An interventional study of Probiotic and Placebo in Respiratory Infection (for Example, Pneumonia, Bronchitis), sponsored by Min-Tze LIONG. Recruiting at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 12 Months to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-22.
Sponsored by Min-Tze LIONG · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 14 studies testing probiotic in Respiratory Tract Infections — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Probiotic · Respiratory Tract Infections.
Among the 14 studies testing probiotic in Respiratory Tract Infections, this one is the 7th largest by planned enrollment of the 13 interventional ones, is one of 3 that started in 2023, is one of 11 with no phase, and was the 12th registered.
751 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections; 114 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 120 is below the median of 200 across 540 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections.
Browse Respiratory Tract Infections studies →3 of the 14 studies testing probiotic in Respiratory Tract Infections are open now, in 2 countries. Each count lists the studies.
No approval found in the FDA or EMA files read. How studies give it is on its page →
Of the 73 Respiratory Tract Infections studies recruiting now, 34 (47%) set no upper age limit and 31 (42%) stop at 75 or younger; 34 take children under 18; 25 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 12 Months to 7 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →14 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2012; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2023.
Median enrollment 120 across the 13 interventional studies. Of the 10 that completed or were terminated, 1 (10%) have results posted.
4 of 14 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Min-Tze LIONG is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Min-Tze LIONG has 3 studies filed under Respiratory Tract Infections — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
None of the studies under way reaches primary completion within a year.
Among the 14 studies testing probiotic in Respiratory Tract Infections, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
This project aims to study the benefits of probiotics namely Bifidobacterium infantis YLGB-1496 in modulating gut microbiota of children with respiratory symptoms, among pre-school children in Malaysia aged >12 months old, \<7 years old.
Probiotic can be defined as "live microorganisms that grant health effects to the host if consumed in sufficient amounts". Probiotic bacteria, which beneficially affect the host by improving the intestinal microbial balance, may affect the immune response, thus boosting the body system to combat against diseases.
Respiratory illnesses are the most common acute diseases in children where no virtually effective treatments or prophylaxes are available for these infections. Probiotics on the other hand have gained increasing evidences as an effective therapy in preventing respiratory tract infections. Children attending day care are especially at risk for acquiring respiratory illness, as close physical contact among children in day care favour the transmission of infectious diseases. When studying children receiving either probiotic in milk and control milk, the number of absences from day care because of illness is significantly lesser in probiotic group when compared with control group. In addition, children in the probiotic group had fewer respiratory tract infections with complications (otitis media, sinusitis, bronchitis and pneumonia) and less prescribed antibiotic treatments. The time without respiratory symptoms was also significantly longer in the probiotic group compared with the control group. When the effects of probiotics were studied on nasopharyngeal carriage of bacterial pathogens, the number of human bocavirus was reduced significantly in the nasopharynx of these children, indicating that probiotics may be more effective against respiratory tract infections of viral origin. While the precise mechanisms of using probiotics in management of respiratory infections are largely unknown, speculations include: probiotics compete against pathogens; increase the barrier function in respiratory epithelium; immunostimulatory effects by enhancing cellular immunity with increased activity of natural killer cells and macrophages in airways. Hence, probiotics may offer safe means of reducing the risk of early respiratory related illnesses, common cold and antibiotic use, and the risk of recurrent respiratory infections, thereby represent a simple, safe, effective, available and affordable method for preventing respiratory infections in children.
In worldwide, it is estimated that 5.2 million of children under five of age die every year due to preventable disease such as diarrhea, malaria and pneumonia. Up to date, diarrhea still remains as global health issues, even in developing countries, with 1 million of children deaths reported to be attributed to diarrhea. In Malaysia, reported cases of diarrhea and acute gastroenteritis have been observed to occur throughout the year, with rotavirus-associated diarrhea being the most prevalently identified gastrointestinal disorder. One of the most common gastrointestinal disorders in young children, is diarrhea. Diarrhea is commonly defined as three or more loose or watery stools in the last 24 hours. For clinical studies employing oral administration of probiotics, the probiotics were administered directly to the participants or mixed with a variety of fluids and foods. In studies on probiotic prevention of acute diarrhea in daycare centres worldwide, probiotics tested such as Lactobacillus GG, Bifidobacterium lactis (alone or in combination with Streptococcus thermophiles), and Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus showed a clear evidence of efficacy to reduce diarrhea-related symptoms in a strain-dependent and dose-dependent manner. Probiotics administration reduces duration of diarrhea, indicating the efficacy of probiotics not only in preventing occurrence of diarrhea, as well as to treat episodes of diarrhea. Probiotics Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium longum and Saccharomyces boulardii also showed decreased time of vomiting in the intervention groups as compared with controls during the probiotics treatment of acute rotavirus diarrhoea. The rationale for using probiotics in infectious diarrhoea is that they act against enteric pathogens by competing for available nutrients and binding sites, making the gut contents acid, producing a variety of chemicals, and increasing specific and non-specific immune responses. Probiotics reduced infectious diarrhoea in children and adults in various settings but a mechanism common to most probiotics, for example, colonization resistance, is effective against a wide range of gut pathogens.
Probiotic bacteria, which beneficially affect the host by improving the intestinal microbial balance, may affect the immune response, thus boosting the body system to combat against diseases. Probiotics have been studied extensively for their effects in preventing and treating a multitude of conditions, including the treatment of lactose intolerance, traveller's diarrhoea and the prevention and treatment of nosocomial diarrhoea. In acute diarrhoea, a reduction in the frequency of diarrhoeal symptoms has been reported in adults and children treated with probiotics. Among the beneficial microbes, Bifidobacterium is one of the best-known probiotic genus in the world, and it is widely applied in the dairy industry as a probiotic. Evidences from in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies and long consumption history support the safety and health benefits of Bifidobacterium strains. The ingestion of yogurt fortified with B. longum reduced harmful bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcus and C. perfringens, while at the same time alter the microbiota gut profile of volunteers with a significant increase of beneficial microbes Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species. Additionally, putrefactive substances in the intestinal environment were also reduced in the presence of the probiotic supplement. Such findings suggest that Bifidobacterium strains are safe and could be used further to evaluate its effect in preventing diarrhea and/or respiratory-related illness prevalence in young children.
Probiotic (Bifidobacterium infantis YLGB-1496) adheres to probiotic properties such as excellent tolerance to gastric acid, intestinal fluid and bile salt of the digestive system. Both probiotic and placebo products are manufactured under HACCP conditions. All products do not contain any animal-origin ingredients. The probiotic product contains probiotic and carrier while placebo contains only carrier. Sachets of products containing probiotic and placebo appear as light yellow powder. Both probiotic and placebo products are kept at storage temperature range below 30oC according to the condition recommended by the manufacturer.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Bifidobacterium infantis YLGB-1496 at 1x10 log CFU/day for 12 weeks
Dietary Supplement: Probiotic
Intervention consists of daily administration of 2g of maltodextrin, administered daily for 12-weeks)
Dietary Supplement: Placebo
Bifidobacterium infantis YLGB-1496 at 1x10 log CFU/day for 12 weeks
Intervention consists of daily administration of 2g of maltodextrin, administered daily for 12-weeks)
Microbiota profiles of fecal samples in children with respiratory tract infections upon administration of probiotic as assessed via pyrosequencing
Differences in microbiota abundance in fecal sample of children with respiratory tract infections upon administration o probiotic compared to placebo
Time frame: 12-weeks
Clinical respiratory symptoms duration and frequency in children with respiratory tract infections upon administration of probiotic as assessed using the Monthly Health Questionnaire (as used in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier number NCT02434042)
Changes in duration and frequency of respiratory illnesses symptoms from children on probiotic or placebo after 12-weeks, via the use of questionnaire.
Time frame: 12-weeks
Clinical gastrointestinal symptoms in children with respiratory tract infections upon administration of probiotic as assessed using the Monthly Gastrointestinal Questionnaire as used in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier number NCT02434042)
Differences in duration and frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms of children upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo
Time frame: 12-weeks
Immunity profiles in children with respiratory tract infections upon administration of probiotic via the use of oral swabs
Differences in concentrations of proteins such as interleukins (IL-10, IL-4, IL-6, Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interferon gamma) in swab samples (ug/mL) of children upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo
Time frame: 12-weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Probiotic
Respiratory Tract Infections →
Min-Tze LIONG