ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05927090STAADUpdated May 19, 2026

Outcomes of Aortic Dissection Repair

An observational study in Type A Aortic Dissection, Ascending Aortic Dissection and Aortic Diseases, sponsored by Centre Cardiologique du Nord. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Centre Cardiologique du Nord · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,200
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a potentially life-threatening pathology associated with significant risk of mortality and morbidity. In acute forms of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) mortality is 50% by 24 h and 50% of patients die before reaching a specialist center. Rapid diagnosis and subsequent prompt surgical repair remain the primary goal for these patients.

In the last decade it has been observed that improvements in diagnostic techniques, initial management and increased clinical awareness have contributed to a substantial increase in the number of patients benefiting from a prompt diagnosis and undergoing surgery.However, survival after surgical repair has not yet reached optimal follow-ups and is burdened by high in-hospital mortality(16-18%)The main approach to acute type B non-complicated aortic dissection (TBAD) has always been to use medicines to control the patient's heart rate and blood pressure. However, recent findings suggest that a large number of patients treated for acute complicated (TBAAD) and non-complicated TBAD experience aortic complications, such as aneurysmal degeneration, at a later stage.

Read the detailed description

For patients requiring surgical repair for a TAAD, there is still some disagreement regarding which factors should be considered during the preoperative evaluation, the best decision-making process to undertake that best assesses procedural risk, and how operative mortality can be predicted. Furthermore, the impact of different surgical strategies on outcomes remains unclear.This prospective study was designed to evaluate the impact of the center volume-outcome relationship and that on mortality which remain poorly understood. A better understanding of the determinants of outcome in patients undergoing surgery could support decision making, aid in the design of service delivery, and improve outcomes for surviving patients who are referred to specialized centers for treatment of aortic disease.Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate whether precise risk stratification can provide better patient counseling and be used for unit-surgeon benchmarking. Ultimately in the present study, we aimed to investigate outcome predictors in patients undergoing surgery for TAAD, including clinical and perioperative variables as well as to evaluate follow up beyond 15 years.TBAD occurring beyond the left subclavian artery (LSA) is classified in chronological order based on the timing of clinical presentation: acute (14 days or less), subacute (more than 14 days and less than or equal to 3 months), and chronic (more than 3 months).TBADs are also divided into complicated or non-complicated based on their initial clinical manifestation. Acute complicated TBAD is characterised by tearing of the aorta, pain, rapid expansion, hypertension, or blockages in the vasculature.Malperfusion syndrome is the most common complication, occurring in nearly 30% of cases. More than 30% of patients with mesenteric compromise following aortic dissection die .

02

Conditions studied

  • Type A Aortic Dissection
  • Ascending Aortic Dissection
  • Aortic Diseases
  • Aortic Arch
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency
  • Aortic Root Dissection
  • Aortic Root Dilatation
  • Type B Aortic Dissection

Keywords

  • DeBakey type I Dissection
  • DeBakey type II Dissection
  • Type A Acute Aortic Dissection (TAAAD)
  • Root-Sparing Replacement
  • Ascending Aorta Replacement
  • Partial Arch Repair
  • Hemiarch Procedures
  • Total Arch Replacement (TARP)
  • Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) Hemiarch Procedures
  • Type B Acute Aortic Dissection (TBAAD)
  • Type B non acuteAortic Dissection (TBAD)
03

In context

Aortic Diseases

108 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Diseases; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,200 is above the median of 186 across 62 observational studies indexed under Aortic Diseases.

Browse Aortic Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Cardiologique du Nord is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The STAAD study is a prospective multicenter registry including patients who will underwent surgery for acute TAAD at 6 centers of cardiac surgery located in 2 European countries and Japan (3 France, 2 Italy and 1 Hokkaido ). Data will be prospectively collected from patients (conservative vs estensive Type A aortic dissection repair) who will be treated during the study period. In addition, the aim will be to gather further data for future clinical research on this topic. Preoperative and postoperative variables will be included during in-hospital stay and follow-up data instead they will be included on subsequent encounters for all other patients who will be hospitalized.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged > 18 years
  • TAAD or intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta
  • Symptoms started within 7 days from surgery
  • Primary surgical repair of acute TAAD
  • Any other major cardiac surgical procedure concomitant with surgery for TAAD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged \< 18 years
  • Onset of symptoms > 7 days from surgery
  • Prior procedure for TAAD
  • Concomitant endocarditis;
  • TAAD secondary to blunt or penetrating chest trauma.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
18 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with or without Hemiarch Repair

    Patients who will require a conservative prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta with or without hemiarch.Patients who required a concomitant aortic valve replacement with conventional xenograft or mechanical prosthesis

    Procedure: Conservative Root- Sparing Aortic Valve Resuspension with or without Hemiarch Repair

  • Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with Aortic Root Replacement (ARR)

    Patient who will require the extensive procedure including ascending aorta replacement associated to root replacement with or without sparing of the aortic valve

    Procedure: Extensive Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with Aortic Root Replacement (ARR)

  • Ascending Aorta Replacement with Total Arch Replacement (TARP)

    Patient who will require the extensive procedure including ascending aorta replacement associated to TARP

    Procedure: Extensive Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with Total Arch Replacement (TARP)

  • Root and Ascending Aorta Replacement with Total Arch Replacement

    Patient who will require the extensive procedure including root and ascending aorta replacement associated to TARP

    Procedure: Extensive Root and Ascending Aorta Replacement with Total Arch Replacement

  • Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

    Patient who will require the procedure including thoracic endovascular aorta repair

    Procedure: Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

  • Open Thoracic Aortic Repair

    Patient who will require the procedure including open thoracic aorta repair

    Procedure: Open Thoracic Aortic Descendig Repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureConservative Root- Sparing Aortic Valve Resuspension with or without Hemiarch Repair

    Cardiac arrest will be performed by administering a potassium-rich antegrade cardioplegia solution delivered directly into the coronary ostium or in the case of aortic regurgitation after insertion of the coronary sinus cannula.The aorta will be resected up to the sinotubular junction and the thrombus located in the false lumen of the aortic root will be removed so that the aortic lesion can be visualized. The commissures will be resuspended using 4-0 or 5-0 sutures reinforced with a Teflon pledget above every commissure. A 4-0 or 5-0 polypropylene suture will be chosen to seal the proximal anastomosis and this suture line will also be used to secure the intima to the adventitia. In patients demonstrating normal-sized aortic roots associated with poor-quality valve leaflets, concomitant aortic valve replacement with conventional xenograft or mechanical prosthesis will be preferable.

    Also known as: Ascending Aorta Replacement with Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR)

  • ProcedureExtensive Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with Aortic Root Replacement (ARR)

    Patients who experienced dilatation of the sinuses of Valsalva \> 4.5 cm in diameter on computed tomography imaging, those with connective tissue disease, or those in whom intimal tears extended into the sinuses, will receive replacement of the aortic root using a biologic or mechanical composite valve graft or valve-sparing root reimplantation procedure associated to AAR

    Also known as: ARR with or without aortic valve sparing

  • ProcedureExtensive Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with Total Arch Replacement (TARP)

    Total arch replacement procedures (TARP) will performed with the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and with either antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion, maintaining systemic cooling between 19°C to 25°C and depending on the surgeon's practice.TARPs will be carried out using 1- and 4-branch grafts and involved the resection of all the aortic tissue up to the left common carotid artery (total arch)

    Also known as: AAR with TARP or Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET)

  • ProcedureExtensive Root and Ascending Aorta Replacement with Total Arch Replacement

    This extensive procedure will include complete replacement of the anterior thoracic aorta extending to part or all of the aortic arch. It will be performed with the previously reported techniques

    Also known as: Full anterior thoracic aorta replacement with partial hemiarch repair or TARP or FET

  • ProcedureThoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

    TEVAR patients have a higher incidence of complications and reintervention than open repair patients. TEVAR complications may include endoleak, retrograde type A aortic dissection, stent-graft migration, fracture or collapse, and increased size.

    Also known as: TEVAR

  • ProcedureOpen Thoracic Aortic Descendig Repair

    Surveillance imaging can detect complications of open repair, such as graft infection and anastomotic pseudoaneurysm. After open repair or TEVAR, patients may develop progressive aneurysmal dilatation of adjacent or remote aortic segments.

    Also known as: TOAR

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative Mortality (OM)

    Patients who died within 30 days

    Time frame: 30-day

  2. Rate of mesenteric ischemia

    Rate of abdominal pain with or without nausea and vomiting and rectal bleeding or bloody diarrhea

    Time frame: 30-day

  3. Rate of permanent Neurologic Deficit (PND)

    Number of participants with acute episode of a focal or global neurological deficit. Rates of alteration of degree of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, numbness or sensory loss affecting one side of the body, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopsia, amaurosis fugax. To consider rate of other neurologic signs or symptoms consistent with stroke duration of focal or global neurologic deficit greater than 24 hours.

    Time frame: 30-day

  4. Rate of composite of Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    Number of participants with MAE which will include the composite rate of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, need for dialysis, or need for tracheostomy according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE)

    Time frame: 30-day

  5. Rate of perioperative Myocardial Infarction (MI)

    Number of participants with MI based on fourth universal definition.

    Time frame: 30-day

  6. Rate of acute heart failure (AHF)

    Number of participants with postoperative AHF who will require prolonged use of concentration of inotropes for a period greater than 24 h and/or the insertion of any mechanical circulatory support device.

    Time frame: 30-day and in-hospital mortality

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Transient Neurologic Deficit (TND)

    Number of participants who will complicate postoperatively with episode of TND which will include complication rate such as confusion, delirium, agitation

    Time frame: 30-day

  2. Rate of spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

    Number of participants with SCI intended as rate of paraplegia and/or paraparesis

    Time frame: 30-day

  3. Rate of acute kidney injury

    Number of participants with postoperative change in serum creatinine concentration. Severity will be stratified on the basis of number of participants with the KDIGO (Kney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria.

    Time frame: 30-day

  4. Rate of perioperative bleeding

    Number of participants who will receive postoperative transfused red blood cell units. The E-CABG ( coronary artery by pass grafting) classification of bleeding rate has been proposed as a simple classification of perioperative bleeding

    Time frame: 30-day

  5. Reoperation for bleeding

    Number of participants who will receive postoperative chest reopening for excessive bleeding.

    Time frame: 30-day

  6. Rate of mechanical circulatory support

    Number of participants who will receive the use of intra-aortic balloon pump and/or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postoperative acute heart failure.

    Time frame: 30-day

  7. Rate of composite of Major Adverse Pulmonary Events (MAPE)

    Number of participants with MAPE which will include the composite rate of intubation \>48 hours, pneumonia, reintubation, tracheostomy according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE)

    Time frame: 30-day

  8. Rate of reintervention

    The number of participants who will require reoperation for the aortic valve, proximal aorta, or distal aorta.

    Time frame: 18-years

  9. Rate of late survival

    Data on patient's survival status will be collected

    Time frame: 18-years

Other outcomes

  1. Rate of urgent procedure

    Number of participants who will require scheduled procedure within 24 hours of admission.

    Time frame: 30-day

  2. Rate of emergency grade 1

    Number of participants will require procedure within 24 hours of hospital admission and who are symptomatic or minimally symptomatic with stable hemodynamic conditions and no signs of malperfusion.

    Time frame: 30-day

  3. Rate of emergency grade 2

    Number of participants who will require procedure within the first 6 hours of hospital admission due to hemodynamic instability despite use of concentration inotropes and/or malperfusion.

    Time frame: 30-day

  4. Rate of salvage grade 1

    Number of participants who will require immediate surgical procedure. Rate of cardio pulmonary resuscitation with external chest compressions and/or open cardiac massage between induction of anesthesia and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass.

    Time frame: 30-day

  5. Rate of salvage grade 2

    Number of participants who will require immediate surgical procedure. Rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with external chest compressions en route to the operating theatre or prior to induction of anesthesia.

    Time frame: 30-day

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mahase E. Half of patients with acute aortic dissection in England die before reaching a specialist centre. BMJ. 2020 Jan 23;368:m304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m304. No abstract available. PubMed 31974270 ↗
  • Braverman AC. Acute aortic dissection: clinician update. Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):184-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958975. No abstract available. PubMed 20625143 ↗
  • Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Perkins J, Silver LE, Rothwell PM; Oxford Vascular Study. Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the Oxford Vascular Study. Circulation. 2013 May 21;127(20):2031-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000483. Epub 2013 Apr 18. PubMed 23599348 ↗
  • Biancari F, Juvonen T, Fiore A, Perrotti A, Herve A, Touma J, Pettinari M, Peterss S, Buech J, Dell'Aquila AM, Wisniewski K, Rukosujew A, Demal T, Conradi L, Pol M, Kacer P, Onorati F, Rossetti C, Vendramin I, Piani D, Rinaldi M, Ferrante L, Quintana E, Pruna-Guillen R, Rodriguez Lega J, Pinto AG, Acharya M, El-Dean Z, Field M, Harky A, Nappi F, Gerelli S, Di Perna D, Gatti G, Mazzaro E, Rosato S, Raivio P, Jormalainen M, Mariscalco G. Current Outcome after Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection. Ann Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):e885-e892. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005840. Epub 2023 Mar 13. PubMed 36912033 ↗
  • Benedetto U, Dimagli A, Kaura A, Sinha S, Mariscalco G, Krasopoulos G, Moorjani N, Field M, Uday T, Kendal S, Cooper G, Uppal R, Bilal H, Mascaro J, Goodwin A, Angelini G, Tsang G, Akowuah E. Determinants of outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit. Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 28;43(1):44-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab586. PubMed 34468733 ↗
  • Geirsson A, Shioda K, Olsson C, Ahlsson A, Gunn J, Hansson EC, Hjortdal V, Jeppsson A, Mennander A, Wickbom A, Zindovic I, Gudbjartsson T. Differential outcomes of open and clamp-on distal anastomosis techniques in acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1750-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 29. PubMed 30401530 ↗
  • Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD, Woznicki EM, Braverman AC, Trimarchi S, Myrmel T, Pyeritz R, Hutchison S, Strauss C, Ehrlich MP, Gleason TG, Korach A, Montgomery DG, Isselbacher EM, Eagle KA. Early Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;7(10):1009-1015. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2718. PubMed 36001309 ↗
  • Czerny M, Schoenhoff F, Etz C, Englberger L, Khaladj N, Zierer A, Weigang E, Hoffmann I, Blettner M, Carrel TP. The Impact of Pre-Operative Malperfusion on Outcome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results From the GERAADA Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 23;65(24):2628-2635. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.030. PubMed 26088302 ↗
  • O'Hara D, McLarty A, Sun E, Itagaki S, Tannous H, Chu D, Egorova N, Chikwe J. Type-A Aortic Dissection and Cerebral Perfusion: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1461-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.144. Epub 2020 Jun 26. PubMed 32599034 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2005 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 203 months.

Of 33 observational studies under Aortic Diseases, half reached primary completion within 98 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 43 and three quarters within 203. This study's 203 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 3, 2023
First posted
Jul 3, 2023
StartActual
Jan 1, 2005
Primary completionActual
Dec 30, 2021
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
May 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05927090
Lead sponsor
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Collaborators
Henri Mondor University Hospital, Universita degli Studi di Genova, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Ospedale San Camillo, Rome, Italy, Campus Bio-Medico University
Responsible party
Francesco Nappi (Doctor, Centre Cardiologique du Nord) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 3, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2005
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2021
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2026

Study contacts

Francesco Nappi, MD
study chair · Cardiac Surgery Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion