ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06119867SPACEUpdated Aug 17, 2026

CompariSon Between the EuroPeAn and Japanese pathologiCal InvEstigation for Colon Cancer (SPACE)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Japanese pathological investigation and European pathological investigation in Colonic Neoplasms, sponsored by Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons. Recruiting at 1 site in Russia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
430
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 11 studies in Colonic Neoplasms with a site in Russia — 4 open to participants now, 7 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Colonic Neoplasms · Russia.

Started
2023
with 1 other
Phase 3
3 of 11
2 open now
Registered
7th of 11
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 11
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons

Among the 11 studies in Colonic Neoplasms with a site in Russia, this one is one of 2 that started in 2023, is one of 3 in phase 3, and was the 7th registered.

By phase

11 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observational5 · 0 open
Phase 3this study3 · 2 open
No phase2 · 1 open
Phase 21 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2013; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2023.

Size and results

Median enrollment 669 across the 6 interventional studies, 700 across the 5 observational. Of the 4 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Colonic Neoplasms with a site in Russia, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

In general, the European pathological examination method primarily relies on pathologists and does not require the involvement of surgeons. The Japanese pathological evaluation approach, on the other hand, involves the intervention of surgeons, particularly in the extraction of lymph nodes from fresh specimens and the assessment of specimen quality. Given that the Japanese pathological assessment method lacks systematic evaluation and there is currently no literature clearly demonstrating its diagnostic accuracy, the main objective of this study is to verify whether the diagnostic accuracy of the Japanese pathological investigation method is inferior to that of the European pathological evaluation method.

03

Conditions studied

  • Colonic Neoplasms

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with colon cancer who underwent colectomy;
  • Patients with pathological confirmed adenocarcinoma;
  • Patients agreed to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffered from rectal cancer;
  • Patients diagnosed with colon cancer but did not undergo colectomy;
  • Patients refused participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
430 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Japanese pathological investigation method group

    The surgeon will be involved into the Japanese pathological investigation method. The surgeon will perform the intraoperative markings and the postoperative lymph node harvest, after which the specimen will be assessed by the pathologist.

    Procedure: Japanese pathological investigation

  • Active comparator
    European pathological investigation method group

    After receiving the resected specimen, the entire process will be independently managed by the pathologist.

    Procedure: European pathological investigation

Interventions

  • ProcedureJapanese pathological investigation

    Japanese pathological investigation

  • ProcedureEuropean pathological investigation

    The European pathology evaluation method involves the analysis of fresh and intact specimens. Pathologists carefully inspect the entire specimen's appearance and assess the surgical resection plane and capture complete photographs for documentation purposes before further sectioning the specimen. During specimen processing, the CRM is initially marked with ink or other markers. After fixation, macroscopic data are recorded, and the entire length of the intestine is cut into cross-sections at intervals of 3-4 millimeters. These sections are then undergoing subsequent systematic pathological examination. However, the surgeon will be involved in the Japanese pathological investigation method. Intraoperative markings will be made 10 cm bilaterally from the primary tumor area. The resected colon will be incised at 1 cm intervals, after which the pericolic lymph nodes will be harvested. Each single retrieved lymph node will be packed up independently and will be examined by the pathologist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparision of the incidence of stage III colon cancer between European and Japanese pathological investigation methods.

    indentification of the rate of postive lymph nodes

    Time frame: up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The role of immunohistochemical examination in the Node (N) stage determination

    indentification of the rate of postive lymph nodes using immunohistochemical examination

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  2. Comparison of the lymph node ratio (LNR) between the European and Japanese pathological approaches

    LNR=Postivie lymph node/ Total retrived lymph node

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  3. Comparison of the pT Stage between the European and Japanese pathological approaches

    indentification of the rate of the pathological T stages

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  4. Comparison of the resection margin (proximal, distal, circular) between the European and Japanese pathological approaches

    indentification of the rate of the postive proximal, distal or circular resection margin

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  5. Comparison of the tumor budding between the European and Japanese pathological approaches

    indentification of the rate of tumor budding

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  6. Comparison of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) count between the European and Japanese pathological approaches

    indentification of the rate of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) count

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  7. Comparison of the extracapsular invasion between the European and Japanese pathological approaches

    indentification of the rate of the extracapsular invasion

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  8. Comparison of the extramural invasion (venous, lymphatic, perineural) between the European and Japanese pathological approaches

    indentification of the rate of the venous, lymphatic or perineural extramural invasion

    Time frame: up to 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 40 months after the start.

Of 55 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Colonic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 87 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 123. This study's planned 40 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 72 studies reached it within 55 months; a quarter within 37 and three quarters within 119.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2023
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
StartActual
Nov 14, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Apr 12, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
Last update
Aug 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06119867
Lead sponsor
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Responsible party
Vladimir Balaban (Principal Investigator, Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Start date
Nov 14, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 12, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Study contacts

Mingze He
Contact
hemingze97@gmail.com
+79801881266
Vladimir Balaban
principal investigator · Sechenov University
Petr Tsarkov
study director · Sechenov University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion