ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT05945147Updated Nov 22, 2024

Ketamine and Midazolam Infusions for CRPS: Feasibility Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ketamine and Midazolam in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, sponsored by Stanford University. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-22.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Lack of funding
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will assess the feasibility of administering ketamine plus midazolam or midazolam alone, when infused over 5 days in an outpatient setting, to adults with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

Read the detailed description

Subanesthetic ketamine infusions are a potentially impactful treatment for chronic refractory pain, but the acute psychoactive effects of ketamine complicate successful masking in randomized trials. Multi-day ketamine infusions have produced long-lasting, but not permanent, remission of symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), a chronic and often debilitating neuropathic pain condition that can affect one or more limbs. In this feasibility study, 4 adults with CRPS will be randomized to receive either ketamine and midazolam or midazolam-only, infused over 5 days in an outpatient setting. The objectives of this feasibility study are:

  1. Assess whether the recruitment and retention rate observed in this feasibility study can support a larger clinical trial.
  2. Evaluate whether participants can adhere to study procedures.
  3. Determine whether midazolam, when given alone as an intravenous (IV) infusion, can be used as an active placebo that is well-tolerated, practical, and believable compared to a ketamine plus midazolam infusion.
  4. Gather preliminary data on clinically-relevant outcomes for CRPS.
02

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Keywords

  • Feasibility Study
  • Ketamine
  • Midazolam
  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
  • Active Placebo
  • Analgesics
  • Dissociative Anesthetics
  • Chronic Pain
  • Neuropathic Pain
03

In context

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

202 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 55 are open to participants now.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,161 studies on the registry; 428 are open to participants now.

Of its 268 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (77%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • Meets the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
  • Primary complaint of CRPS-attributable pain for ≥3 months
  • Average pain intensity of ≥3/10 over the last month
  • Can read and comprehend English-language questionnaires
  • Can receive text messages by phone
  • Can identify a responsible adult who can provide transportation to and from infusion site for 5 consecutive days (Mon-Fri)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketamine and Midazolam

    Participants will receive intravenous infusions of ketamine and midazolam for 4 hours each day, over 5 consecutive days, in an outpatient setting.

    Drug: Ketamine · Drug: Midazolam

  • Placebo comparator
    Midazolam and Saline

    Participants will receive intravenous infusions of midazolam and normal saline for 4 hours each day, over 5 consecutive days, in an outpatient setting.

    Drug: Midazolam · Drug: Normal Saline

Interventions

  • An escalating dose of ketamine (0.15 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days

    Also known as: Ketalar

  • A constant dose of midazolam (0.04 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days

    Also known as: Versed

  • DrugNormal Saline

    An escalating dose of normal saline (0.15 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr) will be administered as 4-hour infusions over 5 consecutive days

    Also known as: 0.9% Sodium Chloride

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number and proportion of patients who can undergo the steps of recruitment, informed consent, enrollment, and randomization

    Out of all patients identified as potentially eligible for the study based on chart review, we will measure the number and proportion who can undergo the steps of recruitment, informed consent, enrollment, and randomization during a 2-month period.

    Time frame: 2 months after the study opens for enrollment

  2. Number and proportion of randomized participants who remain in the study until the last follow-up timepoint

    Out of all patients who were randomized to a treatment group, we will measure the number and proportion who remain in the study until their last follow-up timepoint.

    Time frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention

  3. Change in participant masking

    Participants will be asked to guess their assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.

    Time frame: Daily during intervention administration (5 days), and once at 8 weeks after receiving intervention

  4. Change in participant masking

    Participants will be asked to guess their assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.

    Time frame: During intervention administration

  5. Change in investigator masking

    Investigators administering and monitoring the drug infusions will be asked to guess the participant's assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.

    Time frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention

  6. Change in investigator masking

    Investigators administering and monitoring the drug infusions will be asked to guess the participant's assigned treatment in a forced binary choice and to rate their level of confidence on a scale from 0 to 100%.

    Time frame: During intervention administration

  7. Number and types of adverse events

    Adverse events will be elicited from the participant in a brief, open-ended structured interview.

    Time frame: 8 weeks after receiving intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    A numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) over the past 24 hours will be used to assess pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline, daily during treatment (5 days), and daily for 8 weeks after treatment

  2. Treatment expectancies

    The 6-item Healing Encounters and Attitudes Lists (HEAL) Short Form for Treatment Expectancy will be used to assess self-reported expectations about the study treatment. Participants are asked to rate their agreement with brief statements such as, "This treatment will be successful" and "I am confident in this treatment".

    Time frame: Baseline, and daily during treatment (5 days)

  3. Pain interference

    The 6-item PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form assesses the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very Much"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater pain interference.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  4. Physical function

    The 6-item PROMIS Physical Function Short Form assesses the ability to carry out physical tasks and activities in one's daily life. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Unable to do") to 5 ("Without any difficulty"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing better physical function.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  5. Depression (PROMIS)

    The 6-item PROMIS Depression Short Form assesses the severity of depressive symptoms experienced by an individual. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater depression symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  6. Depression (PHQ-9)

    The 9-item PHQ-9 will be used as an additional indicator for changes in depression symptom severity, and to monitor for any risk of acute suicidality during the trial (item #9: "Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself"). Items are self-rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"). Higher total scores indicate greater depression symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  7. Anxiety

    The 6-item PROMIS Anxiety Short Form assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms experienced by an individual. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  8. Sleep disturbance

    The 6-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form assesses the severity of sleep-related issues, such as trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, and experiencing non-restorative sleep. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very Much"). Raw score totals are converted to standardized T-scores, with a higher T-score representing greater sleep disturbance.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  9. Pain catastrophizing

    The 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale assesses the extent to which an individual engages in magnifying, rumination, and helplessness thoughts related to their pain experience. Items are self-rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("All the time"). Higher total scores indicates higher levels of pain catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  10. Chronic pain acceptance

    The 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire assesses one's level of acceptance and willingness to engage in valued activities despite the presence of chronic pain. Items are self-rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 ("Never true") to 6 ("Always true"). Higher total scores indicate greater levels of chronic pain acceptance.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  11. Patient global impression of change

    The Patient Global Impression of Change scale assesses the patient's perception of change in their overall health status resulting from a specific treatment. The single-item scale is self-rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 ("Very much improved") to 7 ("Very much worse").

    Time frame: Weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

  12. Number of painful body regions

    The CHOIR Body Map is a visual tool that allows individuals to indicate the location(s) of their pain on a human body outline.

    Time frame: Baseline, and weekly for 8 weeks after the end of treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05945147
Responsible party
Theresa Lii (Principal Investigator, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2099 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2099 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2099 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 22, 2024

Study contacts

Theresa R Lii, MD, MS
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ketamine

Start the discussion