ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07924995Updated Nov 9, 2026

Home-Based Corrective Exercise With Remote Reinforcement for Upper Crossed Syndrome

An interventional study of Home-based corrective exercise program with incentive spirometer and remote reinforcement and Home-based corrective exercise program (no spirometer, minimal follow-up) in Upper Cross Syndrome, Forward Head Posture and Rounded Shoulder Posture, sponsored by Cardenal Herrera University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Cardenal Herrera University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Upper Crossed Syndrome (UCS) is a musculoskeletal condition defined by simultaneous forward head posture (craniovertebral angle, CVA \< 52°), rounded shoulders (RSP > 52°), and thoracic hyperkyphosis (> 42°). It is highly prevalent in sedentary workers and musicians and is associated with neck pain, shoulder pain, and reduced pulmonary function. This two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial will compare two home-based corrective exercise programs over 12 weeks in adults with confirmed UCS. Both groups (Experimental, EG; Control, CG) perform the same 20-minute program three times per week: diaphragmatic breathing re-education and targeted muscle strengthening and stretching. The EG additionally uses a volumetric incentive spirometer (Coach2, 4000 mL) as respiratory biofeedback and receives active remote reinforcement (biweekly video calls + asynchronous educational material from a physiotherapist); the CG performs the same exercises without the spirometer and receives only minimal adherence monitoring. Outcomes are assessed at baseline (week 0) and at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Primary outcome: craniovertebral angle (CVA) measured by lateral photogrammetry. Secondary outcomes: rounded shoulder angle (RSP), thoracic kyphosis (bubble inclinometer and smartphone inclinometer), pain (Visual Analogue Scale), cervical disability (Neck Disability Index), shoulder pain and disability (SPADI), exercise adherence, and pulmonary function (spirometry: FVC, FEV₁/FVC, MVV) at weeks 0 and 12. Recruitment will take place at the Associació Amics de la Música de Meliana, Fisioterapia A Punto, and Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU (Valencia, Spain). A total of 96 participants (48 per arm) will be enrolled over a 2-year recruitment window.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Cross Syndrome
  • Forward Head Posture
  • Rounded Shoulder Posture
  • Thoracic Hyperkyphosis
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases

Keywords

  • upper crossed syndrome
  • forward head posture
  • rounded shoulder
  • thoracic kyphosis
  • home exercise
  • diaphragmatic breathing
  • incentive spirometer
  • remote physiotherapy
  • corrective exercise
  • postural rehabilitation
03

In context

Musculoskeletal Diseases

752 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 76 across 518 interventional studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Browse Musculoskeletal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Cardenal Herrera University is the lead sponsor of 107 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Confirmed UCS diagnosis, defined by the simultaneous presence of: (a) craniovertebral angle (CVA) \< 52°; (b) rounded shoulder posture angle (RSP) > 52°; and (c) thoracic kyphosis angle > 42°.

      • Age between 18 and 65 years.
      • Available and willing to perform the home exercise program and to attend all four face-to-face assessment sessions (weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12).
      • Access to a camera-equipped device (smartphone or tablet) for remote monitoring and reinforcement.
      • Ability to understand the study procedures and to sign .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cervical or thoracic pathology: vertebral fracture, neoplasm, infection, or active systemic inflammatory disease.

    • Spinal surgery within the preceding 12 months.
    • Respiratory pathology contraindicating use of a volumetric incentive spirometer: recent pneumothorax (\< 6 weeks), GOLD grade III-IV, or unstable bronchial asthma.
    • Active physiotherapy treatment specifically targeting UCS within the preceding 3 months.
    • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
    • Cognitive impairment or language barrier preventing comprehension of the exercise program.
    • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group (EC)

    Home-based corrective exercise program (3 sessions/week × 12 weeks, 20 min/session) combining: (1) diaphragmatic breathing re-education with a volumetric incentive spirometer (Coach2, 4000 mL, Smiths Medical) as biofeedback - 4 progressive levels, 10 repetitions; (2) muscle strengthening and stretching targeting the deep cervical flexors, lower and middle trapezius, rhomboids, and pectoral/suboccipital muscles. The EG additionally receives active remote reinforcement: a biweekly video call with a physiotherapist and asynchronous educational material (written guides and video tutorials) delivered via a messaging platform.

    Device: Home-based corrective exercise program with incentive spirometer and remote reinforcement

  • Active comparator
    Control Group (CG)

    Identical home-based corrective exercise program (3 sessions/week × 12 weeks, 20 min/session) with the same muscle strengthening and stretching exercises. The CG does not use an incentive spirometer (diaphragmatic breathing performed without device) and does not receive active remote reinforcement; adherence monitoring is minimal (standardized paper diary).

    Behavioral: Home-based corrective exercise program (no spirometer, minimal follow-up)

Interventions

  • DeviceHome-based corrective exercise program with incentive spirometer and remote reinforcement

    Home-based corrective exercise program (3 sessions/week × 12 weeks, 20 min/session) combining: (1) diaphragmatic breathing re-education with a volumetric incentive spirometer (Coach2, 4000 mL, Smiths Medical) as biofeedback - 4 progressive levels, 10 repetitions; (2) muscle strengthening and stretching targeting the deep cervical flexors, lower and middle trapezius, rhomboids, and pectoral/suboccipital muscles. The EG additionally receives active remote reinforcement: a biweekly video call with a physiotherapist and asynchronous educational material (written guides and video tutorials) delivered via a messaging platform.

  • BehavioralHome-based corrective exercise program (no spirometer, minimal follow-up)

    Identical home-based corrective exercise program (3 sessions/week × 12 weeks, 20 min/session) with the same muscle strengthening and stretching exercises. The CG does not use an incentive spirometer (diaphragmatic breathing performed without device) and does not receive active remote reinforcement; adherence monitoring is minimal (standardized paper diary).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Craniovertebral Angle (CVA)

    Angle formed between the horizontal line at the C7 spinous process and the line connecting C7 to the ipsilateral ear tragus, measured by lateral photogrammetry using standardized adhesive markers and Kinovea software. A lower CVA indicates greater forward head posture (normal \> 52°).

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rounded Shoulder Posture Angle (RSP)

    Angle between the line connecting the C7 spinous process to the right acromion and the horizontal, measured by lateral photogrammetry (Kinovea). Values \> 52° indicate rounded shoulder posture.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  2. Thoracic Kyphosis Angle - Bubble Inclinometer

    Single-inclinometer sequential method: the instrument (Baseline, Fabrication Enterprises Inc., White Plains, NY) is zeroed at T1 and the angle is read at T12. Three measurements per time point; mean used for analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  3. Thoracic Kyphosis Angle - Smartphone Inclinometer

    Same T1-T12 sequential method using the Clinometer app (Plaincode) on iPhone 17. The upper corner of the narrow side of the phone is placed at T1 (zeroed to 0°), then moved to T12 (angle read). Three measurements per time point; mean used for analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  4. Pain Intensity - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    100-mm horizontal VAS (0 = no pain; 100 = worst imaginable pain) for neck and interscapular pain during the past week. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID): 15 mm.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  5. Cervical Disability - Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    10-item self-reported questionnaire assessing the impact of neck pain on daily activities; total score 0-50. Spanish validated version used. MCID: 5 points (10%). Interpretation: 0-8% no disability; 10-28% mild; 30-48% moderate; 50-64% severe; ≥ 64% complete disability.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  6. Shoulder Pain and Disability - SPADI

    13-item self-reported questionnaire with two subscales (Pain: 5 items; Disability: 8 items), each item scored 0-10. Total score 0-100 (higher = worse). MCID: 13-18 points. Spanish validated version used.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

  7. Exercise Adherence

    Percentage of prescribed sessions completed out of 36 planned sessions (3/week × 12 weeks), recorded in standardized session diaries. Adequate adherence defined as ≥ 70%

    Time frame: Weeks 1-12 (cumulative at each assessment point)

  8. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC, % predicted)

    Spirometric measurement (forced vital capacity as percentage of age-sex-height-weight predicted value). ATS acceptability and reproducibility criteria applied; 3 measurements per session, mean used.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12

  9. FEV₁/FVC Ratio (% predicted)

    Ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity, expressed as percentage of predicted value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12

  10. Maximum Voluntary Ventilation (MVV, % predicted)

    Spirometric measure of maximum airflow over 12-15 seconds, expressed as percentage of predicted value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 12

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yan X, Kim T-H. The Impact of Combined Scapular Stabilization and Breathing Training on Pain and Respiratory Function in Individuals with Upper Cross Syndrome. Appl Sci. 2025;15:6147. doi: 10.3390/app15116147
  • Karimian R, Rahnama N, Ghasemi G, Lenjannejadian S. Photogrammetric Analysis of Upper Cross Syndrome among Teachers and the Effects of National Academy of Sports Medicine Exercises with Ergonomic Intervention on the Syndrome. J Res Health Sci. 2019 Jul 3;19(3):e00450. PubMed 31586371 ↗
  • Jeong GH, Lee BH. Effects of Telerehabilitation Combining Diaphragmatic Breathing Re-Education and Shoulder Stabilization Exercises on Neck Pain, Posture, and Function in Young Adult Men with Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 11;13(6):1612. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061612. PubMed 38541838 ↗
  • Kalantariyan M, Sadeghi M, Samadi H. Manual massage versus foam rolling within the NASM corrective framework: a trial for upper crossed syndrome rehabilitation in university students. Sci Rep. 2026 Jan 27;16(1):5471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-35030-6. PubMed 41588041 ↗
  • Chaudhuri S, Chawla JK, Phadke V. Physiotherapeutic Interventions for Upper Cross Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023 Sep 18;15(9):e45471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45471. eCollection 2023 Sep. PubMed 37859911 ↗
  • Sepehri S, Sheikhhoseini R, Piri H, Sayyadi P. The effect of various therapeutic exercises on forward head posture, rounded shoulder, and hyperkyphosis among people with upper crossed syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 1;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07224-4. PubMed 38302926 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07924995
Responsible party
JORGE MONTERO CÁMARA (PT, MSc, PhD, Cardenal Herrera University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Nov 9, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 9, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Jorge M Montero-Cámara, PhD
Contact
jorge.camara@uchceu.es
+34611661505

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion