ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05777551AIR HPSDUpdated Mar 5, 2024

AF Ablation With High Power Short Duration RF

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation and Catheter Ablation, sponsored by Clinica Mediterranea. Recruiting at 9 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-05.

Sponsored by Clinica Mediterranea · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
850
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 252 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in Italy — 44 open to participants now, 64 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Atrial Fibrillation · Italy.

Planned enrollment
33rd of 95
850 · median 411
Started
2023
with 17 others
Observational
95 of 252
22 open now
Primary completion
2026-12
later than 25 of 63 live
Registered
192nd of 252
by date

Among the 252 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in Italy, this one is the 33rd largest by planned enrollment of the 95 observational ones, is one of 18 that started in 2023, is one of 95 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 25 of the 63 other live ones, and was the 192nd registered.

By phase

252 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observationalthis study95 · 22 open
No phase80 · 17 open
Phase 343 · 1 open
Phase 420 · 2 open
Phase 212 · 2 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2000; this study’s year is marked. 18 started in 2023.

Size and results

Median enrollment 321 across the 156 interventional studies, 411 across the 95 observational. Of the 154 that completed or were terminated, 72 (47%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 252 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in Italy, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, research study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with high power short duration radiofrequency energy in patients with paroxysmal/persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

Subjects with paroxysmal/persistent AF will undergo catheter ablation using commercially approved devices (mapping system and catheters).

Patients will be followed up for 12 months to measure the recurrence of AF and its predictors. The primary endpoint will be to investigate the association between clinical and procedural characteristics and the efficacy and the safety of PVI performed with HPSD.

At least 850 consecutive will be enrolled to have an adequate statistical power for the analysis of the primary endpoint. We assume that the freedom form AF recurrence at 12 months will be 80%. Expected R\^2 (Cox-Snell) 0.1. Candidate variables to be included in the model:10. Shrinkage level: 0.9. Based on these assumption the minimum number of patients is 850 with 170 events and EPP 17.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be screened in ambulatory and scheduled for AF ablation according to current guidelines. Ablation will be usually performed under effective oral anticoagulation. Anticoagulation could be withdrawn before admission, so as antiarrhythmic drugs will be removed before scheduled procedure. Patients in AF or with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 will undergo transesophageal echocardiography within 48 hours prior to the ablation. For all other patients transesophageal echocardiography is optional. Cardiac MRI or Cardiac CT scan could be executed as a reference for volume estimations obtained with the mapping system.

Ablation will be carried out under mild or deep sedation, or general anesthesia according to center preference. At least 2 femoral vein access will be obtained and in some patients 1 subclavian vein. One diagnostic catheter will be positioned in the coronary sinus. One or two transseptal accesses to the left atrium will be achieved using a standard approach. Then, the mapping catheter (LASSO, Penta-ray, Octa-ray catheter) and the ablation catheter (QDot Micro catheter) will be placed in the left atrium. Heparin will be administered before the transseptal punctures to maintain an activated clotting time ≥ 300 seconds for the duration of the procedure. Left atrium mapping will be performed in sinus rhythm. Patients with atrial fibrillation at the beginning of the index procedure will undergo electrical cardioversion. After left atrium reconstruction the effective PV-left atrium electrical connection will be checked with the mapping catheter. In all patients a wide antrum circumferential ablation aimed at PV isolation will be performed using the QDot Micro catheter in QMode+ mode (90 w for 4 sec) for the whole ablation or in an hybrid mode (QMode + for posterior wall and QMode guided by AI in the anterior wall), according to the operator preference. The maximum interlesion distance will be \<6 mm (16,17). According to operator preference it will be performed an ablation line encircling each PV or two ablation lines encircling the right and the left PVs. At the end of the ablation effective PV isolation (entry and exit block), will be checked with mapping catheter. After PV isolation will be achieved, the reconnection of the same vein will be evaluated after a 20 minute period from the initial isolation or after adenosine infusion or isoproterenol. If the vein reconnects to the atrium, the ablation will be directed to the gaps identified by the mapping catheter.

All patients will undergo a post-procedural ECG and, optional, an echocardiogram to exclude pericardial effusion or other acute complications.

After ablation, patients will undertake regular follow-up assessments (scheduled at 3 months) including a detailed history, physical examination, 12-lead standard electrocardiography, and 24-h Holter monitoring. Patients who will not report any symptoms related to the previous arrhythmia during a supplementary detailed follow up (6-12 months subsequent to catheter ablation) will be considered free of arrhythmia recurrence

03

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Catheter Ablation

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF with indication to catheter ablation according to current guidelines

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF who signed the
  • Patients on active oral anticoagulation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous ablation for AF
  • Patients with \<35%
  • Women potentially pregnant
  • to X-ray exposure
  • Congenital heart disease or cardiac surgery within 1 month
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
850 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Association between clinical and procedural characteristics and the percentage of arrhythmia recurrence rate after PV isolation performed with HPSD.

    to assess the efficacy of the procedure in terms of atrial arrhythmia recurrence-free rate (binary outcome), with a number of candidate predictors equal to 10

    Time frame: 12 months after ablation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of acute pulmonary vein reconnection reconnection

    After PV isolation will be achieved, the reconnection of the same vein will be evaluated after a 20 minute period from the initial isolation or after adenosine infusion or isoproterenol.

    Time frame: 20 minutes after ablation

  2. Procedural time

    The Investigators will calculate the overall procedural time (min)

    Time frame: during the procedure

  3. Percentage of patients with atrial arrhythmias recurrence during the blanking period

    Number of patients with an atrial arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter) episode lasting at least 30 sec during the 3 month blanking period after the index ablation

    Time frame: 3 months after ablation

  4. Impact of anaesthesia type

    The Investigators will evaluate the type of anesthesia: (mild sedation, deep sedation, general anesthesia), the anesthetic drugs used and their dose in mg

    Time frame: during the procedure

  5. Evaluation of pain perception during ablation

    The Investigators will assess the pain during the ablation with a 0-10 pain scale (0 no pain, 1-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, 7-9 severe, 10 very severe).

    Time frame: during the procedure

  6. Fluoroscopy time

    The Investigators will calculate the overall fluoroscopy time (sec)

    Time frame: during the procedure

  7. Radiofrequency time

    The Investigators will calculate the overall radiofrequency time (sec)

    Time frame: during the procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, acute and at 30-day and 12-month as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Time frame: 30 days and 12 months after ablation

07

Study locations

7 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Centre Cardiologique Du Nord
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
    • Antoine Lepillier · Contact
  • Clinica Montevergine
    Mercogliano, AV, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Francesco Solimene · Contact
  • Maria cecilia Hospital
    Cotignola, RA, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Saverio Iacopino · Contact
  • Ospedale di Conegliano
    Conegliano, TV, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Roberto Mantovan, MD · Contact
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche
    Ancona, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Michela Casella · Contact
    • Antonio Dello Russo · Principal investigator
  • Ospedale Civile di Asti
    Asti, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Marco Scaglione · Contact
  • Clinica Mediterranea
    Napoli, 80100, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Giuseppe Stabile · Contact
  • Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche della Università di Torino.
    Torino, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
    • Matteo Anselmino · Contact
  • Royal Papworth Hospital
    Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
    • Claire Martin · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stabile G, Lepillier A, De Ruvo E, Scaglione M, Anselmino M, Sebag F, Pecora D, Gallagher M, Rillo M, Viola G, Rossi L, De Santis V, Landolina M, Castro A, Grimaldi M, Badenco N, Del Greco M, De Simone A, Pisano E, Abbey S, Lamberti F, Pani A, Zucchelli G, Sgarito G, Dugo D, Bertaglia E, Strisciuglio T, Solimene F. Reproducibility of pulmonary vein isolation guided by the ablation index: 1-year outcome of the AIR registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):1694-1701. doi: 10.1111/jce.14531. Epub 2020 May 11. PubMed 32369225 ↗
  • Duytschaever M, Vijgen J, De Potter T, Scherr D, Van Herendael H, Knecht S, Kobza R, Berte B, Sandgaard N, Albenque JP, Szeplaki G, Stevenhagen YJ, Taghji P, Wright M, Macours N, Gupta D. Standardized pulmonary vein isolation workflow to enclose veins with contiguous lesions: the multicentre VISTAX trial. Europace. 2020 Nov 1;22(11):1645-1652. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa157. PubMed 32879974 ↗
  • Ouyang F, Antz M, Ernst S, Hachiya H, Mavrakis H, Deger FT, Schaumann A, Chun J, Falk P, Hennig D, Liu X, Bansch D, Kuck KH. Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique. Circulation. 2005 Jan 18;111(2):127-35. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151289.73085.36. Epub 2004 Dec 27. PubMed 15623542 ↗
  • Lemola K, Hall B, Cheung P, Good E, Han J, Tamirisa K, Chugh A, Bogun F, Pelosi F Jr, Morady F, Oral H. Mechanisms of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation by segmental ostial ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2004 Jul;1(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.03.071. PubMed 15851153 ↗
  • Cappato R, Negroni S, Pecora D, Bentivegna S, Lupo PP, Carolei A, Esposito C, Furlanello F, De Ambroggi L. Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003 Sep 30;108(13):1599-604. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091081.19465.F1. Epub 2003 Sep 8. PubMed 12963643 ↗
  • Wang XH, Liu X, Sun YM, Gu JN, Shi HF, Zhou L, Hu W. Early identification and treatment of PV re-connections: role of observation time and impact on clinical results of atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2007 Jul;9(7):481-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum101. Epub 2007 May 23. PubMed 17522081 ↗
  • McLellan AJ, Kumar S, Smith C, Morton JB, Kalman JM, Kistler PM. The role of adenosine following pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Jul;24(7):742-51. doi: 10.1111/jce.12121. Epub 2013 Mar 14. PubMed 23489944 ↗
  • Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Biophysical Characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;4(4):467-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Feb 2. PubMed 30067486 ↗
  • Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Leshem E, Buxton AE, Nakagawa H, Anter E. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Safety, efficacy, and long-term durability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;29(9):1287-1296. doi: 10.1111/jce.13651. Epub 2018 Jun 20. PubMed 29846987 ↗
  • Reddy VY, Grimaldi M, De Potter T, Vijgen JM, Bulava A, Duytschaever MF, Martinek M, Natale A, Knecht S, Neuzil P, Purerfellner H. Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Very High Power, Short Duration, Temperature-Controlled Lesions: The QDOT-FAST Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;5(7):778-786. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 8. PubMed 31320006 ↗
  • Stabile G, Schillaci V, Strisciuglio T, Arestia A, Agresta A, Shopova G, De Simone A, Solimene F. In vivo biophysical characterization of very high power, short duration, temperature-controlled lesions. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Oct;44(10):1717-1723. doi: 10.1111/pace.14358. Epub 2021 Sep 15. PubMed 34498748 ↗
  • Halbfass P, Wielandts JY, Knecht S, Le Polain de Waroux JB, Tavernier R, De Wilde V, Sonne K, Nentwich K, Ene E, Berkovitz A, Mueller J, Lehmkuhl L, Reichart A, Lusebrink U, Duytschaever M, Deneke T. Safety of very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: a two-centre report with emphasis on silent oesophageal injury. Europace. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):400-405. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab261. PubMed 34757432 ↗
  • Richard Tilz R, Sano M, Vogler J, Fink T, Saraei R, Sciacca V, Kirstein B, Phan HL, Hatahet S, Delgado Lopez L, Traub A, Eitel C, Schluter M, Kuck KH, Heeger CH. Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious - AF study. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jul 26;35:100847. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100847. eCollection 2021 Aug. PubMed 34381869 ↗
  • Sallo Z, Perge P, Balogi B, Orban G, Piros K, Herczeg S, Nagy KV, Osztheimer I, Abraham P, Merkely B, Geller L, Szegedi N. Impact of High-Power and Very High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation on Procedure Characteristics and First-Pass Isolation During Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 7;9:935705. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.935705. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35872909 ↗
  • Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, Fauchier L, Filippatos G, Kalman JM, La Meir M, Lane DA, Lebeau JP, Lettino M, Lip GYH, Pinto FJ, Thomas GN, Valgimigli M, Van Gelder IC, Van Putte BP, Watkins CL; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):507. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa798. Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):546-547. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa945. Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 21;42(40):4194. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab648. PubMed 32860505 ↗
  • Park CI, Lehrmann H, Keyl C, Weber R, Schiebeling J, Allgeier J, Schurr P, Shah A, Neumann FJ, Arentz T, Jadidi AS. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Jul;25(7):701-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12396. Epub 2014 Apr 2. PubMed 24575734 ↗
  • Phlips T, Taghji P, El Haddad M, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Duytschaever M. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol. Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f419-f427. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux376. PubMed 29315411 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all collected IPD

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: starting 6 months after publication on primary end point

Access criteria: The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 47 months after the start.

Of 550 non-industry observational studies under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 91. This study's planned 47 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 698 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 76.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 15, 2023
First posted
Mar 21, 2023
StartActual
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Mar 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05777551
Lead sponsor
Clinica Mediterranea
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2024

Study contacts

Giuseppe Stabile, MD
Contact
gmrstabile@tin.it
+393488960534
Teresa Strisciuglio, MD
Contact
teresa.strisciuglio@unina.it
+393293238130

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion