ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06109753ERCONUpdated Jan 28, 2026

Ergonomic Benefits From Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Indications

An observational study in Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions, sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 68 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4
Ages
18 Years to 68 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical trial at the Department of Women's Health of the University Hospital Tübingen.

Read the detailed description

Monocentric trial to evaluate differences in musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Demographic and personal data are collected and pseudonymized. During surgery surface electromyography (EMG), electrocardiography (ECG), motion tracking data are collected and the surgery is documented by photos (1 photo/per second). Additionally, perceived physical discomfort (frequency and intensity) and mental load will be assessed within certain time intervals and at the very end of the surgery. The surgeon will not be disturbed in his actions and movement by the measurement equipment or applied procedures. Previous studies with similar designs can be seen as references in this context (549/2012BO1, 409/2013BO1, 262/2018BO1). After completing the surgery, the surgeon will rate difficulty of the surgery, work precision, eye strain and ergonomics during the surgery. Routine interventions like hysterectomies and other selected indications will be analyzed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions

Keywords

  • Muscular and mental demand
  • physical discomfort
  • eye strain
03

In context

Musculoskeletal Diseases

752 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4 is below the median of 120 across 207 observational studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Browse Musculoskeletal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Tuebingen is the lead sponsor of 490 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 68 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

4 (males and females) gynecological surgeons

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 68 years
  • surgeons that are able to work in full shift
  • trained surgeons in RALS and CLS
  • written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • persons influenced by analgesics or muscle relaxants
  • persons not able to perform their common work for any reason
  • persons with acute diseases
  • muscle injury
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
4 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy

    Surgeons perform robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

    Procedure: Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Conventional Laparoscopy

    Surgeons perform conventional laparoscopic surgery

    Procedure: Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureRobotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery

    robotically assisted surgeries of about 60-minute duration with additional 30 min for preparing with the measurement equipment before surgery and 15 post evaluation of the corresponding surgery

  • ProcedureConventional Laparoscopic Surgery

    conventional surgeries of about 60-minute duration with additional 30 min for preparing with the measurement equipment before surgery and 15 post evaluation of the corresponding surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle activity of the bilateral trapezius pars descendens muscle

    The muscle activity of the bilateral trapezius pars descendens muscle will be assessed using surface electromyography, with the root-mean-square (RMS) of electrical muscle activity recordings measured through bipolar surface electrodes. Data will be normalized to an isometric voluntary maximum electrical activation (MVE).

    Time frame: during surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Muscle activity of the bilateral forearm muscles

    The muscle activity of the bilateral forearm muscles will be assessed using surface electromyography, with the root-mean-square (RMS) of electrical muscle activity recordings measured through bipolar surface electrodes. Data will be normalized to an isometric voluntary maximum electrical activation (MVE).

    Time frame: during surgery

  2. Kinematics

    For kinematics, the outcome measures involve the assessment of shoulder abduction, trunk, and head flexion angles in degrees, which are determined using gravimetric position sensors, providing precise measurements of body positioning during the task.

    Time frame: during surgery

  3. Perceived physical discomfort

    Perceived physical discomfort is evaluated by assessing its frequency and intensity. Frequency indicates the number of occurrences, while intensity is measured on a 0 to 10 scale, where higher values indicate more intense discomfort. These measurements are recorded at 20-minute intervals to monitor changes in discomfort over time.

    Time frame: during surgery

  4. Perceived mental demand

    Perceived mental demand is evaluated using the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ) Task Load Index (TLX) questionnaire's mental demand dimension, providing a subjective score ranging from 0 to 21, reflecting the perceived cognitive load during the task. Higher values are representing higher perceived mental demand.

    Time frame: during surgery

  5. Perceived mental demand - Heart rate

    Heart rate (beats per minute) and heart rate variability, such as SDNN (standard deviation of the beat-to-beat differences in instantaneous heart rate), are recorded via electrocardiography to quantify physiological responses associated with mental demand.

    Time frame: during surgery

  6. Perceived mental demand - Heart rate variability

    Heart rate variability, to be precise SDNN (standard deviation of the beat-to-beat differences in instantaneous heart rate), are recorded via electrocardiography to quantify physiological responses associated with mental demand.

    Time frame: during surgery

  7. Work precision

    Work precision is measured during surgery using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm, providing an indication of the precision and accuracy of the surgical maneuvers performed.

    Time frame: during surgery

  8. Eye strain

    Eye strain is evaluated using a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the severity of eye strain, with each question scored on a scale from 0 to 6, aiding in the comprehensive understanding of the subjective experience of visual discomfort.

    Time frame: during surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Musculoskeletal complaints

    The Nordic Questionnaire encompasses an evaluation of diverse parameters, including body height (measured in centimeters), body weight (measured in kilograms), physical activity (assessed in hours of sports per week), work experience (measured in years), and the presence of musculoskeletal complaints within the last 12 months, along with point prevalence \[n\]. This holistic assessment offers critical insights into the participants' physical condition and occupational health status. Additionally, please note that the Nordic Questionnaire does not specifically employ a single scale; rather, it utilizes various metrics tailored to the different parameters, and thus, the measurement scales can differ based on the specific parameter being assessed.

    Time frame: within the last 12 months

  2. Duration of the surgical procedure

    The duration of the surgical procedure is a critical outcome measure, recorded in minutes, providing a precise indication of the time taken to complete the specific surgical intervention, aiding in the assessment of surgical efficiency and time management.

    Time frame: 105 Minutes

  3. Difficulty of the surgery

    The perceived difficulty of the surgery is measured using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with 0 indicating that the surgery was not difficult and 100 indicating that the surgery was very difficult. This measure allows the surgeons to subjectively express the complexity and challenges associated with the performed surgical procedure.

    Time frame: 5 Minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Women's Hospital
    Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg 72076, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06109753
Collaborators
Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Tuebingen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 31, 2023
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2024
Completion
Jan 31, 2024
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Benjamin Steinhilber, PD Dr.
principal investigator · Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research
Bernhard Krämer, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · University Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion