ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07560839AMANIUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Accelerating Maternal and Newborn Survival: The AMANI Study

An interventional study of Audit and Feedback and Enhanced Mentorship in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response (MPDSR) Implementation, Maternal Mortality and Neonatal Mortality, sponsored by University of Washington. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Kenya. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Nov 5, 2026Now Enrolling by invitationStudy documents posted+5 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
260
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this cluster randomized controlled trial is to learn if a practice facilitation package (including both audit and feedback and enhanced mentorship) can increase the use of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in Kenyan health facilities and reduce maternal and perinatal deaths. Twenty facilities will be enrolled (10 intervention; 10 control) and the intervention will be tested with facility staff including the MPDSR committee members and facility administrators. The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Does the practice facilitation package improve the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of MPDSR in Kenyan health facilities?
  • What is the primary pathway through which the practice facilitation package influences MPDSR implementation with fidelity?

Researchers will compare outcomes between the intervention and control facilities to see if the practice facilitation package influences the degree to which facility MPDSR committees can complete all of the steps of the MPDSR process.

Participants in both intervention and control facilities will be asked to respond to short surveys and engage in focus group discussions. Participants in the intervention facilities will be asked to engage regularly with the practice facilitators in enhanced mentorship and audit and feedback.

Read the detailed description

The AMANI study will take place over three years. During the first two years, practice facilitators will deliver the practice facilitation package with intervention facilities. During the third year, practice facilitators will withdraw from intervention facilities, and both intervention and control facilities will be monitored to understand what elements of practice facilitation and MPDSR are maintained without external support.

Prior to beginning the practice facilitation intervention, a baseline service readiness assessment and data quality audit will be conducted in all enrolled facilities to understand the context of maternal and child healthcare provision at baseline. During the data quality audit, the previous year of facility death and MPDSR documentation will be abstracted from all facilities. During the three years of the AMANI study, facility records will be abstracted from all facilities on a monthly basis.

Within the first question that this study aims to answer, we have several sub-questions:

  • What is the number, proportion, and representativeness of health workers who participate in the practice facilitation package? (Reach)
  • What is the effect of the practice facilitation package on maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortality and MPDSR technical knowledge among facility staff? (Effectiveness)
  • What is the number and proportion of deaths for which the MPDSR process is started? (Adoption)
  • What is the effect of the practice facilitation intervention on MPDSR implementation with fidelity? What organizational, individual, and intervention characteristics influence the use of MPDSR in facilities? What changes do the facility MPDSR committees make to MPDSR processes? (Implementation)
  • What is the proportion of facilities implementing MPDSR with fidelity and the proportion of intervention facilities sustaining each component of the practice facilitation package at 6 and 12 months after withdrawing practice facilitator support? (Maintenance)
02

Conditions studied

  • Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response (MPDSR) Implementation
  • Maternal Mortality
  • Neonatal Mortality
  • Perinatal Mortality

Keywords

  • practice facilitation
  • RE-AIM
  • audit and feedback
  • enhanced mentorship
03

In context

Maternal Death

77 studies on the registry are indexed under Maternal Death; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 260 is below the median of 1,126 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Maternal Death.

Browse Maternal Death studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,433 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Member of the MPDSR committee
  • ≥18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
260 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Arm

    The control arm will not receive any interventions. MPDSR committees will continue holding MPDSR meetings as usual for that facility.

  • Experimental
    AMANI Intervention Arm

    In the intervention arm, trained practice facilitators (PFs) will deliver the practice facilitation package.

    Behavioral: Audit and Feedback · Behavioral: Enhanced Mentorship

Interventions

  • BehavioralAudit and Feedback

    For audit and feedback (component 1), practice facilitators will hold regular meetings with MPDSR committees and facility administrators to present data on facility mortality and MPDSR implementation. Practice facilitators will discuss challenges in MPDSR implementation and help committees engage in quality improvement, including tracking adaptations to the MPDSR process.

  • BehavioralEnhanced Mentorship

    For enhanced mentorship (component 2), practice facilitators will attend regular MPDSR committee meetings and provide coaching on navigating data sources and provide information about MPDSR, how to complete quality improvement cycles, and how to problem solve. Practice facilitatorswill also be available for individual mentorship in person or via Zoom/phone call. During meetings, practice facilitators will support the committee to co-develop a tracking system for recommendations made during MPDSR meetings.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MPDSR Fidelity (Implementation)

    The number and proportion of maternal and perinatal deaths for which all six MPDSR steps (identify deaths, report deaths, review deaths, recommend solutions, implement recommendations, evaluate recommendations) are implemented in full. Proportions of fully completed MPDSR cycles will be compared between intervention and control arms.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline at 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reach of the practice facilitation package

    Reach is defined as the proportion of MPDSR committee members who participate in each component of the strategy package (audit and feedback and enhanced mentorship) out of the number of MPDSR committee members in each facility. We will determine if there is a significant difference in participation in each practice facilitation component over time across intervention facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to end of the active intervention phase (2 years)

  2. Institutional Maternal Mortality Ratio (IMMR)

    Number of deaths of pregnant women within 42 days of the termination of pregnancy (from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management), divided by the total of deliveries in the facility over the same period of time. IMMR will be compared between intervention and control facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  3. Perinatal mortality rate

    Number of stillbirths (fetal deaths at least 28 weeks of gestation) and newborn deaths (up to and including the first seven days after birth), divided by the total births in the facility over the same time. Perinatal mortality rate will be compared between intervention and control facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  4. Neonatal mortality rate

    Number of deaths that occur in the first 28 days of life, divided by total live births in the facility over the same period of time. Neonatal mortality rate will be compared between intervention and control facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  5. Adoption

    Adoption is defined as the proportion of deaths at each facility for which the first two steps of the MPDSR cycle are initiated (death was identified). The first two steps include deaths 1) identified and 2) reported with full documentation in maternal death review (MDR), perinatal death review (PDR), and neonatal death review (NDR) data forms within 7 days. Adoption will be considered a binary outcome (yes/no), and adoption will be compared between intervention and control facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  6. Partial MPDSR fidelity

    Proportion of maternal, perinatal, and neonatal deaths for which less than six of the MPDSR steps are implemented, and average number of steps completed, to identify most challenging MPDSR step. Partial fidelity will be compared between intervention and control facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  7. Adaptations

    We will use the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME) to track monthly facility specific adaptations to MPDSR implementation in intervention facilities only and to identify how facilities incorporate MPDSR steps into their practice context and facility infrastructure. Of note, intervention facilities will not be adapting the implementation strategy (AMANI practice facilitation package) and will only be adapting how the MPDSR process is integrated into facility operations. Specifically, we will track the number of modifications made per month to MPDSR implementation, including documentation of the nature of the modification, goal/rationale for modification, timing, and other features.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  8. Maintenance of practice facilitation package

    Proportion of intervention facilities sustaining audit and feedback and/or enhanced mentorship 6 and 12 months after external PF support is withdrawn. We will determine if there is a significant difference in the prevalence ratio comparing participation in strategy components during the maintenance phase among intervention facilities.

    Time frame: From the end of the AMANI intervention phase to the end of the maintenance phase (1 year)

  9. Maintenance of MPDSR

    The proportion of maternal and perinatal deaths for which all six MPDSR steps are implemented in full within 3 months, measured 6 and 12 months after external PF support is withdrawn. We will test the effect size of the immediate post-intervention change in fidelity and the overall slope to determine if moving from phase 1 (intervention phase) to phase 2 (maintenance phase) had a meaningful impact on fidelity, comparing intervention and control facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  10. Provider technical MPDSR knowledge

    MPDSR technical knowledge will be measured at baseline, and months 12, 24, 30, and 36 across intervention and control facilities using a brief survey tool. The survey includes 38 questions in 3 domains (MPDSR knowledge, Data sources/forms/processes, and clinical competency), with three to four answer options per question. The total score and domain scores will be compared between intervention and control facilities.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  11. Attitude towards MPDSR use (Personal motivation)

    Mean responses to four questions using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) will be calculated and compared between intervention and control facilities. Personal motivation will be assessed at baseline, and at months 12, 24, 30, and 36.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  12. Perceived MPDSR social support (Social motivation)

    Mean responses to five questions using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) will be calculated and compared between intervention and control facilities. Social motivation will be assessed at baseline, and at months 12, 24, 30, and 36.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  13. Perceived self-efficacy to perform MPDSR steps (Behavioral skills/fatalism)

    Mean responses to six questions using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) will be calculated and compared between intervention and control facilities. Behavioral skills will be assessed at baseline, and at months 12, 24, 30, and 36.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  14. Psychological safety

    Mean responses to nineteen questions using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) will be calculated and compared between intervention and control facilities. Psychological safety will be assessed at baseline, and at months 12, 24, 30, and 36.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

  15. Provider Burnout

    Provider burnout is assessed with 23 questions using a 5-point Likert scale (never to always). these 23 questions capture four domains: 1) exhaustion (8 questions); 2) mental distance (5 questions); 3) cognitive impairment (5 questions); and 4) emotional impairment (5 questions). Mean domain-specific scores will be calculated and compared between intervention and control facilities. Provider burnout will be assessed at baseline, and at months 12, 24, 30, and 36.

    Time frame: From enrollment to study endline (3 years)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • National Guidelines for Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenyan Ministry of Health; 2024.
  • Baskerville NB, Liddy C, Hogg W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):63-74. doi: 10.1370/afm.1312. PubMed 22230833 ↗
  • Willcox ML, Price J, Scott S, Nicholson BD, Stuart B, Roberts NW, Allott H, Mubangizi V, Dumont A, Harnden A. Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 25;3(3):CD012982. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012982.pub2. PubMed 32212268 ↗
  • Smith H, Ameh C, Godia P, Maua J, Bartilol K, Amoth P, Mathai M, van den Broek N. Implementing Maternal Death Surveillance and Response in Kenya: Incremental Progress and Lessons Learned. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 28;5(3):345-354. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00130. Print 2017 Sep 27. PubMed 28963171 ↗
  • Confidentiality Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in Kenya. Ministry of Health Kenya; 2017.
  • Maputo Plan of Action 2016-2030: Universal Access to Comprehensive Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: The African Union Commission; 2015.
  • Kuruvilla S, Bustreo F, Kuo T, Mishra CK, Taylor K, Fogstad H, Gupta GR, Gilmore K, Temmerman M, Thomas J, Rasanathan K, Chaiban T, Mohan A, Gruending A, Schweitzer J, Dini HS, Borrazzo J, Fassil H, Gronseth L, Khosla R, Cheeseman R, Gorna R, McDougall L, Toure K, Rogers K, Dodson K, Sharma A, Seoane M, Costello A. The Global strategy for women's, children's and adolescents' health (2016-2030): a roadmap based on evidence and country experience. Bull World Health Organ. 2016 May 1;94(5):398-400. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.170431. Epub 2016 May 2. No abstract available. PubMed 27147772 ↗
  • Sharrow D, Hug L, You D, Alkema L, Black R, Cousens S, Croft T, Gaigbe-Togbe V, Gerland P, Guillot M, Hill K, Masquelier B, Mathers C, Pedersen J, Strong KL, Suzuki E, Wakefield J, Walker N; UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation and its Technical Advisory Group. Global, regional, and national trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2019 with scenario-based projections until 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e195-e206. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00515-5. PubMed 35063111 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Abstracted, de-identified patient record data and survey data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: The final versions of any de-identified data collected and/or generated will be made publicly available within 12 months of publication. Data deposited in Dryad is intended to remain permanently archived and available.

Access criteria: Final data gathered from this project will be archived for data sharing purposes in Dryad, NIH's recommended open-access generalist data repository.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2029, 36 months after the start.

Of 35 interventional studies with no phase under Maternal Death, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 5, 2026: start Jul 2026 → Oct 2026, primary completion Jun 2029 → Oct 2029 and completion Jun 2029 → Oct 2029.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2026
First posted
May 1, 2026
StartActual
Oct 7, 2026was Jul 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2029was Jun 2029
CompletionEst.
Oct 2029was Jun 2029
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
changed Nov 5, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in Kenya
Show site
  • Kenyatta National Hospital · Nairobi, Kenya
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Jul 2026→Oct 7, 2026 (actual)
Nov 5, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2029→Oct 2029
Nov 5, 2026
Study completion
Jun 2029→Oct 2029
Nov 5, 2026
Contact
No study contact listed any more: removed j•••@uw.edu · •••9713; removed a•••@uw.edu
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
    1 site added — first site in Kenya
    Show site
    • Kenyatta National Hospital · Nairobi, Kenya
    Start date Jul 2026→Oct 7, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Jun 2029→Oct 2029
    Study completion Jun 2029→Oct 2029
    Contact No study contact listed any more: removed j•••@uw.edu · •••9713; removed a•••@uw.edu
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07560839
Responsible party
Arianna Means (Associate Professor, Global Health, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 1, 2026
Start date
Oct 7, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Arianna Means, PhD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion