A Phase 3 interventional study of Solriamfetol and Placebo in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness, sponsored by Ignis Therapeutics (Suzhou) Limited. Completed at 26 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.
Sponsored by Ignis Therapeutics (Suzhou) Limited · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 108 studies in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive with a site in China — 48 open to participants now, 50 under way, 10 of them phase 3. Sleep Apnea, Obstructive · China.
Among the 108 studies in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive with a site in China, this one is the 16th largest by enrollment of the 60 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2023, is one of 13 in phase 3, and was the 61st registered.
2,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 475 are open to participants now.
Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →48 of the 108 studies in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive with a site in China are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Chinese Pulmonary Vascular Disease Research Group · Sites in China
Ages 18+
Peking University First Hospital · Sites in China
Ages 18–65 · Healthy volunteers
Beijing Anzhen Hospital · Sites in China
Ages 18–75
Novo Nordisk A/S · Sites in China, United States, Australia and 7 more countries
Ages 18+
Novo Nordisk A/S · Sites in China, United States, Australia and 7 more countries
Ages 18+
A study can be open while its sites in China have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in China →
Of the 313 Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies recruiting now, 146 (47%) set no upper age limit and 124 (40%) stop at 75 or younger; 52 take children under 18; 65 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
108 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2003; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2023.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 204 is above the median of 52 across 1,474 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.
Median enrollment 140 across the 60 interventional studies, 200 across the 47 observational. Of the 40 that completed or were terminated, 4 (10%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
14 of 108 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
This is the only study on the registry with Ignis Therapeutics (Suzhou) Limited as lead sponsor.
Ignis Therapeutics (Suzhou) Limited has 1 study filed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
11 of the studies in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive with a site in China that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 2 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT06974851Phase 3Fujian Shengdi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.A Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of HRS9531 Injection in Subjects With Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and Obesity | 2026-12 |
| NCT07493057Phase 3Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals.Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GZR18 Injection in Obese Subjects With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Not Treated With Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Therapy | 2027-11-14 |
| NCT05735444Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineProspective National Multi-center Registry of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Hypertensive Patients in China | 2026-12 |
| NCT07307560Zhejiang UniversityHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula for Preventing Hypoxia During Sedated Endoscopy in High-Risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients | 2026-12-01 |
| NCT07908160Peking University First HospitalDevelopment and Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Sleep Staging and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Based on a Large-Scale Model Trained on Multimodal Physiological Signals From Diverse Populations | 2026-12-31 |
Add all 11 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 108 studies in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive with a site in China, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12-week solriamfetol administration in the treatment of EDS in patients with OSA from China, using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, parallel-design.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Patients with OSA may be considered for enrollment if they meet one of the following criteria:
A stable level of compliance with a primary OSA therapy for at least 1 month prior to the baseline visit as follows:
Exclusion criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ECG (electrocardiogram)
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
subject will first enter a 2-week Titration Phase, during which the initial dose will be 37.5mg. The dose will be increased from 37.5mg QD to 75mg QD after 3 days, and then to 150mg QD at the first day of the second week if well-tolerated. subjects will then enter the 10-week Maintenance Phase on 150mg QD if well-tolerated. If a subject tolerability issues after titration up to 150mg at the second week, the dose can be reduced to 75mg QD following instructions of the investigators. This subject will then enter the 10-week Maintenance Phase on 75mg QD. If a subject experiences tolerability issues after titration up to 75mg at the first week, the dose can be reduced to 37.5mg QD following instructions of the investigators. The dose will be increased to 75mg QD again at the first day of the second week. Subject will then enter the 10-week Maintenance Phase on 75mg QD if well-tolerated. All subjects should be maintained on either 75mg QD or 150mg QD during the Maintenance Phase.
Drug: Solriamfetol
Drug: Placebo
solriamfetol : QD,PO,Day 1-Day 84;
Placebo :QD,PO,Day 1-Day 84
To evaluate the effect of solriamfetol compared to placebo among patients with OSA in change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean MWT sleep latency (minutes, (determined from the first four 40-minute trials of the MWT)
Change from baseline in mean MWT sleep latency (minutes, determined from the first four 40-minute trials of the MWT) to Week 12
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
To evaluate the effect of solriamfetol compared to placebo among patients with OSA in change from baseline to Week 12 in ESS scores
Change from baseline in ESS total score to Week 12 Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS): ESS score ranges from 0 to 24 (inclusive), with higher score denoting greater degrees of sleepiness
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Key Secondary Study Objective: To compare treatment with solriamfetol versus placebo on the percentage of participants reported as improved (minimally, much, very much) in PGIc at Week 12 among patients with OSA
Percentage of participants with improved PGIc at Week 12
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Other Secondary Study Objective 1:To evaluate the effect of solriamfetol compared to placebo among patients with OSA in change from baseline to Week 2 and Week 5 in the mean MWT sleep latency
Changes from baseline in MWT at the end of the Week 2 and Week 5 are defined as: mean sleep latency at the end of the Week 2 and Week 5 (determined from the first four 40-minute trials of the MWTs) minus the baseline measurement (minutes)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at the 2- and 5-week
Other Secondary Study Objective 2: To evaluate the effect of solriamfetol compared to placebo among patients with OSA in change from baseline to Week 2, 5 and 8 in ESS score
Changes from baseline in ESS scores at the end of Week 2, 5 and 8 are defined as: ESS total scores at the end of Week 2, 5 and 8 minus baseline values Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS): ESS score ranges from 0 to 24 (inclusive), with higher score denoting greater degrees of sleepiness
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at the 2- ,5- and 8-week
Other Secondary Study Objective 3: To compare treatment with solriamfetol versus placebo on the percentage of participants reported as improved (minimally, much, very much) in PGIc at Week 2, 5 and 8 among patients with OSA
The percentages of participants reported as improved (minimally, much, very much) in PGIc at Week 2, 5 and 8 are defined as the percentages calculated by dividing the number of participants reported as improved in PGIc by the total number of participants in the each treatment group at Week 2, 5 and 8
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at the 2- ,5- and 8-week
Other Secondary Study Objective 4: To compare treatment with solriamfetol versus placebo on the percentage of participants rated as improved (minimally, much, very much) in CGIc at Week 12 among patients with OSA
The percentage of participants rated as improved (minimally, much, very much) in CGIc at the end of Week 12 is defined as the percentage calculated by dividing the number of participants who have achieve improvement (minimally, much, very much) in CGIc by the total number of participants in each treatment group at Week 12
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Other Secondary Study Objective 5: To compare treatment with solriamfetol versus placebo on the percentage of participants rated as improved (minimally, much, very much) in CGIc at Week 2, 5 and 8 among patients with OSA
The percentage of participants rated as improved (minimally, much, very much) in CGIc at the end of Week 12 is defined as the percentage calculated by dividing the number of participants who have achieve improvement (minimally, much, very much) in CGIc by the total number of participants in each treatment group at Week 2, 5 and 8
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at the 2- ,5- and 8-week
Other Secondary Study Objective 6: To compare the efficacy of solriamfetol versus placebo throughout the day in sleep latency for each of the 5 MWT trials
Changes of the efficacy throughout the day in MWT: changes in sleep latency for each of the 5 MWTs (minutes)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Ran from Aug 2023 to primary completion in Jul 2024, 11 months.
Of 27 phase 3 interventional studies under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 32. This study's 11 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Solriamfetol