ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05781854Updated Apr 9, 2024

Dexmedetomidine for Intermittent Epidural Boluses Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labour Epidural Analgesia

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine in Labor Pain, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-09.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2024), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare two modes of labour epidural analgesia:

programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) versus continuous epidural infusion (CEI), with patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using dexmedetomidine in addition to low-dose bupivacaine and through measuring the total volume of local anesthetic received through patient controlled epidural analgesia per hour

Read the detailed description

Labour although varies with the individual may be the most painful experience, any women may ever encounter. Concerns about pain in labour are as old as mankind. Pain can make patients feel uncomfortable and become sleepless and agitated. Pain also stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, which causes increase in the heart rate, blood pressure, sweat production, endocrine hyper-function, and delays the patients' prognosis. Labor pain often causes a strong stress response. Several inhalation and parenteral anesthetics, sedatives, tranquilizers, and analgesics have been used for pain relief during labor, while over the last decade, lumbar epidural analgesia has greatly increased. The ideal labor analgesia should be based on maternal and child safety and should have a fast-acting good analgesic effect and less adverse reaction. Different adjuvants such as opioids and α2-adrenergic agonists were added to local anesthetics to improve the quality of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective 2-adrenergic agonist which has been used as pre-medication and as an adjuvant to general anesthesia . Dexmedetomidine have several beneficial actions during perioperative period. It decreases the sympathetic tone with attenuation of the neuroendocrine and hemodynamic response to anesthesia and surgery, reduce anesthetic and opioid requirement, cause sedation and analgesia. Dexmedetomidine was used to enhance the analgesic property of local anesthetics like lidocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The mechanism by which intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists prolong the motor and sensory block of local anesthetics is not clear. It may be an additive or synergistic effect secondary to the different mechanisms of action of local anesthetic and alpha 2-adrenergic agonist. Maintenance of epidural analgesia involved intermittent provider , administered boluses, patient-controlled epidural analgesia, and continuous epidural infusions with or without patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Continuous epidural infusion is the standard application setting for epidural infusion, highly effective, and provides consistent analgesia. however, is associated with greater local anesthetic consumption . A newer approach to maintenance of labor epidural analgesia involves the administration of programmed intermittent epidural boluses with patient-controlled epidural analgesia dosing for breakthrough pain. Earlier studies have suggested that programmed intermittent epidural boluses may be superior to continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia and may be associated with a reduction in local anesthetic requirement, decreased motor blockade, lower risk of instrumental deliveries, and improved patient satisfaction. This may be related to increased pressure generated during automated boluses, resulting in improved distribution of the local anesthetic in the epidural space .

02

Conditions studied

  • Labor Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Labor Pain

409 studies on the registry are indexed under Labor Pain; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 100 across 336 interventional studies indexed under Labor Pain.

Browse Labor Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,050 studies on the registry; 2,174 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 - 45 years
  • Scheduled for normal vaginal delivery
  • ASA physical status ӀI-IӀӀ.
  • Singleton non-complicated pregnancy.
  • At least 36 weak of gestation.
  • Vertex presentation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to epidural analgesia.
  • History of cardiac, liver, or kidney diseases.
  • History of allergy to amide local anesthetics or study medications.
  • Any neurological problem.
  • History of chronic opioid analgesic use.
  • Any contraindication of regional anesthesia.
  • Evidence of intrauterine growth restriction or fetal compromise.
  • Failed or unsatisfactory analgesic block.
  • Body mass index ≥40 kg/m2
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group P (PIEB-group)

    After the initial epidural loading dose of 10 ml, 30 patients will receive programmed intermittent epidural boluses (5 ml every 45 min with the first bolus 30 minutes after epidural initiation) + patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) as 5 ml boluses with a 20-minute lockout period).

    Drug: Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine

  • Active comparator
    Group C (CEI-group)

    After the initial epidural loading dose of 10 ml, 30 patients will receive continuous epidural infusion (5 ml/h starting immediately after the loading dose) + patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) as 5 ml boluses with a 20-minute lockout period).

    Drug: Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • DrugEpidural analgesia with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine

    Drug pages: Bupivacaine · Dexmedetomidine

    Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. total volume of local anesthetic

    total volume of local anesthetic received through patient controlled epidural analgesia per hour

    Time frame: 24 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ramsay sedation scale

    Completely awake or asleep and not responsive to any stimulus

    Time frame: 24 hour

  2. Heart rate

    Beat per minute

    Time frame: 24 hour

  3. Blood Pressure

    mmHg

    Time frame: 24 hour

  4. Likert scale for satisfaction

    very satisfied or very dissatisfied

    Time frame: 24 hour

  5. Bromage score for motor block

    free movement of legs and feet or unable to move legs and feet

    Time frame: 24 hour

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Assiut university hospital
    Asyut, 71111, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ebirim, L.N., Buowari, O.Y., Ghosh, S. Physical and Psychological Aspects of Pain in Obstetrics. In: Ghosh, S., editor. Pain in Perspective [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2012 [cited 2022 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/40395 doi: 10.5772/53923
  • Fortescue C, Wee MYK. Analgesia in labour: non-regional techniques. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain. 2005; 5(1): 219-223.
  • Paramasivan A, Lopez-Olivo MA, Foong TW, Tan YW, Yap APA. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine and postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2020 Aug;24(7):1215-1227. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1575. Epub 2020 May 22. PubMed 32333825 ↗
  • Verghese T, Dixit N, John L, et al. Effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine on duration of spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine - A comparative study. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2019;6(1):97-101
  • Mostafa MF, Herdan R, Fathy GM, Hassan ZEAZ, Galal H, Talaat A, Ibrahim AK. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate for postoperative analgesia and stress response after caesarean delivery; randomized controlled double-blind study. Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):182-191. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1476. Epub 2019 Sep 12. PubMed 31461801 ↗
  • Martin E, Ramsay G, Mantz J, Sum-Ping ST. The role of the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine in postsurgical sedation in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):29-41. doi: 10.1177/0885066602239122. PubMed 15189665 ↗
  • Gertler R, Brown HC, Mitchell DH, Silvius EN. Dexmedetomidine: a novel sedative-analgesic agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001 Jan;14(1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2001.11927725. PubMed 16369581 ↗
  • Werdehausen R, Fazeli S, Braun S, Hermanns H, Essmann F, Hollmann MW, Bauer I, Stevens MF. Apoptosis induction by different local anaesthetics in a neuroblastoma cell line. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):711-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep236. Epub 2009 Aug 22. PubMed 19700777 ↗
  • Fairbanks CA, Wilcox GL. Spinal antinociceptive synergism between morphine and clonidine persists in mice made acutely or chronically tolerant to morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Mar;288(3):1107-16. PubMed 10027848 ↗
  • Sng BL, Sia ATH. Maintenance of epidural labour analgesia: The old, the new and the future. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;31(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12. PubMed 28625301 ↗
  • Ojo OA, Mehdiratta JE, Gamez BH, Hunting J, Habib AS. Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses With Continuous Epidural Infusion for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):426-435. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004104. PubMed 30882524 ↗
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. PubMed 17695343 ↗
  • El Fawal, S., El Kabarity, R., Ahmed, N., Abd-El-Tawab, S. (2022). Effect of Epidural Dexmedetomidine vs Nalbuphine for Labor Analgesia. A randomized clinical trial. Egyptian J Anesthesia: 38 (1); 373382
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2025, 21 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 23, 2023
First posted
Mar 23, 2023
StartActual
May 29, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2025
Last update
Apr 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05781854
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Hassan Khaled ahmed gomaa (principal investigator , anesthesiology and ICU resident, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2023
Start date
May 29, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 9, 2024

Study contacts

Hassan Khaled Ahmed Gomaa, Resident
Contact
hassssan.khaled2013@gmail.com
01067319365
Mohamed Fathy Mostafa, Ass. Prof.
Contact
mo7_fathy@aun.edu.eg
01001123062
Zein El-Abden Zareh Hassan, Professor
study director · Assiut University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Bupivacaine · Dexmedetomidine

Start the discussion