ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05983159TARGET-VMUpdated May 5, 2026

A Trial of Targeted Therapies for Patients With Slow-Flow or Fast-Flow Vascular Malformations

A Phase 2 interventional study of Alpelisib and Mirdametinib in Slow-Flow Vascular Malformation, Fast-Flow Vascular Malformation and Vascular Malformations, sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute. Recruiting at 2 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Primary conditionArteriovenous MalformationsRegistry: Vascular MalformationsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Vascular Malformations — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Arteriovenous Malformations
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Arteriovenous Malformations, a narrower term within Vascular Malformations.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Recent studies have demonstrated that growth of vascular malformations can be driven by genetic variants in one of 2 signalling pathways. Targeted drugs specific to these pathways have been developed and shown to be effective in treating cancer. This study will describe the effectiveness of (i) 48 weeks of alpelisib therapy for participants with slow-flow vascular malformations and a gene mutation in one of these signalling pathways (module 1) and (ii) 48 weeks of mirdametinib therapy for participants with fast-flow vascular malformations and a gene mutations in the other signalling pathway (module 2).

Read the detailed description

TARGET-VM is a modular open-label, signal seeking, phase II trial of targeted therapies for patients with vascular malformations. Patients with vascular malformations which are refractory to standard therapies, or in whom standard therapy is not appropriate, are potentially eligible for the clinical trial. Vascular malformations will be classified as slow-flow or fast-flow lesions using established clinical criteria. Genetic testing to identify causative variants in genes affecting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathway for slow-flow vascular malformations or the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway for fast-flow vascular malformations must be performed using research protocols or commercial testing assays that are external to this clinical trial.

The study consists of individual modules, each evaluating the clinical efficacy of 48 weeks of targeted therapy. The treatment modules are:

  1. Module 1 - Treatment for slow-flow vascular malformations Eligible patients with slow-flow vascular malformations with an identified causative variant in the PI3K signalling pathway will receive alpelisib, an oral alpha-specific PI3-kinase inhibitor for a total duration of 48 weeks as monotherapy (treatment period), followed by 24 weeks of follow-up (follow-up period).
  2. Module 2 - Treatment for fast-flow vascular malformations Eligible patients with fast-flow vascular malformations with an identified causative variant in the MAPK signalling pathway will receive mirdametinib, an investigational oral MEK inhibitor for a total duration of 48 weeks as monotherapy (treatment period), followed by 24 weeks of follow-up (follow-up period).

TARGET-VM will be conducted only in Victoria, Australia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Slow-Flow Vascular Malformation
  • Fast-Flow Vascular Malformation
  • Vascular Malformations
  • Venous Malformation
  • Lymphatic Malformation, Low Flow
  • Lymphatic Malformation
  • Lymphangioma
  • Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Venous Malformation, Low Flow
  • Cystic Hygroma
  • Vascular Anomaly
  • Vascular Anomalies
  • PI3K Gene Mutation
  • MAP2K1 Gene Mutation
  • PIK3CA-related Overgrowth Spectrum
  • Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM)
  • KRAS G12C
  • KRAS G12D

Keywords

  • Targeted therapy
  • vascular malformations
  • skin diseases, vascular
  • Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
  • MEK inhibitor 1
03

In context

Arteriovenous Malformations Reclassified

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Arteriovenous Malformations; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is above the median of 43 across 47 interventional studies indexed under Arteriovenous Malformations.

Browse Arteriovenous Malformations studies →

Lead sponsor

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Compared within Arteriovenous Malformations, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Vascular Malformations. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

MODULE 1

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult or paediatric patient, 2 years of age or over
  2. Patient has a clinical diagnosis of a slow-flow vascular malformation
  3. Patient has received standard therapy for the vascular malformation or in which, in the opinion of the investigator, standard therapy is not appropriate

    - Note: standard therapy may include treatment with sirolimus. A minimum of 14 days since the last dose of sirolimus is required prior to starting treatment with alpelisib

  4. A documented genetic alteration in the PI3K signalling pathway identified by genetic sequencing prior to enrolment in this study
  5. Adequate performance status ( Performance Status Scale (ECOG) 0-2 in patients ≥ 16 years of age; Lansky > 50 in patients \< 16 years of age)
  6. Patient has a ≥ 12 weeks
  7. Patient is able to swallow and retain oral medication
  8. Adequate haematologic and end-organ function:

    • Haematology: ≥ 9.0 g/dL; ≥ 1.5 x 109/L; ≥ 90 x 109/L, except where bleeding leading to low haemoglobin level is an indication for treatment, in which case haemoglobin \< 9.0 g/dL is acceptable.
    • Hepatic function: (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AT) ≤ 3 x ; Total \< 2x ULN except for participants with Gilbert's syndrome who may only be included if the total bilirubin is ≤ 3.0 x ULN or direct bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN
    • Renal function: Serum creatinine \< 1.5 x ULN
    • Biochemistry: Calcium (corrected for serum albumin) and magnesium within normal limits or ≤ Grade 1 according to v5.0 if judged clinically not significant by the investigator; Potassium within normal limits, or corrected with supplements
    • Fasting blood glucose ≤ 7.0 mmol/L and Glycosylated Haemoglobin () ≤ 6.4% (both criteria must be met)
  9. Patient agrees to abstinence or highly effective measures for males and women of (WOCBP)

    • Males who are sexually active must use a condom during intercourse while taking alpelisib and for at least 4 weeks after stopping alpelisib and should not father a child in this period. A condom is required to be used also by vasectomised men in order to prevent delivery of the drug via seminal fluid. In addition, male participants must not donate sperm during the study and for at least 4 weeks after stopping alpelisib
    • Females who are of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, must use a highly effective method of contraception during study treatment and for at least 1 week after the last dose of any study treatment. Highly effective contraceptive methods include:

      • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject) Periodic abstinence (eg., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception;
      • Female sterilisation (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the women has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment;
      • Male partner sterilisation (at least 6 months prior to screening) of the sole partner of a female participant on the study;
      • Use of oral (estrogen and progesterone), injected or implanted combined hormonal method of contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), or forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate \< 1%), for example hormonal vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception. In the case of use of oral contraception, women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.
    • Women are considered and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhoea with an appropriate clinical profile (i.e., age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered to be not of child bearing potential.
  10. Patient has signed and is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study, including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits and examinations

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of to any drugs or metabolites of PI3K inhibitors or any of the of alpelisib
  2. Severe infection requiring intravenous antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to enrolment
  3. Patient has had a major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to enrolment
  4. Prior use of an alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor
  5. History of pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease
  6. Patient is pregnant or lactating at the time of study registration. A pregnancy test is mandated for women of child-bearing potential in the screening period
  7. Established diagnosis of type I diabetes mellitus, type II diabetes mellitus requiring anti-hyperglycaemic medication or any participant with HbA1c > 6.4%
  8. Patient who is currently receiving medication with a known risk of prolonging the or inducing Torsades de Pointes
  9. Patient is currently receiving any of the following medications and cannot be discontinued 7 days prior to the start of treatment:

    • Strong inducers of
    • Strong inhibitors of CYP3A4
    • Inhibitors of BCRP
  10. History of acute pancreatitis within 1 year of screening or past history of chronic pancreatitis
  11. Patient with score B or C
  12. Unresolved osteonecrosis of the jaw
  13. Impairment of GI function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of the study drug based on investigator discretion
  14. Known history of (HIV) infection (testing for HIV is not mandatory in screening)
  15. Known history of severe cutaneous reactions like Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), Erythema Multiforme (EM), or Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS)
  16. Known history of , uncontrolled heart disease and/or recent cardiac events including:

    • History of angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), symptomatic pericarditis, or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the start of study treatment;
    • History of documented congestive heart failure ( functional classification III-IV);
    • History of impaired (LVEF) \< 50% (an assessment of LVEF is not mandatory in screening)
    • History of clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, (e.g., ventricular tachycardia), complete left bundle branch block, high grade Atrioventricular (AV) block (e.g. bifascicular block, Mobitz type II and third degree AV block without pacemaker in place);
    • Uncontrolled hypertension defined by a Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg, with or without anti-hypertensive medication. Initiation or adjustment of antihypertensive medication(s) is allowed prior to screening;
    • Long QT syndrome, family history of idiopathic sudden death or congenital long QT syndrome, or corrected QT interval > 470 msec at screening (using Fridericia correction);
    • Bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 beats per minute at rest), by (ECG) or pulse
  17. Patient has other concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions that would, in the Treating Physician's judgement, contraindicate administration of alpelisib (eg. active or uncontrolled severe infection, chronic active hepatitis, immune-compromised, acute or chronic pancreatitis, uncontrolled high blood pressure)
  18. Patient is unable to understand and comply with treatment instructions and requirements

MODULE 2

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult or paediatric patient, 2 years of age or over where Body Surface Area (BSA) is greater than or equal to 0.4m2.
  2. Patient has a clinical diagnosis of a fast-flow vascular malformation
  3. Patient has received standard therapy for the vascular malformation or in which, in the opinion of the investigator, standard therapy is not appropriate

    - Note: standard therapy may include treatment with sirolimus. A minimum of 14 days since the last dose of sirolimus is required prior to starting treatment with mirdametinib

  4. A documented genetic alteration in the RAS-MEK-ERK signalling pathway identified by genetic sequencing prior to enrolment in this study
  5. Adequate performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale (ECOG) 0-2 in patients ≥ 16 years of age; Lansky > 50 in patients \< 16 years of age)
  6. Patient has a life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
  7. Participant has the ability to swallow capsules whole if the capsule dosage form is being utilized. This criterion does not apply if participant is utilizing the dispersible tablet form of study treatment
  8. Adequate haematologic and end-organ function:

    • Haematology: Haemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL; Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 109/L; Platelets ≥ 90 x 109/L, except where bleeding leading to low haemoglobin level is an indication for treatment, in which case haemoglobin \< 9.0 g/dL is acceptable.
    • Hepatic function: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AT) ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN); Total bilirubin \< 1.5x ULN (isolated bilirubin > 1.5x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractioned and direct bilirubin \< 35%), except where impaired hepatic function is a consequence of the fast-flow malformation and hence is an indication for treatment, in which case impaired hepatic function is acceptable.
    • Renal function: Serum creatinine \< 1.5 x ULN
    • Biochemistry: Calcium (corrected for serum albumin) and magnesium within normal limits or ≤ Grade 1 according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0 if judged clinically not significant by the investigator; Potassium within normal limits or corrected with supplements; Phosphate ≤ 1x ULN.
  9. Patient agrees to abstinence or highly effective contraceptive measures if of childbearing potential (WOCBP)

    • Males who are sexually active must use a condom during intercourse while taking mirdametinib and for at least 90 days after stopping mirdametinib and should not father a child in this period. A condom is required to be used also by vasectomised men in order to prevent delivery of the drug via seminal fluid. In addition, male participants must not donate sperm during the study and for at least 90 days after stopping mirdametinib
    • Females who are of child-bearing potential, defined as all individuals physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, must use a highly effective method of contraception during study treatment and for at least 180 days after the last dose of any study treatment. Highly effective contraceptive methods include:

      • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject) Periodic abstinence (eg., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception;
      • Female sterilisation (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the women has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment;
      • Male partner sterilisation (at least 6 months prior to screening) of the sole partner of a female participant on the study;
      • Use of oral (estrogen and progesterone), injected or implanted combined hormonal method of contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), or forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate \< 1%), for example hormonal vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception. In the case of use of oral contraception, women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.
    • Women are considered postmenopausal and not of childbearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhoea with an appropriate clinical profile (i.e., age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered to be not of childbearing potential.
  10. Patient has signed informed consent and is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study, including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits and examinations

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of hypersensitivity to any drugs or metabolites of MEK inhibitors or any of the excipients of mirdametinib
  2. Severe infection requiring intravenous antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to enrolment
  3. Patient has had a major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to enrolment
  4. Prior use of a MEK inhibitor
  5. Patient has abnormal QT interval corrected by Fridericia's formula (> 450 msec for male participants, > 470 msec for female participants, or > 480 msec for participants with bundle branch block) (triplicate ECG readings taken approximately 2 to 3 minutes apart and averaged) at Screening;
  6. Patient is pregnant or lactating at the time of study registration. A pregnancy test is mandated for persons of child-bearing potential in the screening period
  7. Impairment of GI function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of the study drug based on investigator discretion
  8. Any clinically significant active or known history of liver disease, or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones)
  9. Lymphoma, leukaemia, or any within the past 5 years except for basal cell or squamous epithelial carcinomas of the skin that have been resected with no evidence of disease for 3 years;
  10. Breast cancer within the past 5 years;
  11. Known history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection (testing for HIV is not mandatory in screening)
  12. Known history of severe cutaneous reactions like Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), Erythema Multiforme (EM), or Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS)
  13. Patient has a history of, or evidence of, retinal pathology on ophthalmologic examination that is considered a risk factor for central serous retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion (RVO), or neovascular macular degeneration. Patients will be excluded from study participation if they have any of the following risk factors for RVO at Screening:

    • Intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg;
    • Serum cholesterol > 7.8 mmol/L;
    • Serum triglycerides > 3.4 mmol/L;
    • Hyperglycaemia (fasting blood glucose > 7.0 mol/L );
    • Age specific hypertension

      • Patients ≥ 13 years of age with a blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg
      • Patients ≤ 12 years of age with a blood pressure ≥ 95th percentile for age + 12 mmHg
  14. Known history of glaucoma
  15. Known history of clinically significant, uncontrolled heart disease and/or recent (within 6 months [24 weeks] of signing informed consent/assent) cardiac events including:

    • History of angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), symptomatic pericarditis, or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the start of study treatment;
    • History of documented congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classification III-IV);
    • History of clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, (e.g., ventricular tachycardia), complete left bundle branch block, high grade Atrioventricular (AV) block (e.g. bifascicular block, Mobitz type II and third degree AV block without pacemaker in place);
    • Uncontrolled hypertension defined by a Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, with or without anti-hypertensive medication. Initiation or adjustment of antihypertensive medication(s) is allowed prior to screening;
    • Long QT syndrome, family history of idiopathic sudden death or congenital long QT syndrome, or corrected QT interval > 470 msec at screening (using Fridericia correction);
    • Bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 beats per minute at rest), by electrocardiogram (ECG) or pulse
  16. Patient has recorded a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 55% at Screening
  17. Patient has experienced a cerebrovascular accident, transient ischaemic attach, or symptomatic pulmonary embolism within 6 months (24 weeks) of signing informed consent/assent.
  18. Patient has other concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions that would, in the Treating Physician's judgement, contraindicate administration of mirdametinib (eg. active or uncontrolled severe infection, chronic active hepatitis, immune-compromised, acute or chronic pancreatitis, uncontrolled high blood pressure)
  19. Patient is unable to understand and comply with treatment instructions and requirements
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(26)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Module 1: Slow-flow vascular malformations

    Slow-flow vascular malformations with identified causative variants in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathway will receive alpelisib (provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals), an oral alpha-specific PI3-kinase inhibitor for a total duration of 48 weeks as monotherapy, followed by 24 weeks of follow-up.

    Drug: Alpelisib

  • Experimental
    Module 2: Fast-flow vascular malformations

    Fast-flow vascular malformations with identified causative variants in the RAS-MEK-ERK signalling pathway will receive mirdametinib (provided by SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.), an investigational oral MEK inhibitor for a total duration of 48 weeks as monotherapy, followed by 24 weeks of follow-up.

    Drug: Mirdametinib

Interventions

  • Oral alpha-specific PI3-kinase inhibitor

    Also known as: BYL719

  • An investigational oral MEK inhibitor

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of participants who achieve or exceed a predetermined threshold of improvement in their most significant symptom at 48 weeks based on the Vascular Malformation Patient Specific Outcome Measure (VM-PSOM).

    Vascular malformations present with a range of different symptoms. Therefore, there is no single outcome measure that can capture the effectiveness of a systemic treatment across different patients. Thus for this study, an individualised primary outcome for each patient informed by their symptoms will be used, termed the Vascular Malformation Patient Specific Outcome Measure (VM-PSOM). The study "Outcome Committee" will define an individualised primary outcome for each patient informed by their symptoms and vascular malformation features prior to starting trial treatments. The VM-PSOM endpoint will therefore define a binary outcome for each patients (achieved or failed to reach the threshold improvement in the chosen measure).

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of participants who achieve or exceed a predetermined threshold of improvement in their most significant symptom at the 168-day timepoint based on the Vascular Malformation Patient Specific Outcome Measure (VM-PSOM).

    VM-PSOM response at the 168 day follow-up visit assessment compared with the 48 week (end-of-treatment) VM-PSOM.

    Time frame: 48 weeks, 168-day follow-up

  2. The number of participants with an objective response (defined as ≥ 20% reduction from index date in the sum of measurable target lesion volume) by volumetric analysis on MRI.

    Objective response rate by volumetric MRI assessment comparing 48 week (end-of-treatment) MRI with baseline MRI. MRI scan will only be performed in patients where their vascular malformation is feasibly evaluable by MRI scan. Objective response is defined as ≥ 20% reduction from index date in the sum of measurable target lesion volume by volumetric analysis on MRI.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  3. Change in symptoms score as recorded on the OVAMA (Outcome measures for VAscular MAlformations) questionnaire.

    The mean scores in the OVAMA (Outcome measures for VAscular MAlformations) questionnaire will be calculated and analysed at specified time points. This is a set of questions developed specifically to measure symptom burden from vascular malformations. These questions are open-ended to allow the subject to describe how they feel. The questions are more tightly structured to allow comparison of answers to other people with vascular malformations. The questions have been designed in a way to determine if symptoms are getting better over time.

    Time frame: Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  4. Change in symptoms score as recorded on the OVAMA (Outcome measures for VAscular MAlformations) which is a set of questions developed specifically to measure symptom burden from vascular malformations.

    The mean scores in the OVAMA (Outcome measures for VAscular MAlformations) questionnaire will be calculated and analysed at specified time points.

    Time frame: Time frame: 48 weeks, Day 168 follow-up

  5. The number of patients who experience adverse events as defined by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v5.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 168 follow-up

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Garzon MC, Huang JT, Enjolras O, Frieden IJ. Vascular malformations: Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Mar;56(3):353-70; quiz 371-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.05.069. PubMed 17317485 ↗
  • Penington, A.P., R.; Sleebs, N.; Halliday, J. , Epidemiology of Vascular Malformations Poster, in International Society for the Study of Vascluar Anomalies World Congress. 2022: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Wagner KM, Lokmic Z, Penington AJ. Prolonged antibiotic treatment for infected low flow vascular malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):798-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 27. PubMed 28599969 ↗
  • Cheng J, Liu B, Farjat AE, Routh J. The Public Health Burden of Lymphatic Malformations in Children: National Estimates in the United States, 2000-2009. Lymphat Res Biol. 2017 Sep;15(3):241-245. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0009. Epub 2017 Jul 31. PubMed 28759318 ↗
  • Liu AS, Mulliken JB, Zurakowski D, Fishman SJ, Greene AK. Extracranial arteriovenous malformations: natural progression and recurrence after treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1185-1194. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d18070. PubMed 20335868 ↗
  • Chen RJ, Vrazas JI, Penington AJ. Surgical Management of Intramuscular Venous Malformations. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jan;41(1):e67-e73. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001667. PubMed 32815867 ↗
  • Leaute-Labreze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taieb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2649-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0708819. No abstract available. PubMed 18550886 ↗
  • Hammill AM, Wentzel M, Gupta A, Nelson S, Lucky A, Elluru R, Dasgupta R, Azizkhan RG, Adams DM. Sirolimus for the treatment of complicated vascular anomalies in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Dec 1;57(6):1018-24. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23124. Epub 2011 Mar 28. PubMed 21445948 ↗
  • Adams DM, Trenor CC 3rd, Hammill AM, Vinks AA, Patel MN, Chaudry G, Wentzel MS, Mobberley-Schuman PS, Campbell LM, Brookbank C, Gupta A, Chute C, Eile J, McKenna J, Merrow AC, Fei L, Hornung L, Seid M, Dasgupta AR, Dickie BH, Elluru RG, Lucky AW, Weiss B, Azizkhan RG. Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus in the Treatment of Complicated Vascular Anomalies. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153257. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3257. Epub 2016 Jan 18. PubMed 26783326 ↗
  • Hammer J, Seront E, Duez S, Dupont S, Van Damme A, Schmitz S, Hoyoux C, Chopinet C, Clapuyt P, Hammer F, Vikkula M, Boon LM. Sirolimus is efficacious in treatment for extensive and/or complex slow-flow vascular malformations: a monocentric prospective phase II study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Oct 29;13(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0934-z. PubMed 30373605 ↗
  • Keppler-Noreuil KM, Sapp JC, Lindhurst MJ, Parker VE, Blumhorst C, Darling T, Tosi LL, Huson SM, Whitehouse RW, Jakkula E, Grant I, Balasubramanian M, Chandler KE, Fraser JL, Gucev Z, Crow YJ, Brennan LM, Clark R, Sellars EA, Pena LD, Krishnamurty V, Shuen A, Braverman N, Cunningham ML, Sutton VR, Tasic V, Graham JM Jr, Geer J Jr, Henderson A, Semple RK, Biesecker LG. Clinical delineation and natural history of the PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum. Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Jul;164A(7):1713-33. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36552. Epub 2014 Apr 29. PubMed 24782230 ↗
  • Venot Q, Blanc T, Rabia SH, Berteloot L, Ladraa S, Duong JP, Blanc E, Johnson SC, Hoguin C, Boccara O, Sarnacki S, Boddaert N, Pannier S, Martinez F, Magassa S, Yamaguchi J, Knebelmann B, Merville P, Grenier N, Joly D, Cormier-Daire V, Michot C, Bole-Feysot C, Picard A, Soupre V, Lyonnet S, Sadoine J, Slimani L, Chaussain C, Laroche-Raynaud C, Guibaud L, Broissand C, Amiel J, Legendre C, Terzi F, Canaud G. Targeted therapy in patients with PIK3CA-related overgrowth syndrome. Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7711):540-546. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0217-9. Epub 2018 Jun 13. PubMed 29899452 ↗
  • Canaud, G., et al., LBA23 EPIK-P1: Retrospective chart review study of patients (pts) with PIK3CA-related Overgrowth Spectrum (PROS) who have received alpelisib (ALP) as part of a compassionate use programme. Annals of Oncology, 2021. 32: p. S1297.
  • Al-Olabi L, Polubothu S, Dowsett K, Andrews KA, Stadnik P, Joseph AP, Knox R, Pittman A, Clark G, Baird W, Bulstrode N, Glover M, Gordon K, Hargrave D, Huson SM, Jacques TS, James G, Kondolf H, Kangesu L, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Khan A, Lindhurst MJ, Lipson M, Mansour S, O'Hara J, Mahon C, Mosica A, Moss C, Murthy A, Ong J, Parker VE, Riviere JB, Sapp JC, Sebire NJ, Shah R, Sivakumar B, Thomas A, Virasami A, Waelchli R, Zeng Z, Biesecker LG, Barnacle A, Topf M, Semple RK, Patton EE, Kinsler VA. Mosaic RAS/MAPK variants cause sporadic vascular malformations which respond to targeted therapy. J Clin Invest. 2018 Apr 2;128(4):1496-1508. doi: 10.1172/JCI98589. Epub 2018 Mar 12. PubMed 29461977 ↗
  • Dombi E, Ardern-Holmes SL, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Barker FG, Connor S, Evans DG, Fisher MJ, Goutagny S, Harris GJ, Jaramillo D, Karajannis MA, Korf BR, Mautner V, Plotkin SR, Poussaint TY, Robertson K, Shih CS, Widemann BC; REiNS International Collaboration. Recommendations for imaging tumor response in neurofibromatosis clinical trials. Neurology. 2013 Nov 19;81(21 Suppl 1):S33-40. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000435744.57038.af. PubMed 24249804 ↗
  • Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. PubMed 10655437 ↗
  • Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed 19097774 ↗
  • Matthews HS, Penington AJ, Hardiman R, Fan Y, Clement JG, Kilpatrick NM, Claes PD. Modelling 3D craniofacial growth trajectories for population comparison and classification illustrated using sex-differences. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 19;8(1):4771. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22752-5. PubMed 29556038 ↗
  • Fan Y, Penington A, Kilpatrick N, Hardiman R, Schneider P, Clement J, Claes P, Matthews H. Quantification of mandibular sexual dimorphism during adolescence. J Anat. 2019 May;234(5):709-717. doi: 10.1111/joa.12949. Epub 2019 Mar 4. PubMed 30834524 ↗
  • Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Brandenburg N, Carr DB, Cleeland C, Dionne R, Farrar JT, Galer BS, Hewitt DJ, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robinson JP, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Witter J. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003 Dec;106(3):337-345. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001. PubMed 14659516 ↗
  • Patel KV, Amtmann D, Jensen MP, Smith SM, Veasley C, Turk DC. Clinical outcome assessment in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments. Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 21;6(1):e784. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000784. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb. PubMed 33521482 ↗
  • Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):143-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 13. PubMed 16777328 ↗
  • Younger J, McCue R, Mackey S. Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009 Feb;13(1):39-43. doi: 10.1007/s11916-009-0009-x. PubMed 19126370 ↗
  • Smith SM, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Eccleston C, Farrar JT, Rowbotham MC, Bhagwagar Z, Burke LB, Cowan P, Ellenberg SS, Evans SR, Freeman RL, Garrison LP, Iyengar S, Jadad A, Jensen MP, Junor R, Kamp C, Katz NP, Kesslak JP, Kopecky EA, Lissin D, Markman JD, Mease PJ, O'Connor AB, Patel KV, Raja SN, Sampaio C, Schoenfeld D, Singh J, Steigerwald I, Strand V, Tive LA, Tobias J, Wasan AD, Wilson HD. Interpretation of chronic pain clinical trial outcomes: IMMPACT recommended considerations. Pain. 2020 Nov;161(11):2446-2461. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001952. PubMed 32520773 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9. PubMed 31078660 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PubMed 18929686 ↗
  • Fritsch C, Huang A, Chatenay-Rivauday C, Schnell C, Reddy A, Liu M, Kauffmann A, Guthy D, Erdmann D, De Pover A, Furet P, Gao H, Ferretti S, Wang Y, Trappe J, Brachmann SM, Maira SM, Wilson C, Boehm M, Garcia-Echeverria C, Chene P, Wiesmann M, Cozens R, Lehar J, Schlegel R, Caravatti G, Hofmann F, Sellers WR. Characterization of the novel and specific PI3Kalpha inhibitor NVP-BYL719 and development of the patient stratification strategy for clinical trials. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014 May;13(5):1117-29. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0865. Epub 2014 Mar 7. PubMed 24608574 ↗
  • Janku F, Hong DS, Fu S, Piha-Paul SA, Naing A, Falchook GS, Tsimberidou AM, Stepanek VM, Moulder SL, Lee JJ, Luthra R, Zinner RG, Broaddus RR, Wheler JJ, Kurzrock R. Assessing PIK3CA and PTEN in early-phase trials with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors. Cell Rep. 2014 Jan 30;6(2):377-87. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PubMed 24440717 ↗
  • Anderson NG, Maller JL, Tonks NK, Sturgill TW. Requirement for integration of signals from two distinct phosphorylation pathways for activation of MAP kinase. Nature. 1990 Feb 15;343(6259):651-3. doi: 10.1038/343651a0. PubMed 2154696 ↗
  • Roskoski R Jr. ERK1/2 MAP kinases: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol Res. 2012 Aug;66(2):105-43. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Apr 27. PubMed 22569528 ↗
  • Hoshino R, Chatani Y, Yamori T, Tsuruo T, Oka H, Yoshida O, Shimada Y, Ari-i S, Wada H, Fujimoto J, Kohno M. Constitutive activation of the 41-/43-kDa mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in human tumors. Oncogene. 1999 Jan 21;18(3):813-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202367. PubMed 9989833 ↗
  • Weiss BD, Wolters PL, Plotkin SR, Widemann BC, Tonsgard JH, Blakeley J, Allen JC, Schorry E, Korf B, Robison NJ, Goldman S, Vinks AA, Emoto C, Fukuda T, Robinson CT, Cutter G, Edwards L, Dombi E, Ratner N, Packer R, Fisher MJ. NF106: A Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials Consortium Phase II Trial of the MEK Inhibitor Mirdametinib (PD-0325901) in Adolescents and Adults With NF1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):797-806. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02220. Epub 2021 Jan 28. PubMed 33507822 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — From 6 months post analysis and article publication, the following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept The Murdoch Children's Research Institute's (MCRI) conditions for access: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after de-identification Trial protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, PICF The Sponsor-Investigator will be the long-term custodian after the archive period has finished.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Available from 6 months following analysis and article publication

Access criteria: Future researchers must be from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept MCRI's conditions for access

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 28 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 27, 2023
First posted
Aug 9, 2023
StartActual
Sep 13, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2027
Last update
May 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05983159
Lead sponsor
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Collaborators
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia, Royal Children's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 9, 2023
Start date
Sep 13, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

Michelle de Silva, PhD
Contact
michelle.desilva@vcgs.org.au
+61399366109
Tony Penington, MBBS, FRACS
Contact
tony.penington@rch.org.au
+61383416200
Tony Penington, MBBS, FRACS.
principal investigator · Study Principal Investigator
Stephen Luen, MBChB, FRACP.
principal investigator · Principal Investigator
Lydia Pathmanathan, MBBS, FRACP.
principal investigator · Principal Investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Alpelisib · Mirdametinib

Start the discussion