ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07094048CHUQUL_HO001Updated Jul 22, 2026

Immunoglobulins in Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving a BCMA-Directed T Cell Engager

A Phase 4 interventional study of Target trough IgG level of 8-10 g/L and Target trough IgG level 4-6 g/L in Multiple Myeloma Refractory and Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval. Recruiting at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bispecific antibody therapies targeting BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with multiple myeloma. They are currently used in cases of refractory multiple myeloma but are also being investigated in earlier lines of treatment. However, these new therapies can lead to deeper immunosuppression and exacerbate an underlying immunosuppressive state in patients with multiple myeloma. As a result, infectious complications are common with these therapies and are a significant concern. Therefore, preventing infections in this population is crucial. However, data on the best strategies for prevention are currently lacking.

Read the detailed description

Although the effectiveness of immunoglobulins (Ig) has been demonstrated, it remains to be determined whether immunoglobulin administration is necessary for all patients receiving these therapies or only for those with low serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels. Furthermore, the optimal target IgG level to achieve in order to reduce the risk of infections is also unknown in this specific population of multiple myeloma patients. Guidance needs to be provided to the clinicians to better support MM patients undergoing this novel therapy by addressing the hypogammaglobulinemia and therefore limiting and ideally avoiding the high risk of infections.

In this prospective, randomized, unblinded, multicenter study, as per the standard of care approach, every patient with relapsed refractory MM receiving a BCMA-directed TCE with history of recurrent or severe infections and/or total IgG level less than 4 g/L will receive Ig support (intravenous ou subcutaneous). Once on Ig supplementation, the optimal target trough IgG level to achieve is not well established. The goal of this study is therefore to better define, in this patient population , the target trough IgG level to achieve a reduction in the incidence of severe infections.

The primary objective is to demonstrate the non-inferiority in the cumulative incidence of severe infections at 3 months between patients on Ig support with a target trough IgG level of 4-6 g/L (experimental group) versus a target trough IgG level of 8-10 g/L (standard of care (SOC) group).

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma Refractory
  • Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Immunoglobulins
  • Multiple Myeloma
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,760 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 769 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 41 across 3,005 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Multiple myeloma patient:
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • ≥ 1
  • Receiving a BCMA-directed T-cell Engager therapy (starting on treatment)
  • On previous Ig support or not

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years old
  • Pregancy or breastfeeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A IgG level 8-10 g/L

    Immunoglobulin support (subcutaneous or intravenous)

    Drug: Target trough IgG level of 8-10 g/L

  • Experimental
    Group B IgG level 4-6 g/L

    Immunglobulin support (subcutaneous or intravenous)

    Drug: Target trough IgG level 4-6 g/L

  • Other
    Group C

    No immunoglobulin support. If pre specified conditions are met, crossover to Group A or B.

    Drug: No history of recurrent or severe infections and total IgG level higher or equal at 4 g/L

Interventions

  • DrugTarget trough IgG level of 8-10 g/L

    Target trough IgG level of 8-10 g/L

    Also known as: Standard of care

  • DrugTarget trough IgG level 4-6 g/L

    Target trough IgG level of 4-6 g/L

    Also known as: Experimental

  • DrugNo history of recurrent or severe infections and total IgG level higher or equal at 4 g/L

    If, during follow-up, the patient presents recurrent or severe infections and/or total IgG level less 4 g/L, crossover to group A or B

    Also known as: Crossover

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severe infections

    Non-inferiority in the cumulative incidence of severe infections at 3 months between patients on Ig support with a target trough IgG level of 4-6 g/L (experimental group) versus a target trough IgG level of 8-10 g/L (standard of care group)

    Time frame: From enrollment to 3 months after time of randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Minor/Moderate infections rate

    Rates of minor/moderate infection rates

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 monts after randomization

  2. All infection rate

    All infections rate

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after randomization

Other outcomes

  1. Vaccinal response (optional)

    For patients with no previous Ig support, we will examine the vaccinal response with specific antibody titers to tetanus.

    Time frame: From vaccination (at enrollment) to 1 month after vaccination.

  2. CM reactivation and infection rate

    CMV reactivation and infection

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after randomization

  3. Adverse events related to the administration of the Ig product

    Adverse events related to the administration of the Ig product

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after randomization

  4. Quality of life assessment, according to the EORTC-QLQ-C30

    Quality of life assessment (SC and IV)

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after randomization

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mohan M, Monge J, Shah N, Luan D, Forsberg M, Bhatlapenumarthi V, Balev M, Patwari A, Cheruvalath H, Bhutani D, Thanendrarajan S, Dhakal B, Zangari M, Al-Hadidi S, Cooper D, Lentzsch S, van Rhee F, D'Souza A, Szabo A, Schinke C, Chakraborty R. Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: multi-institutional real-world study. Blood Cancer J. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01003-z. PubMed 38443345 ↗
  • Compagno N, Cinetto F, Semenzato G, Agostini C. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in lymphoproliferative disorders and rituximab-related secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: a single-center experience in 61 patients. Haematologica. 2014 Jun;99(6):1101-6. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.101261. Epub 2014 Mar 28. PubMed 24682509 ↗
  • Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Math D, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Bock A, Costa-Carvalho BT, Granert C, Haag S, Hernandez D, Kiessling P, Kus J, Matamoros N, Niehues T, Schmidt S, Schulze I, Borte M. Children and adults with primary antibody deficiencies gain quality of life by subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Oct;114(4):936-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.053. PubMed 15480339 ↗
  • Ducruet T, Levasseur MC, Des Roches A, Kafal A, Dicaire R, Haddad E. Pharmacoeconomic advantages of subcutaneous versus intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in a Canadian pediatric center. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):585-7.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.022. Epub 2012 Oct 2. No abstract available. PubMed 23040368 ↗
  • Martin A, Lavoie L, Goetghebeur M, Schellenberg R. Economic benefits of subcutaneous rapid push versus intravenous immunoglobulin infusion therapy in adult patients with primary immune deficiency. Transfus Med. 2013 Feb;23(1):55-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01201.x. Epub 2012 Nov 20. PubMed 23167310 ↗
  • Perez EE, Orange JS, Bonilla F, Chinen J, Chinn IK, Dorsey M, El-Gamal Y, Harville TO, Hossny E, Mazer B, Nelson R, Secord E, Jordan SC, Stiehm ER, Vo AA, Ballow M. Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: A review of evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;139(3S):S1-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Dec 29. PubMed 28041678 ↗
  • Gardulf A. Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies: advantages of the subcutaneous route. BioDrugs. 2007;21(2):105-16. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200721020-00005. PubMed 17402794 ↗
  • Stiehm ER. Adverse effects of human immunoglobulin therapy. Transfus Med Rev. 2013 Jul;27(3):171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 6. PubMed 23835249 ↗
  • Jolles S, Michallet M, Agostini C, Albert MH, Edgar D, Ria R, Trentin L, Levy V. Treating secondary antibody deficiency in patients with haematological malignancy: European expert consensus. Eur J Haematol. 2021 Apr;106(4):439-449. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13580. Epub 2021 Feb 2. PubMed 33453130 ↗
  • Otani IM, Lehman HK, Jongco AM, Tsao LR, Azar AE, Tarrant TK, Engel E, Walter JE, Truong TQ, Khan DA, Ballow M, Cunningham-Rundles C, Lu H, Kwan M, Barmettler S. Practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Primary Immunodeficiency and Altered Immune Response Committees. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 May;149(5):1525-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Feb 14. PubMed 35176351 ↗
  • Guo Y, Tian X, Wang X, Xiao Z. Adverse Effects of Immunoglobulin Therapy. Front Immunol. 2018 Jun 8;9:1299. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01299. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29951056 ↗
  • Orange JS, Grossman WJ, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Impact of trough IgG on pneumonia incidence in primary immunodeficiency: A meta-analysis of clinical studies. Clin Immunol. 2010 Oct;137(1):21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Aug 1. PubMed 20675197 ↗
  • Lee JL, Mohamed Shah N, Makmor-Bakry M, Islahudin FH, Alias H, Noh LM, Mohd Saffian S. A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis on the Impact of Increasing IgG Trough Level on Infection Rates in Primary Immunodeficiency Patients on Intravenous IgG Therapy. J Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul;40(5):682-698. doi: 10.1007/s10875-020-00788-5. Epub 2020 May 16. PubMed 32417999 ↗
  • Raje N, Anderson K, Einsele H, Efebera Y, Gay F, Hammond SP, Lesokhin AM, Lonial S, Ludwig H, Moreau P, Patel K, Ramasamy K, Mateos MV. Monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of infections in patients with MM receiving bispecific antibody therapy: consensus recommendations from an expert panel. Blood Cancer J. 2023 Aug 1;13(1):116. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00879-7. PubMed 37528088 ↗
  • Frerichs KA, Verkleij CPM, Mateos MV, Martin TG, Rodriguez C, Nooka A, Banerjee A, Chastain K, Perales-Puchalt A, Stephenson T, Uhlar C, Kobos R, van der Holt B, Kruyswijk S, Kuipers MT, Groen K, Vishwamitra D, Skerget S, Cortes-Selva D, Doyle M, Zaaijer HL, Zweegman S, Verona RI, van de Donk NWCJ. Teclistamab impairs humoral immunity in patients with heavily pretreated myeloma: importance of immunoglobulin supplementation. Blood Adv. 2024 Jan 9;8(1):194-206. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011658. PubMed 38052042 ↗
  • Lancman G, Parsa K, Kotlarz K, Avery L, Lurie A, Lieberman-Cribbin A, Cho HJ, Parekh SS, Richard S, Richter J, Rodriguez C, Rossi A, Sanchez LJ, Thibaud S, Jagannath S, Chari A. IVIg Use Associated with Ten-Fold Reduction of Serious Infections in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies. Blood Cancer Discov. 2023 Nov 1;4(6):440-451. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-23-0049. PubMed 37769148 ↗
  • Lesokhin AM, Tomasson MH, Arnulf B, Bahlis NJ, Miles Prince H, Niesvizky R, Rodriotaguez-Otero P, Martinez-Lopez J, Koehne G, Touzeau C, Jethava Y, Quach H, Depaus J, Yokoyama H, Gabayan AE, Stevens DA, Nooka AK, Manier S, Raje N, Iida S, Raab MS, Searle E, Leip E, Sullivan ST, Conte U, Elmeliegy M, Czibere A, Viqueira A, Mohty M. Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial results. Nat Med. 2023 Sep;29(9):2259-2267. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02528-9. Epub 2023 Aug 15. PubMed 37582952 ↗
  • Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, Nahi H, San-Miguel JF, Oriol A, Nooka AK, Martin T, Rosinol L, Chari A, Karlin L, Benboubker L, Mateos MV, Bahlis N, Popat R, Besemer B, Martinez-Lopez J, Sidana S, Delforge M, Pei L, Trancucci D, Verona R, Girgis S, Lin SXW, Olyslager Y, Jaffe M, Uhlar C, Stephenson T, Van Rampelbergh R, Banerjee A, Goldberg JD, Kobos R, Krishnan A, Usmani SZ. Teclistamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 11;387(6):495-505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203478. Epub 2022 Jun 5. PubMed 35661166 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 35 months after the start.

Of 28 phase 4 interventional studies under Multiple Myeloma, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 35 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 11, 2025
First posted
Jul 30, 2025
StartActual
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2029
Last update
Jul 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07094048
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2025
Start date
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Philippe Nadeau, PhD
Contact
philippe.nadeau@chudequebec.ca
1-418-525-4444 ext. 67324
Dr Julie Côté, MD,FRCPC
study chair · CHU de Québec-Université Laval
Dr Julie Côté, MD,FRCPC
principal investigator · CHU de Québec-Université Laval
Dr Vincent Laroche, MD,FRCPC
principal investigator · CHU de Québec-Université Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion