ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07892378PRIME-TZUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) Versus Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Transition Zone Lesions /PRostate Imaging With MRI and PET in the Transition Zone (PRIME-TZ)

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Sanatorio Privado San Geronimo. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Argentina. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Sanatorio Privado San Geronimo · Observational

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This prospective, single-center diagnostic accuracy study will compare mpMRI and PSMA-PET for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with prostate imaging reporting and data System (PI-RADS) ≥4 lesions located in the transition zone of the prostate.

All participants will undergo both mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET before prostate biopsy. Imaging findings will be evaluated independently, and biopsy histopathology will serve as the reference standard for determining the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer.

The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic performance of mpMRI and PSMA-PET for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. The study will also evaluate agreement between the two imaging methods and explore whether combining mpMRI and PSMA-PET may improve diagnostic accuracy and help reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
  • PSMA-PET
  • 18F-PSMA-1007
  • Multiparametric MRI
  • mpMRI
  • PI-RADS
  • Transition Zone
  • Prostate Biopsy
  • PRIMARY Score
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,484 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,415 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 65 is below the median of 200 across 1,200 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sanatorio Privado San Geronimo as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult men with suspected prostate cancer who are candidates for prostate biopsy and have a PI-RADS ≥4 lesion located in the transition zone of the prostate on mpMRI will be prospectively enrolled at a single center. Eligible patients will be consecutively recruited until the prespecified target enrollment of 65 participants is reached. All participants will undergo mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET before image-guided prostate biopsy. Histopathological examination of targeted and systematic biopsy samples will serve as the reference standard for determining the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer. The target sample size was determined a priori based on the paired diagnostic study design, with allowance for potential losses, technical failures, exclusions, or incomplete data.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men with suspected prostate cancer.
  • Candidates for prostate biopsy with a PI-RADS ≥4 lesion located in the - transition zone of the prostate identified on mpMRI.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment for prostate cancer, including surgery, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy.
  • Concomitant conditions that preclude or substantially interfere with imaging evaluation, including severe renal impairment, untreated severe claustrophobia, or mpMRI-incompatible metallic implants.
  • Contraindication to mpMRI or PSMA-PET, including severe renal impairment, MRI-incompatible implants, severe untreated claustrophobia, or known hypersensitivity to gadolinium-based contrast agents or the PSMA radiotracer.
  • Patients undergoing active surveillance without an immediate indication for prostate biopsy.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients With PI-RADS ≥4 Transition Zone Lesions

    Men with suspected prostate cancer and a PI-RADS ≥4 lesion located in the transition zone of the prostate on mpMRI. All participants will undergo Fluorine-18 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET) in addition to mpMRI before prostate biopsy. Imaging findings will be evaluated independently. All participants will subsequently undergo image-guided prostate biopsy, including targeted and systematic sampling, with histopathology serving as the reference standard for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

    Diagnostic Test: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) · Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET · Procedure: Prostate Biopsy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI)

    mpMRI of the prostate will be performed using a 1.5- to 3-Tesla MRI system without an endorectal coil. The protocol will include T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Lesions located in the transition zone will be evaluated according to the PI-RADS classification. MRI images will be interpreted independently and blinded to the PSMA-PET findings.

  • Diagnostic test18F-PSMA-1007 PET

    Participants will undergo PSMA-PET using 18F-PSMA-1007 administered at a dose of 2 MBq/kg. PET images will be acquired approximately 60 minutes after tracer injection. Intraprostatic lesions will be evaluated using the PRIMARY Score according to the PROMISE V2 framework, based on the pattern and intensity of PSMA uptake relative to reference organs. PRIMARY Scores 1-2 will be considered negative and scores 3-5 positive. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) will also be recorded for transition zone lesions. PSMA-PET images will be interpreted independently and blinded to the mpMRI findings.

  • ProcedureProstate Biopsy

    Participants will undergo image-guided prostate biopsy. Targeted samples from suspicious lesions and systematic biopsy samples will be obtained. Histopathological examination of biopsy specimens will serve as the reference standard for determining the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

    Diagnostic performance of mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS ≥4 transition zone lesions will be assessed using prostate biopsy histopathology as the reference standard. Clinically significant prostate cancer will be defined as Gleason score ≥7. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) will be calculated for each imaging modality and compared between modalities.

    Time frame: From completion of diagnostic imaging to availability of prostate biopsy histopathology results, up to 30 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Agreement Between mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET

    Agreement between mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET for the identification of suspicious prostate lesions will be assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

    Time frame: From the first imaging examination to completion of both mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET assessments, up to 14 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sanatorio San Geronimo
    Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province 3000, Argentina
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y, Tretiakova M, Yang C, Antic T, Dahi F, Shalhav AL, Karczmar G, Stadler WM. Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):715-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100021. Epub 2010 Sep 15. PubMed 20843992 ↗
  • de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Feb;202(2):343-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11046. PubMed 24450675 ↗
  • Chesnais AL, Niaf E, Bratan F, Mege-Lechevallier F, Roche S, Rabilloud M, Colombel M, Rouviere O. Differentiation of transitional zone prostate cancer from benign hyperplasia nodules: evaluation of discriminant criteria at multiparametric MRI. Clin Radiol. 2013 Jun;68(6):e323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 23. PubMed 23528164 ↗
  • Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Feuth T, Witjes JA, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):207-17. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120281. Epub 2012 Nov 9. PubMed 23143029 ↗
  • Satapathy S, Singh H, Kumar R, Mittal BR. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Initial Detection in Patients With Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Mar;216(3):599-607. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23912. Epub 2021 Jan 21. PubMed 32755196 ↗
  • Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, Rasiah K, Pattison DA, Yaxley J, Thomas P, Hutton AC, Agrawal S, Amin A, Blazevski A, Chalasani V, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Sheehan-Dare G, Kooner R, Coughlin G, Chan L, Cusick T, Namdarian B, Kapoor J, Alghazo O, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy D, Hofman MS, Stricker P. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 28. PubMed 34465492 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared due to participant confidentiality and data protection considerations. Study results will be reported in aggregate form in scientific publications and presentations.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2028, 24 months later.

Of 496 non-industry observational studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 66 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 147. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 584 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 135.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 22, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2029
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07892378
Lead sponsor
Sanatorio Privado San Geronimo
Responsible party
Miguel Angel Bergero (Principal Investigator, Sanatorio Privado San Geronimo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Miguel A Bergero, PhD
Contact
angelbergero@hotmail.com
+54 9 342 4099960
Miguel A Bergero, MD, MSc, PhD
principal investigator · Sanatorio San Geronimo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion