ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05889208TAVI-PACEUpdated Jun 5, 2023

Prophylactic Permanent Pacemaker in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

An interventional study of Prophylactic pacemaker implantation in Aortic Stenosis and Right Bundle-Branch Block, sponsored by Aalborg University Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-05.

Sponsored by Aalborg University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
320
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the safety and outcome of prophylactic pacemaker implantation in patients with right bundle-branch block undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve (TAVI) implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular ejection fraction.Participants will be randomized to:

  • Prophylactic pacemaker implantation prior TAVI
  • Conservative strategy
Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is standard of care treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis ≥ 75 years and/or not eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement 1. There are two types of prosthetic valves: balloon expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) types with their distinct features 2. The TAVI-procedure and preexisting conditions in this population entails a risk of permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVI due to conduction disturbances related to the valve implantation and valve type (BE vs. SE). The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI is between 2.3 - 36 % depending on valve type and pre-existing conditions3. Major risk factors are right bundle branch block (RBBB), left ventricular outflow track calcification, deeper valve implantation, and SE valves4. Pre-existing RBBB in patients undergoing TAVI occurs in 10% of the cases and it is associated with poor outcome5 in terms of higher pacemaker rate and mortality. Advanced conduction disturbances in patients with pre-existing RBBB occur within three days after the TAVI-procedure6. Hence, pre-existing RBBB is a major risk factor in the TAVI-population with higher mortality7 and needs special attention in peri-operative care. Current European Society Cardiology guidelines do not recommend prophylactic pacemaker implantation in patients without indication for permanent pacing8. However, cardiac pacing is associated with a risk of complications and development of heart failure9, and there is no randomized trial demonstrating a benefit of prophylactic pacemaker implantation in patients with pre-existing RBBB. Although previous observational data suggest prophylactic pacemaker implantation in patients with pre-existing RBBB shortens the TAVI procedure and prevents rehospitalization due to heart block10. Hence, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the outcome of prophylactic permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing TAVI with pre-procedural RBBB and additional risk factors for need of post-procedural permanent pacing. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome and safety of prophylactic pacemaker implantation in this high-risk patient group versus a conservative strategy in a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE To evaluate safety and outcomes of prophylactic permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with RBBB undergoing TAVI.

HYPOTHESIS Prophylactic permanent pacemaker implantation reduces composite primary outcome in patients with RBBB undergoing TAVI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Stenosis
  • Right Bundle-Branch Block

Keywords

  • Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation
  • Pacemaker
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 293 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 320 is above the median of 126 across 554 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Aalborg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing TAVI indicated by severe valvular aortic stenosis
  • Written
  • ≥ 40 %
  • Persistent RBBB in 12-lead (RSR' pattern in V1-3, QRS duration > 120 milliseconds, and wide S wave in leads I, aVL, V5-6)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other indications for pacemaker implantation or previously implanted pacemaker
  • \< 1 year
  • No written
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
320 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Prophylactic pacemaker implantation

    Brady-pacemaker implantation prior the TAVI-procedure. Pacemaker modus is according to local conditions.

    Device: Prophylactic pacemaker implantation

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Pacemaker implantation after TAVI if atrioventricular block occurs.

Interventions

  • DeviceProphylactic pacemaker implantation

    Pacemaker implantation prior the TAVI-procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Events in the control arm

    Composite of all-cause mortality, unplanned pacemaker implantation and new onset of heart failure

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Capodanno D, Conradi L, De Bonis M, De Paulis R, Delgado V, Freemantle N, Gilard M, Haugaa KH, Jeppsson A, Juni P, Pierard L, Prendergast BD, Sadaba JR, Tribouilloy C, Wojakowski W; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2022 Jun 1;43(21):2022. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac051. PubMed 34453165 ↗
  • Suh SH, Oh TR, Choi HS, Yang EM, Kim CS, Bae EH, Ma SK, Oh KH, Hyun YY, Sung S, Kim SW; Korean Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (KNOW-CKD) Investigators. Bone Mineral Density and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from KNOW-CKD Study. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 25;12(5):1850. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051850. PubMed 36902637 ↗
  • van Rosendael PJ, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new-generation devices: a systematic review. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):2003-2013. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx785. PubMed 29420704 ↗
  • Maeno Y, Abramowitz Y, Kawamori H, Kazuno Y, Kubo S, Takahashi N, Mangat G, Okuyama K, Kashif M, Chakravarty T, Nakamura M, Cheng W, Friedman J, Berman D, Makkar RR, Jilaihawi H. A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12. PubMed 28412434 ↗
  • Auffret V, Webb JG, Eltchaninoff H, Munoz-Garcia AJ, Himbert D, Tamburino C, Nombela-Franco L, Nietlispach F, Moris C, Ruel M, Dager AE, Serra V, Cheema AN, Amat-Santos IJ, de Brito FS Jr, Lemos PA, Abizaid A, Sarmento-Leite R, Dumont E, Barbanti M, Durand E, Alonso Briales JH, Vahanian A, Bouleti C, Imme S, Maisano F, Del Valle R, Benitez LM, Garcia Del Blanco B, Puri R, Philippon F, Urena M, Rodes-Cabau J. Clinical Impact of Baseline Right Bundle Branch Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1564-1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jul 19. PubMed 28734885 ↗
  • Watanabe Y, Kozuma K, Hioki H, Kawashima H, Nara Y, Kataoka A, Nagura F, Nakashima M, Shirai S, Tada N, Araki M, Takagi K, Yamanaka F, Yamamoto M, Hayashida K. Pre-Existing Right Bundle Branch Block Increases Risk for Death After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Balloon-Expandable Valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2210-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.035. PubMed 27832846 ↗
  • Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabes JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylen I, Tolosana JM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2022 May 1;43(17):1651. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac075. PubMed 34455430 ↗
  • Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation. 1998 Mar 17;97(10):987-95. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.10.987. PubMed 9529267 ↗
  • Okuno T, Asami M, Heg D, Lanz J, Praz F, Hagemeyer D, Brugger N, Grani C, Huber A, Spirito A, Raber L, Stortecky S, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Impact of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Calcification on Procedural Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 10;13(15):1789-1799. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.015. PubMed 32763071 ↗
  • Bisson A, Bodin A, Herbert J, Lacour T, Saint Etienne C, Pierre B, Clementy N, Deharo P, Babuty D, Fauchier L. Pacemaker Implantation After Balloon- or Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015896. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015896. Epub 2020 May 2. Erratum In: J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 7;9(13):e014562. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014562. PubMed 32362220 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2023; primary completion for Dec 2026, 36 months later.

Of 177 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Aortic Valve Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 79. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 288 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 72.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 26, 2023
First posted
Jun 5, 2023
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
Last update
Jun 5, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05889208
Responsible party
Ashkan Eftekhari (Consultant ass. professor MD PhD, Aalborg University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2023
Start date
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 5, 2023

Study contacts

Ashkan Eftekhari, MD PhD
Contact
asef@rn.dk
+4597664465
Ashkan Eftekhari
principal investigator · Aalborg University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion