ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06091956Updated Jun 8, 2025Results posted

A Study of Deucravacitinib to Treat LPP and FFA

A Phase 2 interventional study of Deucravacitinib in Lichen Planopilaris, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-08.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn more about the use of Deucravacitinib in the treatment of Lichen Planopilaris.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lichen Planopilaris

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lichen Planus

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Lichen Planus; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 30 across 55 interventional studies indexed under Lichen Planus.

Browse Lichen Planus studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,269 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be able to understand and comply with the requirements of the study and communicate with the investigator. Subjects must give written, signed, and dated before any study related activity is performed. When appropriate, a legal representative will sign the informed consent according to local laws and regulation.
  • Subjects must have proven LPP/FFA and active disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On excluded therapies, not on a stable dose of a therapy, or incompletely washed out for a therapy.
  • Known or other adverse reaction to Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165).
  • Variants of LPP/FFA deemed by the investigators to be inappropriate for Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165).
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women (pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test).
  • Women of [ or not of child-bearing potential is defined by 1 year of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea or surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks ago. Oophorectomy alone must be confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment to be considered not of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of which includes:

Total abstinence (Periodic abstinence and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception); Female sterilization (bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. Oophorectomy alone requires follow up hormone level assessment for fertility; Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). The vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject; Barrier methods of contraception: condom or occlusive cap; Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms or hormonal contraception that have complete efficacy (failure \< 1%). (The dose of the contraceptive should be stable for 3 months).

  • Active inflammatory diseases of the scalp and forms of hair loss other than LPP/FFA that might confound the evaluation of the benefit of Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165).
  • Tattooing of the scalp that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with accurate assessment of clinical response to Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165).
  • Underlying condition (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal conditions) which, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly immunocompromises the subject and/or places the subject at unacceptable risk for receiving an immunomodulatory therapy.
  • Moderate-to-severe renal impairment including patients with estimated (eGFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2.
  • Active systemic infections during the 2 weeks prior to randomization (common cold viruses excluded) or any infection that reoccurs on a regular basis.
  • Current severe progressive or uncontrolled disease which the investigator renders the subject unsuitable for the trial or puts the subject at increased risk.
  • Have had any major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or will require major surgery during the study that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose an unacceptable risk to the patient.
  • Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: VTE (DVT/pulmonary embolism [PE]), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or Stage III/IV heart failure.
  • Have a history of recurrent (≥ 2) VTE (DVT/PE).
  • Have a history of lymphoproliferative disease; have signs or symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly; have active primary or recurrent malignant disease; or have been in remission from for \< 5 years prior to randomization.
  • Have had symptomatic herpes zoster infection within 12 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Have a history of disseminated/complicated herpes zoster (for example, ophthalmic zoster or CNS involvement).
  • or AST > 2 x (ULN); alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 2 x ULN; total ≥ 1.5 x ULN; \< 10 g/dL (100.0 g/L); total white blood cell count \< 3000 cells/μL (\< 3.00 x 10\^3/μL or \< 3.00 billion/L); neutropenia ( [ANC] \< 1500 cells/µL) (\< 1.50 x 10\^3/lµL or \< 1.50 billion/L); lymphopenia (lymphocyte count \< 1000 cells/μL) (\< 1.00 x 10\^3/μL or \< 1.00 billion/L); thrombocytopenia ( \< 100,000 cells/μL) (\< 100 x 10\^3/μL or \< 100 billion/L)
  • Have a positive test for virus (HBV) defined as: positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg); or positive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and positive for hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA). Note: Patients who are HBcAb-positive and HBV DNA-negative may be enrolled in the study but will require additional HBV DNA monitoring during the study.
  • Have virus (HCV) infection (hepatitis C antibody-positive and HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA]-positive): Note: Patients who have documented anti-HCV treatment for a past HCV infection AND are HCV RNA-negative may be enrolled in the study.
  • Have evidence of infection and/or positive HIV antibodies.
  • Have had household contact with a person with active TB and did not receive appropriate and documented prophylaxis for TB.
  • Have evidence of active TB or latent TB
  • Have evidence of active TB, defined in this study as the following: positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test (≥ 5 mm induration between approximately 2 and 3 days after application, regardless of vaccination history), medical history, clinical features, and abnormal chest x-ray at screening; QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or T-SPOT®.TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines) may be used instead of the PPD test. Patients are excluded from the study if the test is not negative and there is clinical evidence of active TB; Exception: patients with a history of active TB who have documented evidence of appropriate treatment, have no history of re-exposure since their treatment was completed, have no clinical features of active TB, and have a screening chest x-ray with no evidence of active TB may be enrolled if other entry criteria met. Such patients would not be required to undergo the protocol-specific TB testing for PPD, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test, or T-SPOT®.TB test but must have a chest x-ray at screening (i.e., chest imaging performed within the past 6 months will not be accepted).
  • Have evidence of untreated/inadequately or inappropriately treated latent TB, defined in this study as the following: positive PPD test, no clinical features consistent with active TB, and a chest x-ray with no evidence of active TB at screening; or if the PPD test is positive and the patient has no medical history or chest x-ray findings consistent with active TB, the patient may have a QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or T-SPOT®.TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines). If the test results are not negative, the patient will be considered to have latent TB (for purposes of this study); or QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or T- SPOT®.TB test (as available and if compliant with local TB guidelines) may be used instead of the PPD test. If the test results are positive, the patient will be considered to have latent TB. If the test is not negative, the test may be repeated once within approximately 2 weeks of the initial value. If the repeat test results are again not negative, the patient will be considered to have latent TB (for purposes of this study).
  • Have been exposed to a within 12 weeks of randomization or are expected to need/receive a live vaccine during the course of the study (with the exception of herpes zoster vaccination).
  • Have donated more than a single unit of blood within 4 weeks prior to screening or intend to donate blood during the course of the study.
  • Have a history of intravenous drug abuse, other illicit drug abuse, or chronic alcohol abuse within the 2 years prior to screening or are concurrently using, or expected to use during the study, illicit drugs (including marijuana).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris

    Subjects diagnosed with Lichen Planopilaris (LP) will receive Deucravacitinib for 24 weeks.

    Drug: Deucravacitinib

Interventions

  • 6 milligram (mg) orally administrated, twice daily

    Also known as: BMS-986165

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete and Partial Response to Deucravacitinib Measured by Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) Score

    Number of subjects to have complete or partial response to Deucravacitinib treatment as measured by Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) score: complete response = LPPAI reduction greater than 85% from baseline score and partial response = LPPAI reduction between 25-85% from baseline score. LPPAI scores range from 0 (no disease) to 10 (most severe) with higher scores indicating worsening disease.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response to Deucravacitinib Measured by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score

    Number of subjects to have an overall response to treatment (Deucravacitinib) as assessed by the physician using PGA. PGA scores range from 0 to 6 with scores between 0-3 indicating a response to treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

  2. Change in the Dermatology-LQI Score

    Measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire that asks participants to measure their Lichen Planopilaris (LLP) or Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia (FFA) has affected their life over the last month. 10-item questionnaire using a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Maximum score is 30 and minimum score is 0, with higher scores indicating worsening quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

  3. Change in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Subjects are asked on average and at its worst to rate their itch level over the past day by placing a vertical mark on the line with one end indicating no itch and the other end indicating worst imaginable itch. That point will be measured from the "No itch" end, and the number of centimeters (cm) will be reported as the pain score. VAS score interpretation: VAS 0 cm = No itch; VAS \<3 cm = Mild itch; VAS ≥3 cm \<7 cm = Moderate itch; VAS ≥7 cm \<9 cm = Severe itch, VAS ≥9 cm \<10 cm = Very severe itch.

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

  4. Change in Pruritus Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)

    Subjects are asked on average and at its worst to rate their itch in the last 24 hours using a scale of 0= none, 1-mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe. Scores range from 0-3, with higher scores indicating worsening itch.

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

  5. Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Itch

    Itch is measured using numerical rating scale 0-10; 0= no itch, 1-4 = mild itch, 4-7 = moderate itch, 7-9 = severe itch, 10= very severe itch

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

  6. Change in Skindex-16

    Measured by the Skindex-16 scoring system focused on itch and its impact upon quality of life. 16-item questionnaire using a scale of 0=never bothered to 6=always bothered, total score 0 to 96 with higher score indicated worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 8, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Started11
Completed9
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Complicating disease1

Outcome measures

PrimaryComplete and Partial Response to Deucravacitinib Measured by Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) Score

Number of subjects to have complete or partial response to Deucravacitinib treatment as measured by Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) score: complete response = LPPAI reduction greater than 85% from baseline score and partial response = LPPAI reduction between 25-85% from baseline score. LPPAI scores range from 0 (no disease) to 10 (most severe) with higher scores indicating worsening disease.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Complete and Partial Response to Deucravacitinib Measured by Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) Score
ParticipantsDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Complete and Partial Response to Deucravacitinib Measured by Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) Score9
SecondaryResponse to Deucravacitinib Measured by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score

Number of subjects to have an overall response to treatment (Deucravacitinib) as assessed by the physician using PGA. PGA scores range from 0 to 6 with scores between 0-3 indicating a response to treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline, 24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Response to Deucravacitinib Measured by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score
ParticipantsDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Response to Deucravacitinib Measured by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score8
Statistical analysis
  • Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris · McNemar · p = 0.008
SecondaryChange in the Dermatology-LQI Score

Measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire that asks participants to measure their Lichen Planopilaris (LLP) or Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia (FFA) has affected their life over the last month. 10-item questionnaire using a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Maximum score is 30 and minimum score is 0, with higher scores indicating worsening quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Dermatology-LQI Score
score on a scaleDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Change in the Dermatology-LQI Score0.0 ± 4.2
Statistical analysis
  • Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.629
SecondaryChange in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Subjects are asked on average and at its worst to rate their itch level over the past day by placing a vertical mark on the line with one end indicating no itch and the other end indicating worst imaginable itch. That point will be measured from the "No itch" end, and the number of centimeters (cm) will be reported as the pain score. VAS score interpretation: VAS 0 cm = No itch; VAS \<3 cm = Mild itch; VAS ≥3 cm \<7 cm = Moderate itch; VAS ≥7 cm \<9 cm = Severe itch, VAS ≥9 cm \<10 cm = Very severe itch.

Time frame:
Baseline, 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
units on a scaleDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Itch Level on Average-1.6 ± 3.0
Itch Level at its Worst-2.7 ± 3.8
SecondaryChange in Pruritus Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)

Subjects are asked on average and at its worst to rate their itch in the last 24 hours using a scale of 0= none, 1-mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe. Scores range from 0-3, with higher scores indicating worsening itch.

Time frame:
Baseline, 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pruritus Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
score on a scaleDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Itch level on average-0.9 ± 0.7
Itch level at its worst-0.9 ± 0.6
SecondaryChange in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Itch

Itch is measured using numerical rating scale 0-10; 0= no itch, 1-4 = mild itch, 4-7 = moderate itch, 7-9 = severe itch, 10= very severe itch

Time frame:
Baseline, 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Itch
score on a scaleDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Itch-1.9 ± 3.3
Statistical analysis
  • Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.175
SecondaryChange in Skindex-16

Measured by the Skindex-16 scoring system focused on itch and its impact upon quality of life. 16-item questionnaire using a scale of 0=never bothered to 6=always bothered, total score 0 to 96 with higher score indicated worse quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Skindex-16
score on a scaleDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Change in Skindex-16-21.0 ± 22.1
Statistical analysis
  • Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.014

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the first administration of study treatment through 30 days following the last administration of study treatment, approximately 28 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris0/11 (0%)1/11 (9.1%)11/11 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
DiverticulitisGastrointestinal disorders1/11
Colon and Rectal SurgeryGastrointestinal disorders1/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventDeucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/11
Canker Sores on TongueGastrointestinal disorders2/11
Hand DermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/11
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/11
Rash/AcneInfections and infestations1/11
Virus (cold/flu)General disorders1/11
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/11
Bakers CystMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/11
Canker Sore and Mouth TendernessGastrointestinal disorders1/11
Upper Respiratory InfectionInfections and infestations1/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Mean61.6 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Female8
Male3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino11
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White11
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Deucravacitinib Treatment for Lichen Planopilaris
United States11
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Florida
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2023 to primary completion in May 2024, 6 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2025, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 16 phase 2 interventional studies under Lichen Planus, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 28. This study's 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 16, 2023
First posted
Oct 23, 2023
StartActual
Nov 7, 2023
Primary completionActual
May 21, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 24, 2024
Results first posted
Jun 8, 2025
Last update
Jun 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06091956
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Aaron R. Mangold (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2023
Start date
Nov 7, 2023
Primary completion
May 21, 2024
Completion
Dec 24, 2024
Results posted
Jun 8, 2025
Last update
Jun 8, 2025

Study contacts

Aaron Mangold, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Deucravacitinib

Start the discussion