ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06089863RAPPUpdated Jan 17, 2024

Rehabilitation Program on Genetic and Degenerative Ataxia

An interventional study of PAMPERO program in Ataxia, Degenerative Disease and Genetic Disease, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-17.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cerebellar ataxia is a pathology linked to the lesion of the cerebellum or the afferent and/or efferent cerebellar pathways. The aetiology can be an acquired cerebral lesion, following a chemical poisoning or a genetic degenerative lesion (for example : Friedreich's ataxia, spinocerebellar ataxias, etc.). As reported by the latest estimate available, genetic degenerative cerebellar ataxias affect approximately 6,000 patients in France (Orpha.net). Symptoms suffered by ataxic patients are : problems and gait disorders along with difficulties in coordination resulting in ataxia, uncoordinated movements.

These symptoms cause a decrease in the quality of life on patients with spinocerebellar ataxia. The symptoms improvement linked to the cerebellar syndrome is based on rehabilitation that can be supplemented by use of technical aids. Current scientific knowledge confirms that intensive rehabilitation by physiotherapy and occupational therapy in patients with degenerative ataxias improves cerebellar symptoms. Nevertheless, the choice rehabilitation technique stay at the appreciation of the therapist.

From the observation, the investigators have designed an intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, called PAMPERO, with partner patients member of two genetic degenerative ataxia patient organisations. This 5-weeks program has been used in clinic during 3 years on 28 patients. It appears to be the only one in France.

The preliminary results show a positive effect on ataxia symptom. Nevertheless, the duration of the benefice over time and the effect on the quality of life stay unknown.

However, the quality of life is mainly affected by the participation restriction due to the risk of falling. The most frequent complaint from partner patient is the diminution of the social interaction resulting of the incapacity to move without risk.

The present protocol aimed at evaluating the Rehabilitation Program in collaboration with partner patient on the symptom intensity, activity and quality of life on genetic and degenerative ataxia.

This PAMPERO program's effect will be assessed by comparing the difference of Intensity of symptom measured by to Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) at inclusion and 3 months after the end of rehabilitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ataxia
  • Degenerative Disease
  • Genetic Disease

Keywords

  • Genetic ataxia
  • Degenerative ataxia
  • Rehabilitation
  • Cerebellar ataxia
03

In context

Ataxia

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Ataxia; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is above the median of 30 across 100 interventional studies indexed under Ataxia.

Browse Ataxia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years
  • Patients with genetic and degenerative cerebellar ataxia
  • Diagnostic of cerebellar ataxia confirmed by anatomic MRI
  • Affiliated to a social insurgence regime or similar
  • Patients who have given their free, informed and express consent
  • Walking patients (who can walk unsupervised on flat ground with the help of proper technique : categories greater than 4 on the New Functional Ambulation Classification scale)

Non inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have already benefited from a hospitalization of more than 3 weeks for rehabilitation during the last 12 months
  • Patients participating simultaneously in another research whose objective would be the evaluation of a therapy, medicinal or not, likely to improve neurological or functional recovery
  • Pregnants, parturient or breastfeeding
  • Patients deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
  • Psychiatric care patients
  • Patients admitted to Patients admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research for purposes other than research
  • Major patients protected by the Law
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PAMPERO program group

    This program is an intensive multidisciplinary program rehabilitation including Physical, Occupational, Speech, Psychomotor therapy and Adapted Physical Activity.

    Other: PAMPERO program

  • No intervention
    Usual Care intervention group

    Usual Rehabilitation of the patient after the inclusion. 0 to 2 physical therapy sessions and 0 to 2 Speech therapy sessions each week usually constitute this program. This rehabilitation highly depends on the patients usual preferences. Some patients have no rehabilitation in the daily care while some have more.

Interventions

  • OtherPAMPERO program

    This program is an intensive multidisciplinary program rehabilitation including Physical, Occupational, Speech, Psychomotor therapy and Adapted Physical Activity. The duration of this program is 5 weeks and each week is divided as follow : * 5 hours of physical therapy : individual session with the objective to improve the dynamic balance and coordination on the aim to gain confidence of moving, gripping capacity and interaction with object * 5 hours of Adapted Physical activity : group session to promote pairing with muscle building priority * 1 hour of Speech therapy : group session to educate and promote prevention strategy about dysphagia rick * 2 hours of Occupational therapy : group session to bring adaptive solution of autonomy lost with material propose, home organisation or gesture * 2 hours of Hydrotherapy : group session activity performed in water to assist rehabilitation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

    Intensity of symptom measured by to Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Scores are from 0 to 42. An higher score is associated with a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Inclusion ; 3 months after the end of rehabilitation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

    Intensity of symptom measured by to Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Scores are from 0 to 42. An higher score is associated with a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Inclusion ; Immediately or 1 week after the end of rehabilitation ; 6 months after the end of rehabilitation

  2. Score of the Mini-BESTest scale

    Measure of the balance evaluate by Mini-BESTest scale (Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test). Scores are from 0 to 28. An higher score is associated with a better outcome.

    Time frame: Inclusion ; Immediately or 1 week after the end of rehabilitation ; 3 months after the end of rehabilitation ; 6 months after the end of rehabilitation

  3. Eyes open postural surface

    Measure of the balance evaluate by the Eyes open postural surface

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  4. Displacement length of the center of mass as a function of time eyes open

    Measure of the balance evaluated by the displacement length of the center of mass as a function of time eyes open

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  5. Scale of Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (Short FES-I)

    Fear of fall evaluated by to Scale of Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (Short FES-I). Scores are from 7 to 28. An higher score is associated with a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Inclusion ; Immediately or 1 week after the end of rehabilitation ; 3 months after the end of rehabilitation ; 6 months after the end of rehabilitation

  6. Number of weekly steps

    Number of steps during one week continuously measured by actimeter ActiGraph wGT3X-BT with EUROCOC (European Certificate of Conformity)

    Time frame: Inclusion ; Immediately or 1 week after the end of rehabilitation ; 3 months after the end of rehabilitation ; 6 months after the end of rehabilitation

  7. Time of weekly sedentary activity

    Time in minutes/day of sedentary activity during one week continuously measured by actimeter ActiGraph wGT3X-BT with EUROCOC

    Time frame: Inclusion ; Immediately or 1 week after the end of rehabilitation ; 3 months after the end of rehabilitation ; 6 months after the end of rehabilitation

  8. Light, moderate and vigorous weekly activity

    Light, moderate and vigorous activity during one week continuously measured by actimeter ActiGraph wGT3X-BT with EUROCOC

    Time frame: Inclusion ; Immediately or 1 week after the end of rehabilitation ; 3 months after the end of rehabilitation ; 6 months after the end of rehabilitation

  9. Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    Measure of the quality of life evaluate by Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Scores are from 0 to 100. An higher score is associated with a better outcome.

    Time frame: Inclusion ; Immediately or 1 week after the end of rehabilitation ; 3 months after the end of rehabilitation ; 6 months after the end of rehabilitation

  10. Number of falls during the study

    Risk of falling evaluated by the number of falls during and outside the rehabilitation normalized on 4 weeks

    Time frame: 4 weeks ; up to 3 months ; up to 6 months

  11. Number of patients who completed the entire PAMPERO program

    Number of patients who completed the entire PAMPERO program (5 weeks)

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  12. Number of patients who stopped PAMPERO program

    Number of patients who stopped PAMPERO program

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  13. Time to occurrence of PAMPERO program stops

    Time to occurrence of PAMPERO program stops

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  14. Reasons of PAMPERO program stops

    Reasons of PAMPERO program stops

    Time frame: 5 weeks

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Service de Rééducation Fonctionnelle (S.S.R.) Val Rosay
    Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d'Or, 69370, France
  • Service de Rééducation Fonctionnelle (S.S.R.) de l'Hôpital Henry Gabrielle Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Saint-Genis-Laval, 69230, France
  • Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation (M.P.R) de l'Hôpital Bellevue
    Saint-Étienne, 42100, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2024; primary completion for Jul 2027, 41 months later.

Of 53 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ataxia, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 41 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 55 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 33.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 9, 2023
First posted
Oct 18, 2023
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2027
Last update
Jan 17, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06089863
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 17, 2024

Study contacts

Lucas PIGNON
Contact
lucas.pignon@chu-lyon.fr
04 78 86 50 58 ext. +33
Christelle MAROLHO
Contact
christelle.marolho@chu-lyon.fr
04 72 11 57 68 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion