ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07839390SIMCAUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Determination of the Best Therapeutic Strategy, Interventional With Best Medical Management (BMM) Versus BMM Alone, for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate <70% Atherosclerotic Carotid Artery Stenosis: the SIMCA Multicenter Randomized Trial

An interventional study of endarterectomy and stenting in Carotid Stenosis, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,440
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and the main cause of long-term disability worldwide. A frequent cause is the narrowing of the carotid artery due to atherosclerosis, known as carotid artery stenosis. When stenosis is moderate (\< 70%) and has already caused symptoms, the best strategy to prevent another stroke remains uncertain. Earlier studies compared surgery or stenting with medical therapy, but these trials were conducted before modern medical treatments were available and did not consider important plaque characteristics that may increase the risk of recurrence. As a result, current clinical practice varies widely, and existing guidelines are based on low-quality evidence.

The SIMCA trial aims to address this gap by comparing two treatment strategies in patients with symptomatic moderate carotid stenosis : best medical management (BMM) alone versus BMM combined with an intervention (endarterectomy or stenting). The primary objective is To determine whether intervention (endarterectomy or stenting) plus BMM compared to BMM alone significantly reduces the incidence of ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral infarction in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic moderate stenosis of the cervical internal carotid artery at 5 years

Hypothesis :

The arm of this study is therefore to determine the best therapeutic strategy between intervention with best medical management (BMM) versus BMM alone (main objective) and the best intervention (endarterectomy or stenting) (secondary objective) to prevent cerebral infarction in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic moderate (\< 70%) CAS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carotid Stenosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atherosclerotic Carotid Artery Stenosis (CAS)
03

In context

Carotid Stenosis

364 studies on the registry are indexed under Carotid Stenosis; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,440 is above the median of 103 across 189 interventional studies indexed under Carotid Stenosis.

Browse Carotid Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Central Hospital, Nancy, France is the lead sponsor of 798 studies on the registry; 186 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Modified Rankin Score 0 to 3
  • Atherosclerotic stenosis of the cervical internal carotid artery with

    • Between 50-69% (NASCET method) confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) OR
    • Stenosis \< 50% (NASCET method) confirmed by CTA or MRA or DSA with at least one of the following markers of high-risk carotid plaque features for stroke recurrence (vulnerable plaque), possibly identified by doppler ultrasound:

      • intra-plaque hemorrhage
      • irregular plaque surface defined as an indentation, fissure, erosion, or ulceration on the luminal surface of the plaque
      • lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) occupying ≥50% plaque4. Symptomatic stenosis defined as clinical signs due to
    • ipsilateral ischemic stroke documented on cerebral imaging OR Ipsilateral permanent or transitory retinal embolic infarction document by ophthalmologic examination OR defined as transient motor deficit and/or aphasia. AND
    • obviously due to the atherosclerotic stenosis: in a concordant territory, excluding lacunar infarction, and associated cardio embolic source (atrial fibrillation excluded by , and 24-hour monitoring or holter), and multiterritorial simultaneous cerebral infarctions AND
    • within 14 days before planned intervention
  • For whom both kinds of intervention (endarterectomy and stenting) are allowed.
  • Able and willing to give consent
  • Person affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security plan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Expected survival \<5 years (renal clairance \<30 mL/min/1.73m2, severe cardiac or respiratory insufficiency, active cancer)
  • Patient unable to undergo any of both carotid revascularization (endarterectomy or stenting)
  • Atrial fibrillation or medical history of atrial fibrillation
  • Carotid artery stenosis due to radiotherapy
  • Tandem lesion defined with the association of a severe intracranial stenosis (degree above the determining cervical internal carotid artery stenosis) or complete occlusion
  • History of revascularization procedure on the determining internal carotid artery
  • Contra indication to dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Person referred in articles L.1121-5, L. 1121-7 and L.1121-8 of the Public Health Code:
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman
  • Minor person (non-emancipated)
  • Adult person under legal protection (any form of public guardianship)
  • Person deprived of liberty for judicial or administrative decision, person under psychiatric care as referred in articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,440 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Control Group

    patients treated with BMM alone

    Other: Control group

  • Experimental
    Experimental group endarterectomy

    patients treated with intervention endarterectomy plus BMM

    Procedure: endarterectomy

  • Experimental
    Experimental group stenting

    patients treated with intervention stenting plus BMM

    Procedure: stenting

Interventions

  • Procedureendarterectomy

    patients treated with intervention endarterectomy plus BMM;

  • Procedurestenting

    patients treated with intervention stenting plus BMM

  • OtherControl group

    Patients treated with BMM alone.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Any stroke or death during the periprocedural period, or ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral infarction during long-term follow-up

    * Any stroke or death during the periprocedural period (within 30 days after procedure) * Or symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction ipsilateral to stenosis during long-term follow-up (5 years)

    Time frame: 30 days after procedure and up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction

    occurance of Ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral infarction after randomization

    Time frame: 5 years follow-up

  2. Any symptomatic ischemic stroke,

    Occurance of any symptomatic ischemic stroke

    Time frame: 5 years follow-up

  3. Any symptomatic stroke

    Occurrence of symptomatic stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic),

    Time frame: 5-year follow-up:

  4. Myocardial infarction,

    Occurence of myocardial infarction,

    Time frame: 5 years follow up

  5. Vascular death,

    Death atttributed to a vascular cause

    Time frame: 5 years follow up

  6. Cranial narve palsy

    Occurence of paralysis of any last cranial nerve (ranked by frequency: XII, X, VII, IX, XI, or sympathic cervical nerve with Claude Bernard Horner syndrome)

    Time frame: 5 years follow up

  7. Functional outcome

    Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score,

    Time frame: at 5 years

  8. Health-related quality of live

    Health-related quality of live assesed using EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.

    Time frame: At 5 years

  9. Stroke or death during periprocedural phase or ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction at 5-years

    Composite of any stroke or death during the periprocedural period (within 30 days after the procedure), or ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction during 5 years of follow-up

    Time frame: periprocedural period (30 days) and 5 years follow-up

  10. Arterial blood pressure as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance

    compliance with best medical management assessed from • Arterial blood pressure (mmHg)

    Time frame: 5 years

  11. Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance

    compliance with best medical management assessed from • Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level (g/L or mmol/L)

    Time frame: 5 years

  12. Glycated haemoglobin level as compliance with Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance

    Compliance with best medical management assessed from routine clinical bioliological data Glycated haemoglobin level (%)

    Time frame: 5 years

  13. Tobacco cessation as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance

    Compliance with best medical management assessed from routine assessment : • Tobacco cessation or consumption (YES/NO)

    Time frame: 5 years

  14. Alcohol consumption as as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance

    Compliance with best medical management assessed from routine assessment : • Alcohol consumption (drinks/week)

    Time frame: 5 years

  15. Daily physical activity assessment as best Medical Management (BMM) compliance

    compliance with best medical management assessed from routine clinical assessment : • Daily physical activity assessment (hours/week)

    Time frame: 5 years

  16. Any stroke or death during the periprocedural period, or ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral infarction during 2-Year follow-up

    * Any stroke or death during the periprocedural period (within 30 days after procedure) * Or symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction ipsilateral to stenosis during long-term follow-up (2 years)

    Time frame: 30 days after procedure and up to 2 years

  17. Ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction at 2-years

    occurance of Ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral infarction after randomization

    Time frame: 2 years follow-up

  18. Any symptomatic ischemic stroke at 2-years

    Occurance of any symptomatic ischemic stroke

    Time frame: 2 years follow-up

  19. Any symptomatic stroke at 2-years

    Occurrence of symptomatic stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic),

    Time frame: 2 years follow-up:

  20. Myocardial infarction at 2-years

    Occurence of myocardial infarction,

    Time frame: 2 years follow up

  21. Vascular death at 2-years

    Death atttributed to a vascular cause

    Time frame: 2 years follow up

  22. Cranial narve palsy at 2-years

    Occurence of paralysis of any last cranial nerve (ranked by frequency: XII, X, VII, IX, XI, or sympathic cervical nerve with Claude Bernard Horner syndrome)

    Time frame: 2 years follow up

  23. Functional outcome at 2-years

    Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score,

    Time frame: at 2 years

  24. Health-related quality of live at 2-years

    Health-related quality of live assesed using EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.

    Time frame: At 2 years

  25. Stroke or death during periprocedural phase or ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction at 2-years

    Composite of any stroke or death during the periprocedural period (within 30 days after the procedure), or ipsilateral symptomatic cerebral or retinal infarction during 5 years of follow-up

    Time frame: periprocedural period (30 days) and 2 years follow-up

  26. Arterial blood pressure as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance at 2-years

    compliance with best medical management assessed from • Arterial blood pressure (mmHg)

    Time frame: 2 years

  27. Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance at 2-years

    compliance with best medical management assessed from • Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level (g/L or mmol/L)

    Time frame: 2 years

  28. Glycated haemoglobin level as compliance with Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance at 2-years

    Compliance with best medical management assessed from routine clinical bioliological data Glycated haemoglobin level (%)

    Time frame: 2 years

  29. Tobacco cessation as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance at 2-years

    Compliance with best medical management assessed from routine assessment : • Tobacco cessation or consumption (YES/NO)

    Time frame: 2 years

  30. Alcohol consumption as as Best Medical Management (BMM) compliance at 2-years

    Compliance with best medical management assessed from routine assessment : • Alcohol consumption (drinks/week)

    Time frame: 2 years

  31. Daily physical activity assessment as best Medical Management (BMM) compliance at 2-years

    compliance with best medical management assessed from routine clinical assessment : • Daily physical activity assessment (hours/week)

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Sep 2034, 96 months later.

Of 50 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Carotid Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 96 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 61 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 19, 2026
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2034
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2035
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07839390
Responsible party
Dr Sebastien RICHARD (Professor, Central Hospital, Nancy, France) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2034 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Sébastien RICHARD, Professor
Contact
s.richard@chru-nancy.fr
03 83 85 22 56

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion