An interventional study of linguistic processes in Cognitive Neurodegenerative, Stroke and Verbal Fluency Disorders, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-25.
Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Verbal fluency test require to produce as much words as possible in one or two minutes. This test is highly sensitive to main brain diseases and are therefore widely used in clinical routine for diagnostic purpose. The verbal fluency task requires several cognitive processes including executive and linguistic processes for which it is difficult to extract the origin of the deficit. For this reason, fluency tests are variably interpreted in terms of executive or language. The implementation of an experimental protocol exploring each of these processes separately and studying the links between the verbal fluency task and each of these processes should allow a better understanding of the origin of the verbal fluency deficit after brain injury and improve the identification of key brain structures.
Indeed, the lesion determinants of this task remain to be clarified despite remarkable advances due to the evolution of imaging techniques (voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM); voxel-based morphometry (VBM)).
Furthermore, while the direct assessment of linguistic process, semantic memory, and processing speed is well defined, the examination of the executive component (i.e., strategic search process) remains unsettled and will be undertaken in this study.
This work will take advantage of data from previous multicenter work, validated methodologies for both analysis and interpretation of cognitive performance as well as anatomic-clinical correlations at the voxel level and will be performed in cognitive neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disease.
8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 302 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens is the lead sponsor of 586 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Diagnostic Test: linguistic processes
Linguistic processes are assessed by performance score on the following tests: * naming tests : BNT 34 (Colombo \& Assal, 1992) and semantic naming adapted from the BECS-GRECO (Merck et al., 2011) * vocabulary test (Mill Hill - Deltour, 1993), * repetition tests (Gremots - Bézy et al., 2016), * articulatory speed (Majerus, 2014 ; Roussel et al., 2012) * semantic matching task adapted from the PPT (Howard \& Patterson, 1992) and from the BECS-GRECO (Merck et al., 2011), * semantic categorization and attributes adapted from the BECS-GRECO (Merck et al., 2011), * phonologic and semantic research tasks adapted from the color TMT (D'helia et al., 1996)
Corelation between Linguistic test performance score and verbal fluency score
Linguistic processes are assessed by performance score on the following tests: * BNT 34 and semantic naming adapted from the BECS-GRECO * vocabulary test * repetition tests * articulatory speed * semantic matching task adapted from the PPT and from the BECS-GRECO * semantic categorization and attributes adapted from the BECS-GRECO * phonologic and semantic research tasks adapted from the color TMT
Time frame: 1 hour
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens →