CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05992207Updated Aug 15, 2023

Utilization of Motor Imagery Training for Improvement of Balance of Ataxic Children After Medulloblastoma Resection

An interventional study of motor imaginary training and physical therapy training in Cerebellar Ataxia, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 9 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-15.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Jul 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: after resection of medulloblastoma in children they suffer from signs and symptoms of ataxia which impedes their activities of daily living. purpose: to investigate the effect motor imagery training on balance, severity of ataxia and gait parameters on children after resection of medulloblastoma. Methods: Fifty children surfing from cerebellar ataxia after medulloblastoma resection were selected from tumors hospital of Cairo University, their age ranged from seven to nine years old, they were randomly assigned into two matched control and study groups. The control groups received the selected physical therapy program while, the study group received motor imaginary training in addition to the selected physical therapy program. Both groups were evaluated by ataxic rating scale, pediatric berg balance scale and kinematic gait analysis by kinovea software.

Read the detailed description

Motor imagery is an effective method to enhance motor performance applied in rehabilitation programs it did not impose a physical load on patients, was confirmed through clinical evidence from meta#analysis. Motor imagery means thinking in motor task with executing it to activate motor cortical areas as 25% of the brain neurons are mirror neurons and fire by thinking.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebellar Ataxia
03

In context

Ataxia

295 studies on the registry are indexed under Ataxia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 26 across 216 interventional studies indexed under Ataxia.

Browse Ataxia studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The children had signs of ataxia
  • loss of balance
  • able to understand and execute test instructions
  • the children are in the follow up period after medulloblastoma resection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medically unstable
  • visual impairment
  • increased intracranial pressure
  • any other neuromuscular diseases.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    physical thertapy training

    The Control group received the selected physical therapy program for one hour, three times weekly for three successive months including facilitation of balance and protective reactions from standing position, standing on one leg, weight shifting from standing, squat to standing, strengthening exercises for trunk muscles and for upper and lower extremities musculatures, gait training activities for correction of gait pattern

    Other: physical therapy training

  • Active comparator
    motor imaginary training

    The study group received the selected physical therapy program for one hour, three times weekly for three successive months in addition to motor imagery program for 30 minutes as the following. Each child shown a video of 5 minutes of illustrating normal movements while the child resting in semireclined sitting in quiet room in front the screen. Children then asked to close their eyes and imagine practicing the task like the illustrative video. Repetition of the exercises depend on the children ranging from 5 to 10 repetitions per exercise

    Other: motor imaginary training

Interventions

  • Othermotor imaginary training

    Each child shown a video of 5 minutes of illustrating normal movements while the child resting in semi#reclined sitting in quiet room in front the screen. Children then asked to close their eyes and imagine practicing the task like the illustrative video. Repetition of the exercises depend on the children ranging from 5 to 10 repetitions per exercise.

  • Otherphysical therapy training

    facilitation of balance and protective reactions from standing position, standing on one leg, weight shifting from standing, squat to standing, strengthening exercises for trunk muscles and for upper and lower extremities musculatures, gait training activities for correction of gait pattern

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of ataxia

    The SARA determines the degree of ataxia. It has eight items with a score range of 0 (means no ataxia) to 40 (means severe ataxia). It contains sitting, stance, gait, limb kinetic functions, heel-shin slide, fast alternating hand movements, nose-finger test, finger chase, and speech disturbance. The arithmetic means of the left and right sides and independent ratings of each side are included in the SARA total score.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Pediatric berg balance scale

    The Paediatric Berg Balance Scale assesses children's balance. The scale includes 14 items: sit to stand, stand to sit, transfers, stand unsupported, sit unsupported, stand with eyes closed, stand with feet together, stand with one foot in front of the other, stand on one foot, turn 360 degrees, turn to look behind, retrieve an object from the floor, place an alternating foot on a stool, and reach forward with an outstretched arm. The total scale score ranges from zero to 56.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Kinematic gait assessment

    Kinematic gait analysis measured temporospatial gait variables using a two-dimensional motion analysis system. Markers were placed on the skin overlying the lateral femoral epicondyle, greater trochanter, 5th metatarsal head, and lateral malleolus. The therapist set a tripod with a fixed video camera at 3 m from the walkway. The fixed video camera was concentrated on the central part to record three gait cycles in the sagittal plane. The therapist used the Kinovea software (version 8.15.0) to measure stride length, step length, cadence, and walking speed. The measurement involved one walking trial at the chosen speed throughout the 4-m walkway.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Reham Alsakhawi
    Giza, 11236, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — data from participants will be made available

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05992207
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Reham Saeed Alsakhawi (Assisstant Professor, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2023
Start date
Jan 21, 2023
Primary completion
May 18, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Aug 15, 2023

Study contacts

Reham Alsakhawi
principal investigator · Cairo University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion