ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05854745Updated Nov 22, 2024

Comparison of Virtual Training to In-Person Training of Helping Babies Breathe in Ethiopia

An interventional study of HBB Virtual Training and HBB In-person Training in Neonatal Death and Birth Asphyxia, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in Ethiopia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-22.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
262
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a program that teaches providers in low- and middle-income countries about neonatal resuscitation. Historically, HBB training was delivered in person. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many subject matter experts were unable to travel to conduct HBB courses. Innovative methods for teaching HBB are needed to promote the acquisition and retention of resuscitation skills and knowledge.

Read the detailed description

In this non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, medical students, nursing students, and midwifery students will be randomized to receive either standard in-person HBB training (control) or virtual telesimulation training (intervention). The hypothesis is that virtual delivery is as effective as in-person training of HBB content when teaching neonatal resuscitation skills and knowledge to medical, nursing, and midwifery students.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Death
  • Birth Asphyxia

Keywords

  • Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) training
03

In context

Perinatal Death

87 studies on the registry are indexed under Perinatal Death; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 262 is below the median of 500 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Perinatal Death.

Browse Perinatal Death studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,162 studies on the registry; 429 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults
  • Year IV through year VI medical students, year II to IV nursing students, year II and III midwifery students at Jimma University in Jimma, Ethiopia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors
  • Individuals who are not medical students, nursing students, or midwifery students at Jimma University.
  • Individuals who attended a neonatal resuscitation training course in the preceding year.
  • Individuals who would be unavailable or unwilling to participate in follow-up study activities throughout the 2-month post-initial training period.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
262 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual HBB Teaching

    HBB Virtual Training (Intervention): Participants will receive a blend of virtual training and telesimulation delivered by pediatricians from Ethiopia. The intervention consists of one day of virtual lectures and didactics from the HBB curriculum and skill assessments using neonatal mannequins.

    Behavioral: HBB Virtual Training

  • Active comparator
    In-person HBB Teaching

    Participants will receive in-person HBB instruction by pediatricians from Ethiopia. The control consists of one day of HBB lectures and didactics and skill assessments using neonatal mannequins.

    Behavioral: HBB In-person Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralHBB Virtual Training

    HBB Virtual Training (Intervention): The 2nd edition HBB training course focuses on preparation for birth, routine care for all babies, the Golden Minute, and continued ventilation with normal or slow heart rate. The one-day virtual training will be delivered remotely to participants via Zoom. Facilitators and training materials will be the same in both the control and intervention arms.

  • BehavioralHBB In-person Training

    HBB In-Person Training (Control): The 2nd edition HBB training course focuses on preparation for birth, routine care for all babies, the Golden Minute, and continued ventilation with normal or slow heart rate. The one-day in-person training will be delivered in person. Facilitators and training materials will be the same in both the control and intervention arms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Helping Babies Breathe Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) B

    Compare skill retention between the virtual delivery of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) with the in-person delivery of HBB. This is a standardized evaluation of HBB skills, a score of 17 out of 23 is required to pass. Score range: 0 to 23, higher scores indicate better HBB skills, and a score of 17 or higher is required to pass.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 15 minutes to assess)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Helping Babies Breathe Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) B

    Compare skill acquisition between the virtual delivery of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) with the in-person delivery of HBB. This is a standardized evaluation of HBB skills, a score of 17 out of 23 is required to pass. Score range: 0 to 23, higher scores indicate better HBB skills, and a score of 17 or higher is required to pass.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 15 minutes to assess)

  2. Helping Babies Breathe Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) A

    Compare skill retention between the virtual delivery of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) with the in-person delivery of HBB. This is a standardized evaluation of HBB skills, a score of 9 out of 12 is required to pass. Score range: 0 to 12, higher scores indicate better HBB skills, and a score of 9 or higher is required to pass.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  3. Helping Babies Breathe Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) A

    Compare skill acquisition between the virtual delivery of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) with the in-person delivery of HBB. This is a standardized evaluation of HBB skills, a score of 9 out of 12 is required to pass. Score range: 0 to 12, higher scores indicate better HBB skills, and a score of 9 or higher is required to pass.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  4. Helping Babies Breathe Bag and Mask Ventilation score

    Compare skill acquisition between virtual delivery of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) with the in-person delivery of HBB. This is a standardized evaluation of bag and mask ventilation, a score out of 14. Score range: 0 to 14, higher scores indicate better HBB skills, and a score of 14 is required to pass.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  5. Helping Babies Breathe Bag and Mask Ventilation score

    Compare skill retention between virtual delivery of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) with the in-person delivery of HBB. This is a standardized evaluation of bag and mask ventilation, a score out of 14. Score range: 0 to 14, higher scores indicate better HBB skills, and a score of 14 is required to pass.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  6. Helping Babies Breathe Multiple Choice Questionnaire score

    Determine baseline understanding of HBB material for each participant. This exam contains 18 questions pertaining to HBB curriculum. Score range: 0 to 18, higher scores indicate better HBB knowledge, and a score of 15 or higher is required to pass.

    Time frame: Immediately before HBB training (approximately 20 minutes to assess)

  7. Helping Babies Breathe Multiple Choice Questionnaire score

    Determine knowledge acquisition of HBB material for each participant. This exam contains 18 questions pertaining to HBB curriculum. Score range: 0 to 18, higher scores indicate better HBB knowledge, and a score of 15 or higher is required to pass.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 20 minutes to assess)

  8. Helping Babies Breathe Multiple Choice Questionnaire score

    Determine knowledge retention of HBB material for each participant. This exam contains 18 questions pertaining to HBB curriculum. Score range: 0 to 18, higher scores indicate better HBB knowledge, and a score of 15 or higher is required to pass.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 20 minutes to assess)

  9. NeoNatalie Live Data: Heart rate

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. During each simulation, the heart rate of the mannequin will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  10. NeoNatalie Live Data: Ventilation pressure

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. During each simulation, the ventilation pressure of the mannequin will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  11. NeoNatalie Live Data: Time to spontaneous breathing

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. Data about the amount of time it takes to reach a ventilation rate of 40-60 breaths per minute will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  12. NeoNatalie Live Data: Ventilation attempts

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. Data about the number of ventilation attempts will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  13. NeoNatalie Live Data: Heart rate

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. During each simulation, the heart rate of the mannequin will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  14. NeoNatalie Live Data: Ventilation pressure

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. During each simulation, the ventilation pressure of the mannequin will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  15. NeoNatalie Live Data: Time to spontaneous breathing

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. Data about the amount of time it takes to reach a ventilation rate of 40-60 breaths per minute will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  16. NeoNatalie Live Data: Ventilation attempts

    NeoNatalie Live is a mannequin that will provide data on bag-mask ventilation proficiency. Data about the number of ventilation attempts will be collected per participant.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 10 minutes to assess)

  17. Attitude Questionnaire

    5-point Likert scale designed to assess perceived confidence in performing HBB skills.

    Time frame: Immediately before HBB training (approximately 5 minutes to assess)

  18. Attitude Questionnaire

    5-point Likert scale designed to assess perceived confidence in performing HBB skills as well as evaluation satisfaction with the course and its instructors.

    Time frame: Immediately after HBB training (approximately 5 minutes to assess)

  19. Attitude Questionnaire

    5-point Likert scale designed to assess sustained perceived confidence in performing HBB skills as well as evaluation satisfaction with the course and its instructors.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 5 minutes to assess)

  20. Profile of perceived barriers and facilitators

    Focus group discussions will be intended to understand differences in perceived barriers/facilitators of training. This will explore confidence in performing HBB techniques and attitudes toward virtual and in-person delivery of content. The objective of the focus groups will be to identify key themes around participants' perspectives of the HBB training to provide context around the outcomes listed above.

    Time frame: Two months after HBB training (approximately 60 minutes to assess)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jimma University
    Jimma, Ethiopia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sobelman C, Richard K, McQuilkin P, Fahey N. Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 May 31;8:2333794X211019698. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211019698. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34104697 ↗
  • Jones-Bamman C, Niermeyer S, McConnell K, Thomas JF, Olson C. Teaching Helping Babies Breathe via Telehealth: A New Application in Rural Guatemala. Biomed Hub. 2019 Sep 24;4(3):1-6. doi: 10.1159/000502934. eCollection 2019 Sep-Dec. PubMed 31993430 ↗
  • Mediratta RP, Clary MK, Liang JW, Daniels K, Muhe LM, Lee HC, Eshetu B, Berhane M. Remote versus in-person pre-service neonatal resuscitation training: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial in Ethiopia. Resuscitation. 2025 Apr;209:110556. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110556. Epub 2025 Feb 20. PubMed 39986344 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual de-identified participant data and data dictionary will be available on Dryad within 12 months of publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Individual de-identified participant data and data dictionary will be available on Dryad within 12 months of publication.

Access criteria: Data will be shared with researchers upon reasonable request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2023 to primary completion in Aug 2023, 3 months.

Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Perinatal Death, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 54. This study's 3 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 27, 2023
First posted
May 11, 2023
StartActual
May 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Aug 19, 2023
CompletionActual
Oct 23, 2023
Last update
Nov 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05854745
Collaborators
Jimma University, Laerdal Foundation
Responsible party
Rishi Mediratta (Clinical Associate Professor, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2023
Start date
May 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 19, 2023
Completion
Oct 23, 2023
Last update
Nov 22, 2024

Study contacts

Rishi Mediratta
study chair · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion