ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05912634AoArchUpdated May 19, 2026

Repair Versus Non-repair of the Aortic Arch in Type A Aortic Dissection

An observational study in Aortic Dissection, Aortic Arch and Aortic Dissection Rupture, sponsored by Centre Cardiologique du Nord. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Centre Cardiologique du Nord · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
900
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 18 studies in Aortic Dissection with a site in France — 5 open to participants now, 8 under way, none of them phase 3. Aortic Dissection · France.

Planned enrollment
3rd of 12
900 · median 280
Started
2014
the only one that year
Observational
12 of 18
4 open now
Registered
16th of 18
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 18
Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Among the 18 studies in Aortic Dissection with a site in France, this one is the 3rd largest by planned enrollment of the 12 observational ones, is the only one that started in 2014, is one of 12 observational ones, and was the 16th registered.

By phase

18 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observationalthis study12 · 4 open
No phase6 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2008; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2014.

Size and results

Median enrollment 51 across the 6 interventional studies, 280 across the 12 observational. Of the 7 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 18 studies in Aortic Dissection with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening clinical status requiring surgery that is usually performed as a salvage procedure.We planned a multicenter study to evaluate the balance between the patient's condition and those therapeutic strategies that may limit the risk of late adverse events in patients who will be underwent surgery for appropriate management of TAAD

Read the detailed description

Substantial evidence has suggested a decrease of early mortality during the last years, however recently the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection registry recorded 18% of 30-day mortality after surgery for ATAAD. Similarly, the prospective German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A confirmed this data reporting a 30-day mortality of 16.9%. Again, results from recent analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeon database that report 7353 procedures from 2014 and 2017 for acute TAAD revealed a 30-day mortality of 17%. Understanding the balance between the patient's conditions which may not allow extensive procedure and those treatment strategies which may limit the risk of late adverse events in patients who remain alive long after the surgery is essential for an appropriate management of ATAAD. The best treatment option in patients with ATAAD is dictated by the balance between patient conditions that may not allow for extensive procedures and those more conservative treatment strategies that limit the risk of late adverse events in patients who remain alive long after surgery. surgery. However, previous evidence from large series of patients do not provide information on the long-term durability of these procedures.

Here investigators planned a multicenter study to evaluate the contemporary early outcomes and duration of different surgical strategies for 15-year acute ATAAD in a large study population.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Dissection
  • Aortic Arch
  • Aortic Dissection Rupture
  • Aortic Dilatation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAAD)
  • Root-Sparing Replacement
  • Ascending Aorta Replacement
  • Partial Arch Repair
  • Total Arch Replacement (TARP)
  • Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET)
  • Hemiarch Procedures
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The retrospective multicenter study including patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAAD at 5 centers of cardiac surgery located in 2 European countries and Japan (2 France, 2 Italy and 1 Hokkaido ). Data will be prospectively collected fron patients (conservative vs estensive TAAD- R) treated during the study period and the aim will be to gather further data for future clinical research on this topic. Preoperative and postoperative variables will be included during in-hospital stay and follow-up data instead they will be included on subsequent encounters for all other patients who will be hospitalized. Data on consecutive patients with acute TAAD will be collected with pre-specified baseline, operative and outcome variables.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged > 18 years
  • TAAD or intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta
  • Symptoms started within 7 days from surgery
  • Primary surgical repair of acute TAAD
  • Any other major cardiac surgical procedure concomitant with surgery for TAAD.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged \< 18 years
  • Onset of symptoms > 7 days from surgery
  • Prior procedure for TAAD
  • Concomitant endocarditis;
  • TAAD secondary to blunt or penetrating chest trauma.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
900 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Conservative Type A Aortic Dissection Repair (TAAD-R)

    The Conservative procedure will include patients receiving ascending aortic root sparing replacement with or without the implantation of the aortic hemiarch

    Procedure: Conservative TAAD-R

  • Extensive Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Repair (TAAD-R)

    The extensive procedure will include patients receiving ascending aorta replacement associated to TARP

    Procedure: Extensive TAAD- R

Interventions

  • ProcedureConservative TAAD-R

    Cardiac arrest will be ensured using antegrade potassium-rich cardioplegia solution delivered directly into the coronary ostium or after coronary sinus cannula insertion, in patients with aortic regurgitation aorta will be resected down to the sinotubular junction and the thrombus located in the false lumen of the aortic root will be removed so that the aortic lesion could be visualized. The commissures will be resuspended using 4-0 or 5-0 sutures reinforced with a Teflon pledget over each commissure. A 4-0 or 5-0 polypropylene suture will be chosen to seal the proximal anastomosis and this suture line will also be used to secure the intima to the adventitia. In patients revealing normal-sized aortic roots associated with poor-quality valve leaflets, concomitant aortic valve replacement with conventional xenograft or mechanical prosthesis will be preferred.

    Also known as: Ascending Aortic Root Sparing Replacement with or without Hemiarch Repair

  • ProcedureExtensive TAAD- R

    Patients who experienced dilatation of the sinuses of Valsalva \>4.5 cm in diameter on computed tomography imaging, those with connective tissue disease, or those in whom intimal tears extended into the sinuses, will undergoing replacement of the aortic root using a biologic or mechanical composite valve graft or valve-sparing root reimplantation procedure.Total arch replacement procedures (TARP) will fulfilled with the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and with either antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion, maintaining systemic cooling between 19°C to 25°C and depending on the surgeon's practice.TARPs will be carried out using 1- and 4-branch grafts and involved the resection of all the aortic tissue up to the left common carotid artery (total arch)

    Also known as: Aortic root procedures.TARP procedures. Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative Mortality (OM)

    Patients who died within 30 days

    Time frame: 30-day

  2. Rate of acute heart failure

    Number of participants with postoperative heart failure who will require prolonged use of concentration of inotropes for a period greater than 24 h and/or the insertion of any mechanical circulatory support device.

    Time frame: 30-day

  3. Stroke

    Number of participants with acute episode of a focal or global neurological deficit. Rates of alteration of degree of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, numbness or sensory loss affecting one side of the body, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopsia, amaurosis fugax. To consider rate of other neurologic signs or symptoms consistent with stroke duration of focal or global neurologic deficit greater than 24 hours.

    Time frame: 30-day

  4. Rate of global brain ischemia

    Rate of diffuse hypoxic damage as diagnosed at brain imaging and electroencephalography.

    Time frame: 30-days

  5. Rate of mesenteric ischemia

    Rate of abdominal pain with or without nausea and vomiting and rectal bleeding or bloody diarrhea

    Time frame: 30-days

  6. Rate of acute kidney injury

    Number of participants with postoperative change in serum creatinine concentration. Severity will be stratified on the basis of number of participants with the KDIGO (Kney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria.

    Time frame: 30-days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of paraplegia/paraparesis

    Rate of bilateral weakness and/or multimodality sensory disturb- ance below the level of the ischemic spinal lesion.

    Time frame: 30-day

  2. Rate of perioperative bleeding

    Number of participants will receive postoprative transfused red blood cell units. The E-CABG ( coronary artery by pass grafting) classification of bleeding rate has been proposed as a simple classification of perioperative bleeding

    Time frame: 30-day

  3. Rate of reoperation for bleeding

    Number of participants who will receive postoperative chest reopening for excessive bleeding.

    Time frame: 30-day

  4. Rate of mechanical circulatory support

    Number of participants who will receive the use of intra-aortic balloon pump and/or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postoperative acute heart failure.

    Time frame: 30-day

  5. Late outcomes

    Data on patient's survival status will be collected

    Time frame: 18 years

Other outcomes

  1. Rate of urgent procedure

    Number of participants who will require scheduled procedure within 24 hours of admission.

    Time frame: 30-days

  2. Rate of emergency grade 1

    Number of participants will require procedure within 24 hours of hospital admission and who are symptomatic or minimally symptomatic with stable hemodynamic conditions and no signs of malperfusion.

    Time frame: 30-days

  3. Rate of emergency grade 2

    Number of participants who will require procedure within the first 6 hours of hospital admission due to hemodynamic instability despite use of concentration inotropes and/or malperfusion.

    Time frame: 30-days

  4. Rate of salvage grade 1

    Number of participants who will require immediate surgical procedure. Rate of cardio pulmonary resuscitation with external chest compressions and/or open cardiac massage between induction of anesthesia and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass.

    Time frame: 30-days

  5. Rate of salvage grade 2

    Number of participants who will require immediate surgical procedure. Rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with external chest compressions en route to the operating theatre or prior to induction of anesthesia.

    Time frame: 30-days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Geirsson A, Shioda K, Olsson C, Ahlsson A, Gunn J, Hansson EC, Hjortdal V, Jeppsson A, Mennander A, Wickbom A, Zindovic I, Gudbjartsson T. Differential outcomes of open and clamp-on distal anastomosis techniques in acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1750-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 29. PubMed 30401530 ↗
  • Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD, Woznicki EM, Braverman AC, Trimarchi S, Myrmel T, Pyeritz R, Hutchison S, Strauss C, Ehrlich MP, Gleason TG, Korach A, Montgomery DG, Isselbacher EM, Eagle KA. Early Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;7(10):1009-1015. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2718. PubMed 36001309 ↗
  • Benedetto U, Dimagli A, Kaura A, Sinha S, Mariscalco G, Krasopoulos G, Moorjani N, Field M, Uday T, Kendal S, Cooper G, Uppal R, Bilal H, Mascaro J, Goodwin A, Angelini G, Tsang G, Akowuah E. Determinants of outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit. Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 28;43(1):44-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab586. PubMed 34468733 ↗
  • O'Hara D, McLarty A, Sun E, Itagaki S, Tannous H, Chu D, Egorova N, Chikwe J. Type-A Aortic Dissection and Cerebral Perfusion: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1461-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.144. Epub 2020 Jun 26. PubMed 32599034 ↗
  • Czerny M, Schoenhoff F, Etz C, Englberger L, Khaladj N, Zierer A, Weigang E, Hoffmann I, Blettner M, Carrel TP. The Impact of Pre-Operative Malperfusion on Outcome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results From the GERAADA Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 23;65(24):2628-2635. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.030. PubMed 26088302 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2014 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 135 months.

Of 48 observational studies under Aortic Dissection, half reached primary completion within 83 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 135. This study's 135 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 30, 2023
First posted
Jun 22, 2023
StartActual
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
May 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05912634
Lead sponsor
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Collaborators
Henri Mondor University Hospital, Universita degli Studi di Genova, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
Responsible party
Francesco Nappi (Director, Centre Cardiologique du Nord) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2014
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2025
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2026

Study contacts

Francesco Nappi
study chair · Cardiac Surgery Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion