ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05903001DFUNBIOUpdated Jan 28, 2026

Diaphragmatic Function as a Biomarker

An observational study in Dyspnea; Asthmatic, COPD and Fibrosis, sponsored by RWTH Aachen University. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by RWTH Aachen University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dyspnea is among the most common symptoms in patients with respiratory diseases such as Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Fibrosis, and Pulmonary Hypertension. However, the pathophysiology and underlying mechanisms of dyspnea in patients with respiratory diseases are still poorly understood. Diaphragm dysfunction might be highly prevalent in patients with dyspnea and respiratory diseases. The association of diaphragm function and potential prognostic significance in patients with respiratory diseases has not yet been investigated.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the present project is to comprehensively measure respiratory muscle function and strength in patients with respiratory diseases. The investigators attempt to recruit 800 patients across four disease groups (Asthma, COPD, Fibrosis, and Pulmonary Hypertension) and the investigators intend to measure diaphragm and accessory respiratory muscle function and strength, lung function, and exercise tolerance, as well as the participants' symptom burden during one day at baseline in the investigators' lab. Thereafter, the investigators will follow up on patients by phone 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after the investigators have seen them in the investigators' lab. In a small subset of patients (50 overall at most) and in those in whom a recently approved drug based therapy has been initiated (i.e. Sotatercept in PH, Nintedanib in ILD, Brensocatib in Bronchiectasis, Dupilumab in COPD, Anti IL-4/IL 13 or Anti IL 5 antibodies in eosinophilic asthma) follow up will not be by phone only but also in person to repeat the above mentioned non-invasive measurements. Based on these results, not only the association between dyspnea exercise tolerance and diaphragm function in patients with respiratory diseases can be assessed, but also the prognostic significance of diaphragm dysfunction in these patients can be determined. As such, hospitalization and exacerbation requiring the intake of steroids will be assessed and followed up on by phone, and therefore the prognostic significance of diaphragm dysfunction in predicting hospitalization and the intake of steroids can be determined.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyspnea; Asthmatic
  • COPD
  • Fibrosis
  • Pulmonary Hypertension
  • Asthma
  • Dyspnea

Keywords

  • dyspnea
  • COPD
  • asthma
  • fibrosis
  • pulmonary hypertension
  • pneumology
03

In context

Dyspnea

894 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspnea; 189 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 800 is above the median of 106 across 272 observational studies indexed under Dyspnea.

Browse Dyspnea studies →

Lead sponsor

RWTH Aachen University is the lead sponsor of 230 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

800 patients, 4 groups

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient has one of the following lung diseases: , bronchial asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension
  • is 18 years or older
  • is mentally and physically able to understand the study and to follow instructions
  • are legally competent
  • signed declaration of consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • > 35
  • current or treatments or diseases in the past which could influence the evaluation of the study
  • Expected lack of willingness to actively participate in study-related measures
  • alcohol or drug abuse
  • disc herniation/prolapse
  • epilepsy
  • wheelchair bound
  • in custody due to an official or court order
  • in a dependent relationship or employment relationship with investigating physician or one of their deputy
  • emergency inpatient hospital stay within 4 weeks before study-specific examinations
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with Asthma

    Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Intercostal Muscle Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Borg scale · Diagnostic Test: MRC Breathlessness Scale · Diagnostic Test: Respiratory Questionaire · Diagnostic Test: GINA classification of Asthma · Diagnostic Test: Measurement of respiratory mouth pressure · Diagnostic Test: SNIP · Diagnostic Test: 6-minute walking distance · Diagnostic Test: 60 seconds sit-to-stand test · Diagnostic Test: Electromyography · Diagnostic Test: Lung Function

  • Patients with COPD

    Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Intercostal Muscle Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Borg scale · Diagnostic Test: MRC Breathlessness Scale · Diagnostic Test: Respiratory Questionaire · Diagnostic Test: Measurement of respiratory mouth pressure · Diagnostic Test: SNIP · Diagnostic Test: 6-minute walking distance · Diagnostic Test: 60 seconds sit-to-stand test · Diagnostic Test: Electromyography · Diagnostic Test: Lung Function · Diagnostic Test: CAT-Questionnaire

  • Patients with Fibrosis

    Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Intercostal Muscle Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Borg scale · Diagnostic Test: MRC Breathlessness Scale · Diagnostic Test: Respiratory Questionaire · Diagnostic Test: Measurement of respiratory mouth pressure · Diagnostic Test: SNIP · Diagnostic Test: 6-minute walking distance · Diagnostic Test: 60 seconds sit-to-stand test · Diagnostic Test: Electromyography · Diagnostic Test: Lung Function

  • Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

    Diagnostic Test: Diaphragm Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Intercostal Muscle Ultrasound · Diagnostic Test: Borg scale · Diagnostic Test: MRC Breathlessness Scale · Diagnostic Test: Respiratory Questionaire · Diagnostic Test: Measurement of respiratory mouth pressure · Diagnostic Test: SNIP · Diagnostic Test: 6-minute walking distance · Diagnostic Test: 60 seconds sit-to-stand test · Diagnostic Test: Electromyography · Diagnostic Test: Lung Function · Diagnostic Test: European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/ European Respiratory Society (ERS) risk group

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDiaphragm Ultrasound

    Ultrasound of the Diaphragm at the end of inspiration and expiration

  • Diagnostic testIntercostal Muscle Ultrasound

    Ultrasound of the Intercostal Muscles at the end of inspiration and expiration

  • Diagnostic testBorg scale

    Questionnaire for Perceived Exertion (Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale)

  • Diagnostic testMRC Breathlessness Scale

    The MRC Dyspnoea Scale allows the patients to indicate the extent to which their breathlessness affects their mobility.

  • Diagnostic testRespiratory Questionaire

    Specialized respiratory questionnaire with different domains (Emotional Domain, Dyspnea Domain, Mastery Domain, Fatigue Domain)

  • Diagnostic testGINA classification of Asthma

    Patients are classified according to the GINA classification of Asthma.

  • Diagnostic testMeasurement of respiratory mouth pressure

    Inspiratory and expiratory Measurement of respiratory mouth pressure

  • Diagnostic testSNIP

    Measurement of Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure

  • Diagnostic test6-minute walking distance

    The maximum walking distance achieved in 6 minutes

  • Diagnostic test60 seconds sit-to-stand test

    number of repetitions achieved in sitting down and standing up in 60 seconds

  • Diagnostic testElectromyography

    electromyography of the muscles of respiration via superficial electrodes

  • Diagnostic testLung Function

    Measurement of lung function via body plethysmography

  • Diagnostic testCAT-Questionnaire

    COPD Assessment Test (CAT)

  • Diagnostic testEuropean Society of Cardiology (ESC)/ European Respiratory Society (ERS) risk group

    Patients with pulmonary hypertension are classified according to the ESC/ERS risk group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dyspnea Borg scale 1 to 10

    Borg scale before and after "6 minute walking distance" test. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  2. Dyspnea Borg scale 1 to 10

    Borg scale before and after "6 minute walking distance" test. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: follow up 3 months after recruitment

  3. Dyspnea Borg scale 1 to 10

    Borg scale before and after "6 minute walking distance" test. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: follow up 6 months after recruitment

  4. Dyspnea Borg scale 1 to 10

    Borg scale before and after "6 minute walking distance" test. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: follow up 12 months after recruitment

  5. Dyspnea Borg scale 1 to 10

    Borg scale before and after "6 minute walking distance" test. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: follow up 18 months after recruitment

Secondary outcomes

  1. 6 minute walking distance in m

    Measurement of achieved walking distance in 6 minutes

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  2. Sit-to stand-test (60 seconds)

    Measurement of achieved repetitions of standing up and sitting down from an initial seated position in 60 seconds.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification scale 1 to 4

    Patients are linked to a NYHA degree. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting, follow up up to 18 months after last recruitment

  4. Modified Medical Research Council (MRC) Breathlessness Scale 1 to 5

    Patients are assessed and grouped according to their MRC Breathlessness Scale. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting, follow up up to 18 months after last recruitment

  5. Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ)

    Assessments of different domains (Emotional Domain, Dyspnea Domain, Mastery Domain, Fatigue Domain) in a standardized questionnaire on a scale from 1 to 7. The scores for each question of each dimension are added together and divided by the number of completed questions in each domain. In general, higher scores mean a worse outcome and lower scores mean a better outcome. For the dyspnea domain for example, a high score means that patients have less dyspnea, and a low score means that patients have more dyspnea.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting, follow up up to 18 months after last recruitment

  6. COPD Assessment Test (CAT-Questionnaire) from 0 to 40 points.

    Patients are evaluated and placed into the corresponding groups. Lower scores show fewer dyspnea, higher scores indicate more dyspnea.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting, follow up up to 18 months after last recruitment

  7. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) classification

    Patients are assessed and grouped as mild, moderate, or severe according to the GINA classification.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting, follow up up to 18 months after last recruitment

  8. Body Plethysmography

    TLC (Total lung capacity) in percent predicted.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  9. Diaphragm Thickening Ratio (DTR) in percent

    Via ultrasound, the diaphragm thickening ratio (DTR) was calculated as thickness at total lung capacity (TLC) divided by thickness at functional residual capacity (FRC).

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  10. Diaphragm thickness at Total lung capacity (TLC)

    Via ultrasound, the diaphragm thickness at TLC is measured at the maximum point of inspiration.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  11. Diaphragm thickness at functional capacity (FRC)

    Via ultrasound, the diaphragm thickness at FRC is measured after a normal expiration.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  12. Diaphragm ultrasound sniff velocity in cm/s

    Via ultrasound, the diaphragm sniff velocity was assessed during tidal breathing and following a maximum sniff.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  13. Intercostal Muscle ultrasound thickness at Total lung capacity (TLC) in cm

    Via ultrasound, the intercostal thickness at TLC is measured at the maximum point of inspiration.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  14. Intercostal Muscle ultrasound thickness at functional capacity (FRC) in cm

    Via ultrasound, the intercostal thickness at FRC is measured after a normal expiration.

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  15. Intercostal Muscle Thickening Ratio in percent

    Via ultrasound, the intercostal muscle thickening ratio was calculated as thickness at total lung capacity (TLC) divided by thickness at functional residual capacity (FRC).

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  16. Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) in percent predicted

    Measurement of Maximum Inspiratory Pressure

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  17. Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP) in percent predicted

    Measurement of Maximum Expiratory Pressure

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  18. Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure (SNIP) in percent predicted

    Measurement of Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  19. Blood Gas Analysis in cmH2O

    oxygen partial pressure (pO2)

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  20. Blood Gas Analysis in cmH2O

    carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2)

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  21. Blood Gas Analysis

    pH scale

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  22. Blood Gas Analysis in mmol/l

    Base Excess

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  23. Blood Gas Analysis in (I1/s) percent

    Base Excess

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

  24. Electromyography (EMG)

    Measurement of electrical activity during different breathing maneuvers (Sniff, Cough, Valsalva, Mueller) via superficial electrodes placed on the diaphragm and accessory respiratory muscles (Sternocleidomastoideus muscle, intercostal muscles).

    Time frame: 6 months recruiting

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Daher A, Balfanz P, Aetou M, Hartmann B, Muller-Wieland D, Muller T, Marx N, Dreher M, Cornelissen CG. Clinical course of COVID-19 patients needing supplemental oxygen outside the intensive care unit. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):2256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81444-9. PubMed 33500431 ↗
  • Daher A, Balfanz P, Cornelissen C, Muller A, Bergs I, Marx N, Muller-Wieland D, Hartmann B, Dreher M, Muller T. Follow up of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease sequelae. Respir Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;174:106197. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106197. Epub 2020 Oct 20. PubMed 33120193 ↗
  • Balfanz P, Hartmann B, Muller-Wieland D, Kleines M, Hackl D, Kossack N, Kersten A, Cornelissen C, Muller T, Daher A, Stohr R, Bickenbach J, Marx G, Marx N, Dreher M. Early risk markers for severe clinical course and fatal outcome in German patients with COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 29;16(1):e0246182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246182. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33513168 ↗
  • Spiesshoefer J, Henke C, Herkenrath S, Brix T, Randerath W, Young P, Boentert M. Transdiapragmatic pressure and contractile properties of the diaphragm following magnetic stimulation. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2019 Aug;266:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 25. PubMed 31029769 ↗
  • Spiesshoefer J, Henke C, Herkenrath S, Randerath W, Brix T, Young P, Boentert M. Assessment of Central Drive to the Diaphragm by Twitch Interpolation: Normal Values, Theoretical Considerations, and Future Directions. Respiration. 2019;98(4):283-293. doi: 10.1159/000500726. Epub 2019 Jul 26. PubMed 31352459 ↗
  • Spiesshoefer J, Herkenrath S, Henke C, Langenbruch L, Schneppe M, Randerath W, Young P, Brix T, Boentert M. Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Strength and Diaphragm Ultrasound: Normative Values, Theoretical Considerations, and Practical Recommendations. Respiration. 2020;99(5):369-381. doi: 10.1159/000506016. Epub 2020 May 12. PubMed 32396905 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 41 months after the start.

Of 116 non-industry observational studies under Dyspnea, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 41 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 125 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 18, 2023
First posted
Jun 15, 2023
StartActual
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Jan 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05903001
Responsible party
Jens Spießhöfer (PD Dr. med., RWTH Aachen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 15, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Jens Spiesshoefer, MD
Contact
jspiesshoefer@ukaachen.de
0049 2418037036
Michael Dreher, MD
study director · Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Binaya Regmi, MD
study chair · Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Jens Spiesshoefer, MD
principal investigator · Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Mustafa Elfeturi
study chair · Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Benedikt Jörn
study chair · Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Faniry Ratsimba
study chair · Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Felix Wagner
study chair · Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Maria Aetou, Dr. med.
study chair · RWTH Aachen University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion