ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04966247Updated Sep 8, 2026

Cerebral Protection in Aortic Arch Surgery

An observational study in Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Dissection and Aortic Arch, sponsored by Barts & The London NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Barts & The London NHS Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aortic arch repair surgery is a technically complex and challenging procedure to treat aortic pathologies. Despite advancements in perioperative care, detrimental neurological complications occur during or after surgery. The neurological complications increase the economic burden of healthcare, morbidity and quality of life for the patients, even if they survive. Stroke, for example, leads to an increase in healthcare and social care costs, requiring a subsequent lengthy rehabilitation. Milder neurological impairments include transient ischaemic attacks, confusion and delirium, necessitating longer intensive care and hospital stay.

Currently applied cerebral monitoring modalities are electroencephalogram and cerebral oximetry. However, they are not specific enough to timely detect early cerebral ischaemia to prevent neurological complications. S100B protein and neuron-specific enolase are serum markers that reflect cerebral damage, however, their applicability in the hyperacute setting is limited. However, rapid measurements of glial fibrillary protein have paved new pathways to detect cerebral injury. Recent studies reveal more sensitive biomarkers of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate and glycerol. These biomarkers could potentially detect cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis using the microdialysis method. The aim of the project is to develop a bedside system for early detection of cerebral ischaemia on a near real-time basis during aortic arch surgery.

Early detection of cerebral ischaemia could mandate more aggressive cerebral protection strategies by further optimisation of hypothermia and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during surgery, and optimisation of blood pressure and oxygenation in the intensive care unit. Ultimately, early detection of cerebral ischemia during surgery will prevent disabling and costly neurological complications following surgery.

Read the detailed description

Aortic arch surgery is used to treat life-threatening aortic dissections, aortic aneurysms involving the arch and other aortic pathologies. The procedure is performed under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Neurological complications are detrimental and disabling for the patients, even if they survive. In the 1990s, the risk of stroke after aortic arch surgery was 48% with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The risk of stroke has largely decreased to about 3% after elective surgery and 11% after emergency aortic arch repair in recent years, largely attributed to the development of current cerebral protection strategies. Despite this, the risk of stroke is considerably high and it accompanies devastating disabilities for the patients leading to longer hospital stays and lower quality of life for surviving patients.

Neurological complications are not without an economic burden on the NHS healthcare system. After analysing 84,184 patients admitted to hospital with a stroke, it is reported that the mean total healthcare and social care cost of a stroke patient in the UK is £22,429 at 1 year, and this amount increases to £46,039 in 5-year. The costs also increase with age and severity of the stroke (Figure 1).

Electroencephalogram (EEG) and cerebral oximetry are currently used modalities for cerebral ischaemia monitoring, yet, they fail to detect early cerebral ischaemia. EEG only processes data from superficial cortex areas only. It is also affected by anaesthetic agents, neuromuscular blocking agents and other intraoperative factors. Cerebral oximetry uses near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to monitor cerebral regional oxygen saturation in the frontal cortex. It has a weak predictive value of neurological events, and no data exists to support the optimum threshold of oximetry. Moreover, there is no association between spectroscopy measurements and stroke. The latest emerging imaging modality for monitoring is transcranial doppler ultrasound. It is operator-dependent and images are usually acquired through a small transtemporal window. It measures velocity in cranial arteries such as middle cerebral arteries, and it is still yet to be validated with larger studies. Limitations in these monitoring modalities could often bring the adequacy of cerebral protection into question.

The brain is a very sensitive organ to hypoxemia, and mixed venous oxygen saturation can be used to estimate the oxygen delivery and usage in the body by measuring the blood returning to the right side of the heart. Mixed venous saturation is influenced by many factors, such as cardiac output, respiration and oxygenation, and tissue metabolism in the perioperative period. Intraoperatively, it could serve as a more specific marker of global oxygen delivery during the cardiopulmonary bypass since the pump flow and metabolic rates are fairly constant.

Alternatively, certain proteins, such as the S100B protein, neuron-specific enolase and glial fibrillary protein (GFAP) could be monitored. They are released into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood after cerebral damage. Their concentrations correlate with the extent of cerebral injury and predict the adverse clinical outcomes. However, S100B and neuron-specific enolase cannot accurately diagnose stroke, even after 6 hours from the onset of clinical symptoms. Moreover, their measurement results could take at least 2 hours, and also reliability of the measurements decrease with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Hence, their applicability in the hyperacute setting of aortic surgery is very limited.

On the other hand, GFAP and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have been described as emerging biomarkers for cerebral injury in an acute setting. The conventional measurement of GFAP using ELISA assays cannot reliably detect low levels of GFAP, especially in the blood. However, since the introduction of the portable point-of-care device to measure GFAP and UCH-L1 levels in the blood, these could be measured in as little as 10-15 minutes. This has paved the way for further exploring the role of GFAP as a biomarker for the early identification of cerebral ischaemia in aortic arch surgery.

Recent studies have evaluated the role of metabolic biomarkers; glucose, pyruvate, lactate, glutamate, and glycerol, in cardiac surgery, using the microdialysis method. Although conventional analysis of biomarkers is difficult on a near real-time basis, it is feasible using the microdialysis method. It has been validated and in clinical use for more than 30 years. The microdialysis system consists of a small catheter with a semipermeable membrane placed in the interstitial space and physiologic salt solution is constantly perfused in the catheter allowing some of the solutes to diffuse from the interstitial space into the microdialysis catheter along a concentration gradient. The dialysate can then be analysed for concentrations of biomarkers.

Choice of biomarkers (glucose, pyruvate, lactate, glutamate, and glycerol) is largely dependent on the commercially available analysis capacity of microdialysis method and previous studies on biomarkers in cardiac surgery. Glucose is the sole fuel of the brain. It is broken down in the glycolytic pathway to generate pyruvate, which is then used in mitochondria by oxidative metabolism via the tricarboxylic acid cycle. In the absence of oxygen, pyruvate is converted to lactate by the lactate dehydrogenase reaction for anaerobic glycolysis. An increase in the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio is shown to be a very sensitive biomarker for impending cerebral damage. Glutamate, which acts as the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, is released in excessive amounts following trauma, various brain pathologies and ischaemic events, such as stroke, leading to excitotoxic injury and neural cell death. Glycerol is known to be a sensitive marker for phospholipid cellular membrane degradation after ischaemic cell injury as well. Detection of biomarkers using the near real-time microdialysis method is a promising way of developing a better cerebral monitoring system during aortic surgery to prevent neurological complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Aneurysm
  • Aortic Dissection
  • Aortic Arch
  • Aortic Diseases
03

In context

Aortic Aneurysm

222 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 150 across 117 observational studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

Barts & The London NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 151 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study focuses on patients undergoing aortic arch surgery secondary to aortic pathologies such as aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing aortic arch surgery
  • Patients aged 18 and over
  • Patients who are able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with intraoperative death
  • Patients with preoperative neurological dysfunction
  • Patients who are not able to provide (language barrier, unconscious, unable to understand, retain and process information)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with Aortic Arch Pathology

    Patients undergoing aortic arch surgery for aortic arch pathologies, such as aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection.

    Other: Microdialysis

Interventions

  • OtherMicrodialysis

    Monitoring real-time cerebral biomarkers using microdialysis method

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with postoperative stroke

    New onset stroke after surgery

    Time frame: From the start of surgery until patient is discharged from the hospital, an average of 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with postoperative delirium

    New onset delirium after surgery will be assessed using the "Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)"

    Time frame: From the start of surgery until patient is discharged from the hospital, an average of 7 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 39 months after the start.

Of 44 observational studies under Aortic Aneurysm, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 107. This study's planned 39 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 30, 2021
First posted
Jul 19, 2021
StartActual
Jul 19, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Oct 19, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 19, 2026
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04966247
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2021
Start date
Jul 19, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 19, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 19, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Myat Soe Thet, MD, MSc
Contact
myatsoe.thet@nhs.net
+44 20 7377 7000
Aung Ye Oo, MD, FRCS-CTh
principal investigator · Queen Mary University London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion