ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05797649Updated Oct 6, 2026

Comparing the Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity of Pleural Fluid N-Terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and Other Biochemical Gradient Criteria in Distinguishing Heart Failure and Non-heart Failure Related Pleural Effusions (CENTRE Study)

An observational study in Pleural Effusion, Heart Failure and Malignant Neoplasm, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-06.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Observational

Updated Oct 6, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the discriminative properties of pleural fluid (PF) N-terminal-proB-type-natriuretic-peptide (NTproBNP) levels in identifying heart failure (HF)-associated pleural effusions (PE).

Read the detailed description

Objective: To assess the discriminative properties of pleural fluid (PF) N-terminal-proB-type-natriuretic-peptide (NTproBNP) levels in identifying heart failure (HF)-associated pleural effusions (PE).

Hypothesis to be tested: The PF NTproBNP levels are superior to existing methods including Light's criteria, serum/pleural fluid (S/PF) protein gradient, and albumin gradient, in identifying transudates and distinguishing between HF- and non-HF-associated PE.

Design and subjects: A prospective case-control study involving patients with PE requiring thoracentesis, caused by hypervolaemia due to HF, diseases other than HF, and patients with pleural effusion without hypervolaemia. Patient characteristics, PF results and effusion aetiology will be analysed. Patient outcomes will be followed up to 3 months to confirm the aetiology of PE. Clinical management of patients will not be affected.

Study instruments: PF of recruited patients will be analysed for albumin, protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and NTproBNP. The diagnosis of HF will be based on clinical features, serum NTproBNP and echocardiogram.

Main outcome measures: The performance of PF NTproBNP level in identifying HF-associated PE.

Data analysis: The PF NTproBNP level will be compared between effusions of different aetiologies. The optimal pleural fluid NTproBNP level with largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in identifying HF-associated PE will be determined. Performance of PF NTproBNP level in identifying HF-associated PE, and other biochemical criteria in identifying transudates will be compared. Echocardiographic findings will be correlated with the PF NTproBNP levels.

Expected results: The diagnostic performance of PF NTproBNP will be significantly better in identifying HF-associated effusion than other biochemical criteria.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pleural Effusion
  • Heart Failure
  • Malignant Neoplasm
  • Fluid Overload
  • Hypoalbuminemia
  • Renal Failure
  • Cirrhosis
  • Infections

Keywords

  • pleural fluid
  • heart failure
  • malignancy
  • cancer
  • echocardiography
  • infection
  • tuberculosis
  • respiratory medicine
03

In context

Pleural Effusion

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 140 across 93 observational studies indexed under Pleural Effusion.

Browse Pleural Effusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who are admitted to the Department of Medicine \& Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH) who fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criteria

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients hospitalized for heart failure and pleural effusion
  • Pleural tapping indicated for pleural fluid analysis.
  • Aged 18 years old or above

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of intrapleural therapy (including talc and fibrinolytic) in the ipsilateral pleural space.
  • History of surgical decortication or pleurodesis in the ipsilateral pleural space.
  • Ipsilateral thoracic or cardiac surgery in the past 3 months.
  • Failure to obtain due to the patient's refusal or cognitive impairment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
24 Months
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Heart Failure-Associated Pleural Effusion

    Patients with pleural effusion with an underlying aetiology of heart failure

  • Control group

    Patients with pleural effusion due to exudative, or non-fluid overload causes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of PF NTproBNP level in the diagnosis of HF-associated pleural effusions with other conventional biochemical criteria

    Pleural fluid NTproBNP will be measured in patients with pleural effusion of various aetiologies including malignancy, pleural infection, heart failure and other causes of volume overload. The sensitivity and specificity of an elevated pleural fluid NTproBNP level in successfully identifying a pleural effusion due to underlying heart failure will be measured and compared against existing classification criteria for pleural effusion such as Light's Criteria, pleural-serum protein gradient or albumin gradient.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. To measure the PF NTproBNP level in patients with pleural effusion of various aetiologies

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Correlation of clinical factors that may affect the levels of pleural fluid NTproBNP such as echocardiographic features, presence of comorbidities, nutritional status, serum albumin level, levels of inflammatory markers and presence of infection

    Clinical data of patients admitted to the hospital with pleural effusion will be measured and recorded. Statistical analysis will then be performed to evaluate for degree of correlation between the presence or severity of a clinical parameter, echocardiogram results e.g. severe valvular stenosis, or, e.g. presence of medical comorbidities or presence of concomitant infection, and the levels of NTproBNP identified in the patient's pleural fluid detected within same admission.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. To correlate the PF NTproBNP levels with the echocardiographic features and prognosis of patients with heart failure

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, New Territories 0000, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Given patient data and privacy concerns, clinical data involving individual patients will not be shared. Data summary tables may later be published along with the research manuscript, and may be shared upon receipt of a reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 6, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2025→Jun 30, 2025 (actual)
Oct 6, 2026
Study completion
Nov 30, 2025→Jun 30, 2025 (actual)
Oct 6, 2026
Enrollment
120 (estimated)→160 (actual)
Oct 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 6, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Nov 30, 2025→Jun 30, 2025 (now actual)
    Study completion Nov 30, 2025→Jun 30, 2025 (now actual)
    Enrollment 120 (estimated)→160 (actual)
    + 6 other changes: identifiers, verification date, oversight details, contact details, site details and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05797649
Responsible party
Christopher Chan (Honorary Clinical Tutor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 4, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Oct 6, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion