ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07894198VTS in WCUpdated Oct 26, 2026

VTS Sensorimotor Neuromodulation in WC

An interventional study of Vibro-tactile stimulation in Writer's Cramp and Dystonias, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 26, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Writer's cramps (WC) is a focal task-specific upper limb dystonia that significantly impairs handwriting and other manual skills, affecting functionality. WC is one of the most common task-specific dystonias, affecting 3.8-80 per million individuals. The first-line management option is botulinum toxin injections in the muscles affected by the involuntary movements, causing a transient neuromuscular blocking effect and reducing muscle abnormal contraction. However, the effect lasts for around 3 months or less, is invasive, may cause unintended hand weakness, and the benefits are variable in terms of the severity of dystonic contraction and functional gain.

Focal limb dystonia pathophysiology, including writer's cramps, has been linked to propriospinal signalling defects in the sensorimotor cortex modulation5, prompting an investigation into neuromodulation of this region as a modality for dystonia management.

Other forms of dystonia have shown a reduction of the involuntary movements with vibrotactile stimulation (VTS), including cervical and laryngeal dystonia8. These results have supported the hypothesis that VTS alters the abnormal output of mechanical receptors from proprioceptive and tactile pathways to the sensorimotor cortex.Changes in neurophysiological markers of dystonia in the sensorimotor cortex also corroborated the modulatory effect.

Furthermore, more invasive methods of neuromodulation, such as Globus Pallidus internus Deep Brain Stimulation, are known to be an effective treatment option for medically refractory dystonia, with evidence of promoting a similar result on the sensorimotor pathway via cortico-basal ganglia network direct stimulation. Finally, one of the most common ways of modulation is a core feature in dystonia, which is called an alleviating manoeuvre (AM) or geste antagoniste. This comprises a sensory or motor stimulation located in the anatomical area of the dystonia, which will transiently alleviate the involuntary movement. In that case, Functional MRI studies also suggest a sensorimotor network modulation in AM. Thus, there is considerable preliminary evidence to suggest the role of invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation in the treatment of dystonia.

Given the variable and often suboptimal response to standard treatments for task-specific dystonia, such as WC, and the associated functional impairment, this study explores the role of vibrotactile stimulation (VTS) as a non-invasive neuromodulation tool for WC. VTS targets muscles involved in dystonic contractions, intending to create a non-invasive neuromodulation via propriospinal pathways to the sensorimotor cortex and improve motor control in individuals with WC. The effect described in previous studies lasts around 20-30 minutes, which should allow functionality for handwriting during that period of time. In the future, with the refinement of the technique's effectiveness, it could be escalated for a wearable treatment option.

Based on the clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of task-specific dystonia it is reasonable to use a peripheral sensory modulation technique to try and reduced the abnormal motor cortical output this way reducing the dystonic movement. That has been proved successful in other types of dystonia. Thus, a pilot study for proof-of-concept concept and feasibility is a good first step towards that direction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Writer's Cramp
  • Dystonias

Keywords

  • writer's cramp
  • vibro-tactile stimulation
  • task-specific dystonia
03

In context

Dystonic Disorders

95 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystonic Disorders; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 24 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Dystonic Disorders.

Browse Dystonic Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 547 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of WC confirmed by a movement disorders specialist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of other neurological or musculoskeletal disorders affecting dominant hand function
  • The use of oral pharmacologic treatments for dystonia in the last 3 months
  • Treatment with botulinum toxin injections for WC within the past 10 weeks.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants will undergo research visits for a vibro-tactile stimulation session in the forearm muscles of the dominant hand. These encounters will include a baseline assessment (pre-stimulation), an assessment during a continuous stimulation period, a third assessment 20 minutes after, and a fourth assessment 60 minutes after to assess retention. The assessments will have a specific structure detailed in the next topic.

    Device: Vibro-tactile stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceVibro-tactile stimulation

    Participants will undergo research visits for a vibro-tactile stimulation session in the forearm muscles of the dominant hand. These encounters will include a baseline assessment (pre-stimulation), an assessment during a continuous stimulation period, a third assessment 20 minutes after, and a fourth assessment 60 minutes after to assess retention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Writer's Cramp Rating Scale

    The Writer's Cramp Rating Scale is validated and widely adopted in botulinum toxin trials for WC treatment. The Writer's Cramp Rating Scale quantify dystonia severity by measuring involuntary movements and handwriting speed. It provides a structured, objective measure of motor control specific to WC. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with 0 indicating no writer's cramp symptoms and 30 indicating maximum severity. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes, while a reduction in the score indicates clinical improvement.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective Perception of Improvement Questionnaire

    Captures participant-perceived functional benefit that may not be fully reflected by clinician-rated scales. The questionnaire consists of six items, each rated on an 11-point numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10. The total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater perceived improvement (better outcomes)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wissel J, Kabus C, Wenzel R, Klepsch S, Schwarz U, Nebe A, Schelosky L, Scholz U, Poewe W. Botulinum toxin in writer's cramp: objective response evaluation in 31 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Aug;61(2):172-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.2.172. PubMed 8708685 ↗
  • Sarasso E, Agosta F, Piramide N, Bianchi F, Butera C, Gatti R, Amadio S, Del Carro U, Filippi M. Sensory trick phenomenon in cervical dystonia: a functional MRI study. J Neurol. 2020 Apr;267(4):1103-1115. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09683-5. Epub 2020 Jan 2. PubMed 31897600 ↗
  • Filip P, Jech R, Fecikova A, Havrankova P, Ruzicka F, Mueller K, Urgosik D. Restoration of functional network state towards more physiological condition as the correlate of clinical effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation in dystonia. Brain Stimul. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):1269-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 9. PubMed 36096443 ↗
  • Cordo P, Gurfinkel VS, Bevan L, Kerr GK. Proprioceptive consequences of tendon vibration during movement. J Neurophysiol. 1995 Oct;74(4):1675-88. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1675. PubMed 8989404 ↗
  • BIANCONI R, van der MEULEN J. The response to vibration of the end organs of mammalian muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Jan;26:177-90. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.1.177. No abstract available. PubMed 13968075 ↗
  • Khosravani S, Mahnan A, Yeh IL, Aman JE, Watson PJ, Zhang Y, Goding G, Konczak J. Laryngeal vibration as a non-invasive neuromodulation therapy for spasmodic dysphonia. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54396-4. PubMed 31784618 ↗
  • Avanzino L, Xu J, Martino D, Conte A, Standal S, Salehi P, Terranova S, Bonassi G, Alizadeh P, Adeoti JA, Belvisi D, Costanzo M, Oh J, Konczak J. Vibro-tactile stimulation of the neck induces head righting in people with cervical dystonia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2025 Mar;132:107263. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107263. Epub 2025 Jan 16. PubMed 39848136 ↗
  • Zhu Y, Mahnan A, Konczak J. Vibro-Tactile Stimulation as a Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Therapy for Cervical Dystonia: A Case Study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:6314-6317. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629717. PubMed 34892557 ↗
  • Dresel C, Li Y, Wilzeck V, Castrop F, Zimmer C, Haslinger B. Multiple changes of functional connectivity between sensorimotor areas in focal hand dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;85(11):1245-52. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307127. Epub 2014 Apr 4. PubMed 24706945 ↗
  • Kruisdijk JJ, Koelman JH, Ongerboer de Visser BW, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD. Botulinum toxin for writer's cramp: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial and 1-year follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;78(3):264-70. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.083170. Epub 2006 Dec 21. PubMed 17185301 ↗
  • Defazio G, Berardelli A, Hallett M. Do primary adult-onset focal dystonias share aetiological factors? Brain. 2007 May;130(Pt 5):1183-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl355. Epub 2007 Jan 22. PubMed 17242025 ↗
  • Amini D. Occupational therapy interventions for work-related injuries and conditions of the forearm, wrist, and hand: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Jan-Feb;65(1):29-36. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.09186. PubMed 21309369 ↗
09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2026
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
Last update
Oct 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07894198
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Gabriel Amorelli
Contact
gamorelli@toh.ca
6137985555 ext. 18162

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion