ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06112171CRACK-ITUpdated May 6, 2026

Comparison of a Lithotripsy vs Standard Preparation Followed by Stenting With Supera Stent in Femoropopliteal Lesions

An interventional study of Intravascular lithotripsy and Standard lesion preparation in Peripheral Arterial Disease, sponsored by University of Leipzig. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.

Sponsored by University of Leipzig · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, 1:1 randomized pilot study.

The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy in comparison to standard lesion preparation using standard and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease. All patients will receive subsequent Supera stent implantation at the operator's discretion. Additional standard nitinol bare metal stent (BMS), drug-eluting stent or covered stent implantation is at the operator's discretion.

Patients will be stratified for total occlusions.

Read the detailed description

All enrolled subjects will be followed up through 60 months. At 6, 12, 24, 36 MFU after index procedure the incidence of restenosis will be assessed by DUS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

  • Calcification
  • Lithotripsy
03

In context

Peripheral Arterial Disease

1,377 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 275 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 70 across 927 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Leipzig is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject age ≥ 18
  • Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved inform consent form
  • Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing
  • Rutherford Classification 2-5
  • Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion in SFA and/or PPA not exceeding the medial femoral epicondyle with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically
  • No previous stent in the target lesion, if target vessel was previously stented the stent should be at least 3cm apart
  • Target lesion length is ≥ 10cm, no maximum lesion length limit
  • Severe calcification on fluoroscopy defined by PACSS Grade 4: 1) bilateral calcification and 2) extending ≥50mm in length
  • Multiple lesions with max. 3cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion
  • Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
  • Patency of at least one infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery
  • A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment (both intraluminal and subintimal crossing allowed)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to successfully cross the target lesion
  • Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion
  • Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
  • Presence of a stent in the target lesion, at least 3cm from any previously stent in target vessel
  • Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion
  • Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Enrolled in another drug, device or biologic study that has not reached the primary endpoint
  • of less than one year
  • Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
  • Rutherford Classification of 0, 1, or 6
  • Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti- therapy
  • Receiving therapy
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding females
  • History of major amputation (defined as amputation above ankle joint) in the same limb as the target lesion
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Intravascular lithotripsy arm

    Treatment with Lithotripsy system followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.

    Procedure: Intravascular lithotripsy

  • Other
    Standard lesion preparation arm

    Treatment with Balloon angioplasty with a conventional and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.

    Procedure: Standard lesion preparation

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntravascular lithotripsy

    Lesion preparation with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System

  • ProcedureStandard lesion preparation

    Lesion preparation with Standard and/or High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary efficacy

    Procedural success defined as residual stenosis ≤ 30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥Grade D) in the final angiogram and without the need of additional stent implantation.

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  2. Rate of primary outcome events

    Composite endpoint defined as freedom from device and procedure-related death, freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: 12 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of vessel rupture

    Rate of vessel rupture

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  2. Need of additional stent implantation

    Need of additional stent implantation

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  3. Procedure Time (min)

    Procedure Time (min)

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  4. Fluoroscopy Duration (min)

    Fluoroscopy Duration (min)

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  5. Radiation dose area product

    Radiation dose area product

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  6. Additional need of intra-procedural pain medication

    Additional need of intra-procedural pain medication

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  7. Perception of procedural pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severest pain)

    Perception of procedural pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severest pain)

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  8. Rate of any dissections after lesion preparation and in the final angiogram

    Rate of any dissections after lesion preparation and in the final angiogram

    Time frame: During the Procedure

  9. Rate of primary patency

    Rate of primary patency

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  10. Rate of Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PVR >2.4) of the target lesion

    Rate of Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PVR \>2.4) of the target lesion

    Time frame: post-procedure until discharge from hospital (up to 48 hours) and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months or at any time of re-intervention

  11. Rate of Clinically-driven Target lesion revascularization

    Rate of Clinically-driven Target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  12. Rate of Freedom from Major Adverse Event (defined as death, Target lesion revascularization, Target vessel revascularization and target limb major amputation)

    Rate of Freedom from Major Adverse Event (defined as death, Target lesion revascularization, Target vessel revascularization and target limb major amputation)

    Time frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  13. Rate of All-cause mortality

    Rate of All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  14. Ankle-brachial index (ABI)

    The ABI is calculated by dividing the highest of the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pressures in each leg by the highest of the brachial pressures. Value less than 0.90 indicates a diagnosis of PAD.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  15. Rutherford Classification

    Rutherford Classification Scale from 0=Asymptomatic, 1=Mild claudication, 2=Moderate claudication, 3=Severe claudication, 4=Ischemic rest pain, 5=Minor tissue loss up to worst classification 6=Major tissue loss

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  16. Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)

    The products are summed and divided by the maximum possible score to obtain a percent score, ranging from 0 (representing the inability to perform any of the tasks) to 100 (representing no difficult with any of the tasks).

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  17. EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

    The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: o problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

  18. EQ VAS

    The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 100% 'Best imaginable health state' and 0% 'Worst imaginable health state'.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Clinic Leipzig
    Leipzig, Saxony 04103, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Janin Lenzer · Contactjanin.lenzer@medizin.uni-leipzig.de · +49-341-97
    • Dierk Scheinert, Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
    • Andrej Schmidt, PD Dr. · Sub investigator
    • Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06112171
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 1, 2023
Start date
Feb 13, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2026

Study contacts

Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr.
Contact
Sabine.Steiner@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
+49-341-97 ext. 18770
Janine Brunotte
Contact
janine.brunotte@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
+49-341-97 ext. 18770
Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · University Leipzig

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion