ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06081439Updated Sep 10, 2026

Validating Immunological Markers Associated With Mental Fatigue in Graves' Disease

An observational study in Graves Disease and Mental Fatigue, sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 72 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2019; still recruiting 7 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
430
Ages
18 Years to 72 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mental fatigue occurs in many diseases and the reasons are mostly unknown. The investigators hypothesize that remaining mental fatigue after restored euthyroidism in Graves' disease is an autoimmune complication. This is a confirmatory study of the biomarkers from ImmunoGraves WP1 in which immunological markers with possible association with mental fatigue in Graves' disease are explored.

In ImmunoGraves WP2, 310 patients with Graves' disease are assessed for symptoms of mental fatigue, quality of life, anxiety and depression, self-evaluated stress, coping strategies, personality traits, eye symptoms and background variables. Participants are examined in hyperthyroidism at inclusion, within three weeks from diagnosis, and in euthyroidism after 15 months. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (in a subsample of participants) is collected at both visits and will be evaluated for the immunological markers identified in WP1 as well as for thyroid hormones, thyroid autoantibodies and biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage. Significant predictors for mental fatigue will be identified by logistic regression.

To assess functional changes in the brain, magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls at inclusion and after 15 to 18 months. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation during attention testing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Graves Disease
  • Mental Fatigue
03

In context

Graves Disease

162 studies on the registry are indexed under Graves Disease; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 430 is above the median of 120 across 56 observational studies indexed under Graves Disease.

Browse Graves Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Vastra Gotaland Region is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 109 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 72 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

310 patients with Graves' are recruited from Endocrine Clinic at Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Östra Hospital. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria are consecutively asked to participate. A subgroup of maximum 120 patients who are willing to give cerebrospinal fluid are recruited to the sub-study with magnetoencephalography. Controls to this sub-study are recruited from records from the tax authority.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recently diagnosed Graves' disease
  • Positive thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)-receptor antibodies (TRAb)
  • Thyroid hormones above the upper reference limit
  • Inclusion within three weeks after start of antithyroid drugs

Controls: Matched for gender and age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person unable to follow protocol as with psychosis, dementia or not able to answer questionnaires in Swedish.
  • Recidive of Graves' disease
  • Pregnancy

Controls: -Thyroid disease

  • Neurological disease
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
430 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • patients

    310

  • controls

    120

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identifying the immunological markers in blood at inclusion that significantly increases the risk for mental fatigue at follow up.

    Immunological markers in blood identified in the on-going study ImmunoGraves Wp1 are analysed between participants who at follow up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Levels of the previously identified immunological markers in serum at inclusion compared between participants who at follow up have high scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who at follow up have low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale

    Immunological markers identified in the on-going study ImmunoGraves Wp1 are compared between participants who at follow up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  2. Levels of the previously identified immunological markers in cerebrospinal fluid at inclusion compared between patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Score at follow-up

    Immunological markers identified in the on-going study ImmunoGraves Wp1 are compared between participants who at follow up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Cerebrospinal fluid drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion

  3. Levels of the previously identified immunological markers in serum at follow up compared between patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up and to healthy controls

    Immunological markers identified in the on-going study ImmunoGraves Wp1 are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  4. Levels of the previously identified immunological markers in cerebrospinal fluid at follow up compared between patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up

    Immunological markers identified in the on-going study ImmunoGraves Wp1 are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Cerebrospinal fluid drawn and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  5. Levels of thyroid hormones at inclusion compared in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up

    Levels of thyroid hormones, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  6. Levels of thyroid hormones at inclusion compared in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at inclusion

    Levels of thyroid hormones, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who at inclusion have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion.

  7. Levels of thyroid antibodies at inclusion compared in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up

    Levels of thyroid autoantibodies, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  8. Levels of thyroid antibodies at inclusion compared in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at inclusion

    Levels of thyroid autoantibodies, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale at inclusion. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion.

  9. Levels of thyroid antibodies at follow-up compared in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up.

    Levels of thyroid autoantibodies, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood drawn and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  10. Levels of biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage at inclusion in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up

    Levels of biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood and, in a subgroup, cerebrospinal fluid drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  11. Levels of biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage at inclusion in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at inclusion

    Levels of biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who at inclusion have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood and, in a subgroup, cerebrospinal fluid, drawn at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion.

  12. Levels of biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage at follow-up in patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up

    Levels of biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage, analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, compared between participants who at follow up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Blood and, in a subgroup, cerebrospinal fluid, drawn at follow-up after 15 months. Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  13. Prevalence of endocrine ophthalmopathy at inclusion compared between patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up

    Endocrine ophthalmopathy defined as Clinical Activity Score of 3/7 or more, compared between participants who at follow up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue. Higher scores at the Clinical Activity Score means more serious endocrine ophthalmopathy.

    Time frame: Patients examined at inclusion, Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  14. Prevalence of endocrine ophthalmopathy at follow-up compared between patients with high and low scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at follow-up

    Endocrine ophthalmopathy defined as Clinical Activity Score of 3/7 or more, compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue. Higher scores at the Clinical Activity Score means more serious endocrine ophthalmopathy.

    Time frame: Patients examined and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at follow-up 15 months after inclusion.

  15. Scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at inclusion compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up and to healthy controls

    Scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale at inclusion compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.

    Time frame: Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow-up at 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  16. Self-evaluated quality of life in relation to ophthalmopathy compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up, and to healthy controls.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO QoL). Scores are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue. Higher scores at the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire means better quality of life.

    Time frame: Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow-up at 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  17. Self-evaluated quality of life in relation to thyroid symptoms will be compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up, and to healthy controls.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form (ThyPro 39). Scores are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue.Higher scores at the Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form means worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Thyroid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome short-form and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow-up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  18. Self-evaluated quality of life and well-being will be compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up and to healthy controls

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Psychological General Well Being index (PGWB). Scores are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue. Higher scores at the Psychological General Well Being means higher quality of life.

    Time frame: Psychological General Well Being indexed Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow-up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  19. Self-evaluated symptoms of anxiety and depression compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up and to healthy controls

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). Scores are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Mental Fatigue Scale means more brain fatigue. Higher scores at the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale mean more symptoms of anxiety and depression.

    Time frame: Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow-up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  20. Self-evaluated stress compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up and to healthy controls

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Scores are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the Perceived Stress Scale mean more symptoms of stress.

    Time frame: Perceived Stress Scale and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  21. Coping strategies will be compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up, and to healthy controls

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire Brief cope. Coping strategies are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.

    Time frame: Brief cope and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  22. Optimistic self-beliefs to cope with difficulties in life will be compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up and to healthy controls.

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire General Self-Efficacy. Scores are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale. Higher scores at the General Self-Efficacy questionnaire means higher optimistic self-beliefs.

    Time frame: General self efficacy and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow-up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  23. Personality traits will be compared between patients with Graves' with and without mental fatigue at follow-up, and to healthy controls

    Evaluated by the validated questionnaire NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3). Personality traits are compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.

    Time frame: NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 and Mental Fatigue Scale completed by participants at inclusion and follow-up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  24. Observations of hippocampal neuronal activation during attention testing in hyperthyroidism and in healthy controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients and in controls at inclusion.

  25. Observations of neuronal activation during attention testing in patients with Graves' disease at follow-up and in healthy controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients at follow-up 15 months after inclusion, in controls at inclusion.

  26. Observations of neuronal activation during attention testing at follow-up compared between patients with and without mental fatigue and in healthy controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing. The alfa- and theta-band oscillations will be compared between participants who at follow-up have 10.5 points or more at the Mental Fatigue Scale and participants who have less than 10.5 points at the Mental Fatigue Scale.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients after 15 months, in controls at inclusion. Mental Fatigue Scale will be completed by patients at follow-up 15 months after inclusion, by controls at inclusion.

  27. Immunological markers from Primary Outcome will be compared in patients with changed hippocampal neuronal activation compared to controls, and in controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing. Immunological markers identified in the on-going study ImmunoGraves wp1 and in Primary Outcome.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients at inclusion and after 15 month, in controls at inclusion. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be drawn at inclusion.

  28. Immunological markers from Primary Outcome will be compared in patients without changed hippocampal neuronal activation compared to controls, and in controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing. Immunological markers identified in the on-going study ImmunoGraves wp1 and in Primary Outcome.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients at inclusion and after 15 months, in controls at inclusion. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be drawn at inclusion.

  29. Biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage will be compared in patients without changed hippocampal neuronal activation compared to controls, and in controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing. Biomarkers indicating organic and structural nerve damage analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients at inclusion and at follow-up 15 months after inclusion, in controls at inclusion. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be drawn at inclusion.

  30. Thyroid autoantibodies will be compared in patients with changed hippocampal neuronal activation compared to controls, and in controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing. Thyroid autoantibodies analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients at inclusion and after 15 months, in controls at inclusion. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be drawn at inclusion.

  31. Thyroid autoantibodies will be compared in patients without changed hippocampal neuronal activation compared to controls, and in controls.

    Magnetoencephalography will be performed in a subset of patients and in healthy controls. Combined with magneto resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography gives information on neuronal activation by measuring alfa- and theta-band oscillations during attention testing. Thyroid autoantibodies analysed with the standard method of the laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.

    Time frame: Magnetoencephalography will be performed in patients at inclusion and after 15 months, in controls at inclusion. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be drawn at inclusion.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Endokrina Forskningsenheten, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Gothenburg, 41346, Sweden
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06081439
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2023
Start date
Sep 12, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Karin Tammelin, PhD student
Contact
karin.tammelin@vgregion.se
+46313427331
Helena Filipsson, ass prof
Contact
helena.filipsson@medic.gu.se
Helena Filipsson, ass prof
principal investigator · Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Endocrinology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Wallenberg Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, all in Gothenburg, Sweden

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion