ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05852262HI-DOCCUpdated Aug 3, 2026

High-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis (HI-DOCC)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Cephalexin and Cephalexin in Cellulitis, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Completed at 10 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
454
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cellulitis is a common condition diagnosed and managed in the ED that carries significant burden on healthcare systems globally. Cellulitis is the 8th most common reason patients present to an ED in Canada. Among middle-aged patients (45-64 years) it is the 5th most common reason to visit an ED. This disease is responsible for significant healthcare system burden due to high hospitalization rates and subsequent costs. The Investigators conducted a health records review at two large urban EDs in Ottawa, and found that 29.6% of patients with cellulitis are admitted to hospital. In a separate study, The investigators found that the mean cost of care to hospitalize cellulitis patients for IV antibiotics was $10,145 CDN.

Read the detailed description

Background Non-purulent cellulitis is a bacterial skin and soft tissue infection of the subcutaneous tissue. Group A streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes), beta-hemolytic streptococci and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus are the most common bacteria causing non-purulent cellulitis. Patients typically present to the emergency department (ED) with pain, redness, swelling and induration (skin hardening due to inflammation) of the affected skin. A minority of patients may have fever or tachycardia. The diagnosis of cellulitis is clinical. Once the diagnosis is made, antibiotic treatment is initiated. The emergency physician must select the appropriate agent, oral versus intravenous (IV) route, dose, frequency and duration.

Rationale For ED adult patients with cellulitis, how does high-dose (1000 mg QID) cephalexin compare with standard-dose (500 mg QID) cephalexin with respect to antibiotic treatment failure, adverse events and health service utilization (i.e., need for IV antibiotics, unscheduled return ED visits and hospitalization)? Hypotheses (superiority): Treatment with high-dose cephalexin will lead to lower rates of oral antibiotic treatment failure than using standard-dose cephalexin.

Methods:

Study Design \& Setting The investigators will conduct a multicentre, parallel-arm double-blind, individually randomized trial comparing high-dose (1000 mg) cephalexin to standard-dose (500 mg) cephalexin to treat ED adult patients with cellulitis. This is a superiority trial. The trial will be conducted at 8 Canadian EDs. A total sample size of 446 patients (223 per group) will be required.

Study Population Inclusion Criteria The Investigators will include adults (age ≥18 years) diagnosed with non-purulent cellulitis and determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient oral antibiotics.

Trial Intervention The study interventions are two accepted doses of oral cephalexin. The interventions will begin following randomization.

  1. High-dose cephalexin. Patients randomized to this arm will receive a seven-day medication package of cephalexin 1000 mg (two 500 mg tablets per dose) to be taken four times daily. A duration of seven days was selected as this was the most common prescription duration in a survey of Canadian emergency physicians.32 The antibiotic pills will be provided in a dosette organized by dose and day.
  2. Standard-dose cephalexin. Patients randomized to this arm will receive a seven-day medication package of cephalexin 500 mg (one 500 mg tablet and one placebo tablet per dose) to be taken four times daily.
  3. Blinding. Both cephalexin and placebo will be encased in identical capsules, prepared and packaged independently by an external pharmacy. The patients, treating physician and research team (including outcome adjudicators) will be blinded.

Primary Outcome: Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure The primary outcome is outpatient oral antibiotic treatment failure, defined as a change in antibiotic (change in class of oral antibiotic or step up to IV therapy) within 7 days due to worsening infection.

Secondary Outcomes

  1. Clinical cure, defined as absence of treatment failure criteria, evaluated at day 8 and 30
  2. Clinical response, defined as a reduction in lesion size ≥20% compared to baseline, evaluated at the day 3 and day 8 follow-up assessments
  3. Unplanned visits to a healthcare provider (ED, family doctor) within 30 days
  4. Unplanned hospitalization within 30 days.
  5. Adverse events will be classified as serious or other and will be assessed at day 30 follow up. Serious adverse events will include anaphylaxis to study medication, development of Clostridium difficile colitis or unexpected deaths related to the infection or treatment. Other adverse events include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain and rash.
  6. Antibiotic intolerance, defined as change in treatment due to adverse events.
  7. Antibiotic allergy, defined as change in treatment due to skin, respiratory, cardiovascular, or gastrointestinal symptoms requiring treatment with an antihistamine and/or epinephrine.
  8. Medication adherence, with full adherence defined as patients who report taking all study medication over 7 days
  9. Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQoL-5D-5L36 instrument
  10. Change in antibiotic treatment (oral or IV antibiotics) but does not meet worsening infection criteria (i.e., none of the following: new or persistent fever (temperature ≥38.0 °C), increasing area of erythema (in cm2) ≥20% from baseline, or increase in pain ≥2 points from baseline on the numeric rating scale), evaluated at 30 days.
  11. Additional course of oral or IV antibiotics after 7 day course of oral cephalexin completed, evaluated at day 30.
  12. Recurrence of infection at day 30, defined as initially having met clinical cure criteria at day 3 or 8, but then developed a subsequent recurrent cellulitis within 30 days.

IMPORTANCE Cellulitis is a common cause of ED visits, and many patients are hospitalized. Current evidence is lacking regarding the optimal management of cellulitis. If high-dose cephalexin is found to be superior to standard-dose cephalexin, this will change practice, with the potential to reduce unnecessary IV antibiotic use, hospitalization, and costs. The results will help inform future skin and soft tissue infection treatment guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cellulitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cellulitis
  • Cephalexin
  • Oral antibiotics
  • Treatment failure
03

In context

Cellulitis

160 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulitis; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 454 is above the median of 157 across 124 interventional studies indexed under Cellulitis.

Browse Cellulitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 547 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Adults (age ≥18 years) diagnosed with non-purulent cellulitis and determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient oral antibiotics.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age \<18 years;
  2. Patient already taking oral antibiotics;
  3. Treating physician decides IV antibiotics are required;
  4. Abscess requiring an incision and drainage procedure;
  5. Known prior skin or soft tissue infection secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA);
  6. Cellulitis secondary to a human or animal bite wound;
  7. Penetrating wound or water exposure resulting in cellulitis;
  8. Surgical site infection;
  9. Patient found at a follow up visit to have an alternative, non-infectious etiology (e.g., deep vein thrombosis);
  10. bilateral symptoms (e.g., both legs involved);
  11. and currently being treated with chemotherapy;
  12. Solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipient;
  13. Renal impairment with an estimated \<30 mL/min documented on the health record at any time within the past three months;
  14. Allergy to cephalosporins or history of anaphylaxis to penicillin;
  15. Inability to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
454 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Dose Cephalexin

    The intervention is high-dose cephalexin (1000mg PO QID) for seven days

    Drug: Cephalexin

  • Active comparator
    Standard Dose Cephalexin

    The comparator is standard-dose cephalexin (500mg PO QID) plus oral placebo for seven days

    Drug: Cephalexin

Interventions

  • 1000 mg PO QID for 7 days

    Also known as: High-dose cephalexin

  • 500 mg PO QID plus oral placebo for 7 days

    Also known as: Standard-dose cephalexin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure

    defined as a change in antibiotic (change in class of oral antibiotic or step up to IV therapy) within 7 days due to worsening infection. Any of the following meet criteria for worsening infection (at day 3 or 8 follow-up): (1) New fever (temperature ≥38.0C) or persistent fever at follow-up; (2) Increasing area of erythema (in cm2) ≥20% from baseline; or (3) Increasing pain ≥2 points from baseline (using the numeric rating scale).

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with clinical cure

    defined as absence of pain, erythema, and fever

    Time frame: evaluated at day 8 and day 30

  2. Number of Participants with clinical response

    defined as a reduction in lesion size ≥20% compared to baseline

    Time frame: evaluated at days 3 and 8

  3. Number of Participants with unplanned visits to a healthcare provider for cellulitis

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Number of Participants with unplanned hospitalization for cellulitis

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Number of Participants with adverse events

    classified as serious or other and will be assessed at day 30 follow up. Serious adverse events will include anaphylaxis to study medication, development of Clostridium difficile colitis or unexpected deaths related to the infection or treatment. Other adverse events include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain and rash.

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Number of Participants with antibiotic intolerance

    defined as change in treatment due to adverse events

    Time frame: 7 days

  7. Number of Participants with antibiotic allergy

    defined as change in treatment due to skin, respiratory, cardiovascular, or gastrointestinal symptoms requiring treatment with an antihistamine and/or epinephrine.

    Time frame: 7 days

  8. Number of Participants with medication adherence

    with full adherence defined as patients who report taking all study medication over 7 days

    Time frame: 7 days

  9. Number of Participants with health-related quality of life

    Measured using EuroQol-5D-5L instrument at index visit and all follow-ups (days 3,8 and 30)

    Time frame: 30 days

  10. Change in antibiotic but not meeting worsening infection

    Number of patients that had a change in antibiotic treatment (oral or IV antibiotics) but did not meet worsening infection criteria (i.e., none of the following: new or persistent fever (temperature ≥38.0 °C), increasing area of erythema (in cm2) ≥20% from baseline, or increase in pain ≥2 points from baseline on the numeric rating scale)

    Time frame: Evaluated at 30 days

  11. Additional antibiotics

    Number of patients that received an additional course of oral or IV antibiotics after 7 day course of oral cephalexin completed

    Time frame: Evaluated at 30 days

  12. Recurrence

    Number of patients that had a recurrence of infection at day 30, defined as initially having met clinical cure criteria at day 3 or 8, but then developed a subsequent recurrent cellulitis

    Time frame: Evaluated at 30 days

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • South Health Campus
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Queen Elisabeth II Health Sciences Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Health Sciences North
    Greater Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2H2, Canada
  • Kingston Health Sciences Centre
    Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre
    London, Ontario, Canada
  • The Ottawa Hospital
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
  • Thunder Bay Health Sciences Centre
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
  • Sinai Health System
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Enfant-Jésus Hospital
    Québec, Quebec, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 31 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 1, 2023
First posted
May 10, 2023
StartActual
Aug 30, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 5, 2026
CompletionActual
Apr 5, 2026
Last update
Aug 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05852262
Collaborators
Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers (NCER), The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2023
Start date
Aug 30, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2026
Completion
Apr 5, 2026
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Krishan Yadav, MD
principal investigator · Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cephalexin

Start the discussion