ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05825027RSiCCUpdated Jul 8, 2026

Risk Stratification in Children With Concussion

An observational study in Concussion, Brain and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by Duke University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-08.

Sponsored by Duke University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
11 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project will measure concussion symptoms, biological markers, and academic and social factors across the first year postconcussion to develop a model that enables early identification of and symptom management for children at higher risk for persistent postconcussive symptoms. Findings will provide novel insights into the longer-term effects of concussion on children's physical, psychological, and social well-being and support the development of personalized healthcare and school-based plans to reduce disparities in children's ability to return-to-learn and -play and improve postconcussion quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Concussions occur at an alarming rate among U.S. schoolchildren, with one in five children experiencing a concussion by age 16. The number of children visiting emergency departments for concussions annually has increased by 50% over the past decade, with an estimated cost to the healthcare system of $1 billion/year. Compared to adults, children experience longer and more severe postconcussive symptoms (PCS). Severity and duration of PCS, however, vary considerably among children, complicating clinical care and return to learn and play. Persistent PCS including physical, emotional, and cognitive symptoms, result in increased school absenteeism, social isolation, and psychological distress. Early PCS diagnosis and access to evidence-based return-to-health and -school interventions are strongly linked to positive health and academic outcomes. Yet models to identify children at high risk for persistent PCS are lacking. PCS have been linked to inflammatory processes occurring within the injured brain. Preliminary evidence suggests that fatigue, another symptom likely contributing to poor outcomes, is also a biological byproduct of pediatric concussions. Importantly, even though 73% of children report continuous fatigue after concussion, this symptom is rarely studied along with other PCS. Prior research has focused on the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and PCS severity but has not examined this relationship longitudinally. Acute symptom severity alone, however, is a poor prognostic of clinical outcomes in concussed children. Symptom severity immediately postinjury does not explain why at least 25% of children still experience PCS after 1 year or why even children who may appear asymptomatic still report academic and social challenges months after concussion. To identify which children are at high risk for persistent PCS and poor health, academic, and social outcomes, research tracking PCS trajectories and describing school-based impacts across the entire first year postinjury is critically needed. This proposal will 1) define novel PCS trajectory typologies in a racially/ethnically diverse population of 500 children with concussion (11-17 years, near equal distribution by sex), 2) identify associations between these typologies and patterns of inflammatory biomarkers, 3) develop a risk stratification model to identify children at risk for persistent PCS; and 4) gain unique insights and describe PCS impact, including fatigue, on longer-term academic and social outcomes. We will be the first to use NIH's symptom science model and patient-reported outcomes to explore the patterns of fatigue and other physical, cognitive, psychological, emotional and academic responses to concussion in children over a full year. Our model will enable clinicians and educators to identify children most at risk for poor long-term health, social, and academic outcomes after concussion. This work is critical to meeting our long-term goal of developing personalized concussion symptom management strategies to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in the health and quality of life of children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Concussion, Brain
  • Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Browse trials for

03

In context

Brain Concussion

637 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Concussion; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 149 across 166 observational studies indexed under Brain Concussion.

Browse Brain Concussion studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects will be recruited from concussion clinics in the Raleigh-Durham metro area of North Carolina.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with concussion that occurred within the past 7 days
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13-15
  • English speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
  • Polytrauma
  • Nontraumatic brain injury
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in concussion symptom burden and severity as measured by the Post Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS)

    The PCSS consists of 22 questions that relate to post-concussive symptoms. Survey-takers are asked to rate each symptom according to a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0-6. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of post-concussive symptoms. The greatest possible score is 132 and the lowest possible score is 0.

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  2. Change in post concussion fatigue burden and severity as measured by the PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v2.0 - Fatigue

    The PROMIS Pediatric Fatigue item bank consists of 25 self-report items which measure fatigue symptoms in children aged 8-17 years. Items are ranked on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Almost Always). Raw scores are converted to T-scores using scoring tables. A T-score of 50 is the average for the United States general population. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For negatively-worded concepts like fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse greater degree of fatigue than average. By comparison, a fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better lesser degree of fatigue than average.

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  3. Change in degree of involvement with one's peers in usual social roles, activities and responsibilities as measured by the Neuro-QoL Item Bank v1.0 - Pediatric Social Relations - Interaction with Peers

    This instrument consists of 8 self-report items focused on patient-reported involvement with peers in usual social roles, activities, and responsibilities. Items are rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1 (Never Interacting) to 5 (Always Interacting). Raw scores are converted to T-scores using conversion tables, with a T-score of 50 as the mean. A higher Neuro-QoL T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts this measure, a T-score of 40 is one SD worse less interaction with peers than average. By comparison, a fatigue T-score of 60 is one SD better more interaction with peers than average.

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  4. Change in perceived difficulties in everyday cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, concentration, processing speed and organization skill as measured by the Neuro-QoL Item Bank v2.0 - Pediatric Cognitive Function

    This instrument consists of 8 self-report items focused on patient-reported difficulties with basic cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, concentration, processing speed, and organization skill. Items are rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Raw scores are converted to T-scores using conversion tables, with a T-score of 50 as the mean. A higher Neuro-QoL T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For cognitive function, a T-score of 40 is one SD less difficulty than average. By comparison, a T-score of 60 is one SD more difficulty than average .

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  5. Change in academic needs of a student following concussion as measured by the Concussion Learning Assessment & School Survey, 3rd Edition (CLASS-3)

    This measure consists of four scale scores (General Academic Concern, Academic Problems, School Stresses, and Academic Subjects) and a cumulative score is generated for each of the 4 scales \[0-3 - General Academic Concern (1 item, total score range 0-3), Academic Problems (14 items, total score range 0-42), School Stresses (6 items, total score range 0-6); 0-4 - Academic Subjects (4 items, total score range 0-16)\], which in sum can be considered as a clinical measure to assess and monitor the academic needs of a student following concussion. Higher scores correlate with greater difficulty with academic needs.

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  6. Salivary Interferon Gamma

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  7. Salivary Interleukin-1 Beta

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  8. Salivary Interleukin-6

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  9. Salivary Interleukin-8

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  10. Salivary Interleukin-10

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  11. Salivary TNF-Alpha

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  12. Pubertal status

    Salivary DHEA concentration The high levels of DHEA that are secreted beginning in mid-childhood (\~8 years of age) serve as a marker of adrenarche (puberty). DHEA level rises before external physical changes of puberty become obvious. Levels of DHEA in saliva have been shown to be a reliable index of blood levels in children and adolescents and are not dependent on time of day. DHEA age/sex-based reference ranges will be used to determine pubertal maturation. The assay results range from 10.2 pg/mL to 1000 pg/mL with higher levels correlating with later Tanner stages of puberty.

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  13. Presence of genetic variants in genes that code for inflammatory cytokines

    Inflammatory genetic variants involved in brain injury and in fatigue in the following genes: APOE, IGSF3, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, MAPT, TNF-α, TNFAIP1, TNFAIP8

    Time frame: Within 7 days of injury

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Reuter-Rice K, Fitterer AN, Duquette P, Yang Q, Palipana AK, Laskowitz D, Garrett ME, Fletcher M, Smith J, Makor L, Grant G, Ramsey K, Bloom OJ, Ashley-Koch AE. A study protocol for risk stratification in children with concussion (RSiCC): Theoretical framework, design, and methods. PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0306399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306399. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39024215 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05825027
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 24, 2023
Start date
May 23, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2026

Study contacts

Karin Reuter-Rice, PhD
Contact
karin.reuter-rice@duke.edu
919-681-7647
Amanda Fitterer, MPH
Contact
amanda.fitterer@duke.edu
Karin Reuter-Rice, PhD
principal investigator · Duke University School of Nursing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion