CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03277976AIRUpdated Mar 5, 2024

Pulmonary Vein Isolation Guided by Ablation Index (Ablation Index Registry Study)

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Clinica Mediterranea. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-05.

Sponsored by Clinica Mediterranea · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
490
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, research study designed to evaluate the acute achievement of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with ThermoCool SmartTouch (ST) and ThermoCool SmartTouch SF (STSF) catheter using the Ablation Index Module.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, research study designed to evaluate the acute achievement of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with ThermoCool SmartTouch (ST) and ThermoCool SmartTouch SF (STSF) catheter using the Ablation Index Module.

Subjects with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) will undergo catheter ablation using commercially approved devices (mapping system and catheters).

Patients will be followed up for 12 months to measure the recurrence of AF. This study is expected to start in September 2017 and to continue for approximately 26 months. It is anticipated that this study will require approximately 12 months for subject enrollment. Patients will be followed up for at least 12 months. Data analysis is expected to require approximately 2 months. At least 320 consecutive patients will be enrolled in the study centers. Patients will be divided in 4 groups and enrollment will stop when at least 80 patients will be enrolled in each group. The investigators evaluate two ablation catheters (ST and STSF) and two different ablation index settings (380 posterior - 500 anterior and 330 posterior - 450 anterior). Given that the rate of PV isolation with a standard wide antral circumferential ablation technique (WACA) is about 70%, the investigators want to test if one of two catheters or one of ablation index settings can increase the PV isolation rate of at least 10% (from 70% to 80%, 95% CI 75-85%).

Primary endpoint The primary objective of this study is to evaluate which ablation strategy increase the rate of WACA PV isolation, validated by mean of LASSO catheter, after first encirclement, from 70% to 80%.

Secondary endpoints Incidence of early PV reconnection 30 minutes after acute PV isolation. Difference in procedural and fluoroscopy time between the two groups. Incidence of AF recurrence during the blanking period (3-months after ablation).

Safety of the ablation procedure. At least 320 patients undergoing catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF will be enrolled.

Inclusion Criteria The following criteria must be met for subjects to be eligible for inclusion into the study Subject is indicated for catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF Subject is > 18 years old Subject is \< 80 years old Subject is on adequate anticoagulation therapy

Exclusion Criteria The following criteria are exclusions for study participation Patients who had already undergo an AF ablation procedure Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35% Women of childbearing potential who are or might be pregnant Hematological contraindications to ionizing radiation exposure Presence of complex congenital heart disease, and cardiac surgery within 1 month from enrollment

Patients will be screened in ambulatory and scheduled for AF ablation according to current guide lines. Ablation will be usually performed under effective oral anticoagulation. Anticoagulation could be withdrawn before admission, so as antiarrhythmic drugs will be removed before scheduled procedure. Patients in AF or with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 will undergo transesophageal echocardiography within 48 hours prior to the ablation. For all other patients transesophageal echocardiography is optional. Cardiac MRI or Cardiac CT scan could be executed as a reference for volume estimations obtained with the mapping system.

Ablation will be carried out under mild or conscious sedation, at least 2 femoral vein access will be obtained and in some patients 1 subclavian vein. One diagnostic catheter will be positioned in the coronary sinus. One or two transseptal accesses to the left atrium will be achieved using a standard approach. Then, the LASSO catheter and the ablation catheter (ST and STSF) will be placed in the left atrium. Heparin will be administered before the transseptal punctures to maintain an activated clotting time ≥ 300 seconds for the duration of the procedure. Left atrium mapping will be performed in sinus rhythm. Patients with atrial fibrillation at the beginning of the index procedure will undergo electrical cardioversion. After left atrium reconstruction the effective PV-left atrium electrical connection will be checked with LASSO. In all groups a wide antrum circumferential ablation aimed at PV isolation will be performed using contact force threshold range between 5-40 g (14), and the Ablation Index Module, with the following preset: respiration adjustment; stability range 3 mm, stability time 3 sec, force over time 25% of time, 3 g and ablation index thresholds: 500 for anterior wall and 380 for posterior wall or 450 for anterior wall and 330 for posterior wall; contiguity lesion 5-6 mm (15-16). The default power setting will be 30 W, with ranges of 20-40 W. At the end of the ablation effective PV isolation (entry and exit block), will be checked with LASSO catheter. After PV isolation will be achieved, the reconnection of the same vein will be evaluated after a 30 minute period from the initial isolation or after adenosine infusion or isoproterenol. If the vein reconnects to the atrium, the ablation will be directed to the gaps identified by the LASSO catheter. All patients will undergo a post-procedural ECG and, optional, an echocardiogram to exclude pericardial effusion or other acute complications. After ablation, patients will undertake regular follow-up assessments (scheduled at 3 months) including a detailed history, physical examination, 12-lead standard electrocardiography, and 24-h Holter monitoring. Patients who will not report any symptoms related to the previous arrhythmia during a supplementary detailed follow up (6-12 months subsequent to catheter ablation) will be considered free of arrhythmia recurrence

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation;
  • catheter ablation;
  • pulmonary vein isolation
  • ablation index
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Subjects with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) will undergo catheter ablation using commercially approved devices (mapping system and catheters).

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is indicated for catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF;
  • Subject is > 18 years old;
  • Subject is \< 80 years old ;
  • Subject is on adequate anticoagulation therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had already undergo an AF ablation procedure;
  • Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%
  • Women of childbearing potential who are or might be pregnant
  • Hematological contraindications to ionizing radiation exposure
  • Presence of complex congenital heart disease, and cardiac surgery within 1 month from enrollment
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
490 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • ThermoCool SmartTouch 1

    In this cohort are included patients who will undergo atrial fibrillation ablation using the ThermoCool SmartTouch Catheter and Ablation Index range: 380 for the posterior wall and 500 for the anterior wall

    Device: PVI using ThermoCool® SmartTouch® Catheter

  • ThermoCool SmartTouch 2

    In this cohort are included patients who will undergo atrial fibrillation ablation using the ThermoCool SmartTouch Catheter and Ablation Index range: 330 for the posterior wall and 450 for the anterior wall

    Device: PVI using ThermoCool® SmartTouch® Catheter

  • ThermoCool SmartTouch SF 1

    In this cohort are included patients who will undergo atrial fibrillation ablation using the ThermoCool SmartTouch SF Catheter and Ablation Index range: 330 for the posterior wall and 450 for the anterior wall

    Device: PVI using ThermoCool® SmartTouch SF® Catheter

  • ThermoCool SmartTouch SF 2

    In this cohort are included patients who will undergo atrial fibrillation ablation using the ThermoCool SmartTouch SF Catheter and Ablation Index range: 380 for the posterior wall and 500 for the anterior wall

    Device: PVI using ThermoCool® SmartTouch SF® Catheter

Interventions

  • DevicePVI using ThermoCool® SmartTouch® Catheter

    PVI using RFA, using ThermoCool® SmartTouch® Catheter (Biosense Webster Inc., CA, US), guided by Ablation Index

  • DevicePVI using ThermoCool® SmartTouch SF® Catheter

    PVI using RFA, using ThermoCool® SmartTouch SF® Catheter (Biosense Webster Inc., CA, US), guided by Ablation Index

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate which ablation strategy increase the rate of WACA PV isolation, validated by mean of LASSO catheter, after first encirclement, from 70% to 80%.

    Time frame: From the end of the WACA PV isolation up to 5 min after

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of early PV reconnection 30 minutes after acute PV isolation.

    Time frame: Up to 30 min after the effective pulmonary vein isolation

  2. Difference in procedural and fluoroscopy time between the two groups

    Time frame: From the beginning of the index procedure to the end of index procedure

  3. Incidence of AF recurrence during the blanking period

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after the ablation procedure

  4. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.

    Time frame: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0, from the index procedure to one-year follow-up

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinica Mediterranea
    Naples, Italy
07

References and documents

Publications

  • El Haddad M, Taghji P, Phlips T, Wolf M, Demolder A, Choudhury R, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Nakagawa H, Duytschaever M. Determinants of Acute and Late Pulmonary Vein Reconnection in Contact Force-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Identifying the Weakest Link in the Ablation Chain. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;10(4):e004867. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004867. PubMed 28381417 ↗
  • Das M, Loveday JJ, Wynn GJ, Gomes S, Saeed Y, Bonnett LJ, Waktare JEP, Todd DM, Hall MCS, Snowdon RL, Modi S, Gupta D. Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):775-783. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw105. PubMed 27247002 ↗
  • Das M, Wynn GJ, Morgan M, Lodge B, Waktare JE, Todd DM, Hall MC, Snowdon RL, Modi S, Gupta D. Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia during the second month of the blanking period is associated with more extensive pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;8(4):846-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003095. Epub 2015 Jun 24. PubMed 26108982 ↗
  • Stabile G, Di Donna P, Schillaci V, Di Monaco A, Iuliano A, Caponi D, Urraro F, Solimene F, Grimaldi M, Scaglione M. Safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using a surround flow catheter with contact force measurement capabilities: A multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jul;28(7):762-767. doi: 10.1111/jce.13227. Epub 2017 Jun 21. PubMed 28422368 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03277976
Lead sponsor
Clinica Mediterranea
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2017
Start date
Nov 29, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 28, 2018
Completion
Nov 28, 2019
Last update
Mar 5, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion