An interventional study of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-24.
Sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The STICH-SWEDEHEART trial will compare PCI vs CABG for revascularization of patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction (LVEF) \<40%) and multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
Short background/ Rationale/Aim:
CABG has been shown to prolong survival in patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) function and multi-vessel coronary artery disease and "CABG is recommended as the first revascularization strategy choice in patients with multi-vessel disease and acceptable surgical risk". However, a major concern with CABG is the early risk of complications, including death and stroke. Although PCI has lower rates of peri-procedural complications than CABG in patients without heart failure (HF), this has not been confirmed in patients with HF. The lack of contemporary data comparing CABG and PCI in HF leaves clinicians with no guidance as to which option to choose, and a robust trial is therefore necessary. The STICH-SWEDEHEART trial will compare PCI vs CABG for revascularization of patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 40%) and multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
Study objective:
To test whether PCI is non-inferior to CABG for revascularization of patients with ischemic heart failure.
Study design:
Multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial
Study population:
Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and reduced ejection fraction.
Number of subjects:
470 subjects
Investigational treatment:
PCI
Treatment in control group:
CABG
Study endpoints:
Primary endpoint (variable):
The occurrence of the composite of death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction or heart failure hospitalization at 3 years.
Key secondary endpoint The hierarchical occurrence (in descending order of importance) at 3-year follow-up of time to death, time to stroke, time to non-procedural myocardial infarction, number of heart failure hospitalizations and 1-year Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score; evaluated using the win ratio approach.
Secondary safety endpoints
In-hospital occurrence of the following:
The occurrence of in-hospital BARC ≥3 bleeding
Time to the occurrence of the following:
5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 470 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.
Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →Vastra Gotaland Region is the lead sponsor of 267 studies on the registry; 107 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be revascularized by PCI
Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
Patients will be revascularized by CABG
Alternative treatment
Major adverse cardiac event
The occurrence of the composite of death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction or heart failure hospitalization
Time frame: 3 years
The occurrence of death
Time to death
Time frame: 3 years
The occurrence of stroke
Time to stroke
Time frame: 3 year
The occurrence of non-procedural myocardial infarction,
Time to non-procedural myocardial infarction,
Time frame: 3 year
The occurrence of heart failure hospitalizations
Number of heart failure hospitalizations
Time frame: 3 year
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score; evaluated using the win ratio approach. High score mean a better outcome
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Vastra Gotaland Region