ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06067750Updated Jul 14, 2025

Comparison of Narcotrend and Cerebral Function Analysing Monitor in Intensive Care to Monitor Seizures and Deep Sedation

An observational study in Traumatic Brain Injury, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Intracerebral Haemorrhage, sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 1 Month and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-14.

Sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
44
Ages
1 Month and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A study in the use of the Narcotrend depth of anaesthesia monitor to record a) seizures, and b) monitor a level of sedation referred to as 'burst suppression', in sedated patients in the adult and paediatric intensive care.

Studies have shown that patients in coma on the intensive care unit may have subclinical in addition to clinical seizures. Subclinical seizures are seizures that do not show any outward signs and may go undetected.

The current gold standard of recording seizures in the intensive care unit is by non-invasive, continuous monitoring of the electrical activity of the brain by electroencephalography (cEEG) using cerebral function analysing monitor (CFAM).

This is recorded with simultaneous video recording and is performed by Clinical Neurophysiology departments.

There has been a steady increase in demand for this service over recent years. Additionally, CFAM / cEEG is labour intensive and expensive. If trends continue, the proportion of hospitals offering CFAM / cEEG will continue to rise, creating increased demand for specialist staff, of which there are a finite number.

Depth of anaesthesia monitors are used by anaesthetists to assess the level of anaesthesia in sedated patients using specialised, automated EEG analysis and are now recommended by NICE (DG6) to tailor anaesthetic dose to individual patients.

This study aims to investigate the utility of the Narcotrend depth of anaesthesia monitor to monitor for seizures and burst suppression on the adult and paediatric intensive care unit. These monitors are cheaper and more widely available with the scope to be used at every bed space requiring neuro observation on the intensive care unit.

The study aims to recruit all patients who are referred for CFAM / cEEG monitoring at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) Trust over a 12 month period. These patients will undergo simultaneous recording using CFAM / cEEG and depth of anaesthesia monitoring.

Read the detailed description

A non-invasive, prospective, observational, qualitative, comparative study performed on the adult and paediatric intensive care unit of NUH Trust. Study population will be all adult and paediatric patients referred for CFAM monitoring, including, but not limited to patients who are at risk of seizures due to status epilepticus, haemorrhage and traumatic brain injury.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Intracerebral Haemorrhage
  • Encephalitis
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Status Epilepticus
  • Seizures
  • Subdural Hematoma
  • ICP (Intracranial Pressure) Increase

Keywords

  • Narcotrend
  • Continuous Electroencephalography
  • Cerebral Function Analysing Monitor
  • Depth of Anaesthesia Monitor
  • Seizures
  • Burst Suppression
  • Intensive Care
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,721 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 117 across 557 observational studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 107 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Study population will be all adult and paediatric patients referred for CFAM monitoring, including, but not limited to patients who are at risk of seizures due to status epilepticus, haemorrhage and traumatic brain injury.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Intensive care CFAM is recommended but not confined to identify non-convulsive seizures and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in critically ill patients with the following:

  1. Persistently abnormal mental status following generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) or other clinically evident seizures.
  2. Acute supratentorial brain injury with altered mental status. This includes traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, encephalitis, acute ischemic stroke, and during and after therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest.
  3. Fluctuating mental status or unexplained alteration of mental status without known acute brain injury: Mental status abnormalities can include agitation, lethargy, fixed or fluctuating neurologic deficits such as aphasia or neglect, obtundation, and coma.
  4. Patients requiring pharmacological paralysis and risk for seizures.
  5. Clinical paroxysmal events suspected to be seizures, to determine whether they are ictal or non-ictal
  6. Patients with suggested secondary brain injury e.g. those with increased intracranial pressure.
  7. Monitoring of the response of seizures and status epilepticus to treatment and to a level of burst suppression

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients where CFAM has been requested but a routine EEG is thought to be more appropriate, eg. in cases where a routine 20 minute EEG would answer the clinical / referral question.
  2. Next of kin will not be approached to consent for the patient to be enrolled into the study where clinical condition dictates that it would not be appropriate eg. imminent withdrawal of care.
  3. Participants will be excluded from the study where consent is not granted or withdrawn. This may be at commencement of the study by parents of paediatric patients or next of kin of adult patients.
  4. Data gained from patients who regain capacity to give retrospective consent and then withdraw will also be excluded.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients referred to Clinical Neurophysiology for Cerebral Function Analysing Monitoring (CFAM)

    Patients referred from both adult and paediatric intensive care units

    Diagnostic Test: Narcotrend compared to Cerebral Function Analysing Monitor (CFAM)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testNarcotrend compared to Cerebral Function Analysing Monitor (CFAM)

    All patients will receive Narcotrend and CFAM monitoring in this observational study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Seizure detection

    The number of seizures detected and verified by the Narcotrend monitor when compared to the number of seizures detected by conventional CFAM / cEEG monitoring. Seizure activity is detected by analysing changes in brain activity. This is done by visually analysing waveforms

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours monitoring of each patient

  2. Burst suppression monitoring

    The number of periods of burst suppression detected and verified by the Narcotrend monitor when compared and detected by conventional CFAM / cEEG monitoring. Burst suppression is detected by analysing changes in brain activity. This is done by visually analysing waveforms

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours monitoring of each patient

Secondary outcomes

  1. Interrater reliability

    Compare the interrater reliability between clinical neurophysiology staff and the non-expert reviewers (intensivists / advanced critical care practitioners) in assessing seizures and periods of burst suppression activity using CFAM and Narcotrend equipment. The non-expert group will categorise the Narcotrend and CFAM recordings blindly and retrospectively. Their findings will then be compared to clinical neurophysiology findings for the same machines and categories to compare interrater agreement.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours monitoring of each patient

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nottingham University Hospitals Trust
    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bader MK, Arbour R, Palmer S. Refractory increased intracranial pressure in severe traumatic brain injury: barbiturate coma and bispectral index monitoring. AACN Clin Issues. 2005 Oct-Dec;16(4):526-41. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200510000-00009. PubMed 16269897 ↗
  • Arbour RB, Dissin J. Predictive value of the bispectral index for burst suppression on diagnostic electroencephalogram during drug-induced coma. J Neurosci Nurs. 2015 Apr;47(2):113-22. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000124. PubMed 25629593 ↗
  • Berger-Estilita J, Steck K, Vetter C, Seidel K, Krejci V, Hight D, Kaiser H. A case report of several intraoperative convulsions while using the Narcotrend monitor: Significance and predictive use. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(47):e18004. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018004. PubMed 31764814 ↗
  • Dahaba AA, Liu DW, Metzler H. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring of acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures (AERRPS). Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Apr;76(4):298-301. PubMed 20332745 ↗
  • Dwivedi D, Bhatnagar V, Kiran S, Ray A. Intraoperative seizures during redo cranioplasty for sinking skin flap syndrome- Role of BIS monitor in detection. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):359-360. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_44_17. No abstract available. PubMed 28757846 ↗
  • Iturri Clavero F, Tamayo Medel G, de Orte Sancho K, Gonzalez Uriarte A, Iglesias Martinez A, Martinez Ruiz A. Use of BIS VISTA bilateral monitor for diagnosis of intraoperative seizures, a case report. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2015 Dec;62(10):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 3. PubMed 25944463 ↗
  • Tallach RE, Ball DR, Jefferson P. Monitoring seizures with the Bispectral index. Anaesthesia. 2004 Oct;59(10):1033-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03953.x. No abstract available. PubMed 15488073 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06067750
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2023
Start date
Jun 27, 2023
Primary completion
May 25, 2024
Completion
May 25, 2024
Last update
Jul 14, 2025

Study contacts

Helen Sneath, DClinSci-stu
principal investigator · NUH
Ziad Alrifai, MBChB(Hons)
study director · Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion