CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05743179Zoo-PUpdated Feb 20, 2024

The Effect of Zoledronate on the Prevention of Pneumonia in Hip Fracture Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Zoledronate in Hip Fractures and Pneumonia, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 5 sites in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-20.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2022; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,692
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs; such as alendronate and zoledronate) are commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention, in which zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study showed that the use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. In addition to cardiovascular diseases, both preclinical study and sensitivity analysis also suggest evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. Moreover, a pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate effect of the tested intervention in real-life routine clinical practice since traditional explanatory radomised controlled trial (RCT) may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. This study aims to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

This is an open-label, multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients will be recruited from 4 hospitals, namely Caritas Medical Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Queen Mary Hospital, and United Christian Hospital. Age, sex, body mass index, eGFR, history of fracture, chronic respiratory diseases, and other medical history, will be measured and recorded at recruitment.

Read the detailed description

N-BPs are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention. Although alendronate is the first-line antiosteoporosis medication in many countries, it is associated with esophageal and gastrointestinal irritation. In addition, the regimen for alendronate is one tablet per week and careful use of alendronate is required to avoid gastrointestinal irritation (e.g. take the tablet on an empty stomach, stay upright for at least 30 minutes after taking the medication), leading to relative low drug compliance. On the other hand, the regimen of zoledronate is 5mg infusion once a year. Since the route of administration is intravenous infusion, it avoids the gastrointestinal irritation problem. In terms of fracture prevention, zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. Most importantly, previous HORIZON recurrent fracture trial showed that zoledronate use reduced risk of mortality in addition to fracture prevention. Thus, zoledronate is considered the most efficacious N-BP in clinical use.

N-BPs could exert extra-skeletal beneficial effects. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study (N=34,991) using the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), a clinical database managed by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority, showed that use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. Later in the same year, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 2,000 osteopenic women showed that zoledronate may reduce risk of myocardial infarction with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36-1.02) after following up for 6 years. They subsequently performed a detailed post-hoc analysis and showed that zoledronate use was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction, composite cardiovascular end-point, and fatal stroke. This example demonstrated not only the extra-skeletal effect of N-BPs, but also showed that high-quality real-world data with state-of-the-art statistical method could potentially be useful in causal inference.

In addition to cardiovascular diseases, N-BPs may be useful in preventing pneumonia. Preclinical study showed that N-BPs are anti-inflammatory and may modulate macrophages in response to pneumonia. In addition, pharmacokinetic studies showed that the highest concentration of N-BPs was detected in trachea other than bone after oral ingestion or intravenous infusion of N-BPs. Among various N-BPs, alendronate was detected in the trachea with a concentration of 607 ng/ml 72 hours after oral ingestion, which was almost half of the concentration (1370 ng/ml) detected in vertebrae. Thus, we conducted a real-world population-based propensity score matched study in a cohort of 54,047 hip fracture patients to investigate the association of N-BP use with risk of pneumonia. Among hip fracture patients, N-BP use was significantly associated with 24% risk reduction in pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.83), with an absolute risk difference of 2%. Similar significant association was observed for pneumonia mortality. To further reduce the potential bias of confounding by indication, we performed a sensitivity analysis by including users of other anti-osteoporosis medications in the control group, instead of patients without using any anti-osteoporosis medications. A similar significant association was observed. In agreement with the preclinical studies, we provided evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. This finding attracted wide media coverage, including Reuters and the New York Times.

Although utilisation of real-world data is an emerging approach in evaluating drug effectiveness, RCT is still considered the gold standard in evaluating drug efficacy. However, traditional explanatory RCT may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. Thus, pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate if the tested intervention is effective in real-life routine clinical practice, by reducing bias using randomization and improving generalizability using real-world setting. We aim to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Fractures
  • Pneumonia

Keywords

  • Zoledronic Acid
  • Pneumonia
  • Hip Fractures
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,692 is above the median of 106 across 1,247 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,262 studies on the registry; 340 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female ≥ 60 years
  • With recent fragility hip fracture at proximal femur
  • Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent, including consent for the use and discloser of research-related health information, and comply with the study data collection procedures. Provide signed and dated informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to be hypersensitive to any N-BPs
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body surface area
  • Regular user of anti-osteoporosis medications (including bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatides, and raloxifene) or oral or intravenous systemic glucocorticoids in the previous year.
  • Subject currently involved in a clinical trial or in an exclusion period following participation in another clinical trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,692 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Zoledronate

    Zoledronate intravenous infusion (5mg) once and usual care will be provided to the patient and mark the start of 12-month follow-up period

    Drug: Zoledronate

  • No intervention
    Control

    Only usual care will be provided to the patient with 12-month follow-up period.

Interventions

  • DrugZoledronate

    Aclasta Solution for Infusion 5mg/100ml (zoledronic acid)

    Also known as: Zoledronic acid, Aclasta

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pneumonia hospitalizations

    Diagnosis records of pneumonia from electronic medical records

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cardiovascular events

    Diagnosis records of cardiovascular events from electronic medical records

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Refracture events

    Diagnosis records of refracture from electronic medical records

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Problems associated with fracture healing, including revision surgery

    Diagnosis and operation records from electronic medical records

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. All-cause mortality

    Date of death and cause of death information from electronic medical records

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

4 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
  • United Christian Hospital
    Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Sha Tin, Hong Kong
    Not yet recruiting
  • Caritas Medical Centre
    Sham Shui Po, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
  • Tai Po Hospital
    Tai Po, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Jan 7, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will be shared upon special request to the principal investigator.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05743179
Lead sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, United Christian Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2023
Start date
Dec 5, 2022
Primary completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 20, 2024

Study contacts

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD
Contact
lung1212@hku.hk
+852 2831-5080
Kathryn Tan, MD
principal investigator · The University of Hong Kong

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion