ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05834270Updated Apr 28, 2023

Single Dose Versus Double Dose Tamsulosin in Management of Moderate and Severe LUTS Due to BPH

An interventional study of Single dose tamsulosin 0.4mg and Double dose tamsulosin 0.4mg in Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostate Disease and Prostate Obstruction, sponsored by Menoufia University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-28.

Sponsored by Menoufia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2022, registered Apr 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Single dose versus double dose tamsulosin in Management of Moderate and severe lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostate Disease
  • Prostate Obstruction
  • Prostate Hypertrophy

Keywords

  • Tamsulosin
  • Prostate
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,484 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,415 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 58 across 4,908 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Menoufia University is the lead sponsor of 197 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age more than 50 years
  • moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prostatic cancer
  • urethral stricture
  • prostate surgery
  • Neurogenic bladder
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Single dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

    Single dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

    Drug: Single dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

  • Active comparator
    Double dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

    Double dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

    Drug: Double dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

Interventions

  • DrugSingle dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

    Single dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

  • DrugDouble dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

    Double dose tamsulosin 0.4mg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the lower urinary tract symptoms

    Assessed by the improvement in the internal prostatic symptoms score (IPSS)

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine
    Shibīn al Kawm, Menofia 342007, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05834270
Responsible party
Ahmed M. Hassan (Dr, Menoufia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 28, 2023
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022
Completion
Dec 1, 2022
Last update
Apr 28, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion