ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06100250Updated Jul 1, 2025Results posted

Zenyth: Motivational Interviewing-based Telehealth Intervention for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening

An interventional study of Motivational interviewing and specimen self-collection in Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Gonorrhea and Chlamydia, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-01.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the United States (US), gay and bisexual men living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) bear a heavy burden of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis. It is important to diagnose and treat STIs in a timely manner to prevent health complications and reduce transmissions. The purpose of this study is to understand whether gay and bisexual men living with HIV are willing to collect and return specimens for bacterial STI testing when combined with live audio/video (AV) conferencing support.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be recruited from across the US via social media advertising and peer referral. Seventy-five participants that complete an online survey (called the baseline survey) will be asked to attend a pre-test live AV conferencing session, collect and return a urine sample, a throat swab, a rectal swab, and a blood sample for bacterial STI testing, attend a post-test live AV conferencing session, and complete another online survey (called the satisfaction survey). Some participants (20 of 75) will also be invited to attend an online interview to share study-related experiences.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  • Gonorrhea
  • Chlamydia
  • Syphilis
  • HIV

Keywords

  • Specimen Collection
  • Audio/Video Conferencing
  • Motivational Interviewing
  • Sexual and Gender Minorities
  • Telemedicine
03

In context

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

523 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexually Transmitted Diseases; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is below the median of 449 across 425 interventional studies indexed under Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Browse Sexually Transmitted Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,506 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 169 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 133 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individual self-reports identifying as a man (regardless of sex assigned at birth) in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports residing in a US state or territory in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports being physically located in a US state or territory when completing study activities in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports being greater than or equal to (≥)18 years of age in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports being of legal age to provide consent for research participation in the US state or territory of residence in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports having been diagnosed with in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports having any kind of condomless sex (e.g., oral, anal) with ≥2 men in the past year in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports being willing to provide contact information (full name, email address, mobile phone number, and mailing address) in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports being able to participate in live AV conferencing sessions using an internet-connected device (e.g., computer, tablet, smartphone) in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports being willing to receive a box that contains kits to self-collect a urine sample, a throat swab, a rectal swab, and a blood sample for bacterial STI testing in the eligibility screener
  • Individual provides valid contact information (full name, email address, mobile phone number, and mailing address) in the contact information form
  • Individual completes the baseline survey in order to receive the intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individual self-reports not identifying as a man (regardless of sex assigned at birth) in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not residing in a US state or territory in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not being physically located in a US state or territory when completing study activities in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not being ≥18 years of age in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not being of legal age to provide consent for research participation in the US state or territory of residence in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not having been diagnosed with in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not having any kind of condomless sex (e.g., oral, anal) with ≥2 men in the past year in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not being willing to provide contact information (full name, email address, mobile phone number, and mailing address) in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not being able to participate in live AV conferencing sessions using an internet-connected device (e.g., computer, tablet, smartphone) in the eligibility screener
  • Individual self-reports not being willing to receive a box that contains kits to self-collect a urine sample, a throat swab, a rectal swab, and a blood sample for bacterial STI testing in the eligibility screener
  • Individual does not provide valid contact information (full name, email address, mobile phone number, and mailing address) in the contact information form
  • Individual does not complete the baseline survey in order to receive the intervention
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Telehealth intervention

    Participants will receive an MI-based telehealth intervention for bacterial STI screening.

    Behavioral: Motivational interviewing and specimen self-collection

Interventions

  • BehavioralMotivational interviewing and specimen self-collection

    Participants will be asked to attend a pre-test live AV conferencing session, collect and return a urine sample, a throat swab, a rectal swab, and a blood sample for bacterial STI testing, and attend a post-test live AV conferencing session.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants That Schedule a Pre-test Session

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  2. Number of Participants That Join the Pre-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  3. Number of Participants That Return Each Type of Specimen Within 6 Weeks of Box Delivery

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  4. Number of Participants That Provide Specimens of Adequate Quality for Lab Testing

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  5. Number of Participants That Schedule a Post-test Session

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  6. Number of Participants That Join the Post-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  7. Overall Intervention Satisfaction

    Participants' satisfaction with the pre-test session, urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, blood sample collection, and the post-test session will be assessed using six 5-point Likert items included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater overall intervention satisfaction.

    Time frame: Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  8. Interventionist Perceptions

    Participants' perceptions of the interventionist conducting the pre-test and the post-test sessions will be assessed using two 12-item Counselor Rating Form Short scales included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 24-168, with higher scores indicating more positive interventionist perceptions.

    Time frame: Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  9. Usability of the Pre-test and the Post-test Sessions

    Participants' usability of the pre-test and the post-test sessions will be assessed using two 4-item subscales from the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire on the quality of interactions with the interventionist during each session included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 8-56, with higher scores indicating greater usability of the pre-test and the post-test sessions.

    Time frame: Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  10. Willingness to Repeat the Intervention

    Participants' willingness to repeat the pre-test session, urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, blood sample collection, and the post-test session will be assessed using six 5-point Likert items included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater willingness to repeat the intervention.

    Time frame: Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  11. Likelihood of Recommending the Intervention to Friends or Sex Partners

    Participants' likelihood of recommending the pre-test session, urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, blood sample collection, and the post-test session to friends or sex partners will be assessed using six 5-point Likert items included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater likelihood of recommending the intervention to friends or sex partners.

    Time frame: Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in STI-related Knowledge

    Potential changes in participants' knowledge of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis will be assessed by comparing responses to the same set of 22 items included in the baseline survey and the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain separate total scores ranging from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater STI-related knowledge. A positive value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents an increase, and a negative value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents a decrease.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention score (from the baseline survey); Post-intervention score (from the satisfaction survey completed up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey)

  2. Likelihood of Testing for Bacterial STIs at Least Annually

    Participants' likelihood of testing for bacterial STIs at least annually will be assessed using a single 5-point Likert item included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will range from 1-5, with higher values indicating greater likelihood of testing for bacterial STIs at least annually.

    Time frame: Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  3. Change in Self-efficacy for Specimen Self-collection

    Potential changes in participants' self-efficacy for urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, and blood sample collection will be assessed by comparing responses to similar sets of four 5-point Likert items included in the baseline survey and the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain separate total scores ranging from 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy for specimen self-collection. A positive value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents an increase, and a negative value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents a decrease.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention score (from the baseline survey); Post-intervention score (from the satisfaction survey completed up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey)

  4. Number of Participants That Test Negative or Positive for Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Syphilis

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

  5. Number of Participants That Initiate Treatment Within 1 Week of Receiving a Positive Test Result

    Time frame: Up to 28 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey

07

Results

Posted Jul 1, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were recruited between April 2024 and October 2024 via advertising on mobile dating apps and social networking sites.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTelehealth Intervention
Started75
Completed70
Not completed5
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants That Schedule a Pre-test Session
Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Schedule a Pre-test Session
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Number of Participants That Schedule a Pre-test Session74
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Join the Pre-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time
Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Join the Pre-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Number of Participants That Join the Pre-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time69
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Return Each Type of Specimen Within 6 Weeks of Box Delivery
Time frame:
Up to 16 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Return Each Type of Specimen Within 6 Weeks of Box Delivery
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Urine sample57
Throat swab57
Rectal swab57
Blood sample54
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Provide Specimens of Adequate Quality for Lab Testing
Time frame:
Up to 16 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Provide Specimens of Adequate Quality for Lab Testing
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Urine sample57
Throat swab56
Rectal swab55
Blood sample47
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Schedule a Post-test Session
Time frame:
Up to 24 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Schedule a Post-test Session
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Number of Participants That Schedule a Post-test Session57
PrimaryNumber of Participants That Join the Post-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time
Time frame:
Up to 24 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Join the Post-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Number of Participants That Join the Post-test Session Within 30 Minutes of the Start Time55
PrimaryOverall Intervention Satisfaction

Participants' satisfaction with the pre-test session, urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, blood sample collection, and the post-test session will be assessed using six 5-point Likert items included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater overall intervention satisfaction.

Time frame:
Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Intervention Satisfaction
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Overall Intervention Satisfaction28.09 ± 2.42
PrimaryInterventionist Perceptions

Participants' perceptions of the interventionist conducting the pre-test and the post-test sessions will be assessed using two 12-item Counselor Rating Form Short scales included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 24-168, with higher scores indicating more positive interventionist perceptions.

Time frame:
Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Interventionist Perceptions
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Interventionist Perceptions163.92 ± 20.39
PrimaryUsability of the Pre-test and the Post-test Sessions

Participants' usability of the pre-test and the post-test sessions will be assessed using two 4-item subscales from the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire on the quality of interactions with the interventionist during each session included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 8-56, with higher scores indicating greater usability of the pre-test and the post-test sessions.

Time frame:
Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Usability of the Pre-test and the Post-test Sessions
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Usability of the Pre-test and the Post-test Sessions53.56 ± 7.14
PrimaryWillingness to Repeat the Intervention

Participants' willingness to repeat the pre-test session, urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, blood sample collection, and the post-test session will be assessed using six 5-point Likert items included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater willingness to repeat the intervention.

Time frame:
Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Willingness to Repeat the Intervention
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Willingness to Repeat the Intervention28.60 ± 2.32
PrimaryLikelihood of Recommending the Intervention to Friends or Sex Partners

Participants' likelihood of recommending the pre-test session, urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, blood sample collection, and the post-test session to friends or sex partners will be assessed using six 5-point Likert items included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 6-30, with higher scores indicating greater likelihood of recommending the intervention to friends or sex partners.

Time frame:
Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Likelihood of Recommending the Intervention to Friends or Sex Partners
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Likelihood of Recommending the Intervention to Friends or Sex Partners28.33 ± 2.30
SecondaryChange in STI-related Knowledge

Potential changes in participants' knowledge of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis will be assessed by comparing responses to the same set of 22 items included in the baseline survey and the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain separate total scores ranging from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater STI-related knowledge. A positive value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents an increase, and a negative value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents a decrease.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention score (from the baseline survey); Post-intervention score (from the satisfaction survey completed up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in STI-related Knowledge
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Pre-intervention score (from the baseline survey)16.34 ± 3.48
Post-intervention score (from the satisfaction survey)17.16 ± 3.41
Difference0.82 ± 2.66
Statistical analysis
  • Telehealth Intervention · Paired sample t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.01 (A priori threshold for statistical significance = 0.05) · Mean difference (net): 0.82Estimation parameter represents the average of the differences between the paired observations (post-intervention score minus pre-intervention score)
SecondaryLikelihood of Testing for Bacterial STIs at Least Annually

Participants' likelihood of testing for bacterial STIs at least annually will be assessed using a single 5-point Likert item included in the satisfaction survey. Response values will range from 1-5, with higher values indicating greater likelihood of testing for bacterial STIs at least annually.

Time frame:
Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Likelihood of Testing for Bacterial STIs at Least Annually
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Likelihood of Testing for Bacterial STIs at Least Annually4.91 ± 0.37
SecondaryChange in Self-efficacy for Specimen Self-collection

Potential changes in participants' self-efficacy for urine sample collection, throat swab collection, rectal swab collection, and blood sample collection will be assessed by comparing responses to similar sets of four 5-point Likert items included in the baseline survey and the satisfaction survey. Response values will be summed to obtain separate total scores ranging from 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy for specimen self-collection. A positive value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents an increase, and a negative value for the difference in scores (post-test minus pre-test) represents a decrease.

Time frame:
Pre-intervention score (from the baseline survey); Post-intervention score (from the satisfaction survey completed up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Self-efficacy for Specimen Self-collection
score on a scaleTelehealth Intervention
Pre-intervention score (from the baseline survey)18.83 ± 1.64
Post-intervention score (from the satisfaction survey)17.54 ± 2.69
Difference-1.29 ± 2.17
Statistical analysis
  • Telehealth Intervention · Paired sample t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.01 (A priori threshold for statistical significance = 0.05) · Mean difference (net): -1.29Estimation parameter represents the average of the differences between the paired observations (post-intervention score minus pre-intervention score)
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Test Negative or Positive for Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Syphilis
Time frame:
Up to 16 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Test Negative or Positive for Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Syphilis
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Gonorrhea PCR — Negative43
Gonorrhea PCR — Positive11
Gonorrhea PCR — Unable to Analyze Specimen3
Chlamydia PCR — Negative50
Chlamydia PCR — Positive4
Chlamydia PCR — Unable to Analyze Specimen3
Syphilis RPR — Negative29
Syphilis RPR — Positive18
Syphilis RPR — Unable to Analyze Specimen7
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Initiate Treatment Within 1 Week of Receiving a Positive Test Result
Time frame:
Up to 28 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Initiate Treatment Within 1 Week of Receiving a Positive Test Result
ParticipantsTelehealth Intervention
Number of Participants That Initiate Treatment Within 1 Week of Receiving a Positive Test Result5

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 32 weeks after participants complete the baseline survey. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Telehealth Intervention0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Telehealth Intervention
Mean44.91 ± 11.46
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Telehealth Intervention
Female0
Male75
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Telehealth Intervention
Hispanic or Latino23
Not Hispanic or Latino52
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Telehealth Intervention
American Indian or Alaska Native2
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American17
White43
More than one race5
Unknown or Not Reported7
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Telehealth Intervention
United States75
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sharma A, Boyd S, Bonar EE. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Motivational Interviewing-Based Telehealth Intervention for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening: Protocol for a Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 29;13:e64433. doi: 10.2196/64433. PubMed 39208425 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study results will be publicly reported through presentations at domestic and international conferences, and publications in peer-reviewed journals. Once analyses relating to the major aims of the proposed study have been completed and reported, the data will be deposited with the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) located at the University of Michigan. All confidentiality requirements will be followed as outlined on the website. ICPSR will make the data available to over 750 universities, government agencies, and other institutions, permitting other researchers to conduct secondary analyses. Data availability will be announced on the ICPSR website.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will be made available within 6 months after analyses relating to the major aims of the proposed study have been completed and reported, and will remain available for at least 5 years.

Access criteria: Creating an account on the ICPSR website.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.icpsr.umich.edu

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2024 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 10 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2025, 3 months after primary completion.

Of 172 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sexually Transmitted Diseases, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 47. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 182 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2023
First posted
Oct 25, 2023
StartActual
Apr 19, 2024
Primary completionActual
Mar 7, 2025
CompletionActual
Mar 7, 2025
Results first posted
Jul 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06100250
Responsible party
Akshay Sharma (Associate Professor, University of Michigan School of Nursing, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 25, 2023
Start date
Apr 19, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 7, 2025
Completion
Mar 7, 2025
Results posted
Jul 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2025

Study contacts

Akshay Sharma, PhD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion