ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05966675PACE-4-TAVIUpdated Jun 8, 2025

Physiologic Cardiac Pacing to Prevent Left Ventricular Dysfunction Post TAVI

An interventional study of conduction system pacing and right ventricular or biventricular pacing in Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree, sponsored by Medical University of Silesia. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-08.

Sponsored by Medical University of Silesia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to compare permanent Conduction System Pacing (CSP) with the standard therapy - Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) or Biventricular Pacing (BVP) - in preventing the development and progression of symptomatic Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and improving survival in patients after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI).

Read the detailed description

A multicenter randomized controlled head-to-head trial was planned to compare the effects of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) using CSP (study intervention) with currently standard therapy - RVP or BVP (control group). The study population will consist of patients hospitalized after TAVI complicated with high-degree persistent atrioventricular (AV) block or newly developed complex AV or intraventricular conduction disturbances, qualified for PPMI within 30 days after surgery, following the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree

Keywords

  • Pacemaker
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Conduction System Pacing (CSP)
  • Atrioventricular Block
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Bradycardia
03

In context

Atrioventricular Block

117 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrioventricular Block; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 127 across 78 interventional studies indexed under Atrioventricular Block.

Browse Atrioventricular Block studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Silesia is the lead sponsor of 115 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in up to 30 days before qualification to pacemaker implantation
  2. Fulfilled criteria for permanent pacemaker implantation according do 2021 ESC guidelines
  3. Written
  4. Age of at least 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Permanent pacemaker implantation before TAVI procedure
  2. The occurrence of conduction disturbances more than 30 days after TAVI procedure
  3. No written
  4. Inability to obtain informed consent from participant
  5. Predicted inability to obtain cooperation from patient during observation period
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Conduction System Pacing

    Patients who receive Conduction System Pacing in form of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing or His Bundle Pacing.

    Device: conduction system pacing

  • Active comparator
    Standard Pacing Method

    Patients who receive currently standard pacing method with exact type of ventricular pacing depending upon left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): right ventricular pacing in case of LVEF \>= 40% or biventricular pacing if LVEF is determined to be less than 40%, as per current ESC guidelines.

    Device: right ventricular or biventricular pacing

Interventions

  • Deviceconduction system pacing

    Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with conduction system pacing (left bundle branch area pacing or his bundle pacing).

  • Deviceright ventricular or biventricular pacing

    Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic device with right ventricular or biventricular pacing according to left ventricular ejection fraction and current ESC guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Heart Failure Hospitalization

    Hospitalization due to heart failure as a main reason

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. All-cause death

    Death from any cause

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in exercise capacity

    Improvement or deterioration in exercise capacity assessed as a change of ≥1 New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class or a change in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance by 55m or more

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)

    Meeting the echocardiographic criteria of response to CRT defined as a decrease in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume by ≥15% or an increase in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction by ≥5% from the baseline values

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM)

    Pacing-related CHF meeting the echocardiographic criteria of PICM defined as a decrease in LVEF by \>=10% to the absolute value of \<50%

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Change in global longitudinal strain (GLS)

    An increase in GLS value of 20 absolute percentage points from baseline or an increase above -16%.

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) episodes

    Occurrence of the first episode of AF in a patient with no previous history of atrial fibrillation (AF).

    Time frame: 24 months

  6. Atrial High Rate Episodes (AHRE) in pacemaker recordings

    Occurrence or change of the burden of AHRE events in the records from the CIED.

    Time frame: 24 months

  7. Change in the concentration of the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)

    pl/mL

    Time frame: 24 months

  8. Change in Quality of Life

    Assessed with Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): 0 to 100; low QoL to high QoL - better outcome.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
    Katowice, Poland
    Recruiting
    • Krzysztof S. Gołba, MD PhD · Contactk.golba@sum.edu.pl
    • Tomasz Soral, MD · Contacttomasz.soral@gmail.com
    • Danuta Łoboda, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Rafał Gardas, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Jolanta Biernat, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Grzegorz Jarosiński, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Tomasz Soral, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabes JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylen I, Tolosana JM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. No abstract available. PubMed 34455430 ↗
  • Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, Amit G. Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Europace. 2012 Jan;14(1):81-91. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur240. Epub 2011 Jul 27. PubMed 21798880 ↗
  • Daubert JC, Ritter P, Le Breton H, Gras D, Leclercq C, Lazarus A, Mugica J, Mabo P, Cazeau S. Permanent left ventricular pacing with transvenous leads inserted into the coronary veins. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Jan;21(1 Pt 2):239-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01096.x. PubMed 9474680 ↗
  • Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. How to perform permanent His bundle pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 Mar 22. No abstract available. PubMed 27016475 ↗
  • Huang W, Chen X, Su L, Wu S, Xia X, Vijayaraman P. A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1791-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 22. No abstract available. PubMed 31233818 ↗
  • Jastrzebski M, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Kielbasa G, Vijayaraman P, Czarnecka D. Programmed His Bundle Pacing: A Novel Maneuver for the Diagnosis of His Bundle Capture. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007052. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007052. PubMed 30707037 ↗
  • Jastrzebski M, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Kielbasa G, Kusiak A, Sondej T, Bednarski A, Vijayaraman P, Czarnecka D. Programmed deep septal stimulation: A novel maneuver for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture during permanent pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Feb;31(2):485-493. doi: 10.1111/jce.14352. Epub 2020 Jan 20. PubMed 31930753 ↗
  • Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT, Xu K, Babaliaros V, Douglas PS, El-Chami MF, Herrmann HC, Mack M, Makkar RR, Miller DC, Pichard A, Tuzcu EM, Szeto WY, Webb JG, Moses JW, Smith CR, Williams MR, Leon MB, Kodali SK; PARTNER Publications Office. Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt A):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.022. PubMed 25616819 ↗
  • Xi Z, Liu T, Liang J, Zhou YJ, Liu W. Impact of postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5130-5139. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.02. PubMed 32030230 ↗
  • Xu S, Zhang E, Qian Z, Sun J, Zou F, Wang Y, Hou X, Zou J. Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 28;9:911234. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.911234. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35837611 ↗
  • Fadahunsi OO, Olowoyeye A, Ukaigwe A, Li Z, Vora AN, Vemulapalli S, Elgin E, Donato A. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis From the U.S. Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2189-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.026. PubMed 27832844 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 51 months after the start.

Of 44 interventional studies with no phase under Atrioventricular Block, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 51 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 20, 2023
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
StartActual
Feb 27, 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 2028
Last update
Jun 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05966675
Collaborators
Medical Research Agency, Poland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 1, 2023
Start date
Feb 27, 2024
Primary completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2025

Study contacts

Krzysztof S. Gołba, MD PhD
Contact
krzysztof.golba@gmail.com
+48 (32)359-88-93
Tomasz Soral, MD
Contact
tomasz.soral@gmail.com
Krzysztof S. Gołba, MD PhD
study chair · Silesian Medical University in Katowice

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion