CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05814913CaPSIUpdated Dec 12, 2024

Culturally Adapted Psychosocial Interventions for Early Psychosis in a Low-resource Setting

An interventional study of CaCBT for psychosis and Culturally adapted Family Intervention (CulFI) for psychosis in Psychosis, sponsored by Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-12.

Sponsored by Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
390
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Aims:

To determine the clinical efficacy of Culturally adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CaCBT) and Culturally adapted Family Intervention (CulFI) compared to Treatment As Usual (TAU) on reducing overall symptoms of psychosis in patients with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) in Pakistan.

Secondary Aims:

  1. To determine the efficacy of CaCBT and CulFI compared to TAU on positive and negative symptoms of psychosis, general psychopathology, depressive symptoms, quality of life, general functioning, and insight in patients with FEP in Pakistan.
  2. To determine the efficacy of CaCBT and CulFI compared to TAU on improving carer experience, carer wellbeing, carer illness attitudes and symptoms of depression and anxiety in family and carers of patients with FEP in Pakistan.
  3. To determine the comparative effect of CaCBT and CulFI in improving patient and carer related outcomes in individuals with FEP in Pakistan.
  4. To estimate the economic impact of delivering culturally appropriate psychosocial interventions in low-resource settings
  5. To explore delivery and reach of each intervention, tolerability of intervention components, acceptability of interventions, understanding mechanism of change and developing an understanding of barriers and facilitators to future adoption using process evaluation.

Study design and setting:

This will be a multi-centre, assessor masked, individual, three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Sample Size:

The study aims to recruit a total of N=390 participants with FEP

Read the detailed description

Family Intervention (FI) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) are among the most efficacious psychosocial interventions to prevent relapse in schizophrenia. However, there is limited evidence from LMICs that supports the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of delivering these psychosocial interventions to individuals with FEP. We aim to determine the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Culturally adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CaCBT) and Culturally adapted Family Intervention (CulFI) compared to TAU in reducing overall symptoms of psychosis in individuals with FEP in Pakistan. The study will include 390 participants with FEP from psychiatric units of hospitals and community settings in ten centres (i.e. Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Hyderabad, Qambar Shahdakot, Shaheed Benazirabad, Sukkur, Peshawar, Quetta and Multan).

Consented participants meeting eligibility criteria will be randomised in a 1:1:1 allocation to CaCBT + TAU, CulFI + TAU or TAU alone. Participants in CaCBT intervention group will receive 12-weekly one-to-one sessions. Participants in CulFI group will receive 10-weekly one-to-one sessions. Each CaCBT and CulFI session will last for approximately 1 hour. Sessions will be delivered by trained psychologists who will receive regular weekly supervision to maintain fidelity. Assessments will be carried out at baseline, months 3, 6, and 12 by trained, blinded assessors. . Process evaluation will help to build the implementation knowledge base for proposed interventions across study settings. We will conduct economic evaluations (i.e., the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses) of the CaCBT and CulFI interventions, as add-on to TAU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychosis

Keywords

  • First Episode Psychosis
  • LAMIC
  • Family Intervention
  • CBT
  • Paksitan
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals of all genders aged over 18 years; diagnosis of schizophrenia confirmed by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) meeting DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform or schizoaffective psychosis
  • Scored at least 4 on the PANSS delusions or hallucinations items, or at least 5 on suspiciousness, persecution, or grandiosity items
  • stable on medication for the past four weeks
  • in contact with mental health services
  • within 3 years of diagnosis
  • able to demonstrate the capacity to provide informed consent to take part in the study
  • potential participants must have a carer or relative who is also willing to participate in the study to be eligible

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria for patient participants:

  • Active DSM-5 substance use disorder (except nicotine or caffeine) or dependence within the last three months
  • A score of 5 or more on the PANSS conceptual disorganisation item
  • Individuals who have received structured psychological intervention within the past 3 months
  • Relevant CNS or other medical disorders that would impact participation
  • Diagnosis of intellectual disability
  • Unstable residential arrangements

Family member/Carer participant inclusion criteria:

  • Living with or spending at least 10 hours per week in face-to-face contact with an individual with early psychosis and assuming a caring role
  • Age>18 years
  • Able to give informed written consent.

Family member/Carer participant exclusion criteria:

  • Active DSM-5 substance use disorder
  • Received psychological intervention within the past 3 months
  • Unstable residential arrangements.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
390 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CaCBT for psychosis

    CaCBT is a culturally adapted psychosocial intervention for people with early psychosis that comprises of 12 sessions. These sessions are conducted individually on a weekly basis and last 45-60 minutes

    Behavioral: CaCBT for psychosis

  • Experimental
    CulFI Intervention

    CulFI is a culturally adapted psychosocial intervention delivered over 10 sessions of 40-60 minutes, weekly for the first 8 weeks and fortnightly for the remaining 4 weeks. Sessions are delivered to patients and their carers, though patient participation in sessions is not necessary.

    Behavioral: Culturally adapted Family Intervention (CulFI) for psychosis

  • No intervention
    Treatment as Usual (TAU)

    TAU will be ascertained by the participant's treating physician. Research staff will record the nature and intensity of TAU delivered to each participant over a period of 3 months.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCaCBT for psychosis

    The CaCBT intervention is based on the intervention manual developed by David Kingdon and Douglas Turkington, and culturally adapted by our group. CaCBT aims to take a collaborative approach to gaining an understanding of the symptoms

  • BehavioralCulturally adapted Family Intervention (CulFI) for psychosis

    CulFI intervention comprises of Family psychoeducation; cognitive-behavioural skills training for stress-management, coping and problem solving; crisis intervention and suicide risk management; relapse prevention; education and support regarding the family environment, including communication training. The components are designed to facilitate an understanding about psychosis, the emotional impact of the illness on family relationships, to promote more adaptive coping strategies and minimize relapse risk.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

    The PANSS is a structured interview use to evaluate the prevalence and severity of the positive, negative and general psychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. The higher the score the greater symptoms severity. potential ranges are 7 to 49 for the Positive and Negative Scales, and 16 to 112 for the General Psychopathology Scale.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia

    The CDSS is a 9-items scale which evaluates depression in individuals with psychosis. The minimum score is 0 and maximum 30.Higher scores indicate greater depressive severity

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  2. EuroQol-5 Dimensions

    EuroQol-5D (EQ- 5D) will be used to assess health-related quality of life over 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain-discomfort, anxiety and depression). Higher score indicates better quality of life.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  3. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale

    It is a self-administered questionnaire based on 36 items that measures health and disability. The scoring has three steps: Step 1 - Summing of recoded item scores within each domain. Step 2 - Summing of all six domain scores. Step 3 - Converting the summary score into a metric ranging from 0 to 100 (where 0 = no disability; 100 = full disability

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  4. Schedule for Assessment of Insight

    The Schedule for Assessment of Insight is used to evaluate the three different aspects of insight: treatment compliance, recognition of illness and re-labelling of psychotic phenomena

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  5. Experience of Caregiving Inventory

    The ECI is a thorough measure that assesses the experiences of caring for a family member with severe mental illness

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  6. Carer Well-Being and Support

    The CWS is an instrument to assess the wellbeing and support of a carer

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  7. Illness Perception Questionnaire

    The IPQ is used to evaluate carer beliefs about schizophrenia

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  8. Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    A 7-item scale measuring anxiety. Higher score indicates higher anxiety. Score 0-4: Minimal Anxiety. Score 5-9: Mild Anxiety. Score 10-14: Moderate Anxiety. Score greater than 15: Severe Anxiety.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  9. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ-9 total score for the nine items ranges from 0 to 27. Higher score indicates greater depression severity

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to months 3, 6, and 12

  10. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Rating Scale

    Fidelity to the manuals of the interventions will be assessed via recorded sessions using Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Rating Scale

    Time frame: Fidelity will be measured after completion of the intervention ( at 3rd month)

  11. Cognitive Therapy for Psychosis Adherence Scale

    Therapists' adherence to the manuals of the interventions will be assessed via recorded sessions using Cognitive Therapy for Psychosis Adherence Scale

    Time frame: Therapists' adherence will be measured after completion of the intervention ( at 3rd month)

  12. The Psychosocial Treatment Compliance Scale (PTCS)

    This is a is a reliable and valid scale which is used to measure the compliance to psychosocial treatment of people with psychotic disorders

    Time frame: Participants' compliance with psychosocial treatment will be assessed at end of intervention (3-months)

  13. Treatment Adherence Rating Scale

    This scale will be used to assess the antipsychotic medication adherence of participants

    Time frame: Participants' adherence will be assessed at end of intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months

  14. Session Attendance Log

    A session log will be maintained for each participant to maintain record of attendance for each session of assigned intervention.

    Time frame: Session attendance for each session for 3 months

  15. The block design

    The block design sub-test from the Wechsler Intelligence Scales will be sued to assess cognitive functioning. The higher score on the scale reflects better cognitive functioning

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12-month follow up

  16. Matrix ReasoningTest

    The matrix reasoning sub-test from the Wechsler Intelligence Scales will be used to assess visual information processing and abstract reasoning skills. Higher scores on the scale indicate better visual information processing and abstract reasoning skills.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12 month follow up.

  17. Picture Completion Test

    The picture completion sub-test from the Wechsler Intelligence Scales measures measures visual perception, specifically, alertness to visual details. Higher score on this sub-scale indicate better cognitive skills in terms of visual perception.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12-month follow up

  18. Visual Puzzles Test

    The Visual Puzzles sub-test from the Wechsler Intelligence Scales measures visual intelligence. Higher score on this sub-test indicates high visual intelligence.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12-month follow up

  19. The Oral Fluency test

    This test measures the ability to evoke valid and distinct exemplars of a particular category. Higher score on this scale indicate better cognitive ability.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12-month follow up

  20. Memory for Design

    The test examines visual recall of an individual. Higher score indicate better cognitive skills.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12-month follow up

  21. Coughlan Learning Task (verbal)

    This test assesses verbal memory. Higher score on this test indicates better verbal memory.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12-month follow up

  22. Coughlan Learning Task (visual)

    This test assesses visual memory. Higher score on this test indicates better visual memory.

    Time frame: Change in scores from baseline to 3, 6 and 12-month follow up

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Civil hospital
    Karachi, Sindh 75600, Pakistan
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05814913
Lead sponsor
Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning
Collaborators
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 18, 2023
Start date
Apr 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 12, 2024

Study contacts

Ameer B Khoso
Contact
ameer.bukhsh@pill.org.pk
021-35371084
Omair Husain, MD
principal investigator · Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Imran B Chaudhry, MD
principal investigator · Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion