CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05972018EXODUSUpdated Sep 3, 2025

Liposomal Bupivacaine/Bupivacaine in Rectus Sheath Blocks Versus Ropivacaine in Rectus Sheath Blocks And Catheters

A Phase 4 interventional study of Liposomal bupivacaine and Ropivacaine in Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Abdominal Aortic Occlusion and Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease, sponsored by Hartford Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-03.

Sponsored by Hartford Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this pilot study is to compare single shot rectus sheath blocks of liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture to bilateral rectus sheath catheters infused with ropivacaine (standard of care at our facility) in patients undergoing vascular surgery with an open mid-abdominal laparotomy incision. This study will assess the safety and feasibility of this approach compared to standard of care.

Participants will receive either a single dose of liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture intraoperatively at the end of surgery through bilateral rectus sheath blocks (LB/B group) or the standard of care ropivacaine intraoperatively at the end of surgery through bilateral rectus sheath blocks with the insertion of bilateral RS catheter for continuous ropivacaine infusion plus repeated daily boluses (Catheter group; standard care). They will be assessed for differences in the rate of postoperative complications, resources consumed with each intervention, as well as postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, hospital and PACU length of stay, patient's satisfaction, and quality of recovery, and hospital length of stay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
  • Abdominal Aortic Occlusion
  • Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
  • Aortic Diseases

Keywords

  • Open abdominal aortic repair surgery
  • Rectus Sheath Block
  • Rectus Sheath Block and Catheter
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine
  • Exparel
  • Ropivacaine continuous infusion
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged 18-80 years
  2. Patients scheduled for elective vascular surgery with an open mid-abdominal laparotomy incision, including abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery (AAA), mesenteric artery bypass surgery, and aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aortic occlusive disease.
  3. Patients who are able to speak and read English
  4. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status score I-IV
  5. Patients who are admitted to the hospital and are incidentally discovered to require any of the aforementioned surgeries, being asymptomatic for vascular issues, and having their surgery scheduled no sooner than three days after admission, are also considered eligible.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency vascular reconstruction surgery., patients admitted to the hospital due to symptoms directly associated with their vascular condition, such as severe abdominal pain or a ruptured aneurysm causing bleeding, will be excluded.
  2. Patients with contraindications to RSB, including but not limited to anatomical abnormality, previous surgical intervention that limits or prevents receiving bilateral RSBs, or infection at the injection site.
  3. History of allergy to local anesthetics.
  4. Weight \< 40 kg, as a combination of 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% with 30 mL of LB is greater than the maximal dose allowed, given concern for local anesthetic toxicity.
  5. Patients who take long-acting opioid medication, or on continuous opioid use > 50 MME per day for at least 30 days within 90 days prior to surgery.
  6. Patients who have chronic pain syndrome with a recent preoperative consultation with the chronic pain service. Also, patients with distant metastatic cancers (e.g. bone, lung, brain) confirmed by CT scan.
  7. Patients with current substance abuse, or history of substance abuse within 3 months, this includes any illicit drugs (not including marijuana) or excessive alcohol consumption as defined as 4 or more drinks per day or 8 or more drinks per week for women and 5 or more drinks per day or 15 or more drinks per week for men.
  8. Lack or refusal to sign the study consent.
  9. Patients who are unable to receive postoperative ropivacaine intermittent boluses within the first 5 days after surgery due to issues with their catheter (such as dislodgement, migration, or kinking) will be excluded from the final analysis.
  10. Patients with a plan to undergo abdominal wall surgery, in addition to the vascular surgery that involves a mid-abdomen incision, such as abdominal wall reconstruction surgery. The additional abdominal wall incisions or interventions might have an impact on the study's pain, opioid, and LOS outcomes.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RSB LB/B

    Rectus Sheath Block: Total 60mL: (20mL 1.3% LB + 30mL 0.25% bupivacaine + 10mL NS) (30mL per side)

    Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine · Drug: Bupivacain

  • Active comparator
    RSB/RSC Ropivacaine

    Rectus Sheath Block: Total 60mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (3 vials) (30mL per side) \+ Rectus Sheath Catheter intermittent hourly boluses of 0.2% ropivacaine 10mL/hr per side

    Drug: Ropivacaine

Interventions

  • DrugLiposomal bupivacaine

    Rectus Sheath Block: Total 60mL: (20mL 1.3% Liposomal bupivacaine + 30mL 0.25% bupivacaine + 10mL NS).(30mL per side)

    Also known as: Exparel

  • DrugRopivacaine

    Total 60mLof 0.2% ropivacaine: (60mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (3 vials)

    Also known as: Naropin

  • DrugBupivacain

    Rectus Sheath Block: Total 60mL: (20mL 1.3% LB + 30mL 0.25% bupivacaine + 10mL NS. 30mL per side)

    Also known as: Bupivacaine HCL

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The cost of care during hospitalization.

    To compare the resources consumed by each intervention from many different perspectives (e.g. anesthesia staff cost per time spent to perform the study intervention and the successive daily evaluations, facility cost per length of stay, block and catheter medication cost, block and catheter supply cost.)

    Time frame: From the time of the blocks until the date of discharge, assessed as 2 weeks

  2. The occurrence of block-related and catheter-related complications, or local anesthetics-related adverse events up to hospital discharge or up to one week.

    Determine whether patients receiving ropivacaine in rectus sheath catheter versus Bupivacaine/Liposomal Bupivacaine in rectus sheath block have any difference in the occurrence of any related complications or adverse events up to hospital discharge or up to one week.

    Time frame: From the date of the block until the date of discharge, assessed up to 1 week

  3. Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Compare the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting using the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale which consists of two questions, with a possible response total score of 0-6. Response score totals of 0-2 require no intervention. Response score totals of 3-4 may necessitate antiemetic medication. Response score totals of 5-6 are considered clinically important nausea requiring medication intervention, as this would constitute patients with excessive vomiting. This scale will be used daily through the duration of in-hospital care (1-7 days)

    Time frame: Up to 96 postoperative hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain scores.

    The maximum, average, minimum, and current pain scores for the past 24 hours, on a scale from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain reported by participants, daily and up to the end of the 96 postoperative hours and at 2 weeks after discharge using the validated tool; Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form.

    Time frame: Intensive Care Unit time duration and up to 96 postoperative hours

  2. The time to extubation

    The time to extubation: from anesthesia end time to the time of removing the endotracheal tube in the Intensive Care Unit.

    Time frame: From anesthesia end date and time to the date and time of extubation, assessed up to 96 postoperative hours

  3. Intraop, postop, and total opioid consumption

    The intraoperative, postoperative, and total opioid consumption during hospitalization using morphine milliequivalent doses (MME) between the groups.

    Time frame: During hospitalization up to 7 post-operative days

  4. Hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS)

    Determine whether patients receiving ropivacaine in RSC versus B/LB in RSB have any the difference in the duration of ICU stay, in addition to the duration of hospitalization if \> or \< 7 days.

    Time frame: From the date and time of admission to the date and time of discharge, up to 2 weeks.

  5. Hospital readmission and ED visits

    Incidences of hospital readmission and emergency visits within 2 weeks after discharge

    Time frame: up to 2 weeks after discharge

  6. Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire

    Determine any differences between the two groups in the quality of recovery using the "Quality of Recovery Questionnaire-40 questionnaire" which consists of 40 questions categorized into 5 dimensions; emotional state (9 questions), physical comfort (12 questions), psychological support (7 questions), physical independence (5 questions), and pain (7 questions). All questions scored from 1-5; positive items are scored from 1 (worst) to 5 (best); whereas scores are reversed for negative items 1 (best) to 5 (worst).

    Time frame: On postop day 4, at 2 weeks after discharge

  7. Patient satisfaction with pain management using CSAT

    Patient satisfaction with pain management after surgery using the CSAT score: 5 very satisfied, 4 satisfied, 3 neutral, 2 unsatisfied, 1 very unsatisfied. this assessment on the day of discharge (estimated 168 postoperative hours) and at 2 weeks after discharge, via a phone call.

    Time frame: At discharge and at 2 weeks after the discharge, up to 96 postoperative hours

  8. The time to the first rescue opioid.

    The time from the last intraoperative opioid given to the time of the first rescue opioid given after surgery is measured in hours.

    Time frame: Up to 96 postoperative hour

  9. The time to first postop antiemetics

    The time from the last intraoperative antiemetic medication given to the time of the first rescue antiemetic medication given after surgery is measured in hours.

    Time frame: Up to 96 postoperative hour

  10. Opioid use and refills within 2 weeks after hospital discharge

    Opioid use and refills within 2 weeks after hospital discharge (yes or no)

    Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after discharge

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Burger JW, van 't Riet M, Jeekel J. Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Scand J Surg. 2002;91(4):315-21. doi: 10.1177/145749690209100401. PubMed 12558078 ↗
  • Kenna P, Melekamayhu A. Bilateral rectus sheath block as postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing midline laparotomy in Minilk II Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [master's thesis]. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University; 2018.doi.org/10.4103%2F0259-1162.179315
  • Weissman C. Pulmonary function after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jun;88(6):1272-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199906000-00014. No abstract available. PubMed 10357329 ↗
  • Agostini P, Calvert R, Subramanian H, Naidu B. Is incentive spirometry effective following thoracic surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;7(2):297-300. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.171025. Epub 2007 Nov 26. PubMed 18039692 ↗
  • Simpson JC, Bao X, Agarwala A. Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Mar;32(2):121-128. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676477. Epub 2019 Feb 28. PubMed 30833861 ↗
  • Purdy M, Kinnunen M, Kokki M, Anttila M, Eskelinen M, Hautajarvi H, Lehtonen M, Kokki H. A prospective, randomized, open label, controlled study investigating the efficiency and safety of 3 different methods of rectus sheath block analgesia following midline laparotomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(7):e9968. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009968. PubMed 29443788 ↗
  • Wallstrom A, Frisman GH. Facilitating early recovery of bowel motility after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jan;23(1-2):24-44. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12258. Epub 2013 Jun 20. PubMed 23786567 ↗
  • Alvarez MP, Foley KE, Zebley DM, Fassler SA. Comprehensive enhanced recovery pathway significantly reduces postoperative length of stay and opioid usage in elective laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2506-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4006-8. Epub 2014 Dec 6. PubMed 25480622 ↗
  • Atkinson CJ, Ramaswamy K, Stoneham MD. Regional anesthesia for vascular surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Jun;17(2):92-104. doi: 10.1177/1089253212472985. Epub 2013 Jan 17. PubMed 23327951 ↗
  • Hong S, Kim H, Park J. Analgesic effectiveness of rectus sheath block during open gastrectomy: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(15):e15159. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015159. PubMed 30985694 ↗
  • Hausken J, Rydenfelt K, Horneland R, Ullensvang K, Kjosen G, Tonnessen TI, Haugaa H. First Experience With Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Pancreas Transplant: A Retrospective Observational Study. Transplant Proc. 2019 Mar;51(2):479-484. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.065. Epub 2019 Jan 28. PubMed 30879572 ↗
  • Patzkowski MS, Stevens G. Multimodal analgesia in abdominal sepsis: a case report of liposome bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided rectus sheath blocks after unexpected open hemi-colectomy. Mil Med. 2015 Jun;180(6):e728-31. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00512. PubMed 26032393 ↗
  • Urits I, Ostling PS, Novitch MB, Burns JC, Charipova K, Gress KL, Kaye RJ, Eng MR, Cornett EM, Kaye AD. Truncal regional nerve blocks in clinical anesthesia practice. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Dec;33(4):559-571. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Jul 19. PubMed 31791571 ↗
  • Cho S, Kim YJ, Jeong K, Moon HS. Ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block reduces early postoperative pain after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a randomized study. J Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):189-197. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2457-0. Epub 2018 Feb 8. PubMed 29423579 ↗
  • Jeong HW, Kim CS, Choi KT, Jeong SM, Kim DH, Lee JH. Preoperative versus Postoperative Rectus Sheath Block for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 11;8(7):1018. doi: 10.3390/jcm8071018. PubMed 31336767 ↗
  • Quek KH, Phua DS. Bilateral rectus sheath blocks as the single anaesthetic technique for an open infraumbilical hernia repair. Singapore Med J. 2014 Mar;55(3):e39-41. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014042. PubMed 24664392 ↗
  • Duggan EW, Vadlamudi R, Spektor B, Sharifpour M. Abdominal Surgery With Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block: A Case Report. A A Pract. 2019 Oct 1;13(7):278-280. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001055. PubMed 31361662 ↗
  • Sholin I.Y., Avetisyan V.A., Ezugbaia B.S., Zhikharev V.A., Koryachkin V.A. Assessment of rectus sheath block effectiveness after major abdominal surgery. Regionarnaya аnesteziya i lechenie ostroy boli (Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management, Russian journal). 2018; 12 (1): 37-40 . (In Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/1993-6508-2018-12-1- 37- 40.
  • Rucklidge M, Beattie E. Rectus sheath catheter analgesia for patients undergoing laparotomy. BJA Educ. 2018 Jun;18(6):166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 16. No abstract available. PubMed 33456828 ↗
  • Cleary C, Li YH, Jain A, Kainkaryam P, Shah P, Divinagracia T, Gallagher J 3rd, Aitcheson E, Ayach M, Finkel K, Glotzer O, Gifford E. Rectus Sheath Block Improves Patient Recovery Following Open Aortic Surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Nov;97:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 30. PubMed 38054410 ↗
  • Malchow R, Jaeger L, Lam H. Rectus sheath catheters for continuous analgesia after laparotomy--without postoperative opioid use. Pain Med. 2011 Jul;12(7):1124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01166.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21. PubMed 21692972 ↗
  • Dutton TJ, McGrath JS, Daugherty MO. Use of rectus sheath catheters for pain relief in patients undergoing major pelvic urological surgery. BJU Int. 2014 Feb;113(2):246-53. doi: 10.1111/bju.12316. Epub 2013 Aug 13. PubMed 23937574 ↗
  • Godden AR, Marshall MJ, Grice AS, Daniels IR. Ultrasonography guided rectus sheath catheters versus epidural analgesia for open colorectal cancer surgery in a single centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Nov;95(8):591-4. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.8.591. PubMed 24165343 ↗
  • Finkel KJ, Takata ET, Maffeo-Mitchell CL, Neal JB, Nankin MD, Braffett BH, Perillo LM, Gammerman S, Stuart WT, Walker A. Manufacturer financial conflicts of interest are associated with favourable outcomes in randomised controlled trials of liposomal bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;129(4):e90-e93. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.06.032. Epub 2022 Aug 16. No abstract available. PubMed 35981918 ↗
  • Ilfeld BM, Viscusi ER, Hadzic A, Minkowitz HS, Morren MD, Lookabaugh J, Joshi GP. Safety and Side Effect Profile of Liposome Bupivacaine (Exparel) in Peripheral Nerve Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):572-82. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000283. PubMed 26204387 ↗
  • Malik O, Kaye AD, Kaye A, Belani K, Urman RD. Emerging roles of liposomal bupivacaine in anesthesia practice. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):151-156. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_375_15. PubMed 28781438 ↗
  • Kuthiala G, Chaudhary G. Ropivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and clinical use. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;55(2):104-10. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.79875. PubMed 21712863 ↗
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366. PubMed 10740540 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05972018
Lead sponsor
Hartford Hospital
Responsible party
Kevin Finkel (Director of Clinical Research - HH Department of Anesthesiology, Hartford Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 2, 2023
Start date
Oct 18, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2025

Study contacts

Aseel Walker, MD
Contact
aseel.walker@hhchealth.org
(860) 972-1778
Kevin Finkel, MD
principal investigator · Hartford Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion