An observational study in Uveitis, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-27.
Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Observational
The first-line etiological workup is currently poorly codified, and some patients undergo sequential investigations. However, the reason which lead the clinician to perform subsequent exams, and the relevance of such exams, remain to be determined. The main objective of the study was to assess the relevance of a second-line workup of patients with uveitis.
The first-line etiological workup is currently poorly codified, with some patients undergoing extensive investigations, and other minimal etiological workup. In addition, some patients undergo sequential investigations. However, the reason which lead the clinician to perform subsequent exams, and the relevance of investigations performed after a first line workup remain to be determined. The main objective of the study was to assess the relevance of a second-line workup of patients with uveitis.Secondary objectives were to describe the reasons of these second-line workups, and to determine which exams were the most relevant, and the determinants of its realization.
adult pateints with uveitis requiring at least one etiological workup.
Exclusion Criteria:
patients who underwent only one set of exams for etiological investigations of uveitis
Other: second line investigations for uveitis etiological workup
Patients who underwent a second etiological workup, independently of the results of the fist line investigations, and whose diagnosis was not modified by the second line investigations.
Other: second line investigations for uveitis etiological workup
Patients who underwent a second etiological workup, independently of the results of the fist line investigations, and whose diagnosis was modified by the second line investigations.
Other: second line investigations for uveitis etiological workup
Biological, radiological or histological investigations performed after a first line etiological workup. Investigations conducted following abnormal resultats of first line exams were not considered as second line exams (e.g. : bronchoscopy performed after abrnomal CT scan).
patients undergoing a second line etiological workup
percentage of patients undergoing a second line etiological workup
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 18 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France