CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06099223(Acupuncture)Updated Mar 26, 2025Results posted

Preoperative Acupuncture for Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty

An interventional study of Acupuncture needles in Knee Arthropathy, Hip Arthropathy and Anxiety, sponsored by Hartford Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-26.

Sponsored by Hartford Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2022, registered Oct 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Open-label, randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain for high-anxiety patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis is that preoperative acupuncture will reduce preoperative anxiety, reduce postoperative pain, reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, reduce opioid consumption, and improve patient satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Acupuncture has been extensively practiced and studied worldwide, particularly as a part of Eastern medicine, but it is a relatively uncommon therapy offered in Western medical institutions, such as those in the United States. Considering the commonly cited benefits of acupuncture, such as reduced anxiety and pain, hospitals throughout the United States have the opportunity to implement acupuncture as a cost-effective and safe technique for improving surgical outcomes.

Acupuncture administered in the preoperative period can be particularly effective for reducing preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, postoperative opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Consequently, preoperative acupuncture can improve patient satisfaction and decrease hospital costs. However, due to a lack of implementation and experience, further research is needed to establish the safety and efficacy of preoperative acupuncture in United States medical practices.

At the Bone-and-Joint Institute at Hartford Hospital, where this study is proposed, a quality study on total knee or hip arthroplasty patients found that 21% of its monthly patients were "high-anxiety" according to the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Thus, there is a significant population of patients who would benefit from a procedure to reduce preoperative anxiety at our facility.

This proposal is for a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain for high-anxiety patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis is that preoperative acupuncture will reduce preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain as well as reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and opioid consumption and improve patient satisfaction. The study population is to include adult patients undergoing lower extremity total joint arthroplasty, including hip and knee joints, at the Bone-and-Joint Institute at Hartford Hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Arthropathy
  • Hip Arthropathy
  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Acupuncture
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • Total hip arthroplasty
  • Anxiety
  • Pain
03

In context

Joint Diseases

712 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Diseases; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 470 interventional studies indexed under Joint Diseases.

Browse Joint Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Hartford Hospital is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (42%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female (age 52 to 85) or male (age 18-85) patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty or Total Hip Arthroplasty at the Bone-and Joint Institute at Hartford Hospital
  • Patients classified as high-anxiety based on having a score of >10 on the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS-A-T). The APAIS-A-T is a modified survey that reliably quantifies total preoperative anxiety using summed scores for anesthesia and surgery-related anxiety; a minimum score of 11 is the most accurate cutoff to identify patients with anxiety

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give consent
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 8.0%)
  • Infection at any of the acupuncture points
  • Known allergy to metals
  • Abnormal laboratory blood work values (INR>1.5, if available; platelet count \<70,000, if available)
  • Patients with active ongoing coagulopathy based on lab data (INR >1.5) and/or on current anticoagulant use which increases bleeding risk.
  • Non-English speaking
  • Revision TKA or THA
  • Women of reproductive age or under the age of 52 years old, as acupuncture is not recommended during pregnancy. They were excluded due to the potential conflict between our institute's standard timing for pregnancy tests on the day of surgery and the scheduled preoperative acupuncture session for the study, to avoid unwanted delays in the operating room schedule.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acupuncture

    Preoperative acupuncture

    Device: Acupuncture needles

  • No intervention
    Control

    No acupuncture

Interventions

  • DeviceAcupuncture needles

    The acupuncture intervention includes a combination of auricular and body acupuncture. The auricular points used are Shen men, Zero point, Tranquilizer point, and Master cerebral. The body points used are the wrist PC6.

    Also known as: DBC™ Detox-5 Acupuncture Needles (SKU: DTX.20X13) and ure needles o 1) SEIRIN J-Type Acupuncture Needles (SKU: SJ.18X30)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perioperative Anxiety

    Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative anxiety in the acupuncture group using VAS (Visual Analog Scale) which is a 10 centimeters line in length, from 0-100, with 0 at the left extreme being "not at all anxious" and 100 at the right extreme being "very anxious". Participants put a cross on the line to indicate how they felt at the time point used. A higher score means worse as it means high anxiety.

    Time frame: Prior to acupuncture and 30 minutes after acupuncture

  2. Postoperative Pain in the First 3 Postoperative Hours

    Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean of the total pain in the first 3 postoperative hours between groups.

    Time frame: Total mean pain in the first 3 postoperative hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction With Acupuncture Procedure

    Patients' satisfaction with acupuncture intervention was assessed in the acupuncture group only using the satisfaction scale of (1-5), where 1 is Extremely satisfied, 2 is Very satisfied, 3 is Somewhat satisfied, 4 is Not very satisfied, and 5 is Not at all satisfied. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients who were satisfied (given a score of 1 or 2 out of 5) with their acupuncture treatment. This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

    Time frame: Within 1 week after hospital discharge

  2. Preoperative Pain

    Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative pain in the acupuncture group using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare pre-acupuncture pain to post-acupuncture pain score in the acupuncture group only.

    Time frame: Prior to acupuncture and 30 minutes after acupuncture

  3. Opioid Consumption

    Postoperative opioid consumption to be converted into morphine milliequivalents (MMEs) and compared between the two groups for up to 24 hours post surgery.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 24 hours post surgery

  4. Midazolam Use as Anxiolytic Medications

    The dose of Midazolam as an anxiolytic medication that was given at any time throughout hospitalization up to 24 postoperative hours.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 24 hours post surgery

  5. Patient Satisfaction Scale With Overall Care

    Patients' satisfaction with overall care management was compared using the patient satisfaction scale of (1-10), where 1 is extremely unsatisfied and 10 is extremely satisfied with overall care. Each frequency represents the percentage of patients in each group who have been either satisfied or extremely satisfied (given a score of 9 or 10 out of 10). This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

    Time frame: Within 1 week after hospital discharge

  6. Occurrence of Nausea and Vomiting at First Postoperative Hour

    Compare the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting using the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale which consists of two questions, with a possible response total score of 0-6. Response score totals of 0-2 require no intervention. Response score totals of 3-4 may necessitate antiemetic medication. Response score totals of 5-6 are considered clinically important nausea requiring medication intervention, as this would constitute patients with excessive vomiting. This scale was used to report the occurrence of nausea (yes/no), with "yes" defined as any number above 0 in the scale, while "no" defined as 0.

    Time frame: At 1 postoperative hour

  7. Antiemetic Medications

    The frequency of any antiemetic medication given at any time throughout hospitalization up to 24 postoperative hours

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 24 hours post surgery

  8. Hospital Length of Stay

    Using the hospital admission and discharge dates \& times; this will be compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: From the date and time of admission to the date and time of discharge, assessed as 24-48 hours

  9. Postoperative Pain Upon Arrival to the PACU

    Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean pain scores between groups upon arrival to the PACU.

    Time frame: Postoperative pain at time of PACU arrival

  10. Postoperative Pain at 1 Postoperative Hour

    Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean of pain scores at the first postoperative hour between groups.

    Time frame: At the first postoperative hour

  11. Postoperative Pain After 3 Postoperative Hours

    Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean pain scores after three postoperative hours between groups.

    Time frame: After three postoperative hours

  12. Number of Participants That Received Midazolam Dose >2mg

    The number of participants who received a dose of midazolam exceeding 2 mg indicated a high level of perioperative anxiety that necessitated pharmacological intervention. The decision to use a dose higher than 2 mg was based on the standard practice of administering 2 mg of midazolam for preoperative regional nerve blocks; any dosage surpassing this amount was specifically intended for anxiety management.

    Time frame: During hospitalization up to 24 postoperative hours

  13. Patient's Satisfaction With Pain Management

    Patients' satisfaction with their postoperative pain management was compared between groups using the satisfaction scale of (1-10), where 1 is extremely unsatisfied and 10 is extremely satisfied. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients in each group who were satisfied (given a score of 9 or 10 out of 10)This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

    Time frame: Within 1 week after hospital discharge

  14. Patient's Satisfaction With Anxiety Management

    Patients' satisfaction with their perioperative anxiety management was compared between groups using the satisfaction scale of (1-10), where 1 is extremely unsatisfied and 10 is extremely satisfied. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients in each group who were satisfied (given a score of 9 or 10 out of 10). This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

    Time frame: Within 1 week after hospital discharge

  15. Acupuncture Patients Who Were Likely to Consider Acupuncture for Future Surgeries

    Patients with acupuncture intervention were assessed for how likely to consider acupuncture for future surgeries using a scale of (1-4), where 1 is Very likely, 2 is Likely, 3 is Maybe, and 4 is Never. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients who were more likely (given a score of 1 or 2 out of 4) to receive acupuncture treatment in a future surgery. This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

    Time frame: Within 1 week after hospital discharge

  16. Occurrence of Nausea and Vomiting After 3 Postoperative Hours

    Compare the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting using the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale which consists of two questions, with a possible response total score of 0-6. Response score totals of 0-2 require no intervention. Response score totals of 3-4 may necessitate antiemetic medication. Response score totals of 5-6 are considered clinically important nausea requiring medication intervention, as this would constitute patients with excessive vomiting. This scale was used to report the occurrence of nausea (yes/no), with "yes" defined as any number above 0 in the scale, while "no" defined as 0.

    Time frame: After 3 postoperative hours

  17. Postoperative Pain in the First 3 Postoperative Hours (Group X Time)

    Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". To compare mean pain scores between groups, considering all 3 individual time points (at arrival to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, 1st Postoperative hour, and 3rd Postoperative hour)

    Time frame: Mean pain scores at arrival to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, 1st Postoperative hour, and 3rd Postoperative hour

07

Results

Posted Mar 26, 2025
Limitations and caveats
The limitation of this study is the open-label aspect could be associated with placebo effects.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited based on their high anxiety score (according to the validated Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS-A-T\>10) who are scheduled for elective total knee or hip arthroplasty surgery at Bone and Joint Center from March 2022 to April 2023. The first patient was enrolled in March 21, 2022 and the last patient was enrolled in April 3, 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAcupunctureControl
Started3030
Completed3029
Not completed01
Withdrew: Preoperative surveys missed01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPerioperative Anxiety

Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative anxiety in the acupuncture group using VAS (Visual Analog Scale) which is a 10 centimeters line in length, from 0-100, with 0 at the left extreme being "not at all anxious" and 100 at the right extreme being "very anxious". Participants put a cross on the line to indicate how they felt at the time point used. A higher score means worse as it means high anxiety.

Time frame:
Prior to acupuncture and 30 minutes after acupuncture
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Perioperative Anxiety
score on a scalePreoperative Pre-acupuncturePreoperative Post-acupuncture
Perioperative Anxiety60.73 ± 21.2828.90 ± 21.54
Statistical analysis
  • Preoperative Pre-acupuncture vs Preoperative Post-acupuncture · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001
PrimaryPostoperative Pain in the First 3 Postoperative Hours

Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean of the total pain in the first 3 postoperative hours between groups.

Time frame:
Total mean pain in the first 3 postoperative hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain in the First 3 Postoperative Hours
score on a scaleAcupunctureControl
Postoperative Pain in the First 3 Postoperative Hours1.93 ± 1.632.79 ± 2.83
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.029
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction With Acupuncture Procedure

Patients' satisfaction with acupuncture intervention was assessed in the acupuncture group only using the satisfaction scale of (1-5), where 1 is Extremely satisfied, 2 is Very satisfied, 3 is Somewhat satisfied, 4 is Not very satisfied, and 5 is Not at all satisfied. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients who were satisfied (given a score of 1 or 2 out of 5) with their acupuncture treatment. This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

Time frame:
Within 1 week after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Satisfaction With Acupuncture Procedure
ParticipantsAcupuncture Group
Patient Satisfaction With Acupuncture Procedure22
SecondaryPreoperative Pain

Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative pain in the acupuncture group using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare pre-acupuncture pain to post-acupuncture pain score in the acupuncture group only.

Time frame:
Prior to acupuncture and 30 minutes after acupuncture
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Preoperative Pain
score on a scalePreoperative Pre-acupuncturePreoperative Post-acupuncture
Preoperative Pain4.97 ± 3.012.90 ± 6.62
Statistical analysis
  • Preoperative Pre-acupuncture vs Preoperative Post-acupuncture · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.001
SecondaryOpioid Consumption

Postoperative opioid consumption to be converted into morphine milliequivalents (MMEs) and compared between the two groups for up to 24 hours post surgery.

Time frame:
During hospitalization, up to 24 hours post surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Morphine MilliEquivalent
Opioid Consumption
Morphine MilliEquivalentAcupunctureControl
Opioid Consumption45.51 ± 30.0252.46 ± 30.92
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.38
SecondaryMidazolam Use as Anxiolytic Medications

The dose of Midazolam as an anxiolytic medication that was given at any time throughout hospitalization up to 24 postoperative hours.

Time frame:
During hospitalization, up to 24 hours post surgery
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams
Midazolam Use as Anxiolytic Medications
milligramsAcupunctureControl
Midazolam Use as Anxiolytic Medications3.96 ± 1.734.21 ± 1.80
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.61
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction Scale With Overall Care

Patients' satisfaction with overall care management was compared using the patient satisfaction scale of (1-10), where 1 is extremely unsatisfied and 10 is extremely satisfied with overall care. Each frequency represents the percentage of patients in each group who have been either satisfied or extremely satisfied (given a score of 9 or 10 out of 10). This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

Time frame:
Within 1 week after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Satisfaction Scale With Overall Care
ParticipantsAcupunctureControl
Patient Satisfaction Scale With Overall Care2124
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.37
SecondaryOccurrence of Nausea and Vomiting at First Postoperative Hour

Compare the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting using the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale which consists of two questions, with a possible response total score of 0-6. Response score totals of 0-2 require no intervention. Response score totals of 3-4 may necessitate antiemetic medication. Response score totals of 5-6 are considered clinically important nausea requiring medication intervention, as this would constitute patients with excessive vomiting. This scale was used to report the occurrence of nausea (yes/no), with "yes" defined as any number above 0 in the scale, while "no" defined as 0.

Time frame:
At 1 postoperative hour
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurrence of Nausea and Vomiting at First Postoperative Hour
ParticipantsAcupunctureControl
Yes04
No3026
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Fisher Exact · p = 0.11
SecondaryAntiemetic Medications

The frequency of any antiemetic medication given at any time throughout hospitalization up to 24 postoperative hours

Time frame:
During hospitalization, up to 24 hours post surgery
Reported as:
Median · number of doses
Antiemetic Medications
number of dosesAcupunctureControl
Antiemetic Medications0.0 (0.0 to 1.0)0.0 (0.0 to 1.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.37
SecondaryHospital Length of Stay

Using the hospital admission and discharge dates \& times; this will be compared between the two groups.

Time frame:
From the date and time of admission to the date and time of discharge, assessed as 24-48 hours
Reported as:
Median · hours
Hospital Length of Stay
hoursAcupunctureControl
Hospital Length of Stay29.5 (27.8 to 31.3)29.0 (27.0 to 30.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.38
SecondaryPostoperative Pain Upon Arrival to the PACU

Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean pain scores between groups upon arrival to the PACU.

Time frame:
Postoperative pain at time of PACU arrival
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain Upon Arrival to the PACU
score on a scaleAcupunctureControl
Postoperative Pain Upon Arrival to the PACU0.47 ± 1.361.38 ± 2.83
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.087
SecondaryPostoperative Pain at 1 Postoperative Hour

Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean of pain scores at the first postoperative hour between groups.

Time frame:
At the first postoperative hour
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain at 1 Postoperative Hour
score on a scaleAcupunctureControl
Postoperative Pain at 1 Postoperative Hour1.67 ± 2.222.45 ± 3.15
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.147
SecondaryPostoperative Pain After 3 Postoperative Hours

Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". Using the mean pain score to compare the mean pain scores after three postoperative hours between groups.

Time frame:
After three postoperative hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain After 3 Postoperative Hours
score on a scaleAcupunctureControl
Postoperative Pain After 3 Postoperative Hours3.67 ± 3.034.55 ± 3.29
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.098
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Received Midazolam Dose >2mg

The number of participants who received a dose of midazolam exceeding 2 mg indicated a high level of perioperative anxiety that necessitated pharmacological intervention. The decision to use a dose higher than 2 mg was based on the standard practice of administering 2 mg of midazolam for preoperative regional nerve blocks; any dosage surpassing this amount was specifically intended for anxiety management.

Time frame:
During hospitalization up to 24 postoperative hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Received Midazolam Dose >2mg
ParticipantsAcupunctureControl
Number of Participants That Received Midazolam Dose >2mg1922
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.41
SecondaryPatient's Satisfaction With Pain Management

Patients' satisfaction with their postoperative pain management was compared between groups using the satisfaction scale of (1-10), where 1 is extremely unsatisfied and 10 is extremely satisfied. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients in each group who were satisfied (given a score of 9 or 10 out of 10)This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

Time frame:
Within 1 week after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient's Satisfaction With Pain Management
ParticipantsAcupunctureControl
Patient's Satisfaction With Pain Management1920
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.79
SecondaryPatient's Satisfaction With Anxiety Management

Patients' satisfaction with their perioperative anxiety management was compared between groups using the satisfaction scale of (1-10), where 1 is extremely unsatisfied and 10 is extremely satisfied. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients in each group who were satisfied (given a score of 9 or 10 out of 10). This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

Time frame:
Within 1 week after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient's Satisfaction With Anxiety Management
ParticipantsAcupunctureControl
Patient's Satisfaction With Anxiety Management2119
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.58
SecondaryAcupuncture Patients Who Were Likely to Consider Acupuncture for Future Surgeries

Patients with acupuncture intervention were assessed for how likely to consider acupuncture for future surgeries using a scale of (1-4), where 1 is Very likely, 2 is Likely, 3 is Maybe, and 4 is Never. Each frequency represented the percentage of patients who were more likely (given a score of 1 or 2 out of 4) to receive acupuncture treatment in a future surgery. This assessment was done within a week after discharge, via a phone call.

Time frame:
Within 1 week after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acupuncture Patients Who Were Likely to Consider Acupuncture for Future Surgeries
ParticipantsAcupuncture Group
Acupuncture Patients Who Were Likely to Consider Acupuncture for Future Surgeries25
SecondaryOccurrence of Nausea and Vomiting After 3 Postoperative Hours

Compare the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting using the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale which consists of two questions, with a possible response total score of 0-6. Response score totals of 0-2 require no intervention. Response score totals of 3-4 may necessitate antiemetic medication. Response score totals of 5-6 are considered clinically important nausea requiring medication intervention, as this would constitute patients with excessive vomiting. This scale was used to report the occurrence of nausea (yes/no), with "yes" defined as any number above 0 in the scale, while "no" defined as 0.

Time frame:
After 3 postoperative hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurrence of Nausea and Vomiting After 3 Postoperative Hours
ParticipantsAcupunctureControl
Yes55
No2525
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 1.00
SecondaryPostoperative Pain in the First 3 Postoperative Hours (Group X Time)

Determine the effect of preoperative acupuncture on postoperative pain in both groups, using the self-reported NPS (Numeric Pain Scale) which is a scale of 0-10 where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain". To compare mean pain scores between groups, considering all 3 individual time points (at arrival to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, 1st Postoperative hour, and 3rd Postoperative hour)

Time frame:
Mean pain scores at arrival to Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, 1st Postoperative hour, and 3rd Postoperative hour
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Postoperative Pain in the First 3 Postoperative Hours (Group X Time)
score on a scaleAcupunctureControl
at arrival to PACU0.47 ± 1.361.38 ± 2.83
1hr post-operation1.67 ± 2.222.45 ± 3.15
3hr post-operation3.67 ± 3.034.55 ± 3.29
Statistical analysis
  • Acupuncture vs Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.919

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected up to 30 postoperative days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Acupuncture Group0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)13/30 (43.3%)
Control Group0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAcupuncture GroupControl Group
Local bleedingSurgical and medical procedures9/300/30
Residual painSurgical and medical procedures3/300/30
DiscomfortSurgical and medical procedures1/300/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)AcupunctureControlTotal
Mean69.60 ± 9.7167.63 ± 7.7168.62 ± 8.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AcupunctureControlTotal
Female222547
Male8513
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AcupunctureControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino415
Not Hispanic or Latino262955
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AcupunctureControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American044
White262450
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported426
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m2)AcupunctureControlTotal
Mean32.16 ± 5.3130.44 ± 5.5131.30 ± 5.44
Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)(units on a scale)AcupunctureControlTotal
Median1.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.0 (0.0 to 2.0)
History of mental illness
History of mental illness(Participants)AcupunctureControlTotal
History of mental illnesses151227
Anxiety131023
Bipolar disorder011
Depression8614
History of acupuncture
History of acupuncture(Participants)AcupunctureControlTotal
Yes12719
No182341

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Bone and Joint Institute- Hartford Hospital
    Hartford, Connecticut 06106, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Chernyak GV, Sessler DI. Perioperative acupuncture and related techniques. Anesthesiology. 2005 May;102(5):1031-49; quiz 1077-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200505000-00024. PubMed 15851892 ↗
  • Lu DP, Lu GP. An Historical Review and Perspective on the Impact of Acupuncture on U.S. Medicine and Society. Med Acupunct. 2013 Oct;25(5):311-316. doi: 10.1089/acu.2012.0921. PubMed 24761180 ↗
  • Crespin DJ, Griffin KH, Johnson JR, Miller C, Finch MD, Rivard RL, Anseth S, Dusek JA. Acupuncture provides short-term pain relief for patients in a total joint replacement program. Pain Med. 2015 Jun;16(6):1195-203. doi: 10.1111/pme.12685. Epub 2015 Jan 13. PubMed 25586769 ↗
  • Kotani N, Hashimoto H, Sato Y, Sessler DI, Yoshioka H, Kitayama M, Yasuda T, Matsuki A. Preoperative intradermal acupuncture reduces postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, analgesic requirement, and sympathoadrenal responses. Anesthesiology. 2001 Aug;95(2):349-56. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200108000-00015. PubMed 11506105 ↗
  • Lao L, Bergman S, Hamilton GR, Langenberg P, Berman B. Evaluation of acupuncture for pain control after oral surgery: a placebo-controlled trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 May;125(5):567-72. doi: 10.1001/archotol.125.5.567. PubMed 10326816 ↗
  • Mejuto-Vazquez MJ, Salom-Moreno J, Ortega-Santiago R, Truyols-Dominguez S, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Short-term changes in neck pain, widespread pressure pain sensitivity, and cervical range of motion after the application of trigger point dry needling in patients with acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;44(4):252-60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5108. Epub 2014 Feb 25. PubMed 24568260 ↗
  • Mikashima Y, Takagi T, Tomatsu T, Horikoshi M, Ikari K, Momohara S. Efficacy of acupuncture during post-acute phase of rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. J Tradit Chin Med. 2012 Dec;32(4):545-8. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(13)60068-0. PubMed 23427386 ↗
  • Tsang RC, Tsang PL, Ko CY, Kong BC, Lee WY, Yip HT. Effects of acupuncture and sham acupuncture in addition to physiotherapy in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty--a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2007 Aug;21(8):719-28. doi: 10.1177/0269215507077362. PubMed 17846072 ↗
  • Usichenko TI, Dinse M, Hermsen M, Witstruck T, Pavlovic D, Lehmann C. Auricular acupuncture for pain relief after total hip arthroplasty - a randomized controlled study. Pain. 2005 Apr;114(3):320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.08.021. PubMed 15777857 ↗
  • Usichenko TI, Lehmann Ch, Ernst E. Auricular acupuncture for postoperative pain control: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Anaesthesia. 2008 Dec;63(12):1343-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05632.x. PubMed 19032304 ↗
  • Zhang Y, Zhang L, Lu M. [Acupuncture combined with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty and functional rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2018 Mar 12;38(3):251-5. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2018.03.006. Chinese. PubMed 29701041 ↗
  • Lewis GN, Rice DA, McNair PJ, Kluger M. Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):551-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu441. Epub 2014 Dec 26. PubMed 25542191 ↗
  • Bae H, Bae H, Min BI, Cho S. Efficacy of acupuncture in reducing preoperative anxiety: a meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:850367. doi: 10.1155/2014/850367. Epub 2014 Sep 2. PubMed 25254059 ↗
  • Usichenko TI, Dinse M, Lysenyuk VP, Wendt M, Pavlovic D, Lehmann C. Auricular acupuncture reduces intraoperative fentanyl requirement during hip arthroplasty--a randomized double-blinded study. Acupunct Electrother Res. 2006;31(3-4):213-21. doi: 10.3727/036012906815844265. PubMed 17608061 ↗
  • Wetzel B, Pavlovic D, Kuse R, Gibb A, Merk H, Lehmann C, Wendt M, Usichenko TI. The effect of auricular acupuncture on fentanyl requirement during hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2011 Mar-Apr;27(3):262-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181fd516c. PubMed 21346689 ↗
  • Li M, Xing X, Yao L, Li X, He W, Wang M, Li H, Wang X, Xun Y, Yan P, Lu Z, Zhou B, Yang X, Yang K. Acupuncture for treatment of anxiety, an overview of systematic reviews. Complement Ther Med. 2019 Apr;43:247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 16. PubMed 30935538 ↗
  • Ali A, Lindstrand A, Sundberg M, Flivik G. Preoperative Anxiety and Depression Correlate With Dissatisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study of 186 Patients, With 4-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):767-770. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Sep 3. PubMed 27692782 ↗
  • Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ploutz-Snyder R, Boisvert CB. Total knee replacement outcome and coexisting physical and emotional illness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Nov;440:157-61. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000185447.43622.93. PubMed 16239800 ↗
  • Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM; Arthritis Cost and Outcome Project Group. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Feb;9(2):137-46. doi: 10.1053/joca.2000.0369. PubMed 11330253 ↗
  • Blackburn J, Qureshi A, Amirfeyz R, Bannister G. Does preoperative anxiety and depression predict satisfaction after total knee replacement? Knee. 2012 Oct;19(5):522-4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Aug 16. PubMed 21846588 ↗
  • Brander V, Gondek S, Martin E, Stulberg SD. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:21-6. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c032. PubMed 17603386 ↗
  • Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):798-806. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0963-y. Epub 2009 Jul 8. PubMed 19585177 ↗
  • Rolfson O, Dahlberg LE, Nilsson JA, Malchau H, Garellick G. Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Feb;91(2):157-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.20765. PubMed 19190046 ↗
  • Stamenkovic DM, Rancic NK, Latas MB, Neskovic V, Rondovic GM, Wu JD, Cattano D. Preoperative anxiety and implications on postoperative recovery: what can we do to change our history. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Nov;84(11):1307-1317. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12520-X. Epub 2018 Apr 5. PubMed 29624026 ↗
  • Xu J, Twiggs J, Parker D, Negus J. The Association Between Anxiety, Depression, and Locus of Control With Patient Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):720-724. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.022. Epub 2019 Oct 18. PubMed 31708293 ↗
  • Yang MMH, Hartley RL, Leung AA, Ronksley PE, Jette N, Casha S, Riva-Cambrin J. Preoperative predictors of poor acute postoperative pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 1;9(4):e025091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025091. PubMed 30940757 ↗
  • Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, McLawhorn AS, Cross MB, Cornell CN, Padgett DE. Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review. HSS J. 2018 Jul;14(2):192-201. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8. Epub 2018 Jun 5. PubMed 29983663 ↗
  • Acar HV. Acupuncture and related techniques during perioperative period: A literature review. Complement Ther Med. 2016 Dec;29:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 13. PubMed 27912957 ↗
  • Alattas SA, Smith T, Bhatti M, Wilson-Nunn D, Donell S. Greater pre-operative anxiety, pain and poorer function predict a worse outcome of a total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3403-3410. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4314-8. Epub 2016 Oct 12. PubMed 27734110 ↗
  • Eberhart L, Aust H, Schuster M, Sturm T, Gehling M, Euteneuer F, Rusch D. Preoperative anxiety in adults - a cross-sectional study on specific fears and risk factors. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02552-w. PubMed 32228525 ↗
  • Song B, Yang Y, Teng X, Li Y, Bai W, Zhu J. Use of pre-operative anxiety score to determine the precise dose of butorphanol for intra-operative sedation under regional anesthesia: A double-blinded randomized trial. Exp Ther Med. 2019 Nov;18(5):3885-3892. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8040. Epub 2019 Sep 23. PubMed 31611935 ↗
  • Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):445-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00002. PubMed 8623940 ↗
  • Kuzminskaite V, Kaklauskaite J, Petkeviciute J. Incidence and features of preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Acta Med Litu. 2019;26(1):93-100. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v26i1.3961. PubMed 31281222 ↗
  • Stuyt EB, Voyles CA. The National Acupuncture Detoxification Association protocol, auricular acupuncture to support patients with substance abuse and behavioral health disorders: current perspectives. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2016 Dec 7;7:169-180. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S99161. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27994492 ↗
  • Furuse N, Shinbara H, Uehara A, Sugawara M, Yamazaki T, Hosaka M, Yamashita H. A Multicenter Prospective Survey of Adverse Events Associated with Acupuncture and Moxibustion in Japan. Med Acupunct. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):155-162. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1230. PubMed 28736592 ↗
  • Zhang J, Shang H, Gao X, Ernst E. Acupuncture-related adverse events: a systematic review of the Chinese literature. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):915-921C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.076737. Epub 2010 Aug 27. PubMed 21124716 ↗
  • Xu S, Wang L, Cooper E, Zhang M, Manheimer E, Berman B, Shen X, Lao L. Adverse events of acupuncture: a systematic review of case reports. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:581203. doi: 10.1155/2013/581203. Epub 2013 Mar 20. PubMed 23573135 ↗
  • Chen CC, Yang CC, Hu CC, Shih HN, Chang YH, Hsieh PH. Acupuncture for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000138. PubMed 25158837 ↗
  • Karst M, Winterhalter M, Munte S, Francki B, Hondronikos A, Eckardt A, Hoy L, Buhck H, Bernateck M, Fink M. Auricular acupuncture for dental anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Feb;104(2):295-300. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000242531.12722.fd. PubMed 17242083 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Jun 2, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06099223
Lead sponsor
Hartford Hospital
Responsible party
Pranjali P Kainkaryam, MD (Principal Investigator, Hartford Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 25, 2023
Start date
Mar 21, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2023
Completion
May 3, 2023
Results posted
Mar 26, 2025
Last update
Mar 26, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion