ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07810244Updated Oct 16, 2026

Moxifloxacin Versus Clindamycin in the Management of Odontogenic Maxillofacial Infectious Processes

An interventional study of Clindamycin and Moxifloxacin (400 mg) in Odontogenic Infection, Maxillofacial Infection and Cellulitis, sponsored by Nishtar Medical University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Nishtar Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 16, 2026Primary outcomes revisedInterventions changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Investigators are conducting a trial to compare moxifloxacin against clindamycin for dental infections that spread to the face and jaw. The study will enroll 60 adults who are being treated as outpatients for localized abscesses or cellulitis. Every patient will first receive minor surgical drainage in the clinic. Following drainage, participants are randomly assigned to take either moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily) or clindamycin (300 mg four times daily) for 5 to 7 days.

Investigators primary focus is early pain relief. Investigators will measure the drop in pain scores using a 100 mm visual scale at the day 2-3 follow-up visit. Investigators also plan to track how many patients are fully cured by day 5-7, monitor any side effects, and test the infection samples to see exactly which bacteria are present and how participants respond to both drugs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Odontogenic Infection
  • Maxillofacial Infection
  • Cellulitis
  • Cellulitis of Face
  • Abscess

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cellulitis

160 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulitis; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 157 across 124 interventional studies indexed under Cellulitis.

Browse Cellulitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Nishtar Medical University is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years and above of either gender presenting to the Outpatient Department of the Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery.
  • Clinical and radiographic diagnosis of an odontogenic maxillofacial infection - gingival inflammatory infiltrate or a localized abscess/cellulitis (ICD-10: K04, K05) - manageable on an outpatient basis with minor office-based surgical drainage (incision/drainage, extraction, or trepanation under local anaesthesia) and adjunctive oral antibiotic therapy, not requiring hospital admission.
  • Patients providing written for participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, or cephalosporins.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with diabetes mellitus, known infection, hepatic dysfunction, or renal impairment ( \< 50 mL/min).
  • Patients with known cardiac arrhythmia, bradycardia, electrolyte imbalance (particularly hypokalaemia), or a history of tendinopathy related to quinolone use.
  • Patients with signs of a severe or spreading systemic infection (e.g., extensive facial/neck swelling, trismus, dysphagia, or high-grade fever) requiring hospital admission, intravenous antibiotics, or extraoral surgical drainage under general anaesthesia.
  • Patients who received systemic antibiotic therapy within the preceding 7 days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Clindamycin

    Clindamycin 300 mg oral capsule, four times daily.

    Drug: Clindamycin

  • Active comparator
    Moxifloxacin

    Moxifloxacin 400 mg oral tablet, once daily.

    Drug: Moxifloxacin (400 mg)

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. clinical cure rate

    To compare the clinical cure rate (complete resolution of signs and symptoms) at the end of treatment (day 5-7) between the two groups.

    Time frame: 5-7 days

  2. pain intensity

    To compare the mean percentage reduction in pain intensity measure by Visual Analogue Scale 0 to 100 at day 2-3 from baseline between patients treated with moxifloxacin and patients treated with clindamycin. 0 reading means better outcome while 100 means worse outcome

    Time frame: 2-3 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Cachovan G, Böger RH, Giersdorf I, Hallier O, Streichert T, Haddad M, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and clindamycin in the treatment of odontogenic abscesses and inflammatory infiltrates: a phase II, double-blind, randomized trial. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(3):1142-7. 2. Gómez-Arámbula H, Hidalgo-Hurtado A, Rodríguez-Flores R, González-Amaro AM, Garrocho-Rangel A, Pozos-Guillén A. Moxifloxacin versus Clindamycin/Ceftriaxone in the management of odontogenic maxillofacial infectious processes: a preliminary, intrahospital, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(5):e634-9. 3. Ardila CM, Bedoya-García JA. Antimicrobial resistance in patients with odontogenic infections: a systematic scoping review of prospective and experimental studies. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(10):e870-6. 4. Grillo R, Borba AM, Brozoski M, Moreira SB, da Silva YS, da Graça Naclério-Homem M. Evolution of the treatment of severe odontogenic infections over 50 years: a comprehensive review. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022;18(2):225-33. 5. Fischer M, Rödel J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Tolksdorf K. Clinical impact of antibiotic resistance in odontogenic infections: a 12-year analysis of 740 cases. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29:1-12. 6. Antibiotic resistance in odontogenic infections: a systematic review of current evidence and implications for guideline-based therapy. Clin Oral Investig. 2025. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13095914/ 7. Antimicrobial therapy in the management of odontogenic infections: the penicillin-allergic patient. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2023.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 3 months later.

Of 18 interventional studies with no phase under Cellulitis, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2026
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 15, 2027
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Interventions
Arm changed group A→Clindamycin; group B→Moxifloxacin
Oct 16, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • Descriptionpain intensity: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Descriptionpain intensity: how it is measured was reworded
    Interventions Arm changed group A→Clindamycin; group B→Moxifloxacin
    + 2 other changes: verification date and description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07810244
Lead sponsor
Nishtar Medical University
Responsible party
Zeeshan Aslam (Doctor Zeeshan Aslam, Nishtar Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Zeeshan Aslam, FCPS R(OMFS)
Contact
zaslam861@gmail.com
+923238632670

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Clindamycin · Moxifloxacin

Start the discussion