CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06511258STRIVEUpdated May 1, 2026

The STRIVE Before Surgery Trial

An interventional study of Prehabilitation in Surgery-Complications and Disability Physical, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
902
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The STRIVE Before Surgery Trial evaluates patient-reported disability at 90 days after surgery following participating in a home-based multimodal prehabilitation program supported through an online platform. Half of the participants will be randomized into the prehabilitation group, while the other half will be randomized into the control group.

Read the detailed description

Background: The number of people presenting for surgery, and their risk profile, are increasing. People presenting for surgery face substantial risk of postoperative adverse events. Fifteen to 30% of patients suffer a serious medical or surgical complication after surgery, and 1 in 5 develop a new patient-reported disability that reflects a loss of independence in day-to-day life. More than 1.4 million inpatient surgical procedures are performed in Canada each year. Globally, >300 million surgical procedures occur annually. As an increasing number of people present for surgery, the average risk profile of this population is rising. Surgical patients are typically older and live with comorbidity. This means that strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce resource utilization are urgently needed. Patients, the public, clinicians, and policy makers participating in 2 separate James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships (Canada \& UK) identified prehabilitation as a Top 10 priority for perioperative research. Furthermore, prehabilitation is currently discussed in the popular media as a strategy to improve outcomes for the growing number of high-risk patients presenting for surgery.

Overarching Aim: The full-scale trial will evaluate patient reported disability at 90 days after surgery.

Methods:

Design, setting and participants: The STRIVE Before Surgery Trial is an assessor blinded multicenter individual patient parallel-arm vanguard pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

People => 18 years old having inpatient abdominal, thoracic, pelvic, head-and-neck or vascular surgery with expected length of stay of => 2 days will be included.

Intervention: The intervention includes 3 aspects (exercise, nutrition and breathing). Our intervention is a home-based multimodal prehabilitation program supported through an online platform.

Outcomes and sample size: Primary outcome is patient-reported disability 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are days at home in the 30 days after surgery, patient-reported disability at 30 and 365 days after surgery, survival, health-related quality of life, length of stay, patient safety indicators, intensive care unit admission, non-home discharge, readmission, emergency department visits, health system costs, and elicitation of patient, clinician and researcher-identified barriers to our pragmatic trial using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Our trial sample size calculation is informed by parameter estimates from the pilot phase. A sample of 902 patients (451 per arm) will provide 90% power to detect a 5% minimally important difference between the mean WHODAS scores using an F-test from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) at the two-sided 5% significance level. We conservatively assumed a common standard deviation of 23 (equal to the upper limit of the 95% CI observed in our vanguard trial) and a correlation with baseline of 0.3. We also allowed for up to 10% attrition.

Expertise: The team features multidisciplinary clinical and methodological experts, nationally representative knowledge users and patient representatives.

Expected outcomes: Despite systematic review findings that exercise prehabilitation may improve physical performance and function, limitations exist that preclude generalizability, including many identified studies being high or unclear risk of bias and single center studies with \<100 participants. The investigators aim to conduct this low risk of bias, mutli-center study of adult surgical patients >18 years to address this gap.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgery-Complications
  • Disability Physical
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. Scheduled, or on the pathway, for inpatient abdominal, thoracic, pelvic, head-and-neck or vascular surgery
  3. Expected surgery date between 3 and 12 weeks from enrollment
  4. Valid provincial health insurance number
  5. Access to internet-enabled device
  6. Email address

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to read and communicate in English
  2. Cognitive impairment preventing ability to provide informed consent independently
  3. No telephone/cell phone
  4. Cardiac, neurological or orthopedic procedure
  5. Surgery with no curative intent (palliative surgery)
  6. Patient not interested in participating in the context of their TAPA score
  7. Any of the following cardiovascular conditions:

    1. Severe valvular heart disease that limits a patient's ability to ambulate on level ground, or is associated with syncope or dyspnea
    2. Severe cardiac dysrhythmias that limit a patient's ability to ambulate on level ground, or is associated with syncope or dyspnea
    3. Recent myocardial infarction (within 6 weeks prior to enrollment - based on the Heart and Stroke Foundation's HeartWalk program)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
902 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prehabilitation

    The intervention consists of exercise, nutritional support and breathing techniques. The exercise component consists of 1) strength training; 2) cardio and 3) stretching. Participants will be encouraged to complete self-directed and/or group sessions \>= 3 times per week. Each intervention participant will be provided a unique login to the virtual prehabilitation platform, which is the STRIVE Trial website. The nutrition component includes: 1) protein supplementation; 2) nutrition advice to support healthy eating. For the breathing component, participants will be encouraged to watch the video on Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) which involves diaphragmatic breathing and coughing/huffing. They will also be provided with an instruction booklet to take to hospital with them to support postoperative conduct of IMT during early recovery.

    Behavioral: Prehabilitation

  • No intervention
    Control

    To support blinding, improve enrollment and reflect usual care, widely available physical activity (World Health Organization Recommendations for Physical Activity for ages 18-64 and \>65) and healthy eating recommendations (Canada's Food Guide Snapshot) documents will be provided to control participants (without active or online support).

Interventions

  • BehavioralPrehabilitation

    The intervention includes 3 aspects (exercise, nutrition and breathing). Our intervention is a home-based multimodal prehabilitation program supported through an online platform.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported disability using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)

    The WHODAS is a patient-reported disability scale that assesses limitations in six major life domains (i.e., cognition, mobility, self-care, social interaction, life activities, participation in society). Each questionnaire item is scored on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4. The sum of the responses is the WHODAS Disability Score (range: 0 to 48), which is expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D-5L)

    This is a well-validated instrument with Canadian valuation statistics and national implementation used to measure health-related quality of life after surgery and to inform incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. Participants are asked to select one answer under each domain (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Responses range from having no problems with a particular domain to being unable to engage in that particular domain. Participants are asked to identify on a scale of 0-100 how good or bad their health is on that given day (0 being worst health they can imagine, 100 being best health they can imagine).

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 1 year

  2. A count of days at home in the 30-days after surgery

    Count of days at home in the 30-days after surgery is a validated patient-centered outcome that can be ascertained from routinely collected data

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Survival

    All cause deaths and survival time in the 30-days and year after surgery will be captured from vital statistics

    Time frame: 1 month, 1 year

  4. Length of stay

    Days from surgical admission to discharge will be calculated

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Details of patient safety indicators

    A validated set of in-hospital patient safety indicators will be captured from the index hospitalization record

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions

    ICU admissions will be accurately captured by administrative data

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay

    ICU length of stay will be accurately captured by administrative data

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Non-home discharge

    Discharge from the index hospitalization via transfer to a non-home location or death will be captured

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Count of readmissions

    Count of any acute hospitalization in the 30-days after surgery

    Time frame: 1 month

  10. Time to first readmission

    Time to first acute hospitalization in the 30-days after surgery

    Time frame: 1 month

  11. Time to first emergency department visit

    Time to first emergency department visit in the 30-days after surgery.

    Time frame: 1 month

  12. Count of emergency department visits

    Count of any emergency department visits in the 30-days after surgery.

    Time frame: 1 month

  13. Health system costs

    A validated patient-level costing algorithm will be used to capture all health system costs accrued within 30-days and 1-year after surgery

    Time frame: 1 month, 1 year

  14. Elicitation of patient, clinician and researcher-identified barriers to our pragmatic trial using the Theoretical Domains Framework

    For each target group, the frequency of domains identified as barriers will be calculated

    Time frame: 1 year

  15. In-hospital Complications

    Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) is a tool used to identify complications. At time of discharge, participants will be administered a patient-reported version of the POMS tool.

    Time frame: up to 1 month

  16. Patient-reported disability using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)

    The WHODAS is a patient-reported disability scale that assesses limitations in six major life domains (i.e., cognition, mobility, self-care, social interaction, life activities, participation in society). Each questionnaire item is scored on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4. The sum of the responses is the WHODAS Disability Score (range: 0 to 48), which is expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score

    Time frame: 1 month, 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data, including data dictionaries, will be available. This includes individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). The Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan and Informed Consent Form will also be made available. Data will be available beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication of one year follow up data. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Data can be used to achieve aims in a proposed proposal or for individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals should be directed to the Principal Investigator. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be shared via an appropriate 3rd party website that is consistent with ethical and health privacy compliant legislation at the time of study conclusion.

Supporting information: Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06511258
Lead sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2024
Start date
Sep 5, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2026

Study contacts

Emily Hladkowicz, PhD
Contact
emhladkowicz@toh.ca
613-798-5555 ext. 18629
Daniel McIsaac, MD,MPH,FRCPC
principal investigator · The Ottawa Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion