes clinics in every hospital in the United Kingdom. Diabetes UK estimates around 350,000 people in the United Kingdom have type 1 diabetes. Reclassifying 1 in 15 people would mean approximately 23,000 people nationally could benefit from being identified as potentially able to stop insulin treatment.
3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 125 across 792 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Compared within Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Diabetes Mellitus. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Patients with a Type 1 diabetes follow up code OR rapid progression to insulin (within 3 years of diagnosis) to capture miscoded cases. Under the clinical care of the diabetes team(s) at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Adults treated as Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and under the clinical care of the specialist diabetes team(s) at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Diabetes duration \>3 years at the time of study participation. Aged \> 18 at the time of study participation.
Diagnostic Test: C-peptide test
Participants collect a single home finger-prick sample and post to the clinical laboratory for C-peptide analysis (a measure of endogenous insulin production).
Proportion of samples returned
The number of completed samples returned within four weeks of sample pack mailout.
Time frame: Within 4 weeks of initial contact
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Dec 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2025, 9 months after the start.
Of 249 non-industry observational studies under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 78. This study's planned 9 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 299 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 69.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust