ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07884656OPTIMISEUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Optimizing Antibiotic Prescription in STI Clinics Using Rapid POCT

An interventional study of cobas® Liat® CT/NG Point-of-Care Test in Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection and Sexually Transmitted Infections, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
404
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are increasing in France, with a significant proportion of asymptomatic infections. Standard management in sexual health clinics (called CeGIDD) relies on laboratory-based PCR tests with turnaround times of 24-72 hours, leading to frequent empirical antibiotic prescriptions, including broad-spectrum therapies. This practice contributes to antibiotic overuse and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.

The OPTIMISE study evaluates the clinical impact of implementing the cobas® Liat® CT/NG point-of-care test (POCT) in CeGIDD settings. The hypothesis is that immediate, on-site molecular testing enables:

Significant reduction in unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, particularly in asymptomatic exposed individuals, Targeted monotherapy in symptomatic patients, reducing broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure, Improved patient satisfaction and adherence through immediate diagnosis and treatment, Feasibility and acceptability of POCT integration in sexual health care pathways.

The study is a prospective, single-arm, bicentric interventional RIPH2 study including approximately 700 adults consulting in CeGIDD clinics of the Hospices Civils de Lyon, either for symptomatic STI suspicion or recent sexual exposure to CT/NG. Outcomes include the proportion of avoided antibiotic prescriptions, patient and provider satisfaction, and descriptive epidemiology of non-CT/NG pathogens.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection
  • Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections
  • Antimicrobial Resistance / Antibiotic Overuse

Keywords

  • Sexually transmitted infections
  • Point-of-care testing
  • Antibiotic stewardship
  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae
  • Chlamydia trachomatis
03

In context

Gonorrhea

159 studies on the registry are indexed under Gonorrhea; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 404 is close to the median of 380 across 120 interventional studies indexed under Gonorrhea.

Browse Gonorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,854 studies on the registry; 441 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults ≥18 years old, sexually active, consulting in one of the participating CeGIDD clinics (Hospices Civils de Lyon)
  • Presenting with either:
  • Symptoms suggestive of Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection (e.g., urethral discharge, dysuria, rectal pain, abnormal vaginal discharge, odynophagia) OR
  • Documented sexual exposure within the previous 14 days to a partner positive for CT and/or NG, without symptoms
  • Able to understand the study information and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Refusal to undergo the POCT cobas® Liat® CT/NG test
  • Asymptomatic patients presenting for routine screening only, without a documented exposure
  • Recent antibiotic treatment active against CT, NG, or Mycoplasma genitalium within 21 days
  • Technical or medical contraindication to sample collection (e.g., inability to perform urine or swab sampling)
  • Persons under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship), minors, or individuals deprived of liberty
  • Participation in another interventional study with an exclusion period overlapping the inclusion date
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
404 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    POCT cobas® Liat® CT/NG - Single Arm

    Participants will undergo point-of-care testing (POCT) using the cobas® Liat® CT/NG assay on routine urogenital samples collected during their CeGIDD consultation. For extragenital samples (rectal or pharyngeal), the test will be performed off-label and results will be confirmed by standard laboratory PCR. The POCT provides results in approximately 20 minutes and allows immediate clinical decision-making, with the goal of reducing unnecessary empirical antibiotic prescriptions.

    Diagnostic Test: cobas® Liat® CT/NG Point-of-Care Test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testcobas® Liat® CT/NG Point-of-Care Test

    Participants will undergo a point-of-care molecular test (cobas® Liat® CT/NG) performed on routine clinical samples (urine or vaginal swab). For extragenital samples (rectal or pharyngeal), the test will be used off-label, and the primary sample will also be sent for confirmatory PCR at the hospital laboratory. The POCT delivers results in approximately 20 minutes, enabling immediate clinical decision-making to reduce empirical antibiotic use. All participants will complete a short satisfaction questionnaire at the end of the consultation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of antibiotic prescriptions avoided using POCT cobas® Liat® CT/NG

    Percentage of participants for whom empirical or broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription was avoided due to immediate POCT results, compared with the theoretical standard-of-care prescribing strategy.

    Time frame: Day 0 (data collected at the inclusion consultation for each participant)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction score regarding POCT-based care

    Patient-reported satisfaction measured using a standardized self-administered questionnaire immediately after consultation, evaluating comfort, understanding, and perceived usefulness of rapid testing.

    Time frame: Day 0 (at the end of the consultation)

  2. Healthcare Staff Satisfaction Index of integrating POCT into CeGIDD care pathways

    staff satisfaction measured using a standardized self-administered French System Usability Scale (F-SUS) questionnaire

    Time frame: Throughout study duration (12-month inclusion period)

  3. Prevalence of non-target urogenital pathogens detected by standard culture

    Identification and proportion of other bacterial pathogens (e.g., Haemophilus spp.) isolated by routine culture in symptomatic participants, providing surveillance data complementary to POCT results.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Centre gratuit d'information de dépistage et de diagnostic des infections (CeGIDD), Hopital Edouard Herriot Groupement Hospitalier Centre
    Lyon, 69003, France
  • Centre gratuit d'information de dépistage et de diagnostic des infections (CeGIDD), Hopital de la Croix Rousse. Groupement Hospitalier Nord
    Lyon, 69004, France
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 0 months later.

Of 36 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Gonorrhea, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 0 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 39 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 8, 2026
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Oct 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07884656
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Matthieu GODINOT, Dr
Contact
matthieu.godinot@chu-lyon.fr
+33472071107
Florence ADER, Pr
Contact
Florence.ader@chu-lyon.fr
+33472071107

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion